African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6863

Full Length Research Paper

Study of an electromechanical system for solid fertilizer variable rate planting

Joao Roberto Sartori Moreno
  • Joao Roberto Sartori Moreno
  • Mechanical Department, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Cornelio Procópio, PR, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Conrado Di Raimo
  • Conrado Di Raimo
  • Mechanical Department, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Cornelio Procópio, PR, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Romeu Rony da Costa Cavalcanti
  • Romeu Rony da Costa Cavalcanti
  • Mechanical Department, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Cornelio Procópio, PR, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Marcio Aurelio Montezuma
  • Marcio Aurelio Montezuma
  • Mechanical Department, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Cornelio Procópio, PR, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Edson Antonio Capello de Souza
  • Edson Antonio Capello de Souza
  • Bauru School of Engineering (UNESP), Mechanical Department – Bauru- SP- Brazil.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 17 November 2014
  •  Accepted: 29 October 2015
  •  Published: 21 January 2016

Abstract

The work aimed to study the behavior of a prototype planted simultaneously three times with solid fertilizers, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, of variable rates and desired quantities. For the evaluation of the prototype, a test bench was built where helical doses and their respective direct current electric motors; three tanks for storage of fertilizers were used. Also used were: A source (12 V-DC), three power drivers (MOSFET), acquisition board and control software. The tests were performed with LabVIEW®8.6 to control the rotation of the axes, record data in maps of soil fertility and geographical location. The results showed that application values showed an error of 3:56% at the rate of 45 kg/ha and an error of 1.78% at the rate of 85 kg/ha. However, the slightest mistake was on rotation of 26 to 30 rpm because the ratio flow rates had error <1%. Therefore, the dosing speed became maximum of 35 rpm; making the variation of the theoretical flow rate from 2.6 to 93.7 kg/ha. But with low flow rate, the error was 8.3% to 4 rpm on products of  9.79 kg/ha.

 

Key words: Data acquisition board, flow rate, helical feeders, varying rates, power drivers.