Full Length Research Paper
ABSTRACT
This study was performed at lower Wabishebele sub-basin in Somali region south eastern Ethiopia to analyse the land use and cover and spatial variability of soil chemical properties of the sub-basin and develop soil map. A total of 41 soil samples were collected from 0-30 cm depth and analyzed for; pH total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), and exchangeable potassium (EK). The data was analyzed through descriptive statistics and geostatistical methods. The results showed that highest mean value of pH was recorded from bare land (8.05). The highest mean of soil N was seen on potential croplands (0.251) followed by dense shrub land (0.230), woodland (0.230), croplands (0.187), and sparse shrub land (0.159) and bare land (0.151). The highest mean of AP recorded at dense shrub land (7.279) followed by potential croplands (6.607 ppm), cropland, woodland, bare land and sparse shrub land. Soil map was developed for lower Wabishebele sub-basin. Therefore, the findings of this study can be used as baseline information to implement appropriate soil management intervention for current study area.
Key words. Land use, land cover, soil properties, lower wabishebele, sub-basin.
INTRODUCTION
Food production in the tropics and subtropics usually relies on available soil nutrient stocks/soil fertility. This soil fertility is a major production factor for most farmers in Sub-Saharan African Countries in general and Ethiopia in particular where agriculture is the backbone of the country’s economy (Sheldrick et al., 2003). However, loss in soil fertility and productivity, which occurs from time to time in Ethiopia, is one of the key factors limiting crop yield (Gebreyesus et al., 2011; Yared et al., 2021). Soil erosion, nutrient depletion, and a lack of effective and area specific soil rehabilitation and management methods all contributed to the fall in soil productivity. This could have occurred due to lack of area specific soil information and the necessary remediation. Therefore, understanding the geographical and temporal variability of soil is necessary for effective soil management (Guan et al., 2017; Yared et al., 2021).
Nowadays, understanding the variability of soil properties has received considerable attention by many scholars (Mohamed et al., 2019a; Guan et al., 2017; Rosemary et al., 2017) The knowledge in soil property of specific area will help experts and researchers to develop and implement area specific sustainable soil management schemes (Singh et al., 2010; Yared et al., 2021). Scientific information on the spatial variability and distribution of soil properties is critical for understanding ecosystem processes and designing sustainable soil–crop and environmental management decisions (Gebreyesus et al., 2011).
The lack of site-specific soil management recommendation to replenish falling soil fertility has been the major challenge to boost crop production in Ethiopia (Alemu et al., 2016). As a result determining the spatial variability of soil chemical characteristics is very crucial to developing and implementing sustainable soil management and improved cropping systems (Mersha and Meten, 2020; Yared et al., 2021). However, soil properties vary in spatially and temporarily due to the combined effect of biological, physical, and chemical processes over time (Mersha and Meten, 2020; Panday et al., 2018). This may vary within farmland or at the landscape scale and between land uses system as well (Alemu et al., 2016; Corwin and Lesch, 2003). Therefore, soil fertility management requires extremely site-specific interventions. However, site-specific soil management often requires precise and detail spatial information about soil properties of given area (Huang et al., 2006). This detail soil information can be made available through intensive soil chemicals analysis for each specific area and delineating information obtained using remote sensing tools in the form of maps. Modern remote sensing tools including Geo-statistics, GIS and GPS will allow in generating detail soil information along with their map for specific areas and land use system (Alemu et al., 2016; Mohamed et al., 2019b).
Despite the relevance of land use and cover based soil characterization, few studies have been done to investigate the spatial variability of soil properties at different land use catchment-scale. Particularly, in south eastern part of Ethiopia at lower Wabishebele sub-basin almost no study has been made on soil property and variability and no information is available on general soil status regardless of land use. The unavailability of such vital soil information has created challenges in designing appropriate and area-specific soil fertility management interventions (Yared et al., 2021). Therefore, the objective of the study was to assess and analyse the spatial variability of some selected soil chemical properties of different land uses and cover in lower Wabi-shebele sub-basin in Somali region of south-eastern Ethiopia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Description of the study area
This study was carried out in the Somali regional state of Shebelle zone comprising of four districts in south-eastern Ethiopia: Gode, Kelafo, Ber’ano and Addadle. All mentioned districts were under the lower Wabishebele sub-Basin.
Geographically the sub basin is located at 5º 40` 0``N latitude to 43 º 0` 0``E longitude with an elevation range of 285–800 m above sea level (Figure 1). The study area had coverage of 1398.7 km2.
The major crops cultivated in the study areas include cereals (Wheat and Maize) fruit crops including mango, papaya, banana and lemon and vegetable onion and tomato. The native vegetation existing in the study areas includes drought-resistant shrubs, salt-resistant shrubs, and perennial sand-loving herbaceous plants. The soil map of the study area indicates that (118096 km2) 84% is Calcaric Fluvisols followed by Orthic Solonchaks (9334.1km2) (6.6%), Calcic Cambisols (9145.3km2)6.5%, Stone Surface (3784.1 km2) 2.5% and Chromic Vertisols (274.3 km2) 0.2% (Figure 2).
Soil sampling and geo-statistical analysis
A total of 41 composite samples composed of three sub samples were collected using a soil auger from 0 to 30 cm depth during June 2020. The samples were collected from different land use and land cover namely: agricultural, dense shrub land, sparse shrub land, woodland and bare land. During soil sample collection a global positioning system (Garmin; ETREX 22x) was used to locate the sampling locations. Finally 41 soil samples were sent to Haramaya University Ethiopia, soil laboratory for soil chemical properties analysis.
Method of soil analysis
The collected soil was sieved through a 2 mm mesh screen to remove plant roots, rocks, and macro fauna the sieved soil samples were analyzed for chemical properties of soil including soil pH, total nitrogen (TN) percentage available phosphorus (AP) and exchangeable potassium (EK). Soil pH was determined using glass electrode pH meter maintaining soil to water ratio 1: 2.5 as suggested by (Barber and Chen, 1990). Total nitrogen of the soils was determined using the Kjeldahl distillation method as described in (Pauwels et al., 1992; Tellen and Yerima, 2018). Available phosphorus was determined by Olsens’s bicarbonate method (Olsen et al., 1982). The exchangeable potassium (EK) was determined by ammonium acetate method as described by (Simard, 1993).
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics such as minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CV) values of the entire data set of measured soil properties were calculated using SPSS 19 ver. Geo-statistical analysis has been performed to interpolate the values of un-sampled locations and produce maps of soil properties for the different land uses and covers. ERDAS-2010 and Arc GIS-10 software was operated to prepare the spatial soil chemical variability, land use, and cover map of the study area.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Land use and cover of the study area
The result of land use and land cover of lower Wabi-shebele basin was expressed in (Figure 3). According to the result, the largest land cover was found to be fallow land or potentially irrigable land had it had coverage of 35.3%. Similarly cultivated land had coverage of 19.66%, the rest that is, bare land 18.56%, sparse shrub land 10.61%, woodland 10.56% and dense shrub land 5.31%. The result revealed that there is a significant land (49, 942.8 ha) which could be used for irrigation but not utilized yet. As a result, the soil nutrient status, content and other characteristics should be evaluated so that it could be utilized to tackle food insecurity of the region and the country as well (IEGNWRC, 1973).
Description of chemical properties of soils
Soil pH
According to the result, the soil pH showed very low variability (CV=1.64% to 4.46%) under different land uses and it was found to be moderately alkaline to alkaline. When the highest pH recorded from bare land and the lowest was recorded from dance shrub land and woodland. Furthermore, the result of the pH revealed that high pH value was recorded at north-western part of the sub-basin whereas low pH values were found at southern periphery of the sub-basin. Crop land and potential crop land had similar pH range and it was found to be slightly alkaline (Table, 1). Despite slight spatial variation, the soil pH of the sub-basin classified as slightly alkaline to alkaline soil pH values pH (Figure 4 and Table 1).
The findings in the current study corroborates with that of Debela et al. (2011) who reported that pH value between neutral and alkaline pH ranges for different land use in semi-arid lowland areas of north-eastern Ethiopia. Similarly Gebrejewergs et al. (2019) indicated that low precipitation, high value of exchangeable Ca+ and high evapotranspiration that resulted in low losses of base from soil profile which resulted in the high soil pH values.
Total Nitrogen (TN)
The results on soil TN showed that the potential cropland had relatively higher TN content followed by wood land and dense shrub land, cropland, sparse shrub and bare lands (Table 2) (Figure 5). In general majority of the lower Wabi-shebele sub-basin (82%) had medium soil TN and while small portion (18%) of the sub-basin found to be low soil TN. Similarly the north-western part of the sub basin generally had exhibited medium soil TN content; while the central part of the area showed lower nitrogen content. The result indicted that variation in soil TN content was highly influenced by landuse and land cover (Table 2 and Figure 5). The highest TN value was recorded from potential cropland followed by dens shrub land while the lowest recorded from bare land and cropland respectively.
The lowest N in bare and cropland could be resulted from reduced organic matter content of the soil due to the absence of vegetation cover and due to low nutrient cycle (Wondimagegne and Abere, 2012). Current finding corroborates with the findings of Sebhatleab (2014) who reported that the lower organic matter in farm and bare lands compared to forest and grasslands consequentially resulted in low N. similarly Sabiela et al. (2020) indicted that very low value of soil TN observed under cultivated lands may be due to continuous cultivation, soil erosion, plant uptake, and volatilization of Nitrogen. The result is also in line with the findings of Belayneh and Eyasu (2020) who reported higher TN values in forest land compared to croplands and grazing land uses.
Available phosphorus (AP)
The results on AP in (Table 3) revealed that, there was certain variation for the different land use and land cover on the values of AP. The highest AP was obtained from dens shrub land followed by potential cropland and current cropland. The lowest level was recorded from bare land and sparse shrub land respectively (Table 3). Generally entire area under all land use and cover characterized as low level in terms of AP (Table 3 and Figure 6). Despite the low overall AP content, there was variability in AP across different land use system.
The highest AP in shrub land could be due to P return to the soil surface via litter fall to soil surface (Sabiela et al., 2020). The low soil AP content observed in the lower Wab-ishebele sub-basin is in agreement with the results reported by Fekadu et al. (2018) who reported that AP of most Ethiopian soils has been declining due to fixation, crop removal and erosion. Hence, the variation in this parameter might be caused by due to variation in land use and cover differences.
Exchangeable potassium (AK)
The AK content in current study area found to be low to medium and it was highly influenced by land use and cover (Tables 4 and Figure 1). In this parameter dense shrub land exhibited with higher mean value of AK followed by crop land and wood land. Similarly the lowest AP mean value was recorded from bare land, sparse shrub land potential crop land (Table 4 and Figure 7). This finding is in line with (Chauhan et al., 2014; Sudarshan et al., 2018) who reported available (K) was significantly affected by the land use systems. Similarly Bista (2010) reported significantly higher K level in forest land than crop and bare land. In general, the study area was dominated by medium (70.83%) and followed by low (29.17%) soil AP status. The AK values observed in this study area were above the critical levels of (0.4cmol/kg) which is optimum range for many crops except for bare land and sparse shrub land. Hence the AK value recorded in the sub basin from different land use found to be sufficient for the production of most crop plants.
CONCLUSION
This study revealed that land use and land cover influenced major soil chemical properties of the lower Wabi-shebele river sub-basin. Majority of soil in the sub-basin exhibited slightly alkaline soil pH while about 70% of the sub-basin had low level of soil AP. Large proportion of the sub-basin had medium content of TN and low to medium content of EK.
Therefore, based on the information obtained to properly manage the soils of the lower Wabi-shebele sub-basin according to the land cover and land use detail maps were generated. Soil productivity and other related problems of the sub-basin can be managed through implementation appropriate and area specific intervention. As a result the findings of this study can be utilized as starting point for developing and implementing appropriate soil management intervention for soils of lower Wabi-shebele sub-basin in Somali region of South-eastern Ethiopia.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors have not declared any conflicts of interests.
REFERENCES
Alemu L, Tekalign M, Wassie H, Hailu S (2016). Soil micronutrients status assessment, mapping and spatial distribution of Damboya, Kedida Gamela and Kecha Bira Districts, Kambata Tambaro zone, Southern Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(4):305-317. |
|
Barber S, Chen J (1990). Using a mechanistic model to evaluate the effect of soil pH on phosphorus uptake. Plant Soil 124(2):183-186. |
|
Belayneh B, Eyasu E (2020). Effects of land use/land cover changes on selected soil physical and chemical properties in Shenkolla watershed, south central Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture pp. 1-8. |
|
Bista P (2010). Effect of Different Land Use Systems and Management Practices in Soil Fertility Status of Nuwakot and Chitwan Valley; Unpublished Graduate Dissertation; Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences: Rampur, Nepal. |
|
Chauhan R, Pande K, Thakur S (2014). Soil properties affected by land use systems in Western Chitwan, Nepal. Int. Journal of Applied Science and Biotechnology 2:265-269. |
|
Corwin D, Lesch S (2003). Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agronomy Journal 95(3):455-471. |
|
Debela HF, Jesse TN, Zemede A, Nyangito MM (2011). Physic-chemichal Soil properties semiarid Ethiopia in two land use system: implication to crop production. International Journal of Agricultural Research 6(12):840-847. |
|
Fekadu E, Kibret K, Bedadi B, Melese A (2018). Characterization and classification of soils of yikalo subwatershed in lay gayint district, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 7(2):151-166. |
|
Gebrejewergs A, Gebremedhn B, Aklil G (2019) Land use impacts on physicochemical and microbial soil properties across the agricultural landscapes of Debrekidan, Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia, Cogent Food and Agriculture 5(1):1-18. |
|
Gebreyesus B, Lulseged T, Paul L (2011). Catchment-scale spatial variability of soil properties and implications on site-specific soil management in northern Ethiopia. Soil and Tillage Research 117:124-139. |
|
Guan F, Xia M, Tang X, Fan S (2017). Spatial variability of soil nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in Moso bamboo forests in Yong'an City, China. Catena 150:161-172. |
|
Huang SW, Jin JY, Yang LP, Bai YL (2006). Spatial variability of soil nutrients and influencing factors in a vegetable production area of Hebei Province in China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 75:201-212. |
|
Imperial Ethiopian Government National Water Resources Commission (IEGNWRC) (1973). Soil survey of the Wabi Shebelle basin. National Water Resources Commission pp. 154-173. |
|
Mohamed A, Natarajan A, Rajendra H, Prakash S (2019b) Assessment of land degradation using comprehensive geostatistical approach and remote sensing data in GIS-model builder. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 22(3):323-334. |
|
Mohamed SM, Sameh MS, Manqiang L, Rong-jiang Y, Ahmed IA, Peng L, Jiaoguo J, Xiaoyun C (2019a). Soil properties spatial variability and delineation of site-specific management zones based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering in a hilly field in Jianyang, Sichuan, China. Sustainability 11(24):1-19. |
|
Olsen SR, Sommers LE, Page AL (1982). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Methods of Soil Analysis 2(9):403-430. |
|
Mersha T, Meten M (2020). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping and assessment using bivariate statistical methods in Simada area, northwestern Ethiopia. Geoenviron Disasters 7:20. |
|
Panday D, Maharjan B, Chalise D, Shrestha R, Twanabasu B (2018). Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS. PloS ONE 13(10):e0206350. |
|
Pauwels JM, Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Mvondo Ze A (1992). Méthodes d'analyses de sols et de plantes, équipements, gestion de stocks de verrerie et de produits chimiques. A. G. Bulding, Bruxelles, Belgium 180 p |
|
Rosemary F, Indraratne SP, Weerasooriya R, Mishra U (2017). Exploring the spatial variability of soil properties in an Alfisol soil catena. Catena 150:53-61. |
|
Sabiela F, Kehali J, Endalkachew F, Dessale W (2020). Land use and land cover dynamics and properties of soils under different land uses in the Tejibara watershed, Ethiopia. Scientific World Journal pp. 1-12. |
|
Sebhatleab M (2014). Impact of land use and land cover change on soil physical and chemical properties: a case study of Era-Hayelom tabias, northern Ethiopia. United Nations University Land Restoration Training Programme |
|
Sheldrick WF, Syers JK, Lingard J (2003). Soil nutrient audits for China to estimate nutrient balances and output/input relationships. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94(3):341-354. |
|
Simard RR (1993). Ammonium acetate-extractable elements. In Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publisher pp. 39-42. |
|
Singh A, Agrawal M, Marshall FM (2010). The role of organic vs. inorganic fertilizers in reducing phytoavailability of heavy metals in a wastewater-irrigated area. Ecological Engineering 36(12):1733-1740. |
|
Sudarshan K, Babu RK, Dinesh P (2018) Assessment of soil fertility under different land-use systems in Dhading district of Nepal. Soil System 2:57. doi:10.3390/soilsystems2040057. |
|
Tellen V, Yerima B (2018). Effects of land use change on soil physicochemical properties in selected areas in the North West region of Cameroon. Environmental System Research 7(1):1-29. |
|
Yared M, Kibebew K, Bobe B, Muktar M (2021). Soil quality evaluation under different land use types in Kersa sub?watershed, eastern Ethiopia. Environmental System Research 10(1):1-11. |
|
Wondimagegne C, Abere M (2012). Selected physical and chemical characteristics of soils of the middle awash irrigated farm lands, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science 22:127-142. |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0