De Beer and Coon (2007) also indicated that one of such methods include rotating the time of contact with feed and the time when the feed has been taken away. One other method prescribed by Novele et al. (2009) involves restricting the amount of daily feed offered to the animals for sometimes. Renema et al. (1999) indicated that body characteristics in terms of differences in reproductive organs, fat pad sizes and shank length were similar in chickens on both full feeding and restricted feeding systems. Novele et al. (2009) also reported that early period 75% ad libitum restriction feeding gave an economic advantage over ad libitum feeding mainly by enhancing feed utilization. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the influence of the naked neck phenotype and feed withdrawal on growth performance and carcass characteristics of F1 crossbred broilers.

Study location and duration of the experiment

The study’s location was the Poultry Section of the Department of Animal Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi Ghana. The entire experiment lasted for a period of eleven months: October 2016- August 2017.

Experimental birds and design

100-day-old Hubbard Flex 15 commercial broiler chicks were raised for approximately five months and crossed with 10 six-month-old naked neck cockerels. The eggs obtained from the mating between the normal feathered broiler females and the naked neck males were collected over approximately a two months period and then hatched.  Four hatches were obtained and they were used as blocks. A total of 272-day-old naked neck and normal feathered chicks were randomly allotted to the four blocks. There were four treatments (naked neck full feeding, naked neck feed withdrawal, normal feathered full feeding and normal feathered feed withdrawal). Each treatment was replicated four times in an RCBD 2×2 factorial arrangement. There were 68 birds per treatment. For birds on the feed withdrawal regime, their feed was taken out of the pen between 10:00 am and 4:00 pm every day throughout the experimental period.

Housing and feeding

Parents of the first filial generation were kept in 10 deep litter pens while the first filial generation was housed in 16 deep litter pens. Each pen measured 1.8 m × 1.2 m, giving a floor space of 2.16 m². All the 16 pens were used as a brooder during the first two weeks and heat was supplied by means of two 100-watt incandescent bulbs per pen. Brooding temperatures ranged from a minimum of 27°C to a maximum of 39°C. Temperature in the poultry house after the brooding period depended on the temperature of the outside air. The parents of the first filial generation were given a starter diet containing 22% crude protein (CP) and 2940.8 kcal metabolizable energy (ME)/kg, a grower diet containing 16% CP and 2769.2 kcal ME/kg and a finisher diet containing 18% CP and 2754 kcal ME/kg while the first filial generation was fed a starter diet containing 22% CP and 2940.8 kcal ME/kg and a finisher diet that contained 20% CP and 3150.64 kcal ME/kg. Water was made available to the birds throughout the experimental period.

Traits measured on the first filial (F1) generation

Growth performance

Performance traits such as initial weight, weekly feed intake, weekly weight gain, weekly feed conversion ratio, rectal temperature and mortality were measured.

Carcass characteristics

At the end of twelve weeks, one male and one female from each treatment were slaughtered for carcass analysis. In all, carcass yield measured included: live weight, bled weight, defeathered weight, head weight, neck weight, wings weight, back weight, breast weight, thigh weight, leg weight, shank length, visceral weight, full gizzard weight, empty gizzard weight, full intestine weight, empty intestine weight, liver weight and heart weight.

Statistical analysis

All data collected on the first filial (F1) generation were subjected to the analysis of variance procedure of the GenStat statistical package version 11.1 (2009) and differences were deemed significant at p<0.05.

Ethical statement

The Animal Ethics Committee of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi approved protocols used in this study.

Growth performance

There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the naked neck and the normal feathered birds with respect to initial weight and weekly feed intake. The naked neck birds, however, gained higher (P<0.05) weight and had better FCR compared to their normal feathered counterparts (Table 1). Feed intake was not different between the two phenotypes because the experiment was done in the rainy season with moderate ambient temperature, which suppressed the potential of naked neck birds in this trait under high ambient temperature conditions. This result is consistent with the findings of Lou et al. (1992), Cahaner et al. (1993), Eberhart and Washburn (1993), who demonstrated that the full potential of naked neck broilers over their normal feathered siblings, is manifested when raised at constantly high environmental temperatures usually above 30°C. The result is however contrary to the findings of Fathi et al. (1993) and Khan (1998), who reported that the naked neck birds by virtue of the more exposed skin are able to dissipate heat better and thereby increasing their food intake.

The significantly higher weekly weight gain of the naked neck birds could be attributed to the 20 to 40% less feather cover in the naked neck birds, which reduces substantially the requirement for dietary nutrition to supply protein input for feather production. The findings of this research agree with the discoveries of Eberhart and Washburn (1993), who stated that feather reduction in naked neck  birds  enhances  their  ability  to  dissipate heat through bare areas compared to birds not having the gene. Superior feed conversion ratio by the naked neck birds, when compared with the normal feathered ones, agrees with the results of an investigation by Yalcin et al. (1997) and Patra et al. (2002), on chickens raised under hot climatic conditions. They reported that in high temperature conditions, birds with the naked neck gene possessed higher breast weight, better growth rate, and improved feed conversion ratio and carcass yield.  The higher (P < 0.05) amount of feed consumed by birds that were on full feeding compared to those on feed withdrawal (Table 1) was due to their unhindered access to feed. This result is contrary to that of Tumova et al. (2002), who indicated that intake of feed decreased by restricted feeding, which brought about a better feed efficiency when compared with those under unrestricted feeding. The results of this work agree with the findings of Sekoni et al. (2002), who showed that controlled feeding did not influence the feed conversion ratio of birds. Novele et al. (2009) also showed that feed restriction at early age of birds for a short period stimulated compensatory growth so that at the market age feed restricted birds performed similarly to those of the full fed groups.

Rectal temperature and mortality

There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the naked neck birds and the normal feathered ones in terms of rectal temperature in the morning. However, the normal feathered birds had higher (P<0.05) average rectal temperature in the afternoon and mortality when compared with their naked neck counterparts (Table 2). The lower body temperature in the naked necks in the afternoon was due to the higher thermoregulatory ability of these birds (Adomako et al., 2014). The lower mortalities obtained by the naked neck chickens in contrast to the normal feathered ones support the fact that the naked neck birds are able to adapt well to high temperature conditions and as such have high survivability. The result of this work supports the findings of Mahrous et al. (2008), who assessed the growth of heterozygous naked neck and normal feathered chickens and concluded that the normal feathered birds recorded a significantly (P≤0.05) higher mortality in contrast to the naked neck chickens. El-Safty et al. (2006) also observed that naked neck birds had improved ability to secrete Acute Phase Protein (APP), which gives protection to birds against infection or any pathogenic invasion.

Birds on feed withdrawal had higher (P<0.05) rectal temperature in the morning compared to those on full feeding. However, the two feeding systems did not show any significant differences (P>0.05) between them with regard to rectal temperature in the afternoon and mortality. Again the phenotype × feeding system interaction did not show significant differences (P>0.05) for  the  traits  measured  (Table  2). The observation that the birds on feed withdrawal had a significantly higher rectal temperature than their counterparts on full feeding is contrary to the hypothesis of this work as it was expected that feed withdrawal would reduce metabolism and thereby reduce heat production. The result of this study is again contrary to the findings of Oyedeji and Atteh (2005), who indicated that skip-a day feeding for 3 weeks starting from day-old would enhance carcass quality  and  reduce  sudden  death  syndrome,   which  is frequently related to birds that are on ad libitum feed intake. Mahmood et al. (2005) and Ali et al. (2013) also reported significant positive effect of feed restriction on survivability in heat stressed broiler chickens.

Carcass characteristics

The  naked  neck  birds  had higher (P<0.05) defeathered weight, head weight, neck weight and leg weight compared to the normal ones (Table 3). There was however no significant difference (P>0.05) between the two phenotypes for live weight, bled weight, back weight, breast weight, thigh weight, wings weight and shank length. The naked neck phenotype recording higher defeathered weight was because the heat-tolerant naked neck gene is responsible for the reduction of plumage cover. This result is in line with the findings of Singh et al. (1996), who stated that naked neck broilers gained around 3% more weight compared to their normal feathered siblings when they are reared under hot conditions. They further indicated that this advantage was virtually tripled at high ambient temperature of around 32°C. According to Merat (1986), this gives them 1.8 to 7.1% more flesh   in   contrast    to    the     normal   feathered counterparts when the carcass is dressed. He also indicated that the reduction of plumage in the naked neck chickens furthermore retains protein, which is used for the development of muscle tissues.

There was no significant difference (P >0.05) between the two feeding systems for all the carcass traits measured, except breast weight and thigh weight, where birds on full feeding had higher (P >0.05) values compared to their counterparts on feed withdrawal (Table 3). The phenotype ×feeding system interaction also did not show significant difference (P >0.05) for all the traits measured.

The birds on full feeding showing significantly higher breast and thigh weights compared to their sibs on feed withdrawal is consistent with the work by Melnychuk  et  al.  (2004),  who  observed  that  birds that were fed on on ad libitum basis had higher average breast weight in contrast to their counterparts on feed restriction.

Internal organs

The naked neck birds had higher (P<0.05) values for most of the internal organs traits measured compared to their normal feathered sibs (Table 4). There was, however, no significant differences (P>0.05) between the feeding systems for all the traits measured (Table 4). Again the phenotype × feeding system interactions also yielded no significant difference (P>0.05) for all the internal organs traits measured (Table 4). The significantly higher weight observed in the naked neck birds for   some   of   the    internal    organs   measured compared to their normal feathered counterparts, is similar to the findings of Younis and Cahaner (1999), who reported that the giblet proportion was significantly higher in naked neck birds, indicating increased activity of liver and heart to support the metabolic rate in these chickens to overcome heat stress.

The presence of the naked neck gene in broilers enhanced growth performance, carcass characteristics and survivability. However, the feed withdrawal did not generally influence the overall growth performance, mortality and carcass characteristics of crossbred broilers.

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests