Journal of
Parasitology and Vector Biology

  • Abbreviation: J. Parasitol. Vector Biol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-2510
  • DOI: 10.5897/JPVB
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 202

Full Length Research Paper

Evaluation of cytosine DNA methylation of the Biomphalaria glabratahe at shock protein 70 locus after biological and physiological stresses

Wannaporn Ittiprasert*
  • Wannaporn Ittiprasert*
  • Schistosomiasis Resource Center, Biomedical Research Institute 12111 Parklawn Dr, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
  • Google Scholar
André Miller
  • André Miller
  • Schistosomiasis Resource Center, Biomedical Research Institute 12111 Parklawn Dr, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Matty Knight
  • Matty Knight
  • Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Tropical Medicine, Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington D.C 20037, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Matt Tucker
  • Matt Tucker
  • Schistosomiasis Resource Center, Biomedical Research Institute 12111 Parklawn Dr, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. Stevenson University, School of the Sciences 1525 Greenspring Valley Rd, Stevenson, MD 21153,USA.
  • Google Scholar
Michael H. Hsieh
  • Michael H. Hsieh
  • Schistosomiasis Resource Center, Biomedical Research Institute 12111 Parklawn Dr, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. Children’s National Health System, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA. The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 22 June 2015
  •  Accepted: 07 October 2015
  •  Published: 30 November 2015

 ABSTRACT

Deoxyribonucleic (DNA) methylation is one of the widespread epigenetic modifications of genomic DNA, and has been postulated to be a predisposing influence on disease onset and infections. The ability to quantify differences in DNA methylation between the genomes of normal vs.stressed Biomphalaria glabrata would help to profile changes potentially linked to resistance to Schistosoma mansoni infection. Thus, this study sought to measure differences in cytosine DNA methylation of various B. glabrata tissues responding over time to either biological or physiological stresses (S. mansoni exposure vs. heat shock). Here, this study measured DNA methylation at the B. glabrataheat shock protein 70 (Bg-hsp 70) intragenic regionto profile the regions methylome with a simple and cost-effective method. The study found DNA hypomethylation of the Bg-hsp 70 region occurs in the snails in response to both stressors; heat shock and parasite exposure, however, overall DNA hypomethylation after heat shock was similar among the tissues examined.  In contrast, DNA methylation remained suppressed for up to 5 h when snails were responding to stress from parasite exposure.  In parasite exposed snails, the levels of Bg-hsp 70 methylation in whole body, head foot and ovotestis decreased from 30 min to 2 h, and the reduction persisted in the hepatopancreas for up to 5 h.  The DNA hypomethylation of the Bg-hsp 70 intragenic region correlated negatively with the level of Bg-hsp 70 mRNA in infected snails but not in thermally stressed snails. From this study results, the study conclude that the hepatopancreas is the most active host organs in terms of differential DNA methylation events following parasite infection.  Also, from these data the study postulate that different epigenetic mechanisms underlie, Bg-hsp70 gene regulation in this snails while responding to stress due either to parasite exposure or heat shock.

 

Key words: DNA methylation, invertebrate, Biomphalaria glabrata, epigenome, Schistosoma manson iinfection, thermal stress.


 INTRODUCTION

Epigenetic modifications refer to changes in gene expression that occur without altering the underlying DNA sequence (Jaenisch and Bird, 2003; Richards, 2006). These changes are based on a series of molecular processes that can activate, reduce or completely disable the activity of genes (Bossdorf et al., 2008).  DNA methylation is one of the key epigenetic modification in eukaryotic genomes and is crucial for regulation of gene expression during animal and plant development.  This mechanism consists of a chemical modification of the genomic DNA that involves the addition of a methyl group to a nucleotide, usually the 5’ carbon of the cytosine pyrimidine ring, by specific DNA methyltransferase (Lu et al., 2008; Mandrioli, 2007).  Studies of DNA methylation are complicated by naturally occurring variation in methylation among biological entities: different cells, tissues and organisms may show divergent methylation patterns (Yi and Goodisman, 2009).

Since its original identification as an epigenetic regulator, cytosine methylation has been studied through numerous assays, including methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme mapping, deamination of un-methylated cytosines with sodium bisulfite, and enrichment with targeting antibodies (Harrison and Parle-McDermott, 2011; Laird, 2010). Studies during the past decade on the human methylome have increasingly focused on developing methodologies with single base pair resolution, since both regional and single CpG site methylation changes have been shown to have functional consequences (Gibney and Nolan, 2010; Michels et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2007). In addition, in most vertebrates studied, DNA methylation is predominantly limited to the CpG doublets that are present insubstantial numbers, either within CpG islands of promoters or at overlapping nearby transcription start sites, while the methylation in invertebrates is shown predominantly in the gene body  Patterns of DNA methylation are highly variable among different animal taxa (Feng et al., 2010; Suzuki et al., 2007; Zemach et al., 2010).  DNA methylation can generally be found in transposable elements and repetitive elements as well as in gene bodies in Arabidopsis (Cokus et al., 2008; Lister et al., 2008). Gene-body methylation was found to correlate with high expression level (Tran et al., 2005; Zemach et al., 2010; Zilberman et al., 2007) or alternatively, DNA methylation can define exons boundaries or regulate alternative splicing because it has been observed that exons are more highly methylated than intron (Feng et al., 2010; Naydenov et al., 2015). 

Currently, studies on epigenetics in invertebrates are still lagging behind those that have been conducted on vertebrates.  Therefore, the characterization of DNA methylation patterns from a broad spectrum of invertebrates would help advance the field of evolutionary epigenetics and provide much needed biological information about the effect of changing methylation patterns on animal environment adaptations.  Mollusks are one of the most diverse and evolutionarily successful groups of invertebrates.  They possess various body plans and adaptation strategies.  Despite their species abundance and diverse geographical distribution, DNA methylation patterns in mollusks remain largely unexplored.  A recent study showed that specific functional categories of genes were associated with different levels of DNA methylation in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Gavery and Roberts, 2010). For example, genes involved in stress and environmental responses were prone to be hypo-methylated which might be advantageous for greater epigenetic flexibility and for higher regulatory control (Gavery and Roberts, 2010).   Fneich et al. (2013),   were the first to report DNA methylation in Biomphalaria glabrata snails (intermediate host of the human trematode parasite Schistosoma mansoni), and showed that the B. glabrata genome is methylated predominantly at CpG sites, as revealed by several techniques including restriction enzymatic digestion with isoschizomers, bisulfite conversion-based techniques, and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis.

This study focus was to evaluate the gene body methylation pattern of the hsp 70 region using the snail B. glabrata which is the intermediate host of the parasitic trematode S. mansoni, as a model organism responding to either biotic or abiotic stress. Heat shock proteins (Hsp) are highly conserved proteins whose expression is induced by different kinds of stresses. It has subsequently been shown that most Hsps have strong cytoprotective effects and behave as molecular chaperones for other cellular proteins. Inappropriate activation of signaling pathways could occur during acute or chronic stress as result of protein misfolding, protein aggregation or disruption of regulatory complexes.  The action of chaperones, through their properties in protein homeostasis is thought to restore balance.  Studies that compared the two highly homologous members of the Hsp 70 family; the constitutive Hsc 70 and the major stress-inducible Hsp 70, revealed that underphysiological conditions, the constitutive Hsc 70 is expressed at higher levels than Hsp 70, but the synthesis of Hsp 70 is more rapid and accumulates in different subcellular compartments after stress (Ellis et al., 2000; Seidberg et al., 2003).  Furthermore, in contrast to normal cells frequently overexpressed Hsp 70 in the cytocol, present Hsp 70 on their plasma membrane and actively release Hsp 70 (Multhoff et al., 1997; Vega et al., 2008).

In summary, the key actions of Hsp 70 depends on where the protein islocalized.  In the cytosol, Hsp 70 functions by binding to client polypeptides in an ATP dependent manner to prevent aggregation of unfolded peptides and transports proteins (Kim et al., 2013; Mayer, 2013), regulates intercellular signaling and mediates antigen cross-presentation.  As a membrane bound protein, Hsp 70 acts as a tumor-specific recognition structure for activated NK cells on the plasma membranes (Multhoff et al., 1999; Nylandsted et al., 2004) and mediates anti-apoptotic functions on the lysosomal membrane.  Finally, extracellular free and lipid-bound Hsp 70 can induce both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses (De Maio, 2014; Henderson and Pockley, 2010).

Herein, this study examined changes in DNA methylation in varioussnail tissues (whole body, head foot, ovotestis and hepatopancreas) after either heat shock or following early exposure to a compatible strain of S. mansoni. By using an efficient, simple, cost-effective, fluorescence-based, and bisulfite-free procedure that required very small amount of DNA starting material, the study provide evidence, for the first time, of differences in DNA methylation patterns in the Bg-hsp 70 DNA region depending on the type of stressor; biotic or abiotic.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Snails and stress conditions

 

In the study experiments, B. glabrata NMRI snail strain that is susceptibleto S. mansoni infection was used.  This is a laboratory-maintained snail used at the Schistosomiasis Resource Center (Biomedical Research Institute, Rockville, MD).  The snails (4 to 6 mm in diameter) were kept overnight in sterile water containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin.  In total, twenty juvenile B. glabrata snails were used, which included biological triplicates and methodological triplicates. Snails were subjected to either thermal stress by incubation in pre-warmed (32°C) sterile water as previously described (Ittiprasert and Knight, 2012)  for various time points: 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h and 5 h, or biologically stress by S. mansoni miracidia exposure (Ittiprasert et al., 2009). For parasite exposure, the snails were individually exposed to S. mansoni miracidia (10 miracidia/snail) at ambient temperature (~25°C) in 24 well plates containing filtered and aerated (at least 48 h) tap water for the various time points.

 

 

Snail tissue collection

 

Each snail was  placed  between  2  microscope  slides  and  gently crushed to break the shell without damaging the internal tissue.  Each crushed snail was transferred to a clean microscope slide after clearing all shell debris.  Forceps and scalpels were used to dissect the whole body tissue or tissue of interest, namely the head foot, hepatopancreas and ovotestis.  Dissected tissues were processed immediately for dual genomic DNA and total RNA extraction as described below.

 

 

Dual genomic DNA and total RNA isolation

 

To evaluate the effect of cytosine DNA methylation on the intragenic B. glabrata heat shock protein 70 region (Bg-hsp 70) and its effect on this gene’stranscription, the study isolated genomic DNA for methylation determination and total RNA for Bg-hsp70 transcript expression from the same tissue samples.  Briefly, each tissue sample was homogenized in RNAzol® RT (Molecular Research Center, Inc., OH) as previously described (Ittiprasert and Knight, 2012). The sedimented DNA and proteins were precipitated with an equal volume of sterile distilled water (DW), and the supernatant was further processed for RNA recovery by isopropanol precipitation as per the manufacturer’s instructions.  The DNA from DNA/protein pellets was recovered using DNAzol® (Molecular Research Center, Inc., OH) and the DNA was recovered by the ethanol precipitation method as per manufacturer’s instructions.  Briefly, each DNA sample was homogenized in RNAzol®RT solution, then centrifuged at 10,000 x g to remove the tissue debris.  By adding half volume of DW to the clear homogenate to allow DNA and protein precipitation.  After centrifugation, the DNA/Protein pellet was resuspended in DNAzol®solution, while the top aqueous phase containing RNA was transferred into a new tube and an equal volume of isopropanol added.  The RNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol (EtOH) twice, and RNA was resuspended in nuclease-free water. For DNA purification, the pellet that was completely dissolved with DNAzol was used for DNA isolation by adding half volume of absolute EtOH.  The DNA pellet after centrifugation and washing was resuspended in nuclease-free water. Solubilized DNA and RNA were suspended in nuclease-free water and kept frozen (-80°C) until required. Quantification of these nucleic acids was evaluated by NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, DE).

 

 

Gene-specific DNA methylation assessment

 

Genomic DNA from whole body tissue, head foot[sk3] , ovotestis and hepatopancreas were quantified and checked for purity (OD260/280 ratio ~ 1.80) by NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, DE).  The study used the One Step qMethylTM Kit (Zymo Research, CA) to measure the level of methylated cytosines in dinucleotides from individual genomic DNA samples asper manufacturer’s instruction (Gu et al., 2015; Rao et al., 2012; Sanders et al., 2014; Turanli et al., 2013; van Dijk et al., 2012). Because of this, the technique combines the basic techniques of DNA digestion and methylation-sensitive qPCR of a known sequence.  So using this assay, the primer pairs were designed within the CpG rich of the Bg-hsp 70 region according to the guidelines provided in the One Step qMethylTM kit. This was accomplished by splitting the DNA to be analyzed into two tubes: a Test and Reference reaction.  DNA in the ‘Test reaction’ was digested by Methyl Sensitive Restriction Enzymes (MSREs) provided with the kit, while the ‘Reference reaction’ had no MSREs. The DNA from both samples was amplified using real time PCR in the presence  of  SYTO® 9  fluorescent  dye  and  then  quantitated.

Cycle threshold (Ct) values for ‘Test’ and ‘Reference’ DNA samples will vary depending on methylation status, with large Ct differences being characteristic of non-methylated DNA.  The reaction was set up in a single tube according to the manufacturer’s instructions as follows:  a final reaction volume of 10 ul contained either 2xtest reaction premix or 2x reference reaction premix, 1 ul (for each) of 10 uM forward and reverse primer, 3 ul of DNase/RNase-free water, and 5 ul of DNA (20 ng). The reaction sample was mixed by pipetting and both the test and reference reactions were performed in an ABI 7300 real time thermocycler.  The thermal cycle was initiated with MSREs digestion at 37°C for 2 h, followed by an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min and then 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, 54°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min.  The melting analysis was also performed after final extension and prior to the hold step at 4°C. Ct values were determined using ABI 7300 SYBR®Green emission measurements of the SYTO® 9 fluorescent dye.

The Bg-hsp 70 specific primers flanking the CpG island region and containing 3 MSRE sites (following the manufacturer’s primer design instructions and designed using Primer-Blast) were as follows: 1 HpaIIssite and 2 HpyCH4IV sites; Bg-hsp 70_2316: 5’-gagaggcaccaccattccaa-3’ and Bg-hsp 70_2538: 5’-gctgacgttgaggataccgt-3’ (223 bpamplicon). The Ct values obtained are used to calculate delta Ct values [Ct(test)-Ct(reference)].  From this methylation percentages are calculated using Methylation% = 100 x 2 –deltaCt, where the delta Ct is the average Ct value from the test reaction (contains MSREs) minus the average Ct value from the reference reaction (no MSREs).  Percentage methylation was relative to each experiment (experimental samples compared to control samples). Each reaction was tested for reaction efficiency by measuring dilutions of fully methylated and un-methylated DNA samples provided with the kit (data not shown).

 

 

Bisulfite genomic sequencing of cytosine methylated heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) sequence

 

Bisulfite treatment of DNA and PCR

 

The pooled snail hepatopancreas DNA samples were modified with sodium bisulfite using EZ DNA Methylation-DirectTM Kit (Zymo Research, CA) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 ug of DNA was first treated with bisulfite containing a C-T conversion reagent before incubating at 98°C for 8 min and at 64°C for 3.5 h.  The modified DNA was purified using a Zymo-SpinTM IC column (provided with the kit) and stored at -20°C until used for downstream analyses.  The bisulfite-treated DNA was quantified by NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer using factor 33 to detect single stranded DNA (Holmes et al., 2014).  The specific methylated primers for the Bg-hsp70 sequence were designed by the MethPrimer Program (http://www.urogene.org/methprimer/) (Li and Dahiya, 2002).  For each PCR reaction, 50 g of bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified by specific methylated-Bghsp 70 primers flanking CpG Islands 1, 2, 4, and 5 (Figure 1 and Table 1) and the GoTaq G2 Hot Start Master Mix (Promega, WI). PCR cycles were performed with the following conditions: hot start reaction at 95°C for 2 min, then 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, followed by 10 min for the final extension.  PCR fragments,153 bp and 198 bp, amplicons of primers CpG1/2 and CpG 4/5, respectively (Table 1), were separated on a 1.2% agarose gel. Methylation-specific PCR primers were designed using MethPrimer software (Li and Dahiya, 2002) and the complete gene sequence of Bg-hsp 70 with GenBank:AF025477.1    as   the   input   sequence.  Primers    were selected using CpG island prediction with 50% as the GC setting. Six CpG islands were detected in theBg-hsp70 gene, and two pairs of methylated specific Bg-hsp 70 region primer pairs were designed to target putative CpG islands 1, 2, 4, and 5 (Table 1). Two sets of primers, CpG_1/2 and CpG_4/5, were used in this study.

 

 

PCR fragment purification and TA cloning

 

The PCR amplicons at 153 bp and 198 bp from primers CpG_1/2 and CpG_4/5 were purified individually by GeneClean(MP Biomedical, LLC, OH)and cloned individually using a TOPO® TA Cloning® kit (Life Technologies, CA.).  Five single colonies from each transformant were randomly picked using lysogeny broth (LB)/Ampicillin (Amp)/ 5-bromo-4-chloro-3indolyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (Xgal)/ isopropyl beta-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)selection and the plasmid DNA was analyzed by direct sequencing. Amplicons from DNA methylation of the Bg-hsp 70 regions were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.2% agarose/Tris-Borate-EDTA/ethidium bromide) and the single expected band was excised and purified with GeneClean® II Kits (MP Biomedical, LLC, OH) individually according to the manufacturer’s instructions.  The purified fragment was cloned. Five of each methylated Bg-hsp70 recombinants were picked for direct sequencing using the M13 primer (Eurofins Genomics, AL).  The sequences were trimmed to remove vector contamination identified using VectorScreen software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/vecscreen/), followed by further analysis and alignment by use of Serial Cloner Software v. 2.6 (http://serialbasics.free.fr/Serial_Cloner.html).

 

 

Real-time PCR

 

Total RNA was isolated, and Bg-hsp70 transcript expression was quantified by a fluorogenic method with 2x SYBR Green Master Mix using an ABI 7300 real time thermocycleras as previously described (Ittiprasert et al., 2009; Knight et al., 2009). Primers specific for Bg-hsp70 (Acc. no. AF025477.1) were designed spanning the coding DNA sequence (CDS) containing CpG islands and predicted DNA methylated locations within the Bg-hsp 70 region.  The primer sequences were as follows: Bg-hsp70 forward: 5’-aggcgtcgacattcaggtcta- 3’ and Bg-hsp 70 reverse: 5’-tggtgatgttgttggttttacca-3’.  These primers amplify Bg-hsp70 at positions 2379-2578.  The Bg-hsp70 mRNA levels of each sample were normalized to B. glabrata myoglobin value (arbitrarily assigned an abundance value of 1 as previously described (Dewilde et al., 1998; Raghavan et al., 2007).  The Bg-hsp70 transcript fold change was analyzed by the comparative Ct method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001), and normalized for endogenous B. glabratamyglobin. The cytosine DNA methylation and real time PCR were performed independently 3 experiments and each sample run in triplicate.  Data are presented as mean ± standard error of replicate experiments.  For DNA methylation and real-time PCR data comparisons, the study used one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test and Student t-tests, respectively.  Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2011 version 14.4.8with P-values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

 

 

Bioinformatic and statistical analysis

 

Analysis and identification of CpG islands and promoters in the Bg-hsp 70 gene region were performed using the online tools MethPrimer (Li and Dahiya, 2002) and Neural Network Promoter Prediction (Reese, 2001). To generate and analyze the DNA methylation patterns from bisulfite sequencing data of the clones with methylated Bg-hsp 70 fragments, the study used Meth Tools 2.0 software (Grunau et al., 2000). To study the association between stress-induced DNA hypomethylation of the Bg-hsp 70 region and Bg-hsp 70 transcript levels, Microsoft Excel 2011 version 14.4.8 to generate scatter plots and calculate correlation coefficients(r) was used.  The correlation coefficient r measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables on a scatterplot.  The value of r that is higher than 0.7 indicates a strong linear relationship (Ho, 2012).

 


 RESULTS

Prediction of methylated cytidines (mC) of theBg-hsp 70 locus

 

This study investigated mC sites on  predicted  methylated sites of Bg-hsp 70 CpG islands using the input sequence AF025477.1.  The study used MethPrimer Design Software (Cartharius et al., 2005)  to predict CpG islands, and designed specific primers for methylated bisulfite converted DNA.  The study results revealed that there were five predicted CpG islands on the Bg-hsp 70 gene, making a predicted total of six CpG sites (Figure 1 and Table 1).  Out of these six sites, four (CpGs1, -2, -4 and -5) showed predicted mC, while the remaining two were predicted not to exhibit methylated sites.  From these predictions, two primer sets were successfully designed and utilized for the present study. From direct sequencing of cloned amplicons, the study identified eight mC (on the positive strand) in the Bg-hsp 70 regions as summarized in Figure 1: 1272, 1275, 1290, 1395 and 1410 located on CpG1 and CpG2.  The mC on CpG4 and CpG5 were found at 2511, 2514, 2520, 2532, 2634, 2636 and 2681 (Figure 1a).  The two promoters located at 19 to 69 and 330 to 380 were predicted by Neural Network Promoter Prediction Software and no mC sites were found at these promoters (Figure 1a). For further analysis, the study analyzed the random picked recombinants, 5 clones from each TA cloning construction for CpG 1/CpG 2 (indicated as fragment A1 in Figure 1a) and CpG4/CpG5 fragments (indicated as fragment A2 in fig.1A) by MethTools 2.0 software.  This software analyzed the DNA methylation data.  The results (Figure 1b) showed that there were 71.43 and 70% of %5mCpG on A1 (153 bp) and A2 (198 bp) fragments, respectively.  The %5mC on A1 and A2 fragments are 14.71 and 12.96%, respectively.  In this study, there was no methylation outside CpG sites (Figure 1b).

 

 

Steady state cytosine methylationlevels of the Bg-hsp 70 region of B. glabrata

 

To investigate the baseline DNA methylation levels in three different tissues (head foot, ovotestis and hepatopancreas) and the whole bodyin non-stressed snails, 4 independent biological replicates, with 5 snails each was conducted.  Using One Step qMethylTM kit (Zymo Research, CA) with Bg-hsp_2538 and Bg-hsp-2316 primers, the study found that the global methylation levels across tissues from control snails were quite similar,ranging from 15.11 to 17.98% (Figure 2).

 

 

Pattern of DNA hypomethylation between biological and physiological stresses in the B. glabrata epigenome are different

 

To    determine  differential  patterns  of  B. glabrata  DNA hypomethylation induced by biological versus physiological stresses, four independent experimental replicatesto study changes in DNA methylation patterns across three tissues (head foot, ovotestis and hepatopancreas) and the whole body induced by either biological or physiological stress was conducted.  Five snails of each group were stressed either by heat shock at 32°C or by S. mansoni miracidia exposure, and tissues collected at various time points;0, 30 min, 2 h, and 5 h post exposure. Thermal and biological stress induced significant DNA hypomethylation of the CpG4 site after 30 min of treatment.  The decrease in DNA methylation from heat shock treatment was found to be similar among these snails; a ~6 to 11% reduction was observed from 30 min to 2 h compared to non-stressed conditions (Figure 2, panels E-H).  Following heat shock, however, DNA methylation returned to normal levels at 5 h even though the snails remained in a thermally stressed environment.  Interestingly, hypomethylation events triggered by biological stress (in all the tissues) continued to accumulate for up to5 h, albeit with only ~2 to 9% increase in hypomethylated sites compared to controls (Figure 2, panels A to D).  Reduction in the methylation of the Bg-hsp 70 gene in the hepatopancreas was found to be the most dramatic at 5 h post exposure (>13% increase in hypomethylated sites) (Figure 2, panel C).  Beyond this time point post-exposure, the study found that individual snails exhibited differential patterns of DNA hypomethylation for up to 10 h, with a slow recovery to baseline levels after 24 h of parasite infection (data not shown).

 

 

Association of Bg-hsp 70 DNA hypomethylationwith S. mansoni miracidia exposure and effects on Bg-hsp 70 gene expression

 

At serial time points up to 5 h after parasite exposure, DNA hypomethylation of Bg-hsp 70 in parallel with Bg-hsp 70 mRNA levels was measured. In all tissue samples examined, the expression of Bg-hsp 70 transcripts increased in response to infection relative to levels in non-stressed tissues. The levels of Bg-hsp 70 transcript after 5 h of stress decreased slowly, recovering to normal levels within 12 h (data not shown).  Figure 3, panel E shows the fold change of Bg-hsp 70 in the four tissues examined at various time points post-exposure to S. mansoni; the most significant differential expression of this transcript was detected in the hepatopancreas 2 to 5 h post-exposure with 8.32 and 9.35 fold change, respectively.

In parallel with Bg-hsp 70 transcript measurements, methylation levels in the hsp70 gene body region were also analyzed.  Surprisingly, hsp 70 mRNA levels under heat stress conditions did not  correlate  with  the  methy-lation status of the hsp70 gene body region.  For instance, whereas DNA hypomethylation levels after 30 min 2 h post-heat stress recovered to the non-stressed level at 5 h, the transcription of Bg-hsp 70 remained upregulated (~3 to 5.2 fold change, data not shown).  Interestingly, with S. mansoni exposure as the stressor, a negative correlation between the methylation level of the Bg-hsp 70 locus and expression of its transcript was observed.  Thus, as shown in Figure 3, panels A to D, the intergene DNA hypomethylation levels in the Bg-hsp 70 sequence correlated with its mRNA expression in all tissues examined: whole body (r= 0.70), head foot (r = 0.60), hepatopancreas (r = 0.91) and ovotestis (r = 0.99).


 DISCUSSION

    In this study, the percent of cytidine DNA methylation within the intragenic region of the Bg-hsp 70 locus was examined in different tissues; whole body, hepatopancreas, ovotestis and head foot of B. glabrata either after schistosome exposure (biological stress) or heat shock at 32°C (physiological stress) over time.  The study results showed that hypomethylation of the Bg-hsp70 regions in snails undergoing these stresses were different at the time points examined, revealing changes in the mC patterns in the corresponding Bg-hsp 70 DNA sequences.  From these results, the B. glabrata snails showed that DNA methylation on CpG sites only occurred within the intragenic region and not on the promoter sequence that had no CpG sites as predicted by MethPrimer software (Figure 1). This result is further confirmation of previous studies that showed in other invertebrates that methylation of cytosineresidues in DNA is mainly found in gene bodies but not in promoter regions as is the case in vertebrates (Laird, 2010; Regev et al., 1998).

Interestingly, the patterns of cytidine methylation observed in the snail while responding to either biotic or abiotic stress were different.  For example, in the heat shocked snails results showed DNA hypomethylation occurred in all of the tissue samples examined with the same pattern of lower % DNA methylation level than what this study observed in non-stress snails (30 min to 2 h).  However, the methylation level recovered, returning to the same basal level as in non-stressed snails within 5 h after heat shock (Figure 2). 

In contrast, in the snails exposed to S. mansoni results showed the % DNA methylation continued to decrease only in the hepatopancreas (30 min to 5 h post parasite exposure), whilst in the other tissue samples (whole body, head foot and ovotestis) methylation began to increase at 5 h post exposure.  This study represents the first descriptionof tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns in the schistosome-compatible snail host during the early phase of parasite exposure.  In addition, these data support results from a previous study that showed that the hepatopancreas was the preferable organ for the localization of Escherichia coli infection in the snail (Deleury et al., 2012). It is possible that the hepatopancreas may also be the major organ that is most active in responses directed toward S. Mansoni miracidiae in the snail which is consistent with results from other host/pathogen studies.

In a previous study, the higher levels of mRNA was observed in the hepatopancreas, which is the site for the storage of metabolic reserves in the snail, thus providing a source of energy that is utilized during the periods of physiological stress.  The study results suggests that in the early S. mansoni exposed snail, the hepatopancreas (Gomez-Diaz et al., 2012), could be activated by the incoming parasite for the production of its energy requirement and/or for metabolomics responses that are needed for the development and differentiation of miracidiae into mother sporocysts.  In the S. mansoni-B.glabrata interactions, the rapid change in the DNA methylation pattern of the hsp 70 locus, concurrent with an increase in the level of hsp 70 RNA, during the early phase of infection, supports the notion that a plastic and dynamic system becomes established early in the snail host helping it to cope with the selective constraints that are imposed by the parasite.  The parasite to survive, has evolved unparalleled phenotypic plasticity.  This evidence is intimately linked to parasite survival transmission in the snail host especially in a changing host environment that requires rapid and profound alterations of their gene expression profiles (Gomez-Diaz et al., 2012), as shown here with hsp 70 gene expression in the early schistosome/snail interaction. Contrary to results obtained for epigenetic modulation in the snail host following early schistosome infection, heat shock (abiotic stress) affected the pattern of DNA methylation in the B. glabrata snails differently.  Recovery to basal levels in all tissues examined occurred uniformly and within a shorter time frame than when the stimulus was from infection.  These differences suggests that the epigenetic machinery regulating Bg-hsp 70 gene expression under conditions of abiotic stress has no tissue- or organelle – specificity.

It is possible that these differences may also reflect where the hsp 70 proteins is located in order for it to function optimally in the snail while it is responding to either thermal stress or to schistosomes.  Thus, it is possible that under thermal stress conditions, the cytosolic hsp 70 may be the major effector molecule that is needed to control homeostasis in the snails preventing aggregation of unfolded peptides and transporting proteins.  Whilst in the schistosome exposed snails, the parasite may elicit instead a specific tissue/ immune response via either a membrane bound and/or extracellular free, lipid-bound hsp 70 protein that induces either inflammation or anti-inflammation responses to support parasite to survival, development and differentiation to the sporocysts.  This finding could be important for further studies in the snail vector and schistosome interaction about how biological stress affect the phenotypic switching observed in B. glabrata snails (Ittiprasert and Knight, 2012).

Therefore, it is possible that the gene plasticity observed with epigenetic modulation after thermal stress in this snail can caused phenotypic change.  However, in the susceptibility strain of B. glabrata changes to epigenetic marks after parasite exposure would favor host adaptation to support the parasite development and differentiation without phenotypic change. Strong linear negative correlations (r > 0.7) between the degree of intragenic (not promoter regions from this study) was also observed.  Bg-hsp 70 DNA hypomethylation and Bg-hsp 70 mRNA transcript levels was induced after parasite exposure, but not between the magnitude of DNA hypomethylation and levels of Bg-hsp 70 transcript up-regulation from thermal stress.  From previous reports of DNA methylation in invertebrates that display a wide range of DNA methylation from the absence of this mechanism in Caenorhabditis elegan to either low or moderate levels in the case of D. melanogaster invertebrates methylation is not limited to CpG regions but can also occur in other DNA coding regions or CpT islands.  The study results confirmed the evidence showing that in invertebrates, major DNA methylation occurs only in the genebody rather than in promoter region(s) as in the case in many vertebrates (Bird, 2002; Colot and Rossignol, 1999; Elango and Yi, 2008; Mandrioli, 2004; Su et al., 2011). However, this study lack considerable information about epigenetic modulation in B. glabrata (for examples, DNA methylation, histone modification and micro RNAs), especially involving responses to both biotic and abiotic stressors.  The identification and elucidation of these mechanisms would be important to bridge the considerable information gap that currently exists in this subject in the schistosome and snails as well as the mammalian host interaction.


 CONCLUSION

This study may conclude that the molecular mechanisms of the B. glabrata immune response to schistosomes differs from their adaptive response to thermal stress,and may be mediated by different transcription factors and/or another hsp 70 promoter(s) (Akerfelt et al., 2010; Nakai and Morimoto, 1993; Nakai et al., 1997; Sistonen et al., 1992; Stephanou and Latchman, 2011; Younis et al., 2011) or non-heat shock factor proteins (HSF) (Blatke et al., 2013; Madrigal-Matute et al., 2010; Stephanou and Latchman, 2011). Non-CpG forms of methylation, example,  CpA, CpT, CpG, or histone or lysine methylation as reported in mammalians (Pinney, 2014) and invertebrates; Apismellifera and Bombysmori (Elango et al., 2009; Regev et al., 1998), should also be  areas  of considerations   for  studying  epigenetics  in  B. glabrata.

Thermal stress that induces epigenetic change and, therefore, genetic plasticity might cause the phenotype switching observed in S. mansoni parasite resistant snails exposed at elevated temperature (Ittiprasert and Knight, 2012; Knight et al., 2015).  

In previous studies, in situ hybridization was used to show that there was non-random spatial repositioning of Bg-hsp 70 loci in early infected snails concurrent with Bg-hsp 70 transcription (Arican-Goktas et al., 2014; Knight et al., 2011). This have shown that in the Bg-hsp 70, locus of the B. glabrata snail model system, that a negative correlation exists between Bg-hsp 70 hypomethylation and up-regulation of the Bg-hsp 70 transcript level under stressful conditions relative to biological stress.  These data provides evidence, for the first time, that modulation of epigenetic marks in the snail host DNA plays a role in the stress-related regulation of the complex interaction of the schistosome parasite in its invertebrate snail host. These results will help to pave the way towards a better understanding of the role of epigenetic regulatory mechanisms and the involvement of stress in the innate immune response to schistosomes and environmental adaptation (thermal stress) in the snail host enabling us to develop novel vector based biological strategies to block transmission of schisosomiasis.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by the NIAID-NIH contract from National Institute of Health (no. HHSN272201000005I-HHSN27200001-Task D0). The authors would like to thank Dr. Paul Brindley for his advice and feedback on this manuscript and Dr. Paul Nisson for his support.


 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have none to declare.



 REFERENCES

Akerfelt M, Morimoto RI, Sistonen L (2010). Heat shock factors: integrators of cell stress, development and lifespan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.11:545-555.
Crossref
 
Arican-Goktas HD, Ittiprasert W, Bridger JM, Knight M (2014). Differential spatial repositioning of activated genes in Biomphalaria glabrata snails infected with Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8:e3013.
Crossref
 
Bird A (2002). DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16:6-21.
Crossref
 
Blatke MA, Dittrich A, Rohr C, Heiner M, Schaper F, Marwan W (2013). JAK/STAT signalling--an executable model assembled from molecule-centred modules demonstrating a module-oriented database concept for systems and synthetic biology. Mol. Biosyst. 9:1290-1307.
Crossref
 
Bossdorf O, Richards L, Pigliucci M (2008). Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol. Lett.11:106-115.
 
Cartharius K, Frech K, Grote K, Klocke B, Haltmeier M, Klingenhoff A, Frisch M, Bayerlein M, Werner T (2005). MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 21:2933-2942.
Crossref
 
Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X, Chen Z, Merriman B, Haudenschild CD, Pradhan S, Nelson SF, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE (2008). Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 452:215-219.
Crossref
 
Colot V, Rossignol JL (1999). Eukaryotic DNA methylation as an evolutionary device. Bioessays 21:402-411.
Crossref
 
De Maio A (2014). Extracellular Hsp70: export and function. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci.15:225-231.
Crossref
 
Deleury E, Dubreuil G, Elangovan N, Wajnberg E, Reichhart JM, Gourbal B, Duval D, Baron OL, GouzyJ, Coustau C (2012). Specific versus non-specific immune responses in an invertebrate species evidenced by a comparative de novo sequencing study. PLoS One 7:e32512.
Crossref
 
Dewilde S, Winnepenninckx B, Arndt MH, Nascimento DG, Santoro MM, Knight M, Miller AN, Kerlavage AR, Geoghagen N, Van Marck E, Liu LX, Weber RE, Moens L (1998). Characterization of the myoglobin and its coding gene of the mollusc Biomphalaria glabrata J. Biol. Chem. 273:13583-13592.
Crossref
 
Elango N, Hunt BG, Goodisman MA, Yi SV (2009). DNA methylation is widespread and associated with differential gene expression in castes of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:11206-11211.
Crossref
 
Elango N, Yi SV (2008). DNA methylation and structural and functional bimodality of vertebrate promoters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1602-1608.
Crossref
 
Ellis S, Killender M, Anderson RL (2000). Heat-induced alterations in the localization of HSP72 and HSP73 as measured by indirect immunohistochemistry and immunogold electron microscopy. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 321:332.
Crossref
 
Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, Chen PY, BostickM, Goll MG, Hetzel J, Jain J, Strauss SH, Halpern ME, Ukomadu C, Sadler KC, Pradhan S, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE (2010). Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:8689-8694.
Crossref
 
Fneich S, Dheilly N, Adema C, Rognon A, Reichelt M, Bulla J, Grunau C, Cosseau C (2013). 5-methyl-cytosine and 5-hydroxy-methyl-cytosine in the genome of Biomphalaria glabrata, a snail intermediate host of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasit. Vectors 6:167.
Crossref
 
Gavery MR, Roberts SB (2010). DNA methylation patterns provide insight into epigenetic regulation in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas). BMC Genomics 11:483.
Crossref
 
Gibney ER, Nolan CM (2010). Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity (Edinb) 105:4-13.
Crossref
 
Gomez-Diaz E, Jorda M, Peinado MA, Rivero A (2012). Epigenetics of host-pathogen interactions: the road ahead and the road behind. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1003007.
Crossref
 
Grunau C, Schattevoy R, Mache N, Rosenthal A (2000). MethTools--a toolbox to visualize and analyze DNA methylation data. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 28:1053-1058.
Crossref
 
Gu X, Nylander E, Coates PJ, Fahraeus R, Nylander K (2015). Correlation between Reversal of DNA Methylation and Clinical Symptoms in Psoriatic Epidermis Following Narrow-Band UVB Phototherapy. J. Invest. Dermatol.135:2077-2083.
Crossref
 
Harrison A, Parle-McDermott A (2011). DNA methylation: a timeline of methods and applications. Front Genet. 2:74.
Crossref
 
Henderson B, Pockley AG (2010). Molecular chaperones and protein-folding catalysts as intercellular signaling regulators in immunity and inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 88:445-462.
Crossref
 
Ho KM (2012). Scatter plot and correlation coefficient. Anaesth. Intensive Care 40:730-1.
 
Holmes EE, Jung M, Meller S, Leisse A, Sailer V, Zech J, Mengdehl M, Garbe LA, Uhl B, Kristiansen G, Dietrich D (2014). Performance evaluation of kits for bisulfite-conversion of DNA from tissues, cell lines, FFPE tissues, aspirates, lavages, effusions, plasma, serum, and urine. PLoS One 9:e93933.
Crossref
 
Ittiprasert W, Knight M (2012). Reversing the resistance phenotype of the Biomphalaria glabrata snail host Schistosoma mansoni infection by temperature modulation. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002677.
Crossref
 
Ittiprasert W, Nene R, Miller A, Raghavan N, Lewis F, Hodgson J, Knight M (2009). Schistosoma mansoni infection of juvenile Biomphalaria glabrata induces a differential stress response between resistant and susceptible snails. Exp. Parasitol.123:203-211.
Crossref
 
Jaenisch R, Bird A (2003). Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat. Genet. 33:245-254.
Crossref
 
Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU (2013). Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82:323-355.
Crossref
 
Knight M, Elhelu O, Smith M, Miller A, Raghavan N, Wellman C, Cousin C, Dixon F, Mann V, Rinaldi G, Ittiprasert W, Brindley PJ (2015). Susceptibility of snails to infection with schistosomes in influenced by temperature and expression of heat shock proteins. Epidemiology 5:1000189.
 
Knight M, Ittiprasert W, Odoemelam EC, Adema CM, Miller A, Raghavan N, Bridger JM (2011). Non-random organization of the Biomphalaria glabratagenome in interphase Bge cells and the spatial repositioning of activated genes in cells co-cultured with Schistosoma mansoni. Int. J. Parasitol. 41:61-70.
Crossref
 
Knight M, Raghavan N, Goodall C, Cousin C, Ittiprasert W, Sayed A, Miller A, Williams DL, Bayne CJ (2009). Biomphalaria glabrata peroxiredoxin: effect of Schistosoma mansoni infection on differential gene regulation. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 167:20-31.
Crossref
 
Laird PW (2010). Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:191-203.
Crossref
 
Li LC, Dahiya R (2002). MethPrimer: designing primers for methylation PCRs. Bioinformatics 18:1427-1431.
Crossref
 
Lister R, O'Malley RC, Tonti-Filippini J, Gregory BD, Berry CC, Millar AH, Ecker JR (2008). Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133:523-536.
Crossref
 
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta CT) Method. Methods 25:402-408.
Crossref
 
Lu Y, Rong T, Cao M (2008). Analysis of DNA methylation in different maize tissues. J. Genet. Genomics 35:41-48.
Crossref
 
Madrigal-Matute J, Lopez-Franco O, Blanco-Colio LM, Munoz-Garcia B, Ramos-Mozo P, Ortega L, Egido J, Martin-Ventura JL (2010). Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors attenuate inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 86:330-337.
Crossref
 
Mandrioli M (2004). Epigenetic tinkering and evolution: is there any continuity in the role of cytosine methylation from invertebrates to vertebrates? Cell Mol. Life Sci. 61:2425-2427.
Crossref
 
Mandrioli M (2007). A new synthesis in epigenetics: towards a unified function of DNA methylation from invertebrates to vertebrates. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 64:2522-2524.
Crossref
 
Mayer MP (2013). Hsp70 chaperone dynamics and molecular mechanism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 38:507-514.
Crossref
 
Michels KB, Binder AM, Dedeurwaerder S, EpsteinCB, Greally JM, Gut I, Houseman EA, Izzi B, Kelsey KT, Meissner A, Milosavljevic A, Siegmund KD, Bock C, Irizarry RA (2013). Recommendations for the design and analysis of epigenome-wide association studies. Nat. Methods10:949-955.
Crossref
 
Multhoff G, Botzler C, Jennen L, Schmidt J, Ellwart J, Issels R (1997). Heat shock protein 72 on tumor cells: a recognition structure for natural killer cells. J. Immunol. 158:4341-4350.
 
Multhoff G, Mizzen L, Winchester CC, Milner CM, Wenk S, Eissner G, Kampinga HH, Laumbacher B, Johnson J (1999). Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) stimulates proliferation and cytolytic activity of natural killer cells. Exp. Hematol. 27:1627-1636.
Crossref
 
Nakai A, Morimoto RI (1993). Characterization of a novel chicken heat shock transcription factor, heat shock factor 3, suggests a new regulatory pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 13:1983-1997.
Crossref
 
Nakai A, Tanabe M, Kawazoe Y, Inazawa J, Morimoto RI, Nagata K (1997). HSF4, a new member of the human heat shock factor family which lacks properties of a transcriptional activator. Mol. Cell Biol.17:469-481.
Crossref
 
Naydenov M, Baev V, Apostolova E, GospodinovaN, Sablok G, Gozmanova M, Yahubyan G (2015). High-temperature effect on genes engaged in DNA methylation and affected by DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 87:102-108.
Crossref
 
Nylandsted J, Gyrd-Hansen M, Danielewicz A, Fehrenbacher N, Lademann U, Hoyer-Hansen M, Weber E, Multhoff G, Rohde M, Jaattela M (2004). Heat shock protein 70 promotes cell survival by inhibiting lysosomal membrane permeabilization. J. Exp. Med. 200:425-435.
Crossref
 
Pinney SE (2014). Mammalian Non-CpG Methylation: Stem Cells and Beyond. Biology (Basel) 3:739-751.
Crossref
 
Raghavan N, Tettelin H, Miller A, Hostetler J, Tallon L, Knight M (2007). Nimbus (BgI): an active non-LTR retrotransposon of the Schistosoma mansoni snail host Biomphalaria glabrata. Int. J. Parasitol. 37:1307-1318.
Crossref
 
Rao JS, Keleshian VL, Klein S, Rapoport SI (2012). Epigenetic modifications in frontal cortex from Alzheimer's disease and bipolar disorder patients. Transl. Psychiatry 2:e132.
Crossref
 
Reese MG (2001). Application of a time-delay neural network to promoter annotation in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Comput. Chem. 26:51-56.
Crossref
 
Regev A, Lamb MJ, Jablonka E (1998). The role of DNA methylation in invertebrates: Development regulation or genome defense? Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:880-891.
Crossref
 
Richards EJ (2006). Inherited epigenetic variation-revisiting soft inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:395-401.
Crossref
 
Sanders YY, Hagood JS, Liu H, Zhang W, Ambalavanan N, Thannickal VJ (2014). Histone deacetylase inhibition promotes fibroblast apoptosis and ameliorates pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Eur. Respir. J. 43:1448-1458.
Crossref
 
Seidberg NA, Clark RS, Zhang X, Lai Y, Chen M, Graham SH, Kochanek PM, Watkins SC, Marion DW (2003). Alterations in inducible 72-kDa heat shock protein and the chaperone cofactor BAG-1 in human brain after head injury. J. Neurochem. 84:514-521.
Crossref
 
Sistonen L, Sarge KD, Phillips B, Abravaya K, Morimoto RI (1992). Activation of heat shock factor 2 during hemin-induced differentiation of human erythroleukemia cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:4104-4111.
Crossref
 
Stephanou A, Latchman DS (2011). Transcriptional modulation of heat-shock protein gene expression. Biochem. Res. Int. 238601.
Crossref
 
Su Z, Han L, Zhao Z (2011). Conservation and divergence of DNA methylation in eukaryotes: new insights from single base-resolution DNA methylomes. Epigenetics 6:134-140.
Crossref
 
Suzuki MM, Kerr AR, De Sousa D, Bird A. (2007). CpG methylation is targeted to transcription units in an invertebrate genome. Genome Res. 17:625-631.
Crossref
 
Tran RK, Henikoff JG, Zilberman D, Ditt F, Jacobsen SE, Henikoff S (2005). DNA methylation profiling identifies CG methylation clusters in Arabidopsis genes. Curr. Biol. 15:154-159.
Crossref
 
Turanli ET, Kirectepe A, Kasapçopur Ö (2013). PW01-014–MEFV methylation analysis in FMF and JRA diseases. Pediatr. Rheumatol. Online J. 11:A67.
Crossref
 
van Dijk M, Visser A, Posthuma J, Poutsma A, Oudejans CB (2012). Naturally occurring variation in trophoblast invasion as a source of novel (epigenetic) biomarkers. Front Genet. 3:22.
Crossref
 
Vega VL, Rodriguez-Silva M, Frey T, Gehrmann M, Diaz JC, Steinem C, Multhoff G, Arispe N, De Maio A. (2008). Hsp70 translocates into the plasma membrane after stress and is released into the extracellular environment in a membrane-associated form that activates macrophages. J. Immunol. 180:4299-4307.
Crossref
 
Xu J, Pope SD, Jazirehi AR, Attema JL, Papathanasiou P, Watts JA, Zaret KS, Weissman IL, Smale ST (2007). Pioneer factor interactions and unmethylated CpG dinucleotides mark silent tissue-specific enhancers in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:12377-12382.
Crossref
 
Yi SV, Goodisman MA (2009). Computational approaches for understanding the evolution of DNA methylation in animals. Epigenetics 4:551-556.
Crossref
 
Younis AE, Geisinger F, Ajonina-Ekoti I, Soblik H, Steen H, Mitreva M, Erttmann KD, Perbandt M, Liebau E, Brattig NW (2011). Stage-specific excretory-secretory small heat shock proteins from the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti--putative links to host's intestinal mucosal defense system. FEBS J. 278:3319-3336.
Crossref
 
Zemach A, McDaniel IE, Silva P, Zilberman D (2010). Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science 328:916-919.
Crossref
 
Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S (2007). Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription. Nat. Genet. 39:61-69.
Crossref
 

 




          */?>