Journal of
Accounting and Taxation

  • Abbreviation: J. Account. Taxation
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-6664
  • DOI: 10.5897/JAT
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 209

Full Length Research Paper

Information collection concern, procedural justice, and intention to use online tax software: A process model

Xiaoyan Chu
  • Xiaoyan Chu
  • Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Business Administration, Nicholls State University, United States.
  • Google Scholar
Xun Li
  • Xun Li
  • Department of Management and Marketing, College of Business Administration, Nicholls State University, United States.
  • Google Scholar
Jeffrey J. Haynie
  • Jeffrey J. Haynie
  • Department of Management, College of Business Administration, Louisiana Tech University, United States.
  • Google Scholar
Yu Zhang
  • Yu Zhang
  • Department of Accounting, School of Business, Mount St. Joseph University, United States.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 27 July 2022
  •  Accepted: 28 September 2022
  •  Published: 31 October 2022

References

Anic ID, Škare V, Milakovi? IK (2019). The determinants and effects of online privacy concerns in the context of e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 36:100868.
Crossref

 

 

Auxier B, Rainie L, Anderson M, Perrin A, Kumar M, Turner E (2019). Americans and Privacy: Concerned, Confused and Feeling Lack of Control Over Their Personal Information. Pew Research Center. Available at

View

 

Bansal G, Zahedi FM, Gefen D (2010). The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems 49(2):138-150.
Crossref

 

Barth S, de Jong MDT (2017). The Privacy paradox-investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior-a systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics 34(7):1038-1058.
Crossref

 

Brink WD, Lee LS (2015). The effect of tax preparation software on tax compliance: a research note. Behavioral Research in Accounting 27(1):121-135.
Crossref

 

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) (2018). Available at

View

 

Cheng SY (2014). The mediating role of organizational justice on the relationship between administrative performance appraisal practices and organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25(8):1131-1148.
Crossref

 

Chu X, Xun L, Wei-Chih C, Zhang Y (2019). Taxpayers' online information privacy concerns, antecedents, and behavior intention. Journal of Accounting and Taxation 11(4):57-66.
Crossref

 

Colquitt JA (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3):386-400.
Crossref

 

Culnan MJ (1995). Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: implication for direct marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 9(2):10-19.
Crossref

 

Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science 10(1):104-115.
Crossref

 

Dinev T, Hart P (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for E-Commerce transactions. Information Systems Research 17(1):61-80.
Crossref

 

Doyle E, Gallery K, Coyle M, Commissioners IR (2009). Procedural justice principles and tax compliance in Ireland: A preliminary exploration in the context of reminder letters. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services 8(1):49-62. Available at:

View

 
 
 

EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (2018). (EU) 2018/1725 of The European Parliament and of The Council. Available at

View

 

Faizal SM, Palil MR, Maelah R, Ramli R (2017). Perception on justice, trust and tax compliance behavior in Malaysia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 38(3):226-232.
Crossref

 

Gatlan S (2021). Intuit notifies customers of compromised TurboTax accounts. Available at

View

 

Hu L, Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6:1-55.
Crossref

 

Hui KL, Teo HH, Lee SYT (2007). The value of privacy assurance: an exploratory field experiment. MIS Quarterly 31(1):19-33.
Crossref

 

Ichihashi S (2020). Online privacy and information disclosure by consumers. American Economic Review 110(2):569-595.
Crossref

 

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (2022). Filing Season Statistics for Week Ending May 20, 2022 Washington, D.C.: United States Department of the Treasury. Available at

View

 

Internal Revenue Service (2020). All tax prep software will offer multi-factor authentication beginning in 2021. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of the Treasury. Available at

View

 

Kauffman RJ, Lee YJ, Prosch M, Steinbart PJ (2011). A survey of consumer information privacy from the accounting information systems perspective. Journal of Information Systems 25(2):47-79.
Crossref

 

Leventhal GS (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York, NY: Plenum Press pp. 27-55.
Crossref

 

Li X, Santhanam R (2009). Will it be disclosure or fabrication of personal information? An examination of persuasion strategies on prospective employees. International Journal of Information Security and Privacy 2(4):91-109.
Crossref

 

Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H (2010). Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems 51(1):62-71. Available at:

View

 

Li Y, Liu H, Lee M, Huang Q (2020). Information privacy concern and deception in online retailing: The moderating effect of online-offline information integration. Internet Research 30(2):511-537.
Crossref

 

Linden T, Khandelwal R, Harkous H, Fawaz K (2020). The privacy policy landscape after the GDPR. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 1:47-64.
Crossref

 

MacKenzie SB, Spreng RA (1992). How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? Journal of Consumer Research 18(4):519-529.
Crossref

 

MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 7(1):83-104.
Crossref

 

Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale and a causal model. Information Systems Research 15(4):336-355.
Crossref

 

Martin KD, Kim JJ, Palmatier RW, Steinoff L, Stewart DW, Walker BA, Wang Y, Weaven SK (2020). Data privacy in retail. Journal of Retailing 96(4):474-489.
Crossref

 

Muthen LK, Muthen BO (2007). Mplus user's guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

 
 

Murphy K (2003). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues 38(3):379-408.
Crossref

 

Murphy K (2004). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior 28(2):187-209.
Crossref

 

Norusis MJ (2010). PASW Statistics Guide 18 Guide to Data Analysis. Available at:

View

 

Okazaki S, Eisend M, Plangger K. Ruyter KD, Grewal D (2020). Understanding the strategic consequences of customer privacy concerns: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Retailing 96(4):458-473.
Crossref

 

Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly 31(1):105-136.
Crossref

 

Pot J (2022). Tax apps collect your data: How worried should you be? Available at:

View

 

Saunders L (2016). Tax Software Provider Discloses Data Breach. Available at

View

 

Schwartz P (2008). The future of tax privacy. National Tax Journal 61(4):883-900.
Crossref

 

Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly 20(2):167-196.
Crossref

 

Stewart KA, Segars H (2002). An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research 13(1):36-49.
Crossref

 

Thibaut JW, Walker L (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Available at:

View

 

Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011). The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Information Systems Research 22(2):254-268.
Crossref

 

Tyler TR (1990). Justice, self-interest, and the legitimacy of legal and political authority. In Mansbridge JJ (ed.), Beyond self-interest. University of Chicago Press pp. 171-179. Available at: View

 

Van Slyke C, Shim JT, Johnson R, Jiang JJ (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(6):415-443.
Crossref

 

Wang L, Near JP, Somani N, Gao P, Low A, Dao D, Song D (2019). Data Capsule: A New Paradigm for Automatic Compliance with Data Privacy Regulations. In: Heterogeneous Data Management, Polystores, and Analytics for Healthcare pp. 3-23.
Crossref

 

Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BCY, Agarwal R (2010). The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems 26(3):137-176.
Crossref

 

Zaeem RN, Barber KS (2020). The Effect of the GDPR on Privacy Policies: Recent Progress and Future Promise. ACM Transactions on Management of Information Systems 12(1):1-20.
Crossref