Journal of
Oceanography and Marine Science

  • Abbreviation: J. Oceanogr. Mar. Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-2294
  • DOI: 10.5897/JOMS
  • Start Year: 2010
  • Published Articles: 62

Full Length Research Paper

Microalgae richness and assemblage of man-made solar saltpans of Thoothukudi, TamilNadu

T. Santhanakrishnan
  • T. Santhanakrishnan
  • Department of Marine Science, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India
  • Google Scholar
C. Lakshmanan
  • C. Lakshmanan
  • Department of Botany, V. O. Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, India.
  • Google Scholar
V. Radhakrishnan
  • V. Radhakrishnan
  • Department of Marine Science, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 20 May 2015
  •  Accepted: 13 July 2015
  •  Published: 31 July 2015

 ABSTRACT

Solar saltpans are ponds of brine sun evaporated to crystallize salt (Halite). Once provide ambient ecology for several halophilic microalgae. Enumeration of microorganisms in Thoothukudi solar saltpans revealed the presence of 30 genera of microalgae belonging to the divisions of Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta. Chlorophyta species is the dominant group of solar salterns of Thoothukudi.
 
Key words: Solar saltpans, halophilic microalgae, diversity, salt production and Thoothukudi.


 INTRODUCTION

Solar saltpans are man-made system of interconnected ponds (Reservoir, Condenser and Crystallizer) for the production of salt from seawater and/or underground brine by means of evaporation. Luxuriant growth of certain microalgae is noticed in this saltern (Korovessis and Lekkas, 2000). Microalgae are practical grouping of photosynthetic organisms of simple construction, it includes a diverse array of morphologies from single cell to multicellular (Ashok Kumar et al., 2011). The organisms living in every solar salt pans constitute a biological system, which are able to aid to harm salt production. Systems aiding salt production maintain stable species composition and concentrations, they produce and accumulate sufficient organic matter to power the biota, prevent leakages and also increase the solar energy absorption (Reginald and Diana, 2008; Lakshmanan, 2008). The microalgae also colour the brine by producing floating coloured cells in high concentrations (Oren et al., 1992); besides enhancing, the rate of evaporation in saltern. These microorganisms play a very important role in the recycling of materials (nutrients and other substances) in saltpan ecosystem and occupy important membership in of biogeochemical cycles (Kabilan et al., 2012). Therefore the purpose of this study was to investigate the species richness and biodiversity of microalgae occurring in a man–made solar saltern in Thoothukudi.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Water and algal mat samples were collected in four different solar saltpans interdistance of these salt pans maybe around 5 kms (8°46'46"N and 78°9'3"E) of Thoothukudi using 2 lit polythene containers. In each salt pan, five samples are collected from different ponds of reservoir, condenser and crystallizer. The collected samples were preserved using 2% formaldehyde for the laboratory analysis. Microalgae specimens were observed under optical microscopy (Olympus BX51) with different magnifications (up to 100x). Genus and species level identification of Cyanophyta, Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta were examined according to Prescott (1951), Hendey (1964), Sarma and Khan (1980), Komarek and Anagnostidis (2005) and Thajuddin and Subramanian (2005).


 RESULTS

30 genus level species of microalgae were identified in the four solar saltern system of Thoothukudi (Table 1), species were found to be of three divisions viz, Cyanophyta (11 genes), Bacillariophyta (16 genes) and Chlorophyta (5 genes). Bacillariophyta showed the maximum number of species in Thoothukudi salt pans. Some of these species viz, Caloneis sp., Diatoma sp., Anabaen sp., Gyrosigma sp., Lyngbya sp., Gleothece sp. and Pinnularia sp. are not present in commonly all saltpans.
 
 
Figure 1 shows the abundance of microalgae (%) in all salt pans of Thoothukudi. The abundance data was generated for Chlorophyta (53.48), Bacillariophyta (34.61) and Cyanophyta (11.91). Five genuses viz, Chlorella sp., Chlorococcum sp., Closterium sp., Dunaliella sp. and Cosmarium sp. of chlorophyta taking together occur in greater quantities compared to other division of microalgae. 34.61% of Bacillariaphyta species viz, Nitzschia sp., Synedra sp., Mastogloia sp.,Navicula sp., Cymbella sp., Amphora sp., Cyclotella sp., Caloneis sp., Diatoma sp., Coscinodiscus sp., Pleurosigma sp., Pinnularia sp., Fragillaria sp., and Gyrosigma sp., were recorded. Cyanophyta species namely Oscillatoria sp., Spirulina sp., Lyngbya sp., Phormidium sp., Aphanocapsa sp., Gleocapsa sp., Synechococcus sp., Gleothec sp., Synechocystis sp., Anabaena sp. and Chroococcus sp. were identified to 12%.
 
 
Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 shows the species richness in all salt pans of Thoothukudi. This result indicates the bacillariaphyta is a dominant group of all salt pans followed by cyanophyta and chlorophyta. Nearly 15 genus of bacillariaphyta (47%), 11genus of cyanophyta (35%) and 5 genus of chlorophyta (18%) species were recorded in Thoothukudi salt pans. At the same time the abundance of species were observed in chlorophyta (53.48).
 
 


 DISCUSSION

Salt pans are a unique ecosystem where series of different organisms with varying environmental conditions occurs. Organisms ranging from bacteria, archaea to fungi, microalgae etc., are known to colonies salt pans and may influence the quality of salt precipitation (Kabilan et al., 2012). The hydrology play has significant role in the development of biological community of salt pans (Davis, 2000). As recorded and pointed out by Olson (2006), Oren (2000), Golubi? (1980), Borowitzka (1981), Javor (1989) and Oren and Seckbach (2001) hypersaline environment viz, solar salt pans, natural salt lake and for important microalgae groups with the dominancy of Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta. As far as quantitative estimation through the microscopic examination of salt tolerant micro organisms concerned in an all the four salt pans investigated shows similar results. However, Bacillariophyta predominant its assemblage, the presence of microalgae assemblage provides the beneficial effect of salt production as colorization promotes solar evaporation (Lakshmanan, 2008). Overall, microalgal densities were high in salinities of 12 to 36 B0 within saltworks waters, the salt pans salinity was recorded in various stages like reservoir
 
condenser crystallizer and bittern in the ranges from 9 B0 to 40 B0. Our observations indicate that chlorophyta populations and the overall richness of microalgae profile in saltworks in Thoothukudi. The abundance of microalgae coloured cells increase the absorption of solar energy which raise brine temperature and thus improve evaporation (Oren et al., 1992; Michael et al., 2000). The quantity and quality of salt production in solar salt pans is determined by the hydrobiological activity (Sorgeloos, 1983). The microalgae of chlorophyta (Dunaliella), when grown in solar saltpans in high concentration to appear red colour, it is often regarded as a significant contribution to the solar salt production process (Reginald et al., 2004). The bloom of coloured microorganisms in salt works to absorb the solar energy which increases the brine temperature and to enhance the rate of evaporation (Reginald and LailaBanu, 2009), and these organisms to release the organic carbon in solar ponds to increase the quality of precipitated salt (Giordano et al., 1994). In Our research provide the information about the appearance and assemblage of microalgae in solar saltpans from Thoothukudi in Tamil Nadu.


 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.



 REFERENCES

Ashok Kumar N, Viji D, Baluswami M (2011). A short term study of algal flora of a salt pan near Chennai. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2(12):292–296.
 
Borowitzka LJ (1981). The microflora: Adaptation to life in extremely saline lakes. Hydrobiologia 81:33–46.
Crossref
 
Davis JS (2000). Function and management of the biologicalsystem for seasonal solar salt work. Global Nest. 2:217-226.
 
Giordano M, Davis JS, Bowes G (1994). Organic carbon release by Dunaliella salina under different growth conditions of CO2, nitrogen and salinity. J. Phycol. 30:249- 257.
Crossref
 
Golubic S (1980). Halophilic and halotolerance in cyanophytes. Original Life 10:169–183.
Crossref
 
Hendey NI (1964). An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters, Part V: Bacillariophyceae (diatoms), Her Majesty's Stat. Office, London. P. 317.
 
Javor BA (1989). Hypersaline environments. -Microbiology and Biogeochemistry. Springer – Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Crossref
 
Kabilan M, Bhakti S, Deepthi D, Judith MB (2012). Community solar salt production in Goa. India Aquatic Biosystems. 8:30.
Crossref
 
Komarek J, Anagnostidis K (2005). Cyanoprokaryota 2.Teil/2nd part: Oscillatoriales, [in:] Budel B, Krienitz L, Gartner G. Schagerl M. (eds.), Susswasser flora von Mitteleuropa, 19(2), Elsevier/Spektrum, Heidelberg. P. 759.
 
Korovessis NA, Lekkas TD (2000). Solar saltworks production process evolution – wetland function, [in:] Saltworks: Preserving saline coastal ecosystems, N.A. Korovessis and T.D. Lekkas (eds.), 6th Conf. Environ. Sci. Technol. Pythagorion, Samos, 1 September 1999, Global NEST, Athens.
 
Lakshmanan C (2008). Biogeochemical studies for increased salt production in the Tuticorin Coast, Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to ManonmaniamSundaranar University, Tirunelvely.
 
Michael J, Sullivan C, Currin A (2000). Community Structure and Functional Dynamics of Benthic Microalgae in Salt Marshes. Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. pp. 81-106.
 
Olson JM (2006). Photosynthesis in the archean era. Photosynth Res. 88:109–117.
Crossref
 
Oren A, Seckbach J (2001).Oxygenic photosynthetic microorganisms in extreme environments. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 123, Garcia-Pichel, F., Castenholz, R. W. Charac-terization and biological implications of scytonemin, a cyanobacterial sheath pigment. J. Phycol. 1991(27):395-409.
 
Oren A (2000). Salt and brines. In: Whitton, B.A. & Potts, M. (eds): The ecology of cyanobacteria: Their diversity in time and spaceKluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht. pp. 281–306.
 
Oren A, Stambler N, Dubinsky Z (1992). On the red coloration of saltern crystallizer ponds. Int. J. Salt Lake Res.1:77-89.
Crossref
 
Prescott GW (1951). Algae of the western Great Lakes area, Cranbrook Inst. Sci. Bloomfield Hills P. 946.
 
Reginald M, LailaBanu NR (2009). Role of microalgae for quality salt production in south Indian solar salt production Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Ecological Importance of Solar Saltworks (CEISSA2009) Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. pp. 26–29.
 
Reginald M, Kitto MR, Raj ADS (2004). It Pays to Grow Dunaliella, a sea vegetable Fishing Chimes 24(10):116-117.
 
Reginald M, Helen Diana Y (2008). Role of the micro alga Dunaliellasalina in salt biotechnology. Seaweed Res. Utilin. 30(Special issue):273-277.
 
Sarma YSRK, Khan M (1980). Algal taxonomy in India. Today and tomarrow. Book agency. New Delhi. pp. 153-169.
 
Sorgeloos P (1983). Brine Shrimp Artemia in coastal saltworks. Inexpensive source of food for vertically integrated aquaculture. Aquaculture 9:25-27.
 
Thajuddin N, Subramanian G (2005). Cyanobacterial biodiversity and potential applications in biotechnology. Current Sci. 89:1.

 




          */?>