African Journal of Plant Science
Subscribe to AJPS
Full Name*
Email Address*

Article Number - F7F2F1C64267


Vol.11(6), pp. 220-228 , June 2017
DOI: 10.5897/AJPS2017.1559
ISSN: 1996-0824



Full Length Research Paper

Nondestructive maturity assessment tools for commercially viable fruits and vegetables in Uganda



Paul Okiror
  • Paul Okiror
  • Faculty of Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
  • Google Scholar
Julius Bunny Lejju
  • Julius Bunny Lejju
  • Faculty of Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
  • Google Scholar
Joseph Bahati
  • Joseph Bahati
  • School of Forestry, Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda
  • Google Scholar
Grace Kagoro Rugunda
  • Grace Kagoro Rugunda
  • Faculty of Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
  • Google Scholar
Collins Inno Sebuuwufu
  • Collins Inno Sebuuwufu
  • Faculty of Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
  • Google Scholar







 Received: 07 April 2017  Accepted: 29 April 2017  Published: 30 June 2017

Copyright © 2017 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0


Fruit and vegetable maturity at harvest influences transportation and storage requirements as well as market value. However, small scale farmers in Uganda lack technologies for maturity assessment leading to high pre- and post-harvest losses and low financial returns from fruit and vegetable farms. This study, therefore, assessed the development of fruits (pineapple, passion fruit, watermelon) and vegetables (cabbage, egg plant, pumpkin and tomato), determined optimal maturity indices and fabricated and tested nondestructive tools for maturity assessment. Propagation trials and testing of tools were undertaken at Nangabo and Kangulumira sub counties in central Uganda. The findings show that eggplant, passion fruit, pineapple and pumpkin underwent 3 distinct development stages during which their diameter, length and outer colour changed. Cabbage remained green, but its bulb diameter and length varied with maturity. Watermelon had 4 development stages with significant (P≤0.05) changes in morphology and outer colour. Tomato fruits had 6 distinct outer colour changes. Age and colour were maturity indices for passion fruit. Fruit age and diameter were the maturity indices for watermelon. Age, diameter, length and colour were the maturity indices for pineapple, tomato and eggplant. Cabbage and pumpkin share indices including: age, diameter and length. A farm record book (FRB) was designed for documenting phenology and maturity stages of studied fruits and vegetables. A calibrated calliper (CC) and Calibrated tape (CT) were fabricated for assessing the morphological development in pineapple, tomato, eggplant, cabbage, pumpkin and watermelon. Customized colour charts (CCC) were designed for monitoring colour changes as passion fruits, pineapples, tomatoes and eggplants mature. On-farm trials show that CCCs were the most effective tools for monitoring passion fruit (80%), pineapple (64%), tomato (60%), eggplant (68%). Similar studies involving several cultivars and maturity determination tools are, therefore, recommended.

 

Key words: Fruit, Kangulumira, maturity index, maturity determination tools, Nangabo, vegetable.

Abbott JA (1999). Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15:207-225.
Crossref

 

Agea JG (2010). Use and potential of wild and semi-wild food plants in alleviating household poverty and food insecurity: A case study of Bunyoro-Kitara Kingdom, Uganda. Ph.D Thesis. School of Environment, Natural Resources & Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, U K. 360+xiv pp.

 
 

AOAC (2000). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC international. 17. ed. Washington, DC: AOAC.

 
 

Batte M, Foster L (2008). Ohio Farm Computer Usage. Farm Management Update, Winter 2003-04.20.

 
 

Butz P, Hofmann C, Tauscher B (2005). Recent developments in noninvasive techniques for fresh fruit and vegetable internal quality analysis. J. Food Sci. 70(9):R131-R141.
Crossref

 
 

Chen P (1996). Quality evaluation technology for agricultural products. Seoul, Korea: Agricultural Machinery Engineering.In. Proc. Intl. Conf. November 12-15, pp. 171-204.

 
 

Dadzie BK, Orchard JE (1997). Routine Post Harvest Screening of Banana/Plantain Hybrids. Criteria and Methods. INIBAP Technical Guidelines 2. IPGRI, Rome.

 
 

Hanrahan I, Röder S (2017). New Tools to Help Determine Maturity of Tree Fruit. Washington State University Tree Fruit. TIANNA.DUPONT.

View

 
 

IPC (2017). Report of the integrated food security phase classification Analysis for Uganda. Prepared by Uganda IPC Technical Working Group, January 2017. 80p.

 
 

Jha SN, Chopra S, Kingsly ARP (2007). Modeling of color values for nondestructive evaluation of maturity of mango. Food Eng. 78:22-26.
Crossref

 
 

Jha SN, Kingsly ARP, Chopra S (2006). Non-destructive determination of firmness and yellowness of mango during growth and storage using visual spectroscopy. Biosyst. Eng. 94(3):397-402.
Crossref

 
 

Kader A, Mitcham B (2008). Optimum Procedures for Ripening Mangoes. In. Fruit Ripening and Ethylene Management: 47-48. Univ. Calif. Postharvest Technology Research and Information Center Publication Series #9.

 
 

Kato J (2011). Green house tomato growers root for market. Agribusiness Magazine, New Vision, January 11th, 2011.

 
 

Kisamba-Mugerwa W (2001). Social Background. In: Mukiibi (Ed). Agriculture in Uganda – General information. NARO- Uganda, pp.186-199.

 
 

Malevski Y, Gomez-Brito L, Peleg M, Silberg M (1977). External color as maturity index of mango. J. Food Sci. 42:1316-1318.
Crossref

 
 

Molyneux SL, Lister C, Savage GP (2004). An investigation of the antioxidant properties and colour of glasshouse grown tomatoes. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 55:537-545.
Crossref

 
 

Muchui MN, Njoroge CK, Kahangi EM, Onyango CA (2010). Determination of Maturity Indices of Tissue Cultured Bananas (Musa spp.) 'Williams' and 'Grande Naine'. Proc IC on Banana & Plantain in Africa. Eds.: T. Dubois et al. Acta Hort. 879, ISHS 2010.
Crossref

 
 

Muzaale F (2014). Growing good quality tomatoes. Farming Magazines, Daily Monitor. Wednesday January 8th, 2014.

 
 

NEMA (2016). State of the Environment Report for Uganda 2014. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Kampala.

 
 

Okia CA (2010). Balanites aegyptiaca: A resource for improving nutrition and income of dryland communities in Uganda. Phd thesis, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom. 310 p.

 
 

Okia CA, Kwetegyeka J, Okiror P, Kimondo JM, Teklehaimanot Z, Obua J (2013). Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Fatty Acid Profile of Desert Date Kernel Oil. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 21(3):723-734.

 
 

Okiror P, Lejju JB, Bahati J, Rugunda GK, Sebuuwufu CI, Mulindwa P, Ocan JJ (2017a). Suitability of Kabanyolo Soils for Fruit and Vegetable Production. Open J. Soil Sci. 7:19-33.
Crossref

 
 

Okiror P, Lejju JB, Bahati J, Rugunda GK, Sebuuwufu CI (2017b). Maturity Indices of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), cv. Ghalia 281 in Central Uganda. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 12(14):1196-1203.

 
 

Okojie LO, Ayinde IA (2012). Course materials for AEM 302, Principles of Farm Management. Open Courseware, Unoversity of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

 
 

Ornelas-Paz JJ, Yahia EM, Gardea AA (2008). Changes in external and internal color during postharvest ripening of 'Manila' and 'Ataulfo' mango fruit and relationship with carotenoid content determined by liquid chromatography-APcI+-time-of flight mass spectrometry. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 50:145-152.
Crossref

 
 

Pinho L, Almeida AC, Costa CA, Paes MCD, Glória MBA, Souza RM (2011). Nutritional properties of cherry tomatoes harvested at different times and grown in an organic cropping. Hortic. Bras. 29:205-211.
Crossref

 
 

Reid MS (2002). Maturation and maturity indices. In. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops, A. A. Kader, ed. Univ. of California, Oakland, CA, USA: ANR Publication 3311. pp. 55-62.

 
 

Robinson JC (1996). Bananas and Plantains. 2nd edition. University Press, Cambridge.

 
 

Slaughter DC (2009). Nondestructive Maturity Assessment Methods for Mango: A Review of Literature and Identification of Future Research Needs. Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, January 2009.

 
 

Slaughter DC, Crisosto C (2006). Nondestructive determination of internal quality in clingstone peaches. ASABE Paper 066180. St. Joseph, Mich. USA: ASABE.

 
 

UBOS (2016). The 2016 Statistical Abstract. Uganda Bureu of Statistics, Kampala, Uganda.

 
 

USDA (1991). United States standards for grades of fresh tomatoes. USDA, Agricultural Market Service, Washington, DC. 

View

 
 

Utegi M, Utegi EN (2014). The Importance of Farm Records And Accounting In Agricultural Production. Katsina-Ala Multidiscip. J.

 
 

Winkler MM (1938). Farm Accounting from the Viewpoint of the Farm Manager. J. ASFMRA 2(1):27-56.

 
 

Wu M, Kubota C (2008). Effects of high electrical conductivity of nutrient solution and its application timing on lycopene, chlorophyll and sugar concentrations of hydroponic tomatoes during ripening. Sci. Hortic. 116:122-129.
Crossref

 
 

Xudong S, Hailiang Z, Yande L (2009). Nondestructive assessment of quality of Nanfeng mandarin fruit by a portable near infrared spectroscopy. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2(1):65-71.

 
 

Yost D, Eswaran H (1990). Major Land Resource Areas of Uganda.World Soil Resources. Soil Conservation Service-USDA. Washington D.C, USA. 227p.

 
 

Zhang L, McCarthy MJ (2012). Measurement and evaluation of tomato maturity using magnetic resonance imaging. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 67:37-43
Crossref

 

 


APA Okiror, P., Lejju, J. B., Bahati, J., Rugunda G. K., & Sebuuwufu, C. I. (2017). Nondestructive maturity assessment tools for commercially viable fruits and vegetables in Uganda. African Journal of Plant Science, 11(6), 220-228.
Chicago Paul Okiror, Julius Bunny Lejju, Joseph Bahati, Grace Kagoro Rugunda and Collins Inno Sebuuwufu. "Nondestructive maturity assessment tools for commercially viable fruits and vegetables in Uganda." African Journal of Plant Science 11, no. 6 (2017): 220-228.
MLA Paul Okiror, et al. "Nondestructive maturity assessment tools for commercially viable fruits and vegetables in Uganda." African Journal of Plant Science 11.6 (2017): 220-228.
   
DOI 10.5897/AJPS2017.1559
URL http://academicjournals.org/journal/AJPS/article-abstract/F7F2F1C64267

Subscription Form