Full Length Research Paper
Masudul Alam Choudhury
Department of Economics and Finance, College of Commerce and Economics, Sultan Qaboos University Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.
Knowledge and time, truth versus falsehood, unity versus dualism, these and the like are the subjects for philosophical discourse in the light of the two contrasting worldviews of unity of knowledge versus rationalism. The emerging formalism also leads to practical considerations in the circular causation model of unity of knowledge. The Qur’an is invoked in this formalism to build the arguments underlying the analysis that follows in comparative perspective. This cultural diversity of intellectual discourse unravels the realism of the arguments taken up here in respect of what delineates the primordial reality - knowledge or time? In the Qur'anic sense, knowledge and time are circularly interrelated within the episteme of unity of divine knowledge. But the functional ontology, which establishes the phenomenology of unity of knowledge, is an exercise in logical formalism. This is taken up here. The arguments proceed through a labyrinth of mathematical philosophical discourse combined with facts from the philosophy of economics. A quantification of the idea in respect of the viability of the model of circular causation between complementary (unifying) entities is tested out. The results establish the practical possibility of the phenomenological model of unity of knowledge, explained in terms of its internal dynamics in the context of the circular causation and the complementary nature of interrelationship between knowledge and time in the philosophical part of the paper. The concept of knowledge, time and spatial entities, jointly comprising the topological mapping of and between multi-systemic events, is developed technically in the paper. It is extended to a technical appendix as well.
Key words: Epistemology, methodology, formal systems, philosophy of science, Qur’an.
|Al-Ghazzali I, Abdul H (1997). the Incoherence of the Philosophers, Choudhury 015 Provo, Utah: (trans. Marmura, M.E.), Brigham Young University Press.|
|Barrow JD (1991). Theories of Everything, the Quest for Ultimate Explanation, Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press.|
|Buchanan JM (1971). The Bases for Collective Action, New York, NY: General Learning Press.|
|Cantor G (1955). Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers, ed. P. Jourdain, New York, Dover.|
|Choudhury MA (1993). "The dynamic and evolutionary nature of the polity-ecology interactions", in his The Unicity Precept and the Socio-Scientific Order, Lanham, Maryland, University Press of America, Inc. pp. 32-35.|
|Choudhury MA (2000). "Contrasting models of knowledge and 'de-know-ledge' "in his ''The Islamic Worldview, Socio-Scientific Perspectives'', London, Eng: Kegan Paul International, pp. 259-86.|
Choudhury MA (2003). "Learning sys-tems", Kybernetes, the Int. J. Syst. Cybernetics, 33(1): 26-47.
|Choudhury MA (2006). "The relationship between temporal and supreme felicity", Chapter 8 of his The Nature of Monotheism in Choudhury MA (2002). "The Hereafter as a topological super-manifold of divine knowledge: Tawhidi timal topology and supermanifold", in his Explaining the Qur'an – a Socio-Scientific Inquiry, Book II, Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, pp. 675-723.|
|Koranic Thought, being vol. 2 of 5 of his generic volumes, Science and Epistemology in the Qur'an, Lewiston, New York, The Edwin Mellen Press.|
Choudhury MA, Korvin G (2002). "Simulation versus optimization in knowledge-induced fields", Kybernetes: International J. Syst. Cynernetics 31(1): 44-60.
|Darwin C (1936). Descent of Man (also known as The Origin of Species), New York, NY: Modern Library.|
|Dawkins R (1976). The Selfish Gene, Oxford, Eng: Oxford University Press.|
Dewitt B (1992). Supermanifolds, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|Dreyfus HL, Rabinow P (trans) (1983). M. Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Gulick D (1992). "Bifurcations", in his Encounters with Chaos, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp. 52-60.|
|Hammond PJ (1989). "On reconciling Arrow's theory of social choice with Harsanyi's Fundamental Utilitarianism", in G.R. Feiwel Ed. Arrow and the Foundation of the Theory of Economic Policy, London, Eng: Macmillan. pp. 179-221.|
Hawking SW (1988). A Brief History of Time, From the Big Bang to Black Holes, New York: Bantam Books, Inc.
|Heidegger M (trans), Hofstadter A (1988). "The thesis of modern ontology: The basic ways of being are the being of nature (res extensa) and the being of mind (res cogitans)", Chapter Three of The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Indiana, Indianapolis, USE, The University of Indiana Press.|
|Hilbert D(trans), Bauer-Mangelburg S (1967). "On the infinite", in Jean van Heijenoort Ed. From Frege to Godel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.|
|Husserl QL (trans) (1965). Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, New York: Harper and Row Publishers. p. 155|
|Maddox IJ (1970). Elements of Functional Analysis, Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press.|
|Nikaido H (1989). "Fixed point theorems", in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman Eds. The New Palgrave: General Equilibrium, New York, NY: W.W. Norton. pp. 139-144.|
|Palan R (2000). "The constructive underpinnings of the new international political economy", in R. Palan ed. Global Political Economy, London, Eng: Routledge, Chapter 14.|
Popper K (1988). "Natural selection and the emergence of mind", in G. Radnitzky and W.W. Bartley, III Eds. Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court. pp. 139-154.
|Prigogine I. (1955). Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Springfield: CC. Thomas.|
|Resnick SA, Wolff RD (1987). Knowledge and Class, A Marxian Critique of Political Economy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.|
|Rucker R (1983). "The transfinite cardinals", in his Infinity and the Mind, New York, NY, Bantam Books, pp. 239-286.|
|Shackle GLS (1972). Epistemics and Economics, Cambridge, Eng: Cambridge University Press.|
|Soros G (2000). "Conceptual framework" Part I (Chapters 1-6) of his Open Society, Reforming Global Capitalism, London, England, Little, Brown & Co. the Archeology of the Human Sciences, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 16-43.|
|United Nations Development Program (UNDP) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 issues. Human Development Report, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.|
|Wallerstein I (1998). "Spacetime as the basis of knowledge", in O.F. Borda Ed. People's Participation, Challenges Ahead, New York: The APEX Press. pp. 43-62.|
|Whitehead AN (1978). Editors. Griffin, DR and Sherburne, DW) Process and Reality, New York, NY: The Free Press.|
|APA||(2009). Which of the two? - Knowledge or time. Philosophical Papers and Review, 1(1), 6-16.|
|Chicago||Masudul Alam Choudhury. "Which of the two? - Knowledge or time." Philosophical Papers and Review 1, no. 1 (2009): 6-16.|
|MLA||Masudul Alam Choudhury. "Which of the two? - Knowledge or time." Philosophical Papers and Review 1.1 (2009): 6-16.|