African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6871

Full Length Research Paper

The effect of nitrogen dose on the yield indicators of oats

Rubia Diana Mantai
  • Rubia Diana Mantai
  • Department of Exact Sciences and Engineering, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street Lulu Ingelfritz 480, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Jose Antonio Gonzalez da Silva
  • Jose Antonio Gonzalez da Silva
  • Department of Agrarian Studies, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street do Comercio 3000, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Emilio Ghisleni Arenhardt
  • Emilio Ghisleni Arenhardt
  • Department of Crop Plants, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Avenue Bento Goncalves 7712, Zip code: 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Thiago Gomes Heck
  • Thiago Gomes Heck
  • Department of Life Sciences, Regional University of Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street do Comercio 3000, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Airam Teresa Zago Romcy Sausen
  • Airam Teresa Zago Romcy Sausen
  • Department of Exact Sciences and Engineering, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street Lulu Ingelfritz 480, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Cleusa Adriane Menegassi Bianchi Kruger
  • Cleusa Adriane Menegassi Bianchi Kruger
  • Department of Agrarian Studies, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street do Comercio 3000, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Amanda Moraes Cardoso
  • Amanda Moraes Cardoso
  • Department of Agrarian Studies, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street do Comercio 3000, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Constantino Jose Goi Neto
  • Constantino Jose Goi Neto
  • Department of Agrarian Studies, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street do Comercio 3000, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Dionatan Ketzer Krysczun
  • Dionatan Ketzer Krysczun
  • Department of Agrarian Studies, Regional University of the Northwestern of Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUI), Street do Comercio 3000, Zip code: 98700-000, Ijui, RS, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 24 April 2014
  •  Accepted: 04 July 2015
  •  Published: 24 September 2015

 ABSTRACT

Studies on the effect of nitrogen dose on the yield indicators of oats can help cultivation recommendations. This study aims to study the simulation of the productivity indicators of oats based on optimal dose of nitrogen on grain yield expression, under the agricultural stand conditions of high and low availability of nitrogen and favorable and unfavorable weather conditions. Studies were conducted in 2011 and 2012 years, in a complete randomized block design with four replications in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement to cultivars (Barbarasul and Brisasul) and nitrogen doses (0, 30, 60 and 120 kg ha-1) in the soybean/oat and corn/oat succession system. In each succession system, two experiments were conducted, one for quantifying the production of biomass and another to estimate grain yield. The use of nitrogen introduced quadratic regression model on the grain yield and harvest index, showed linear behavior in the biological yield and straw in the two crop succession system. The difference of this behavior is caused by the biological, straw and also by year favorable or unfavorable. The simulation of the nitrogen optimal dose for the production of grain confirms major efficiency of Brisasul cultivar in the expression of grain yield indicators.

 

Key words: Avena sativa L., crop succession, nitrogen rates, yield indicators, simulation.


 INTRODUCTION

Climatic changes on the planet have provided a new challenge in the world agricultural production, where breeding of more productive and tolerant to stresses cultivars (Araus et al., 2008), and efficiency in the use of light and nutrients (Oliveira et al., 2011) are required. In this context, the improper management of nitrogen, which efficiency depends on the quality of fertilizer, cultivation techniques, utilization of genetic efficiency and edaphoclimatic conditions become reasons for the low grain production of oat (Silva et al., 2006; Veloso et al., 2009; Costa et al., 2013). Increasing the nitrogen dose and the optimal application time under favorable climatic conditions shows significant effects on grain yield (Dencic et al., 2011; Flores et al., 2012). However, in unfavorable years of cultivation, utilization efficiency may be compromised, reducing productivity and increasing production costs, besides the nitrogen losses by volatilization and leaching generating environmental pollution (Benin et al., 2012; Silva et al., 2015).
 
The biological yield (grain yield + straw yield) is closely related to the processes of photosynthesis and respiration during the vegetative and reproductive stages (Demétrio et al., 2012). The relationship between grain and biological yields allows the determination of the harvest index, important parameter in defining the rate with which photo assimilates are transported to straw and grains (Silva et al., 2012). Studies of Demétrio et al. (2008), show that these traits are influenced by genotype, cultivation technique, water and nutrients availability, and edaphoclimatic conditions, which highlights the importance of these variables on the efficiency of nitrogen uptake and utilization (Silva et al., 2015). Thus, the studies of nitrogen use efficiency based on grain yield indicators can help towards the recommendations on better adjusted technologies, economically satisfactory, lower impact on the environment and decisive conditions in the search for more sustainable agricultural biosystems (Parry et al., 2011; Prando et al., 2013).
 
The objective of this study was the simulation of the productivity indicators of oats based on optimal dose of nitrogen on grain yield expression, under the agricultural stand conditions of high and low availability of nitrogen and favorable and unfavorable weather conditions.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

The field experiments with oats were conducted in Augusto Pestana, RS, Brazil (28° 26’ 30’’ South latitude and 54° 00’ 58’’ West longitude), in 2011 and 2012 years. The soil of the area is classified as Oxisol Distroferric Typical and the climate, according to Köppen classification (Kuinchtner and Buriol, 2011), is temperate humid with hot summer, without dry season. Soil analysis ten days before oats sowings identified the following chemical characteristics of the local: i) crop succession corn/oat (pH = 6.5; P = 34.4 mg dm-3; K = 262 mg dm-3; Organic Matter = 3.5%; Al = 0.0 cmolc dm-3; Ca = 6.6 cmolc dm-3 e Mg = 3.4 cmolc dm-3) and ii) crop succession soybean/oat (pH = 6.2; P = 33.9 mg dm-3; K = 200 mg dm-3 Organic Matter = 3.4%; Al = 0.0 cmolc dm-3; Ca = 6.5 cmolc dm-3 e Mg = 2.5 cmolc dm-3). In both experimental years, oats was sown in optimal time, that is, in the first week of June with seeder-fertilizer. Each plot consisted of 5 rows of 5 m length with 0.20 m line space, forming the experimental unit of 5 m2. During the vegetation period, oats was protected from diseases by FOLICUR® CE tebuconazole fungicide applications at  the  dose  of  0.75 l ha-1  and  from  weeds control by ALLY® metsulfuron-methyl herbicide, at the dose of 2.4 g ha-1 of the active ingredient and manual weeding when necessary.
 
At the time of oat sowing, NPK formulation was used (5-20-20), with nitrogen base of 10 kg ha-1 (except in the standard experimental unit) and 60 and 50 kg ha-1 of P2O5 and K2O applied, respectively, based on the levels of organic matter, P and K in the soil to expect grain yield of about of 3 t ha-1. The rest of the nitrogen to contemplate the remaining doses was applied in coverage with urea (45% N), in four oat leaf stage.
 
The experimental design was randomized blocks with four repetitions, in factorial scheme 4 × 2 to doses of N-fertilizer (0, 30, 60, 120 kg ha-1) and oat cultivars (Barbarasul and Brisasul), respectively, totaling 64 experimental units for crop succession. Therefore, in each crop succession (corn/oat and soybean/oat system), two experiments were conducted to quantify the total biomass production and the other targeting exclusively to estimate grain yield. For that purpose, oats were harvested manually from three central rows of each plot at the maturity stage (grain moisture about 22%). Then threshed with a stationary thresher and dried to the 13% grain moisture, in addition to weighing to estimate the grain yield (GY, kg per ha-1). The grain yield from each plot was determined and then recalculated to Kg per ha, the same for the other parameters.
 
 
 
In 2011, there was more pluviometric precipitation before N-fertilization (Figure 1). Maximum temperatures observed at the beginning of oat development were higher in 2012. From the fertilization, variations of temperature not shown marked change to oat crop (Figure 1). In Table 2, the minimum were not below 5°C in the months of May and June. The maximum temperature, even in the hottest months of the cycle, does not exceed 27°C. In 2011, expressive yield indicators of oat (Table 1) showed that total accumulated pluviometric precipitation was similar to the average precipitation over 25 years (Table 2). Moreover, the reduced expression of these parameters in 2012 indicated smaller rainfall compared to the historical average. Based in these results (Table 2), the 2011 year was classified as favorable (FY) and 2012 as unfavorable year (UY) for the oat production.
 
 
 
 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In soybean/oat crop succession system (Table 1), nitrogen rates indicate change on the yield indicators of oat, regardless of year of cultivation. Genetic differences were observed for grain yield and harvest index in 2011.
 
Although, the genetic differences on the yield indicators of oat in 2012 did not show differences, however, the interaction genotype versus doses confirm differences on nitrogen use by cultivars, condition similar to the previous year. In crop succession corn/oat system (Table 1), the nitrogen levels were also shown on the yield indicators of oat regardless of the year of analysis. In this condition, genetic differences were more evident, except for grain yield in 2011 which did not differed. The mean difference in general between the years in crop succession soybean/oat system were significant, with 2011 surpassing 2012 in 0.7, 3 and 2.5 t ha-1 grain yield, biological and straw, respectively.
 
In corn/oat crop succession system, even with lower average soybean/oat condition, also identified differences between the years, highlighting 2011 as the most favorable, with higher values of 0.2, 1.2 e 1 t ha-1 grain yield, biological and straw, respectively. There is the reduction of the harvest index in the years that were more effective for biomass production and grain, independent succession system. Therefore, the increase in grain yield in favorable years does not follow the same way the expression of the biological yield, leading to reduced harvest index by higher biomass straw. These results confirm in oat, in general, the biological yield and straw must show linear behavior and grain yield and harvest index with quadratic trend. The genetic differences edaphoclimatic conditions and different management in crops affect the use of nitrogen (Dencic et al., 2011; Viola et al., 2013).
 
The cultivation of cereals such as wheat and oats on the residue of soybeans and corn as a fore crops, show different development, mainly by differences in N-residual availability and their interaction with the nitrogen supplied in coverage (Wendling et al., 2007; Mantai et al., 2015). Studies with oat in different succession systems indicated a greater magnitude of alteration in the biological yield and grain than on income of straw and harvest index (Schaedler et al., 2009; Silva et al., 2015). Moreover, the quadratic trend in the expression of grain yield and oat harvest index has been observed (Mantai et al., 2015; Silva et al., 2015). 
 
The cultivation soybean/wheat or soybean/oat crop succession compared to corn/wheat crop succession increased grain yield with the same fertilizer due to the greater availability of N-residual in favorable years (Bredemeier et al., 2013; Mantai et al., 2015). It is noteworthy that the set of favorable year effect (2011) with the N-residual biosystem greater release (soybean/oat) allowed increasing grain yield around 3.6 t per ha-1 (Table 1). Years of favorable and unfavorable climate change to nitrogen availability and use of efficiency by the plant (Espindula et al., 2010). Benin et al. (2012), observed in wheat greater response to grain yield by nitrogen when the rains were not limiting. The strong variation of grain yield is associated with greater variability of cultivation conditions, and the agricultural year being the largest contributing factor to the instability of production (Storck et al., 2014). This conditions support the use of more productive cultivars, tolerant to stresses and efficient in the use of light and nutrients (Araus et al., 2008; Oliveira et al., 2011).
 
The genotype versus nitrogen dose interaction tested in biosystems signal the breakdown of equations for each genotype in both the favorable and unfavorable cultivation years. In Table 3, the soybean/oat crop succession system, the Barbarasul genotype showed grain yield of expression and harvest index with quadratic trend, and the biological yield linear behavior, independent of the agricultural year. Brisasul genotype cultivated after the soybean as a fore crop (Table 3) showed the same response of nitrogen in grain, biological yield and harvest index, in both years. It is noteworthy that, although the Barbarasul genotype indicate this system in unfavorable condition of growing a linear trend, similar to Brisasul in 2011 and 2012, the favorable agricultural year is revealed in straw yield as a quadratic trend. The results indicate quadratic behavior in grain yield and harvest index and the trend of linearity by biological yield, however, the interactions genotype versus favorable and unfavorable year seem to bring more dynamism to instability in straw yield.
 
 
The favorable year (2011) in soybean/oat crop succession in Barbarasul indicated maximum nitrogen use efficiency for grain yield with 66 kg ha-1. In unfavorable year maximum, efficiency was obtained with 92 kg ha-1, including, the grain yield reducing drastically compared to the previous year. In the simulation of biological yield, the difference between the years was intensified, primarily by strong change in straw yield (Table 3). It is noteworthy that the observed reduction in harvest index in the favorable year does not express the efficiency obtained for the productivity of grain due to lowest use of nitrogen in comparison with 2012.
 
Therefore, a condition reports inefficiency of these parameters to indicate more genotypes adjusted to reduced fertilizer in comparing crop years. In Brisasul cultivar, it showed the same management conditions (Table 3), but favorable and unfavorable cultivation year, the use of nitrogen to the maximum grain yield showed similar result with 76 and 70 kg ha-1 fertilizer. Furthermore, in the favorable year grain, biomass and straw yields of barbarasul cultivar increased.
 
Therefore, identifying the brisasul behavior of higher agronomic efficiency to the preparation of both biomass and grain was reported. This fact is evidenced in the more restrictive cultivation year, because, it showed similarity in grain yield, why the use of nitrogen by Barbarasul demanded an increase by 20 kg per hectare. This is in agreement with the results obtained in the adjusted model for simulating the harvest index. The use of the optimal dose, confirms the higher grain yield efficiency of this cultivar, independent of the agricultural year. Besides genetic efficiency of each cultivar, the largest nitrogen utilization is directly linked to environmental stimuli such as photoperiod, temperature, radiation and water availability (Almeida et al., 2011).
 
The use of harvest index while indicating the efficiency of the photo assimilates conversion for the production of straw and grains, but cannot identify cultivars more efficient, because an expressive grain yield also requires an appropriate minimum of expression of leaves and stems (Silva et al., 2015). Oliveira et al. (2011), comment the importance of detecting the genetic differences among cultivars in the production of straw and grains, because, confer gains that qualify economic performance and the benefits of high biomass are directed to the soil. Emphasizes on the viability of the tillage system is directly dependent on the volume and quality of biomass on soil (Silva et al., 2006). Schaedler et al. (2009), studying the genetic variability of yield indicators of oat, observed harvest index between 0.33 and 0.45. The results found by these authors, conforms with the result obtained in this study, that the use of optimal dose of nitrogen directed to grain yield is between 0.34 to 0.42.
 
In corn/oat crop succession system, the Barbarasul cultivar evidenced grain yield and harvest index quadratic, and the behavior of the biological yield and linear straw (Table 4). This behavior of indicators of oat production occurred during favorable or unfavorable condition year of cultivation. Therefore, showing adjusted results obtained on theses parameters. In Brisasul cultivar, in corn/oat crop succession system (Table 4), the use of nitrogen in the expression of grain yield and harvest index showed a quadratic behavior, independent of the year. On the other hand, the biological yield and straw indicated quadratic adjustment of expression in the year 2011 (favorable crop), but linearity observed in the more restrictive year (2012). These results evidenced that crop succession system slower the release of N-residual, part of the nitrogen applied as fertilizer has been used in microbial action in straw, especially in the favorable year, provided that the best volume and distribution of rainfall is observed (Figure 1 and Table 2), giving better benefit to the biological activity.
 
Thus, greater action of microorganisms in straw degradation leads to greater competition in nitrogen use, hypothesis which can elucidate the stability of nutrient absorption oats obtained by this system. Although, it has not been quantified, visible differences in degradation time straw in a year indicated in 2012, still in the oat harvest period, was observe volume of corn straw on the soil cover. Moreover, in 2011 (favorable year), the intensified degradation process did not permit visualization of straw after oats harvest. In general, independent of the year, the quadratic behavior in the expression of grain yield and harvest index was similar among cultivars and years of study, whereas differences of the year in corn/oat crop succession system major instability of the biological yield and straw (Table 4).
 
This similar condition was also obtained in soybean/oat crop succession system by instability of expression biomass straw (Table 3). The favorable year (2011) in corn/oat cropping succession system showed in Barbarasul maximum nitrogen use for grain yield with 96 kg ha-1, with similarity when compared to unfavorable year with maximum use to 93 kg ha-1. Although, the simulations using of the optimal dose in this cultivar, evidence similar expression to the grain yield, and favorable year indicated higher nitrogen contribution in the expression of biological yield and straw in relation with harvest index.
 
 
Therefore, different from what occurred in the soybean/oat cropping succession system, the release condition of the N-residual by corn showed higher harvest index in the favorable year than in the more restrictive condition. This happened because although the values of the total biomass and straw have been incremented, there was also an increase in grain yield when using optimal dose. In the analysis, the Brisasul cultivar slow release of the N-residual biosystem (Table 4) favoring the growth conditions in 2011 showed dose adjusted to maximum grain yield with 76 kg ha-1. There is reduction in fertilizer in comparison with the Barbarasul cultivar in the same crop year.
 
In 2012, there was greater restriction on oat cultivation, although nitrogen consumption show similarity between the two cultivars, grain yield was maximized by Brisasul cultivar, confirming its potential as an ecologically being a more sustainable genotype by higher grain yield by less use of fertilizer. The simulation parameters of production in Brisasul cultivar using the optimal dose in grain yield showed in 2011 high biological yield and straw, including, results obtained in the same year of Barbarasul cultivar.
 
Similar behavior was also obtained in these variables both in condition of high release of N-residual (soybean/oat) and cultivars (Table 3). The biochemical composition of plant residues affect the nitrogen release rate contained in the straw and the use of N-fertilizer by the plants due to competition with soil microorganisms (Siqueira et al., 2010; Nascimento et al., 2012). Moreover, water deficiency hinders the process involved in the use of fertilizer and residual nitrogen, showing that nitrogen to grain yield and biomass can be considerably increased with adequate moisture in the soil (Cazetta et al., 2008).
 
In wheat, the best results of nitrogen fertilization were obtained with nitrogen doses ranging from 70 to 120 kg ha-1 (Espindula et al., 2010; Teixeira Filho et al., 2010). Kolchinski and Schuch (2003), found in oat grain yield nitrogen of 75 kg ha-1. Mantai et al. (2015), studying the nitrogen use efficiency in oat showed a linear behavior on biomass production rate with the increment of fertilizer, condition not always accompanied by the highest grain yield by evidence quadratic behavior. It is noteworthy that oats biomass and grain yields tend to be favored by crop succession system of smaller C/N ratio, generating cost savings and less environmental pollution by nitrogen fertilizers (Silva et al., 2006).
 
Studies realized by Silva et al. (2015), showed that the use of the analysis of the yield indicators was decisive in the most sustainable management system suggesting changes in population density in oat.


 CONCLUSIONS

The use of N-fertilizer in oats presented quadratic response of grain yield and harvest index, however, linear behavior in the biological yield and straw in soybean/oat and corn/oats crop succession systems were obtained. Changes of the response were caused by the biological yield, straw and also by year of favorable or unfavorable cultivation. The simulation of the optimal dose of nitrogen for grain yield confirmed higher efficiency of Brisasul cultivar in the expression of yield indicators.


 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.


 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors sincere thanks goes to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Ampara a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel) and Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUÍ) by the contribution of resources for the development of this research and by grants for Scientific and Technological Initiation and Research Productivity.



 REFERENCES

Almeida ACS, Coelho RMRD, Lourenço LF (2011). Simulação do crescimento do capim Tanzânia irrigado com base na unidade fototérmica, na adubação nitrogenada e na disponibilidade hídrica do período. Acta Sci. Agro. 33:215-222.
Crossref
 
Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008). Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 27:377-412.
Crossref
 
Benin G, Bornhofen E, Beche E, Pagliosa ES, Silva CL da, Pinnow C (2012). Agronomic performance of wheat cultivars in response to nitrogen fertilization levels. Acta Sci. Agro. 34:275-283.
Crossref
 
Bredemeier C, Variani C, Almeida D, Rosa AT (2013). Estimativa do potencial produtivo em trigo utilizando sensor óptico ativo para adubação nitrogenada em taxa variável. Ci. Rural 43(7):1147-1154.
Crossref
 
Cazetta DA, Fornasieri Filho D, Arf O, Germani R (2008) Qualidade industrial de cultivares de trigo e triticale submetidos à adubação nitrogenada no sistema de plantio direto. Bragantia 67:741-750.
Crossref
 
Costa L, Zucareli C, Riede CR (2013). Parcelamento da adubação nitrogenada no desempenho produtivo de genótipos de trigo. Rev. Ci. Agro. 44:215-224.
Crossref
 
Cruz CD (2006) Programa Genes: Biometria. Editora UFV. Viçosa (MG). 382 pp.
 
Demétrio CS, Fornasieri Filho D, Cazetta JO, Cazetta D (2008). Desempenho de híbridos de milho submetidos a diferentes espaçamentos e densidades populacionais. Pesq. Agro. Bras. 43:1691-1697.
Crossref
 
Demétrio JV, Costa ACT, Oliveira PSR (2012). Produção de biomassa de cultivares de aveia sob diferentes manejos de corte. Pesq. Agro.
Crossref
 
Dencic S, Mladenov N, Kobiljski B (2011). Effects of genotype and environment on breadmaking quality in wheat. Int. J. Plant Prod. 5:71-82.
 
Espindula MC, Rocha VS, Souza MA, Grossi JAS, Souza LT (2010). Doses e formas de aplicação de nitrogênio no desenvolvimento e produção da cultura do trigo. Ci. Agrotec. 34:1404-1411.
 
Flores RA, Urquiaga SS, Alves BJR, Collier LS, Morais RF, Prado RM (2012). Adubação nitrogenada e idade de corte na produção de matéria seca do capim-elefante no Cerrado. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Amb. 16:1282–1288.
 
Kolchinski EM, Schuch LOB (2003). Eficiência no uso do nitrogênio por cultivares de aveia branca de acordo com a adubação nitrogenada. Rev. Bras. Ci. Solo 27:1033-1038.
Crossref
 
Kuinchtne A, Buriol GA (2001). Clima do estado do Rio Grande do Sul segundo a classificação climática de Köppen e Thornthwaite. Disci. Sci. 2(1):171-182.
 
Mantai RD, Silva JAG, Sausen ATZR, Costa JSP, Fernandes SBV, Ubessi CA (2015). Eficiência na produção de biomassa e grãos de aveia pelo uso do nitrogênio. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agrí. Amb. 19(4):343-349.
 
Nascimento FM, Bicudo SJ, Fernandes DM, Rodrigues GL, Fernandes JC, Furtado MB (2012). Doses e épocas de aplicação de nitrogênio: influência na relação C/N da palhada no desenvolvimento e produtividade do milho em sistema plantio direto. Científica 40:77-89.
 
Oliveira AC, Crestani M, Carvalho FIF, Silva JAG, Valério IP, Hartwig I, Benin G, Schmidt DAM, Bertan I (2011). Brisasul: A new high-yielding white oat cultivar with reduced lodging. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 11:370-374.
Crossref
 
Parry MAJ, Reynolds M, Salvucci ME, Raines C, Andralojc J, Zhu XG, Price GD, Condon AG, Furbank RT (2011). Raising yield potential of wheat. II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 62(2):453-467.
Crossref
 
Prando AM, Zucarelli C, Fronza V, Oliveira FA, Júnior AO (2013). Características produtivas do trigo em função de fontes e doses de nitrogênio. Pesq. Agro. Trop. 43:34-41.
Crossref
 
Schaedler CE, Fleck NG, Ferreira FB, Lazaroto CA, Rizzardi MA (2009). Características morfológicas em plantas de cultivares de aveia como indicadoras do potencial competitivo com plantas daninhas. Ci. Rural 39:1313-1319.
Crossref
 
Silva EC, Muraoka T, Buzetti S, Trivelin PCO (2006). Manejo de nitrogênio no milho sob plantio direto com diferentes plantas de cobertura em latossolo vermelho. Pesq. Agro. Bras. 41:477-486.
Crossref
 
Silva JAG, Mantai RD, Fontaniva C, Arenhardt EG, Olegário MB, Sberse VL (2015). A densidade de semeadura sobre os parâmetros fisiológicos de produção em aveia. Científica 43(3):181-189.
 
Silva JAG, Fontaniva C, Costa JSP, Krüger CAMB, Ubessi C, Pinto FB, Arenhardt EG, Gewehr E (2012). Uma proposta na densidade de semeadura de um biotipo atual de cultivares de aveia. Rev. Bras. Agro. 18(3):253-263.
Crossref
 
Siqueira NM, Piccolo MC, Venzke Filho SP, Feigl BJ, Cerri CC (2010). Mineralização e desnitrificação do nitrogênio no solo sob plantio direto. Bragantia 69:923-936.
Crossref
 
Storck L, Filho AC, Guadagnin JP (2014). Análise conjunta de ensaios de cultivares de milho por classes de interação genótipo x ambiente. Pesq. Agro. Bras. 49(3):163-172.
Crossref
 
Teixeira Filho MCM, Buzetti S, Andreotti M, Arf O, Benett CGS (2010). Doses, fontes e épocas de aplicação de nitrogênio em trigo irrigado em plantio direto. Pesq. Agro. Bras. 45:797-804.
Crossref
 
Viola R, Benin G, Cassol LC, Pinnow C, Flores MF, Bornhofen E (2013). Adubação verde e nitrogenada na cultura do trigo em plantio direto. Bragantia 72:20-28.
Crossref
 
Wendling A, Eltz FLF, Cubilla MM, Amado TJC, Mielniczuk J, Lovato T (2007). Recomendação de adubação nitrogenada para trigo em sucessão ao milho e soja sob sistema de plantio direto no Paraguai. Rev. Bras. Ci. Solo 31:985-994.
Crossref
 
Veloso MEC, Duarte SN, Dourado Neto D, Silva EC, Pereira CR (2009). Teor de nitrogênio, índices de área foliar e de colheita no milho em função da adubação nitrogenada em solo de várzea. Rev. Bras. Milho e Sorgo 8(1):13-25.

 




          */?>