Full Length Research Paper
ABSTRACT
This study investigated environmental pollution due to mining activities at the BCL mine in Selibe-Phikwe town, Botswana and assessed the level of heavy metals and sulphur in soil and Grewia bicolor leaves adjacent to the mine. Soil and G. bicolor were contaminated with heavy metals on the downwind side, where also concentrations of sulphur in the soil and G. bicolor were found to be elevated when compared to the upwind side. The leaves samples, were significantly difference at P = 0.00 and soil were significantly different at P = 0.03 for both west and east side. A mean soil pH of 4.12 in the prevailing wind direction suggested that atmospheric deposition from the mine has caused acidification. With further distance from the mine concentration in soil and leaves appeared to reflect a decreasing deposition of heavy metals and sulphur. Elevated concentration of heavy metals in leaves represent a high risk of bioaccumulation and biomagnifications in the food chain because G. bicolor leaves are grazed on by farmed animals and are common ingredients of traditional medicines.
Key words: BCL, heavy metals, Grewia bicolor, sulphur, pH, environmental pollution
INTRODUCTION
Pollution due to mining activities is a great concern throughout the world since it has been recognized as a major contributor to environmental pollution over the past years (Zhou et al., 2007). Mining and smelting affect the air, terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems through discharge of solid and liquid waste, as well as particulate matter (Nagajyoti et al., 2010). Developing countries which are rich in minerals like Botswana are at a greater risk from mining pollution. Mining of minerals is associated with benefits such as economic development (Rashed, 2010), increased employment and foreign exchange reserves. Notwithstanding the considerable economic benefits of mining, it should also be noted that mines have the potential to leave a long lasting legacy for the environment as evidenced by case studies in Sudbury, Canada and Kola Peninsula in Russia (Whitby et al., 1976; Poikolainen, 1997).
The presence of heavy metals in soils may pose risk and hazards to humans and the ecosystem through: direct ingestion or contact with contaminated soil, the food chain, drinking of contaminated water (Candeias et al., 2011), reduction in food quality via phytotoxicity, reduction in land usability for agricultural production causing food insecurity and land tenure problems (Wuana and Okieimen, 2011).
Although the extraction of metals such as copper-nickel is necessary for the economic or industrial development of societies (Rashed, 2010), their significant risk to the environment comes from the disposal of mining waste (Figure 1). If the mine waste is not properly disposed, it can contribute immensely to heavy metal pollution in the surrounding environment, which can result in the destruction of ecological landscape, ground water pollution and decrease in biological diversity (Sheoran et al., 2011; Rashed, 2010; Kiikkila, 2003).
Copper-Nickel mines releases not only potential toxic metals but also other particulate matter and gaseous materials such as dust, SO2, CO, CO2, N2O, NO2 and NO in the atmosphere (Nagajyoti et al., 2010). This can have grave consequences for the ecosystem as evidenced by the forests devastation and reduced diversity of vascular plants in Sudbury, Canada (Nkongolo et al., 2008).
The threat that heavy metals pose to humans and animal health is aggravated by their long term persistence in the environment (Yoon et al., 2006). Heavy metals such as Lead and Cadmium are non-biodegradable and have no known biological function. Copper, Zinc and Nickel are source of nutrients to plants at low concentrations but they become toxic at elevated concentrations.
Heavy metals tend to bioaccumulate and biomagnify in animal tissues. Since domestic animals such as cattle and goats do graze in the surrounding area of the BCL mine, they are likely to ingest soil and plants material contaminated with heavy metals which in turn can pose a risk to people consuming animal meat. Cadmium and Lead tend to accumulate in the liver and kidneys of animals (Kirkham, 2006; Wilkinson et al., 2003). These tissues are regarded as delicacies in Southern Africa (Ikenaka et al., 2010; Yabe et al., 2011) and their consumption may pose a risk in contaminated areas.
The Bamangwato Concessions Limited mine (BCL) at Selibe Phikwe is rich in copper and nickel deposits. The main concern with this particular mining and smelting operations is the release of sulphur dioxide emissions into the atmosphere which can damage the environment through acidification. Another concern is the significant volumes of wastes that are deposited on the soil which eventually affect plants and animals through exposure to elements contained in the residue (Figure 1).
Given the environmental impact caused by sulphur dioxide in the adjacent area of the BCL mine, the objective of the present study is to asses sulphur and heavy metals content in soil and Grewia bicolor leaves along a 4 km west and east transect in BCL mine. The soil pH of the area around the latter will also be investigated to further demonstrate the impact of mining on the environment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Heavy metals and sulphur concentration in soil
Previous research has shown that soils around Copper-Nickel mines tend to have high concentrations of heavy metals (Nkongolo et al., 2008; Meadows and Watmough, 2012) especially Cu, Ni and Pb. In most cases, the downwind side is the most affected as depicted by the mean concentrations of heavy metals in Tables 3 and 5. Concentrations of heavy metals in soil and plants from the upwind and downwind sides were significantly different at P=0.00 and P=0.03, respectively.
Figures 4 and 5 further depicts an elevation of heavy metals concentration in the western side of the mine whereas it is opposite with the upwind side. This increase could be a result of dust particles emanating from mine waste, crushed stones and fumes from the smelter which with concentration above three fold in the downwind side. Both heavy metals do not bio-magnify up the food chain; although at higher concentrations they can be detrimental to animals and people. On the other hand, 62.5% of samples had Pb content which exceeded one fold in the downwind side. Although Cd and Pb are within the world soil range, the concern is that they are highly toxic metals and can accumulate in body organs and further biomagnify through the food chain. In Figure 6A, most of the elements are elevated in the inner 0.5 km from the mine except Sulphur which peaked at 1.5-2.0 km. Cu and S peaked from 0.5-2 km, then flattened thereafter (Figure 6C). Overall, the western side has higher concentration of heavy metals in both soils and plants. The concentration of heavy metals further shows a decrease as you go away from the mine and this has been observed by other authors.
In Tables 5 and 6, the ranges for heavy metals and sulphur were Zn (1.64-9.14 μg/g) Cu (4.55-46.67 μg/g), Ni (2.63-19.33 μg/g), Cd (0.39-1.06 μg/g), Pb (5.40-9.91 μg/g) whereas Sulphur and pH ranged from 0.01-0.05(%) and 3.85-5.91 respectively. In this study, the soil heavy metals contents were within the world soil ranges (Rojo et al., 2004) except for Cd which is elevated on both sides. Cd could be emanating from the parent rock. The concentrations of Zn were very low, maximum of 14 ug/g, which could be the result of Sulphur as it is known to decreases soil pH and increases the solubility, availability and mobility of heavy metals, which can eventually leaches into streams (Skwierawska et al., 2012; Fijalkowski et al., 2012).
In Table 5, Sulphur content was higher in the first inner 2 km; depicting the impact of the mining pollution in the soil adjacent to it. The upwind side had lower mean concentration of 0.01% S while downwind side had 0.03% S. According to Linzon et al. (1979), average background Sulphur concentration for soil sampled in Southern Ontario, Canada ranged from 0.05-0.08% for rural and urban areas respectively. The Sulphur content in this study is below the background concentration compared to the latter region.
The mean soil pH in the downwind side is 4.12 whereas in the upwind side is 5.12. These acidic environment could be the consequences of sulphur dioxide emission from the smelter and as such it has negatively affected the vegetation therefore there is no grass and seedlings (Figure 1). The pH of 5.12 in the upwind side shows that the soil in the study area is acidic in nature; however 75% of samples from the same sampling site had pH values above 5 (Table 6). It should be noted that soil pH is considered as one of the most important factors that determine the concentration of metals in the soil solution, their mobility and availability to plants (Fijalkowski et al., 2012). In highly acid soils, the mobility of heavy metals is much higher than in soils with neutral and alkaline reactions or pH (Fijalkowski et al., 2012).
The correlation analysis was employed to determine the common source of pollution (Table 2). Positive correlations were found between Cu-Pb, Cu-Ni, Pb-S, Pb-Zn and Cd-pH. This positive correlation maybe showing that this elements emanate from the same source (Yoon et al., 2006), which is the mine. Since cadmium does not correlate well with other heavy metals, it may be coming from the geological parent material.
Heavy metals and sulphur in G. bicolor leaves
The results of G. bicolor leaves show that heavy metals and sulphur concentration followed a similar trend which occurred in soil samples from west transect. The samples from the western transect had elevated concentration of Cu, Ni, Cd and Pb compared to the eastern transect whereas Zn was the only one elevated in the eastern side Figure 5. Within the sampling sites, 87.5% of plant samples in the downwind side have Cu and Ni concentrations above 2 fold compared to the upwind side. Cu and Ni are essential micronutrients for micro organisms, plants and animals; however at higher concentrations they can have toxic effects (Sheoran et al., 2011). Lead is usually concentrated in the roots of plants; however the observed elevated concentration in G. bicolor leaves could be due to aerial deposition. Generally, plants do not absorb or accumulate lead in their leaves except in the roots. The ranges of heavy metals and Sulphur in G. bicolor leaves on both transects were Zn (0.95-3.60 μg/g), Cu (3.16-46.59 μg/g), Ni (2.90-29.41 μg/g), Cd (0.91-3.46 μg/g), Pb (2.29-8.33 μg/g) and S (0.24-1.30%) (Tables 3 and 4). Since the plant samples were unwashed, the observed elevated concentrations could be due to aerial deposition. Looking at Figure 6B, the concentration of heavy metals is elevated at 0.5 km then it flattens. This is understandable because it is against the prevailing wind (Figure 3). In Figure 6D, Cu, Ni and S are elevated at 0.5-2 km and the rest of other elements does not shown any trend with regard to distance from the mine. The eastern side depicted a much lower heavy metal concentration in soils and plant samples.
However looking at the heavy metals concentrations, there is a potential risk of toxicity to animals grazing in the vicinity of the mining area. Yabe et al. (2011) has conducted a study in animals grazing in a Pb-Zn mining area (Kwabe, Zambia) and he found that the animals accumulated higher concentrations of Pb and Zinc.
Sulphur is an essential element in plants because it serves as a macronutrient; however it becomes detrimental above threshold values. Long term exposure to elevated concentration of Sulphur in plant foliage could cause chronic injuries. A study carried by Linzon et al. (1979) showed that average background Sulphur concentrations for 33 different plant species in Southern Ontario-Canada were within the range of 0.13-1.72% thus higher than the concentrations in my study area. Elevated Sulphur concentration of above 0.80% was found in the downwind side whereas 0.43% (max) was detected in upwind side (Tables 3 and 4). The concentration of Sulphur in the downwind side was more
than 1.5-3 fold (min and max respectively) in the
upwind wide (Tables 3 and 4). This shows that the western side is more polluted with sulphur as compared to the eastern side. In plants samples, positive correlations were found between Cu-Ni, Cu-Pb, Cu-S, Ni-Cd, Ni-Pb and Ni-S (Table 1). Cu, Ni and S correlated well with most of the elements and this trend is also showing in soil samples. Cu, Ni, S clearly demonstrates that they originate from the same source, however Zn did not correlate with this three elements and it also depicts that it doesn’t originate from the mining pollution (Tables 1 and 2).
CONCLUSION
This research study shows that significant amount of heavy metal and sulphur has been deposited in the western side of the mine (downwind) on both soil and G. bicolor leaves. The soil and plants samples from the western side of the mine had high concentration of Cu, Ni and Pb. The statistical test further show that the western side is significantly more polluted than the eastern side, at P=0.00 and P=0.03 (2-tailed test) on both soil and G. bicolor respectively. The study also revealed that the soil in the western side of the mine is acidic, with mean pH of 4.12. Furthermore, for the first time, the mean background pH has been found to be 5.12 which demonstrate that the soils in the study area are acidic in nature. Concentration of soil parameters in the downwind side were in the following order Cu>Ni>Pb>Cd>S.
Assessment of the results of the study area against the world range depicts that heavy metals were below the maximum allowable limits. However persistence of the latter in Grewia bicolor and soil continues to be a treat to animals and people of Selibe-Phikwe and the surrounding areas due to potential biomagnifications and bioaccumulation, especially with regard to Pb and Cd.
The recommendation of this study therefore is that more research needs to be done on heavy metals in edible and medicinal plants and also in animals grazing in the mining area.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
Candeias C, Da Silva EF, Salgueiro AR, Periera HG, Reis AP, Patinha C, Matos JX, Avila PH (2011). Assessment of soil contamination by potentially toxic elements in the Aljustrel mining area in order to implement soil reclamation strategies. Land Degrad. Dev. 22:565-585. |
|
Carter MR (1993). Soil Sampling Methods of Analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Lewis Publisher. pp. 141-144. |
|
Gauthier TD (2001). Detecting Trends Using Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient. Environ. Forensics 2:259-362. |
|
Ikenaka Y, Nakayama SMM, Muzandu K, Choongo K, Teraoka H, Mizuno N, Ishizuka M (2010). Heavy metal contamination of soil and sediment in Zambia. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4(11):729-739. |
|
Kiikkila O (2003). Heavy-metal Pollution and Remediation of Forest Soil around the Harjavalta Cu-Ni Smelter in SW Finland. Silva Fennica 37(3):399-415. |
|
Kirkham MB (2006). Cadmium in plants on polluted soils: Effects of soil factors, hyperaccumulation, and amendments. Geoderma 137:19-32. |
|
Linzon SN, Temple PJ, Pearson RG (1979). Sulfur Concentrations in Plant Foliage and Related Effects. J. Air Pollut. Control. Assoc. 29(5):520-525. |
|
Meadows M, Watmough SA (2012). An Assessment of Long-term Risk of Metals in Sudbury: A Critical Loads Approach. Water Air Soil Pollut. 223:4343-4354. |
|
Moreno-Jimenez E, Penalosa JM, Manzano R, Carpena-Ruiz RO, Gamarra R, Esteban E (2009). Heavy metals distribution in soils surrounding an abandoned mine in NW Madrid (Spain) and their transference to wild flora. J. Hazard. Mater. 162:854-859. |
|
Nagajyoti PC, Lee KD, Sreekanth TVM (2010). Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 8:199-216. |
|
Nkongolo KK, Vaillancourt A, Dobrzeniecka S, Mehes M, Beckett P (2008). Metal Content in Soil and Black Spruce (Picea mariana) Trees in the Sudbury Region (Ontario, Canada): Low Concentration of Arsenic, Cadmium, and Nickel Detected near Smelter Sources. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 80:107-111. |
|
Ogunkunle CO, Fatoba PO (2014). Contamination and spatial distribution of heavy metals in topsoil surrounding a mega cement factory. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 5:270-282. |
|
Poikolainen J (1997). Sulphur and Heavy metal concentrations in Scots pine Bark in Northern Finland and Kola Peninsula. J. Water Air Soil Pollut. 93:395-408. |
|
Rashed MN (2010). Monitoring of contaminated toxic and heavy metals, from mine tailings through age accumulation, in soil and some wild plants at Southeast Egypt. J. Hazard. Mater. 178:739-746. |
|
Sheoran V, Poonia P, Trivedi SK (2011). Metal pollution in soil and plants near copper mining site. Int. J. Geol. Earth Environ. Sci. 1(1):2277-2081. |
|
Skwierawska M, Zawartka L, Skwierawski A, Nogalska A (2012). The effect of different sulfur doses and forms in changes of soil heavy metals. Plant Soil Environ. 58(3): 135-140. |
|
Whitby LM, Stokes PM, Hutchinson TC, Myslik G (1976). Ecological Consequence of acidic and heavy metal discharges from the Sudbury smelters. Can. Mineralogist. 14:47-57. |
|
Wilkinson JM, Hill J, Phillips CJC (2003). The accumulation of potentially-toxic metals by grazing ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 62:267-277. |
|
Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011). Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. International Scholarly Research Network, ISRN Ecology. pp. 1-20. |
|
Yabe J, Nakayama SMM, Ikenaka Y, Mazandu K, Ishizuka M, Umemura T (2011). Uptake of lead, Cadmium, and other metals in the liver and kidney of cattle near a Lead-Zinc Mine in Kabwe, Zambia. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 30(8):1892-1897. |
|
Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma LQ (2006). Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci. Total Environ. 368:456-464. |
|
Zhou JM, Dang Z, Cai MF, Liu CQ (2007). Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Around the Dabaoshan Mine, Guangdong Province, China. Pedosphere 17(5):588-594. |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0