African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6712

Full Length Research Paper

Fertilizer management and nutrient use efficiency on rice paddy in integrated system

Abraham, O. V.
  • Abraham, O. V.
  • Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Nigeria Maritime University, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Akinwole, A. O.
  • Akinwole, A. O.
  • Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries Management, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar
Davies, O. A.
  • Davies, O. A.
  • Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Environment, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 31 May 2019
  •  Accepted: 25 November 2019
  •  Published: 29 February 2020

 ABSTRACT

Nitrogen budget under integrated production system in fish farming is one of the acceptable practices in maintaining ecological balance and circulation. This result reveals the patterns of pond water and nutrient flows which were strongly influenced by the main fish farming activities resulting to large amount of nitrogen inputs. The main nutrient input sources of nitrogen into the system were found to be pig manure, feed and maggot while outputs were in water, soil, harvested fish and rice; and also in unaccounted forms as a result to discharge. Nutrient composition of rice paddy in integrated production system records 17% N, 19% P and 64% K. The NPK value recorded in integration production system throughout the period of the experiment showed significant difference (p>0.05). There was a positive correlation between nitrogen in rice and rice growth r=0.8373 and 0.7709. The Increase in nutrient is correlated with the increase in the rating of rice growth. The increase in nutrient of unaccounted forms which accumulate in the sediments absorbed by the plant from the soil plays an important role in balance of an aquaculture system. Thus, in order to ensure sustainable productivity there is need to enhance the management of all the nutrient input channels while minimizing the nutrient output through crop intensification.

Key words: Nutrient budget, nutrient input, nutrient output, pond effluent, soil, amendment.

 


 INTRODUCTION

The aquaculture industry faces growing pressure to operate under strict environmental safety standards. These standards lead to the development of integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems, designed to maintain a high biological carrying capacity (Twarowska et al., 1997; Thoman et al., 2001). Water exchange and cost in these systems are minimized through the use of biological, chemical and nutrient efficiency in the pond system.  Fish farming has been an important development in recent decades in response to the growing global market demand (Costa-Pierce, 2002). Meeting the demand for fish farming in production systems has developed ranging from extensive to semi-intensive with increasing use of artificial food and high water quality (Crab et al.., 2007). Previous reports on nutrient budget reveal that 90% of nitrogen  and  phosphorous inputs is  in the form of  feed, whereby the major portion is lost and less being assimilated as biomass. The nitrogen waste such as ammonia and nitrite when produced during culture exceeding its recommended capacity in open waters leads to deterioration of water quality. Nevertheless, crop wastes accumulate in water, as in the case of uneaten food and metabolic wastes that increase as time goes on with the intensification of the cropping system (Lin, 1995). Previous studies show that nutrient balance in an open system for tilapia culture with only 21.4 and 18.8% nitrogen and phosphorus incorporated in the feed are retrieved at the time of harvest; the rest are losses that are downloaded as metabolic contaminants through effluent (Siddiqui and Al-Harbi, 1999). The residual nitrogen produced in the culture system (eg ammonia and nitrites) generally exceeds the assimilative capacity of the system, which impairs water quality creating a toxic environment for tilapia (Avnimelech, 1999; Hargreaves and Kucuk, 2001). The outcome of an integrated agriculture-aquaculture system is based on the balance between production and waste assimilation capacity in the pond environment which results into sustainable scale and gives account for the impact of its waste and growth of culture of aquatic organisms (Martins et al., 2010). The basic steps to establish a balance of nutrient in an integrated system is to evaluate the efficiency of fertilizer use, uneaten feed, crop waste accumulation in water, metabolic waste, water quality in biological and physio-chemical processes (Avnimelech and Kochba, 2009).

Problem associated with integrated system is the nutrient discharges effluent from fish farms which causes rapid eutrophication in ponds and receiving water bodies, along with organic matter accumulated during the growing season, and its impact has been a major environmental concern (Phillips et al.., 1993; Piedrahita, 2003). The approach used to mitigate the impact to the environment through the discharge and disease spread by contaminated water is using water recycling in integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems (Timmons et al., 2002; Piedrahita, 2003) thereby manipulating the environment to improve nutrient efficiency of the farm as a whole (Prein, 2002; Lightfoot et al., 1993). This is perceived as a type of integrated resources management which encourages the increase in production through understanding of chemical and biological processes of the ponds (Boyd, 1986). The pond sub-system should be integrated as much as possible with activities to maximize production while minimizing nutrient discharges.

 

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was carried out at the University of Ibadan in the Department of Aquaculture and Fisheries Management, fish farm. The research facilities involved an earthen pond with rice paddy, maggot house and pig sty.

Pond sedimentation was sampled at a depth of 20 cm  in  two (2) sampling locations A and B in rice paddy. Soil samples were collected initially, weekly monitored and at harvest. The composite sediments samples were air-dried at room temperature; sample was dried at 105°C to a constant weight for the determination of bulk density (Boyd, 1998), then sampled for further chemical analysis: Organic matter (Walkley-Black), total nitrogen (Kjeldahl), available phosphorus (Bray-2) and exchangeable potassium (BaCl2 0.1 N solution). The data were aggregated to estimate soil nutrients stocks of the Integrated farming systems.

Other parameters of samples were analyzed and recorded to determine nutrient contents in fish feed, maggot, water (ground water, rain water) and pig manure. Representative samples of each material used as a nutrient input to the pond were analyzed.

Pond nutrient budget

The nutrient inputs were separated into on-farm and off-farm sources. The on-farm sources are: pig manure and maggots. The off-farm sources included: fish stocked, commercial fish feed, and nutrients introduced through water recharge before stocking and rainfall into the pond. The nutrient outputs were separated into harvests and losses. The harvests included: fishes, rice yield, rice plant and aquatic plant. The losses included: outflow water (leakage, evaporation), pond effluent, and accumulation in pond sediments.

Nitrogen budget

Input = Output ± Unaccounted

Where Input is: fish feed, maggot, and pig manure and water exchange; Outputs are: soil, pond effluent, and fish; unaccounted: are assumed as taken by rice. The general balance equation was calculated according to the methods of Nhan et al. (2007) and Teichert-Coddington et al. (2000).

WE in + Fert in + Fe in = PE out + S out + F out ± UN

Calculated as described above; WE- –water exchange; Fert - fertilizer (Pig manure); Fe- fish feed; PE- pond effluent; S- soil sediment; F- fish; UN- unaccounted nutrient (rice yield, rice plant).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics was used to present growth performances. Correlation and regression was used to analyse the nutrient budget data. Correlation and regression were used to investigate relationships of fish, rice growth data and water quality data.

 


 RESULTS

Soil characteristics

The nature of soil component was measured before and during the paddy growing period. The composited soil samples in the rice fish field after 16 weeks of culture period showed reduction in the amount of silt and increase in clay content in line with Kajiru et al. (2015) and Frei et al. (2007). In this study, the textual classes of the  soil  ranged  from  sandy  clay  loam  to  loamy sand.

Nutrient inputs

Laboratory analysis for nutrients in pig manure indicated that the manure samples contained 0.124% nitrogen, 1.848% phosphorus, 0.685% potassium, 8.040% calcium and 1.610% magnesium. Fish feed nutrient indicated 45% protein, 14% fat, 7 - 8% ash, 2.6 - 2.7% fibre, 1% phosphorus while maggot (supplementary feed) indicated 4.75% protein, 2.5% fat, 0.755% ash and 0.477% fibre.

Nutrient amendment

Mean nitrogen concentration was recorded as 9.89±5.80 mg/kg. The nitrogen concentration in rice paddy before transplant was 12.1 mg/kg followed by a decline in the study period and remained low at 7.5 mg/kg (Figure 1) till six weeks of the rearing as shown in Table 2. Nitrogen concentration increase (22.5 mg/kg) trend in the later part of the study which showed highest concentration level in week nine. Available phosphorus concentration in paddy fluctuated as shown in Table 2 without any definite trend and concentration in rice paddy before transplant was 12.1 mg/kg which showed an increase during the rearing period. The mean phosphorus concentration was recorded as 11.46±5.88 mg/kg. The highest concentration (18.5 mg/kg) was recorded in week six, eight and nine and dropped remarkably at week sixteen (2.3 mg/kg). Potassium concentration in rice paddy before transplant was 31 mg/kg which showed an increase during the rearing period. Mean nitrogen concentration was recorded as 38±21.9 mg/kg. Potassium concentration showed alternate decline and surge throughout the study period. An exponential increase in potassium concentration (80 mg/kg) was observed in paddy from week eight followed by a sharp decline of 17 mg/kg at the end of rearing cycle. Organic carbon concentration was recorded as 134.35±41.57 mg/kg. Over the study period, organic carbon concentration in rice paddy before transplant was 103.05 mg/kg followed by an increase during the rearing cycle. A sharp increase (181.5 mg/kg) was recorded from week nine of the experiment followed by a decline toward the end of the rearing cycle. Organic carbon contents translate to organic matter contents in the soils. The organic matter present in rice paddy was 10.31 mg/kg before transplant and at harvest was 12.69 mg/kg; which showed a steady increase and decline towards the rearing cycle. The rice paddy pH values ranged from 6.4 (slightly moderate acidic) to 7.75 (neutral soil reaction) with a mean pH of 6.77±0.47. The optimum soil pH for rice production ranges from 5.5 to 8.92, from neutral soil to alkaline (Landon, 1991) which can be produced in non-irrigated condition and under flooded  condition system. pH values remained within the recommended range all through the rearing cycle. The pH value before planting was 6.45 and at the last planting season, pH was recorded as 6.74. The pH value obtained in this study showed significant difference (p>0.05) and it was seen that there was a positive relationship.

 

 


 DISCUSSION

The soil characteristics presented in Table 1 reveal an increase in clay content. It has being recorded that clay content is suitable for rice production because of their capacities to retain plant nutrient and soil water (moisture). These high clay content restrict the percolation of water through soil, hence encouraging ponding of bundled fields (Kajiru et al., 2015) as well as extends and improves the water use efficiency of the harvested rainwater  by  the  rice  plant.  This  can be due to nutrient accumulation from ammonia present in water. The nitrogen value recorded in integration production system throughout the period of the experiment showed significant difference (p>0.05) and it was seen that there was a strong positive relationship.

 

 

On the whole, the mean soil nutrients recorded as shown in Table 2 during the study were within the range reported by Nwilene et al. (2008) for optimum growth and rice production. Phosphorus obtained in this study showed no significant difference (p<0.05) and it was seen that there was a positive relationship. Since rice plant is a low demanding crop, the observed plant available phosphorus value would satisfy the phosphate demand by the rice. In addition, the availability of phosphorus in rice paddy is a function of soil pH (Inusa et al., 2013; Kajiru et al., 2015). Hence, the availability of the soil phosphorus may be negatively affected by the high pH values of the soils. The potassium recorded in  integrated production system through the period of experimental study showed significant difference (p>0.05). On the whole, the mean soil nutrients recorded in this study were within the range reported by Nwilene et al. (2008) for optimum growth and rice production. Under tropical and subtropical conditions, requirement for N, P2O2 and K2O are reported to be 80, 30 and 30 kg/ha respectively. This variation in organic matter in soil influence physical, chemical and biological properties of soil such as soil texture, water retention, nutrient content and retention and microbial activities in soil (Frei et al., 2007). Application of livestock manure increases soil organic matter content, leading to improved water infiltration and water holding capacity, as well as an increased cation exchange capacity. Rasowo et al. (2008) reported that manure and urine raise the pH level and accelerate the decomposition of organic matter and activity. It is reported  that  cultivation  of rice is even possible with the pH up to 9.0 but high pH values of the soil could negatively influence the availability of the micronutrient as well as phosphorus (Kajiru et al., 2015).

 

 

Nitrogen budget in integrated production system over the study period revealed that fish feed as the major input of nitrogen is shown in Table 3. Nitrogen in form of feed ranged from 58.80 to 63.78% and maggot input through feed ranged from 33.57 to 39.70% of the total inputs; the result is in agreement with Nhan et al. (2007) and Prein (2002). It has being reported previously that the predominant inputs of nitrogen in water exchange unit are feed, which accounted for 82-95% nitrogen of total inputs. Feeds nitrogen gain by ponds occurred primarily from feed 36% and fertilizer at 1.1% in the present study; also, contribution of feed to the total nutrient inputs is in the same range as reported. In addition, nitrogen through feed was significantly higher throughout the study period. Nutrient budget showed that some portions of the nutrient were deposited in soil followed by nutrient contained in water  at   harvest,   and   relatively   large fractions  were unaccounted as observed in Table 3. Percentage nitrogen accumulates into the soil and water (effluent) ranged from 0.61 to 0.96% and 0.01 to 3.97%. In addition, nutrient budget revealed that during the rearing cycle, large percent of the nitrogen went unaccounted for. Unaccounted nitrogen ranged from 95.75 to 99.05% of the total inputs. Moreover, further accounting of the nutrient budget revealed that rearing 1 kg fish resulted into 72 g N loss throughout the study period. Nutrient budget showed in Table 3 that the total of inputs were incorporated into harvested fish and rice yield; the remainder in the system as uneaten feed, excreted material went to support high level of phytoplankton, heterotrophic activity and rice growth.

 

 

These unaccounted forms were deposited in fish and rice growth in line with Rukera et al. (2011) and Inusah et al. (2013) as shown in Table 4. It was reported that the major output of nutrient in water exchange ponds were in discharge water. This experiment showed in Table 3 that in an  integrated  production system losses of nutrient are through sediment and is higher than water borne loss. Integrated production system unit excess of nutrient input, which especially originated from eaten feed, keep accumulating in the system and in turn may support growth of natural food organism, ultimately fish growth and increase in the yield of rice. Furthermore, in this experiment it was observed that the increased unaccounted nutrient was absorbed by the plant from the soil. Rukera et al. (2011) mentioned that the sediment which accumulates the nutrient plays an important role in balance of an aquaculture system; it can act as a buffer in water nutrient concentration and helps in minimizing loss from the system. However, from the nutrient budget data, it is apparent that larger percentage of the nutrient inputs went unaccounted in the integrated production unit. The nitrogen content of the nutrient budget at the end of the experiment provides insight into the physical characteristics of potential effluent waste and magnitude of denitrification.

 

 

Boyd and Tucker (1998) mentioned that the most probable loss of nitrogen is by ammonia gas volatilization which is further enhanced by vigorous aeration and high pH and nitrogen fixation by blue-green algae. In this study, some of the potential sources of nitrogen were not accounted for such as inorganic nitrogen inputs through precipitation which was considered insignificant and nitrogen fixation by blue-green algae. In accounting for the nutrient budget, it revealed that  rearing 1 kg  fish  resulted  into 70 g  (58%)  of  nitrogen  used  up  in  integrated  production  system.

The correlation coefficient was computed to assess the relationship between rice growth, fish growth and ammonia. There was a positive correlation between nitrogen in rice and rice growth r=0.8373 and 0.7709 as shown in Figure 1, leading to a strong positive correlation between the two variables. Increase in nutrient correlated with increase in the rating of rice growth. Meanwhile, a negative correlation between nitrogen in fish and fish growth r=-0.8367 leads to a strong negative correlation between the two variables.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 CONCLUSION

Thus, it is worth pointing out that the use of nutrient rich water such as nitrogen, phosphorus and total dissolved solids to irrigate alleviates a potential problem of pollution. Therefore, maintaining soil structure and fertility through its use, as well as the risk of soil degradation had been reduced. The study provides management practice in integrated production system for nutrient budget; this system unit nutrient input originated from eaten feed which accumulates and supports growth of natural food organism. The increase in unaccounted nutrient which accumulates in the sediments was absorbed by the plant from the soil, plays an important role in balance of an aquaculture system, acts as a buffer in water nutrient concentration  and  helps  in  minimizing   loss   from   the system. Thus, in order to ensure sustainable productivity there is need to enhance the management of all the nutrient input channels while minimizing the nutrient output through crop intensification. Farmers need to better regulate water and nutrient flows between the pond and the other IAA-farm components to maximize the productivity and profitability while minimizing nutrient discharges of the whole farm.

 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The author has not declared any conflict of interests.

 



 REFERENCES

Avnimelech Y (1999). Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture system. Aaquaculture 176:227-235
Crossref

 

Avnimelech Y, Kochba M (2009). Evaluation of Nitrogen Uptake and Excretion by Tilapia in Bio Floc Tanks, using 15N Tracing. Aquaculture 287:163-168.
Crossref

 

Boyd CE, Tucker CS (1998). Pond Aquaculture Water Quality Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts P 700.
Crossref

 

Boyd CE (1986). Chemical Budgets for Channel Catfish Ponds. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 114:291-298.
Crossref

 

Costa-Pierce BA (2002). Farming Research and Extension Methods for the Development of Sustainable Aquaculture Eco-system. Ecological Aquaculture CRC Press Boca Raton, Fl. pp. 103-123.
Crossref

 

Crab R, Avnimelech Y, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W (2007). Nitrogen Removal Techniques in Aquaculture for A Sustainable Production (Review article). Aquaculture 270:1-14.
Crossref

 

Frei M, Razzak MA, Hossain MM, Ochme M, Dewan S, Becker K (2007). Performance of Common Carp Cyprinus carpio L. and Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) in Integrated Rice-fish Culture in Bangladesh. Aquaculture 262:250-259.
Crossref

 

Hargreaves JA, Kucuk S (2001). Effects of Diel Un-Ionized Ammonia Fluctuation on Juvenile Hybrid Striped Bass, Channel Catfish, and Blue Tilapia. Aquaculture 195:163-181.
Crossref

 

Inusah IYB, Abudulai M, Dogbe W, Heskaya A (2013). Integrated Rice-Fish Farming as a Business: The Case Of Golinga Irrigation Scheme Small Farmers. Journal of Agricultural Extension and rural Development 8:154-163.

 

Kajiru GJ, Mrema JP, Mbilinyi BP, Rwehumbiza FB, Hatibu N, Mowo JG, Mahoo HF (2015). Assessment of Soil Fertility Status under Rainwater Harvesting Systems in the Ndala River Catchment Northwest Tanzania. International Water Management Institute 3 p.

 

Martins CIM, Eding EH, Verdegem MCJ, Heinsbroek LTN, Schneider O, Blancheton JP, Roque E d'Orbcastel, Verreth JAJ (2010). New Developments jn Recirculating Aquaculture Systems in Europe: A Perspective on Environmental Sustainability (Review). Aquacultural Engineering 43:83-93.
Crossref

 

Nhan DK, Phong LT, Verdegem MJC, Duong LT, Bosma RH, Little DC (2007). Integrated Freshwater Aquaculture, Crop and Livestock Production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam: Determinants and the Role of the Pond. Agricultural Systems 94:445-458.
Crossref

 

Nwilene FE, Oikeh SO, Agunbiade TA, Oladimeji O, Ajayi O, Sié M, Gregorio GB, Togola A, Touré AD (2008). Growing Lowland Rice: A Production Handbook. Africa Rice Center (WARDA) pp. 14-38.

 

Landon JR (1991). Tropical Soil Manual. A Handbook of Soil Survey and Agricultural Land Evaluation in the Tropical and Subtropical. Broaker, Longman Scientific and Technial Publ., Harlon.

 

Lin CK (1995). Progression of Intensive marine shrimp culture in Thailand. In: Browdy C, Hopkins JS (Eds.), Swimming Through Troubled Water. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, LA, pp. 13-22.

 

Lightfoot C, Bimbao MB, Dalsgaard JPT, Pullin RSV (1993). Aquaculture and Sustainability through Integrated Resources Management. Outlook on Agriculture 22:143-150.
Crossref

 

Piedrahita RH (2003). Reducing the Potential Environmental Impact of Tank Aquaculture Effluents through Intensification and Recirculation. Aquaculture 226:35-44.
Crossref

 

Prein M (2002). Integration of Aquaculture into Crops-Animal Systems in Asia. Agricultural System 71:127-146.
Crossref

 

Phillips MJ, Lin CK, Beveridge MCM (1993). Shrimp Culture and the Environmental-Lessons from the World's Most Rapidly Expanding Warm Water Aquaculture Sector. In: Pullin RSV, Rosenthal H, Maclean JL (Eds.) Environment and Aquaculture in Developing Countries. ICLARM Conference Proceeding 31:171-197.

 

Rasowo J, Auma E, Ssanyu G, Ndunguru N (2008). Does African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Affect Rice in Integrated Rice-Fish Culture in Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2(10):336-341.

 

Rukera TS, Mutanga O, Micha JC (2011). Optimization of an Integrated Rabbit Fish-Rice System for Sustainable Production in Rwanda. Rwanda Journal Agricultural Sciences 24(Series E):1259-1276.

 

Siddiqui AQ, Al-Harbi AH (1999). Nutrient Budgets in Tanks with Different Stocking Densities of Hybrid Tilapia (Short communication). Aquaculture 170:245-252.
Crossref

 

Teichert-Coddington DR, Martinez D, Ram'ırez E (2000). Partial Nutrient Budgets for Semi-Intensive Shrimp Farms in Honduras. Aquaculture 190:139-154.
Crossref

 

Thoman ES, Ingall ED, Davis A, Arnold CR (2001). A Nitrogen Budget for A Closed, Recirculating Mariculture System. Aquacultural Engineering 24:195-211.
Crossref

 

Timmons MB, Ebeling JM, Wheaton FW, Summerfelt ST, Vinci BJ (2002). Sistemas de Recirculación para la Acuicultura. Fundación Chile. ISBN 956-8200-00-2. 745 p.

 

Twarowska JG, Westerman PW, Losordo TM (1997). Water Treatment and Waste Characterization Evaluation of Intensive Recirculating Fish Production System. Aquacultural Engineering 16:133-147.
Crossref

 




          */?>