Full Length Research Paper
Solvents with better properties than the ones presently in use for carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption processes would make absorption technology more attractive for large scale reduction of CO2 emissions. In this work, more than 2000 solvents comprising of four groups were considered for screening. The groups are: amine solvents (primary, secondary, tertiary, sterically hindered, multiple amines and physical solvents), neutral solvents, mixed solvents and ionic liquids (ILs). Conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) model was used in predicting thermodynamic properties, such as Henry’s constant, octanol-water partition coefficient, solubility in water and vapour pressure of all the solvents. The best two solvents from each of the four groups were selected based on the criteria of high capacity and high selectivity of the solvent in comparison to a benchmark solvent (BS), that is, [methyl-diethanolamine (MDEA) + Piperazine]. All the eight selected solvents were found to be environmental friendly having very low octanol-water partition coefficient KOW, which is far less than the hazard limit of 10,000. Out of the eight selected solvents, sulfolane (S), (NMP + S), and ([N,N,N,N,N-Pentamethyl-N-IsopropylGuanidinium][Br]) were recommended for having better properties than the BS.
Key words: Henry’s constant, conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS), carbon dioxide absorption, capacity, selectivity.
|Danckwerts PV (2001). The effect of halogens on the rate of absorption of carbon dioxide: Department of Chemical, Engineering, Pembroke Street, Cambridge.|
|Derks PWJ (2006). Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Piperazine Activated N-Methyldiethanolamine, PHD Thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.|
Eckert F, Klamt A (2002). Fast solvent screening via quantum chemistry: COSMO-RS approach. AIChE J. 48(2):369.
|Edward M (2008). Evaluation of Ionic Liquids in Post-Combustion CO2 Capture: Seventh Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration Pittsburgh. PA.|
|Eirik FS (2005). Computational Chemistry Study of Solvents for Carbon Dioxide Absorption: PHD Thesis at Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Trondheim pp. 99-111.|
|Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1996). Product Properties Test Guidelines: Partition Coefficient (n-Octanol/Water), Generator Column Method, U.S., OPPTS 830.7560. EPA 712-C-96-039. http://murov.info/orgsolvents.htm.|
|Jenab MH, Abdi MA, Najibi SH, Vahidi M, Matin NS (2005). Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Aqueous Mixtures of N-Methyldiethanolamine + Piperazine + Sulfolane. J. Chem. Eng. Data. P. 5.|
Klamt A (1995). Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents: A New Approach to the Quantitative Calculation of Solvation Phenomena. J. Phys. Chem. 99:2224.
|Laurie BS (2004). Diffusion coefficients and 1-octanol-water partition Coefficients of ionic liquids: Notre Dame. Indiana.|
|Luis MB (2007). Evaluation of Cosmo-RS for Henry Constants and Selectivity Prediction: Universidade de Aveiro. pp. 27-51.|
|Sonia PM (2011). Ecotoxicological risk profile of ionic liquids:octanol-water distribution coefficients and toxicological data. Published online in Wiley Online Library.|
Sumon KZ, Henni A (2011). Ionic liquids for CO2 capture using COSMO-RS: Effect of structure, properties and molecular interactions on solubility and selectivity. Fluid Phase Equilib. 310(1-2):39-55.
|APA||(2013). Improvement of carbon dioxide absorption technology using conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) method. Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, 5(4), 96-105.|
|Chicago||Mustapha S. I., Okonkwo P. C. and Waziri S. M.. "Improvement of carbon dioxide absorption technology using conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) method." Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology 5, no. 4 (2013): 96-105.|
|MLA||Mustapha S. I., Okonkwo P. C. and Waziri S. M.. "Improvement of carbon dioxide absorption technology using conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) method." Journal of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology 5.4 (2013): 96-105.|