African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6839

Full Length Research Paper

Survey of diversity and production of yams in four communities in Southern Ghana

Aboagye L. M
  • Aboagye L. M
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, P. O. Box 7, Bunso (ER), Ghana.
  • Google Scholar
Nyadanu D.
  • Nyadanu D.
  • Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
  • Google Scholar
Opoku-Agyeman M. O.
  • Opoku-Agyeman M. O.
  • Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, P. O. Box 8, Akim Tafo, Ghana
  • Google Scholar
Owusu S. K
  • Owusu S. K
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, P. O. Box 7, Bunso (ER), Ghana.
  • Google Scholar
Asiedu-Darko E.
  • Asiedu-Darko E.
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, P. O. Box 7, Bunso (ER), Ghana.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 21 December 2014
  •  Accepted: 15 April 2015
  •  Published: 11 June 2015

 ABSTRACT

A survey was conducted in four yam growing communities in southern Ghana, with the objectives of analyzing the diversity of yam species being cultivated, extent of production, yams preferred and identification of challenges confronting yam production. A total of 264 farmers were involved in the survey, 200 men and 64 women. Six yam species were encountered and 136 varieties were characterized according to the number of households cultivating the varieties, area under cultivation, frequency of harvesting and the preferred yams. Invariably in the four communities, most of the varieties were cultivated in small areas by few households, depicting serious genetic erosion of yams in the communities. Preference of yams cultivated depended mostly on the maturity period, ability to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses and multiple utilization as food sources. Eleven constraints were enumerated which needs to be addressed to ensure sustainable yam production. The inter-relations of the species with respect to the characteristics surveyed are presented.

 

Key words: Yam diversity, genetic erosion, productivity, Ghana.


 INTRODUCTION

Yams are economically important starchy staple in West Africa, which is eaten as boiled, pounded, roasted or fried and can be dried to produce yam flour (Ayedoji et al., 2012; Oluwole et al., 2013). It is a staple food for over 300 million people (Mignouna et al., 2003). The yam belt of West  Africa  produces   95%   of   the   annual   global production of yams which is close to 51 million metric tonnes (Demuyakor et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2011). Ghana produces 25% of yam traded on the international market (Bancroft et al., 2005; SRID, 2011) and ranks third after Nigeria and Ivory Coast and contributes 17% of Agricultural Gross Domestic Product (AGDP) (FAO,2009). Yam contributes substantially to household food security (Akromah, 1993; Kenyon and Fowler, 2000). In Ghana yam occupies 11.6% of the total cropped area and annual production is estimated to be 5.8 million metric tonnes in 2009 (FAO, 2009). Income generation from yam improves the livelih ood of resource poor farmers especially women (Bennett-Lartey and Akromah (1996). Intensive cultivation of improved yam cultivars as a cash crop reduces the number of cultivars grown in a specific area, resulting in genetic erosion (Park et al., 2005; Akromah and Bennett-Lartey, 1993). Usually farmers do not have full access to local varieties due to limitations in financial resources, facilities and the available diversity (Cooper et al., 1992; Dansi et al., 2000). Unpredictable climate extremes manifesting in loss of vegetative cover, flooding, drought and declining soil fertility are all factors militating against the loss of yam diversity. Ghana falls within the West and Central African yam belt and abounds in yam diversity especially the Guinea yam complex (Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea cayenensis). Other species such as Dioscorea alata are introduced species that have adapted well with lots of diversity. In Ghana, a number of surveys related to varietal identification (Demuyakor, et al., 2013), diseases and pests debilitating the crop (Asante et al., 2007; Tanzubil and Yakubu, 1997; Osei et al., 2004) have been carried out. In the West Africa sub-region, a number of studies have been carried out relating to production (Sesay et al., 2013; Dansi et al., 2013). Traditional breeding of yam is relatively difficult and production systems have for a long time relied on the spontaneous hybridization in the wild. There is also the need for innovations in the management of yam genetic resources in the face of current threats to germplasm loss (Mignouna et al., 2003). On-farm conservation in farmers’ fields, germplasm exchange of cultivars with wider adaptation across geographical locations are some of the few interventions that need attention (Arunachalam, 2000; Akromah, 1993; Park et al., 2005). There is therefore the need to assess the existing diversity of yams, farmers’ needs and preferences and to make the resulting information and diversity more available to all stakeholders in the yam value chain (Witcombe et al., 2001; Kenyon and Fowler, 2000). The decentralization of conservation activities on-farm will allow a more efficient regeneration of materials adapted to the various agro-ecological zones and an increased access to diversity of yams by farmers and other users. The knowledge of existing diversity and farmers’ preferences are also a prerequisite for managing the decentralization process in a rational and efficient manner (Almekinders and Elings, 2001; Howard, 2003). The objectives of the study were to survey the diversity of yam in four communities in Southern Ghana in terms of the number of species cultivated per household, assessment of endangered species, identification of challenges facing yam farmers, preferred yam cultivars by farmers and to   develop strategies for sustainable production of yams for food security, income generation and sustainable livelihood.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site selection
 
The study was conducted in four yam growing communities: Dinkro community in the Afram Plains district of the Eastern Region; Agou-fie in the Nkwanta District of the Volta region; Mfadwen in the Ewutu-Senya district of the Central region and Nyankumase in the Upper Manya district of the Eastern region. Data were collected through observation, group and individual discussions and interviews using structured questionnaire (Adoukonou-Sagbadja et al., 2006; Dansi et al., 2008a, b). The farmers were selected taking into consideration their gender, with the assistance of the Agricultural Extension Agents of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture. The discussion on yam diversity was always preceded with an enumeration of various challenges of yam cultivation and their performance.
 
Diversity inventory and distribution
 
At each village, information were taken on: name of variety, species, maturity (early or late), extent of distribution (that is, number of households and cultivated area) which were recorded using four square analysis approach (Brush, 2000; Dansi et al., 2008a, b). All the accessions were taken, evaluated and placed in the appropriate quadrant. Discussions were also held to understand the reasons of cultivation, ranking of preferred varieties and challenges encountered in each community.
 
Data analyses
 
Data was analyzed using SAS 9.2 software and using the simple matching coefficient of similarity, a dendrogram was created by Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Average (Rohlf, 2000).


 RESULTS

Demographic information
 
Table 1 shows the demographic characteristic of the areas surveyed. A total of 246 farmers were involved, 200 males (81%) and 46 females (19%). The percentage of male participants ranged from 76.6% in Mfadwen to 91.4% in Dinkro. Female participants were highest in Mfadwen (23.4%) and least in Dinkro (8.6%). Of the 15 ethnic groups, the Krakyes, Dagombas, Kusasis, Ewes and Akans were the dominant growers of yams as they were encountered in more than one community.
 
Households and extent of cultivation in the four communities
 
Table 2 shows the variability in terms of cultivation and the number of households of the  yams  surveyed.  The greatest numbers of yam varieties were recorded at Dinkro (46) with the least at Mfadwen (20). In general, the number of accessions cultivated by few households on small areas constitutes 77.2% of the total.
 
 

To a lesser extent 12.4% of the yams were cultivated by many households over large areas. In terms of the communities, Dinkro and Agou-fie had the greatest number of yams being cultivated by many households as well as the greatest number of few households on small areas.

 

Maturity period of the accessions

 

Table 3 shows the maturity period early (double harvesting) and late (single harvesting) in the four communities.  Forty-seven   accessions   of   D. rotundata were double harvested and thirty accessions were single harvested. Dinkro and Agoufie had the greatest number of double and single harvested D. rotundata respectively. In D. alata, nine accessions were double harvested in only one community and 34 accessions were single harvested in three communities. In the other three species, Nyankumase recorded a total number of double harvested of 14: D. cayenensis (6), D. dumetorom (1) and D. praehensilis (7). Of the six species enumerated, D. roundata had the greatest number of accessions of 77 followed   by   43 in   D . alata,    with   D.   esculenta,  D.dumetorom having one accession each.

 

Preference for yams

 

Figure 1 shows the preference of the yams   in   the localities and the extent of cultivation in terms of households and area under production. Six varieties were listed, all D. rotundatas, three of which were listed in three communities.

 

 

The varieties: Ntonto, Brass and Pona were planted by many households on large areas and double harvested (Quadrant one). Other most preferred yams cultivated by few household on small areas were: four D. rotundatas (Dika, Kasaante, Kukrupa and Klohie) and three D. praehensilis (Odono, Baale Otim and Kate) which are double harvested. In terms of the communities, at Mfadwen, the preferred D. rotundata varieties were: Ntonto, Krukrupa and Brass and that of D. alata were Matches and Afasee Maale. Ntonto and Brass were cultivated by many households in large areas and practice double harvesting. At Agou-fie, the preferred varieties were Labrako, Pona, Nyamenti and Olando. All the preferred yams were D. rotundata which were double harvested and cultivated by many households over large areas. At Nyankumase, the preferred D. rotundata varieties were Pona and Klohie and that of D. praehensilis were Odono, Kate and Baale Otim. Both D. rotundata and D. praehensilis were double harvested and cultivated in few areas. At Dinkro, the preferred varieties were Ntonto and Brass and cultivated by many people over large areas. Others are Kasaante, Dika and Baale which are cultivated by few people over small areas.

 

Constraints identified

 

Table 4 shows the constraints enumerated during the survey. In all, 11 constraints were recorded. Diseases and pests were recorded as the major constraints in all the four communities. Planting materials constraints were recorded in Nyankumasi and Mfadwen; storage/shelf life and credit were recorded at Mfadwen and Agoufie. Mfadwen recorded constraints of land availability, poor soil, labour and drought. Weed control and transportation were recorded at Agoufie. In all, Mfadwen recorded the highest number of constraints (8) and  Dinkro had the least (1).

 

Figure 2 shows the dendogram of the species based on the characteristic of the yams surveyed. At a similarity index of 10.42, there were two major clusters. Cluster one consists of only D. rotundata and cluster 2 consists of two sub-clusters: D. alata and that of D. esculenta, D. cayenensis, D. dumetorom and D. praehensilis together. These two sub-clusters had a similarity index of 40.28. At the similarity index of 85, there were two sub-clusters grouping D. esculenta and D. cayenensis together with D. dumetorom and D. praehensilis.

 

 
 
 
 


 DISCUSSION

Within the four communities  surveyed,  a  total  of  136 accessions of yams and six out of the seven known species of yams in Ghana were encountered: D. alata - 43; D. rotundata - 77; D. praehensilis – 7; D. cayenensis – 7; D. esculenta -1 and D. dumetorom - 1. A major challenge was the genetic erosion in the farmers’ fields as depicted  by  the  greater  number of accessions in quadrant IV (few households, in small areas), showing a value of 77.2%.
 
Concerted efforts are being made in Ghana to multiply some of the germplasm under threat for re-distribution to farmers and also to place all available yam germplasm in vitro. Yam diversity fairs must be organized by stakeholders to afford farmers opportunity to know more about yam genetic resources and to exchange germplasm, a way of broadening the genetic base of yams on farmers’ fields (Witcombe et al., 2001). The genetic erosion on-farm are due to the introduction of new varieties, loss of farms, changes in farmers’ practice and market demand (Kenyon and Fowler, 2000). Climate change, biotic and abiotic stresses are the other causes of genetic erosion and cultivation of few accessions in small areas. On the other hand as many as 103 accessions were cultivated by farmers under small areas. The number of accessions being cultivated may have peculiar characteristics to mitigate stresses for sustainable food security. In this study, some accessions were identified as tolerant to drought or excessive moisture and these materials give ample room for further research and development of varieties to mitigate stresses. D. praehensilis was identified in only one community and it was double harvested and the others were found in all the four localities. Conspicuously absent was D. bulbifera which was not encountered in any of the communities, a situation giving cause to underutilization, genetic erosion and extinction and suggest urgent need to salvage this endangered variety. In the localities, preference was given to some accessions in terms of maturity (double - early or single - late harvested), tolerant to abiotic and biotic stresses and utilization. Of particular mention was the identification of some yams with special traits resilient to climate change. They are: D. rotundata: ‘Nyamenti’ – which can tolerate excess moisture conditions; Pklinjo, Benin and Ofunkudja which are also D. rotundata varieties that tolerate moisture stress conditions. Other attributes need further investigation so as to develop a full agronomic package to boost their productivity. Over the years, participatory characterization and evaluation were done by scientists without the involvement of the farmers and other stakeholders (Kamara et al., 1996; Kitch et al., 1998; Witcombe et al., 1996). Concerted efforts must be made to involve all stakeholders in the yam value chain for better utilization by knowing the culinary and storage properties of the materials of which gender role especially that of women is very crucial (Defoer et al., 1997; Ogato et al., 2009). Out of the seventeen yam accessions preferred by the farmers, 14 were D. rotundata, out of which 10 were double harvested and 10 were cultivated by many households in large areas (Table 4). Such varieties should be candidate materials for any yam improvement strategy to boost production. Two major groups of white yams in terms of maturity were encountered: early yielding and late yielding. Early yielding in white yams is defined as the ability to conveniently give a double harvest at one planting season when the yam is milked. Late yielding ones were those that might not give ware-tubers if harvested early, in an attempt to obtain double harvest. Generally the preferred yams were early maturing i.e. double harvesting, good quality, good market price, excellent storability and can be used as fufu, a delicacy in Ghana. Other food preparations include Ampesi, Koliko, Wasawasa, Konkonte, Tubani and roasted yam (Owusu et al., 1994). At Nyankumase, all the yams were double harvested and planted by few households. It was the only location that had D. praehensilis among the six species recorded. At Agou-fie, 23 of the yam varieties were double harvested and 13 single harvested, showing the balance between production of ware yams and planting materials (Bennett-Lartey et al., 1997). These materials should be developed as food security crops as well as planting materials production.
 
Diseases and pests issues are often neglected in conservation approaches despite their negative effects on collected samples and further use of the germplasm. Diseases and pest were prevalent in all the 4 areas surveyed. Yam tubers are known to carry and accumulate many pests and diseases: viruses, fungi, nematodes, insects and bacteria (Coyne et al., 2006; Coyne et al., 2012; Morse et al., 2000).
 
As a result, while maintained in the field by farmers , they presents reservoir of pests and diseases with damaging consequences on future germplasm production and pathogen dispersion and the surest way to obtain disease free materials, is through in-vitro conservation. On the other hand materials identified to be resistant to diseases and pests need to be developed, promoted and used by farmers (Ettien et al., 2013; Jarvis and Campilan, 2006).


 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The survey has revealed a number of challenges facing yam production in southern Ghana. Among them was the number of accessions cultivated by few household in small areas, giving cause to tackle genetic erosion of the species to prevent their total extinction. The gender imbalance as reflected in the involvement of women needs to be looked at, since apart from the mounds making (normally done by men), women are the key stakeholders in the marketing, transportation and processing (as food and food products) of yam. Particular attention must be paid to yams preferred such as the following D. rotundatas: Ntonto, Brass, Olando, Nyamenti, Pona, Klohie, Asana, Kukrupa, Labrako, Dika and Kasaante. The preferred D. alata are the Afasee Maale and Maale and that of D. praehensilis include Odono, Otim and Kate. These materials should be improved and production technologies transferred to farmers to enhance productivity of yams. Finally, farmers’ access to conserved germplasm should be improved through the multiplication, distribution and exchange of yam genetic resources.


 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The support of the Global Crop Diversity Trust, the Ministry of Food and Agriculture as well as the Farmer groups in the four locations is gratefully acknowledged.



 REFERENCES

Adoukonou-Sagbadja H, Dansi A, Vodouhe R, Akpagana K (2006). Indigenous knowledge and traditional conservation of Fonio millet (Digitaria exilis Stapf, Digitaria iburua Stapf) in Togo. Biodiver. Conserv. 15:2379-2395.
Crossref
 
Akromah R, Bennett-Lartey SO (1993). The status of yam and cassava genetic resources at the Plant Genetic Resources Unit, Bunso. Paper presented at the 2nd National Root and Tuber Crops and Plantain Workshop, KTI, Kumasi, October 21-22, 1993.
 
Almekinders CJM, Elings E (2001). Collaboration of farmers and breeders: participatory crop improvement in perspectives. Euphytica 122:425-428.
Crossref
 
Arunachalam V (2000). Participatory conservation: a means of encouraging community biodiversity. Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett. 122:1-6.
 
Asante SK, Mensah GWK, Wahaga E (2007). Farmers' knowledge and perceptions of insect pests of yam (Dioscorea spp. And their indigenous control practices in northern Ghana. Ghana. J. Agric. Sci. 40:185-192.
 
Ayedoji SP, Olabanji OM, Adeyeri MK (2012). Design of a process plant for the production of pound yam. Int. J. Eng. 6:10-14.
 
Bancroft RD, Crensil D, Panni JY, Aboagye-Nuamah F, Krampa L (2005). The influence of post-harvest conditioning and storage protocols on the incidence of rots in white yams (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) in Ghana. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 682:2183-2190).
 
Bennett-Lartey SO, Aboagye LM, Gamedoagbao DK (1997). NARP root and tuber crops collection, characterization and evaluation Report. CSIR-PGRC Technical Report 97/2 10 pp.
 
Bennett-Lartey SO, Akromah R (1996). The role of women in plant genetic resources conservation. Plant Genet. Resour. Newslett. 106:43.
 
Brush SB (2000). Genes in the field: on-farm conservation of crop diversity. Boca Raton, Lewis Publishers P. 288.
 
Cooper D, Vellve R, Hobbelink H (1992). Growing diversity: genetic resources and local food security. Intermediate Technology, London.
Crossref
 
Coyne D, Tehabi A, Bainey H, Labuschagnet N, Rotifa I (2006). Distribution and prevalence of nematodes (Scutellonemabrachys and Meloidogyne spp.) on marketed yam (Dioscorea spp.) in West Africa. Field Crops Res. 96:142-150.
Crossref
 
Coyne D, Williamson V, Baimey H, Rotifa I (2002). Comparison of pathogenicity of geographically separate populations of Scutellonemabrachys on yam (Dioscorea spp.) in West Africa. Nematropic 42:161-190.
 
Dansi A, Mignouna HD, Zoundjihekpon J, Sangare A, Ahoussou N, Asiedu R (2000). Identification of some Benin Republic Guinea Yam (Dioscorea cayenensis/Dioscorea rotundata complex) cultivars using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet. Resourc. Crop Evol. 47:619-625.
 
Dansi A, Adjatin A, Adokounou-Sagbadar H, Falade V Yedomouhan H, Odou H, Dossou B (2008a). Traditional leafy vegetables and their use in the Benin Republic Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 8(55):1239-1256.
 
Dansi A, Adjatin A, Adokounou-Sagbadar H, Akpagana K (2008b). Production and traditional seeds conservation of leafy vegetables in Benin's rural areas. Bulletin de la Recherche Agronomic du Benin 59:59-70.
 
Dansi A, Dantsey-barry H, Agre AP, Dossou-Aminon I, Assogba P, Loko YL, N'Kpenu EK, Kombate, K, Dansi M, Vodouhe R (2013). Production constraints and farmers' cultivar preference criteria of cultivated yams (Dioscorea cayenensis-D. rotundata complex in Togo. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharmaceut. Technol. 4:191-199.
 
Defoer T, Kamara A, De Groote H (1997). Gender and variety selection: farmer's assessment of local maize varieties in southern Mali. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 5(1):65-76.
Crossref
 
Demuyakor B, Dukrog TM, Chikpah SK (2013). Yam germplasm in Ghana–A survey on varietal identification and characterization of Dioscorea rotundata – alata in Northern region in Ghana. Int. J. Agron. Plant Prod. 4:719-726.
 
Ettien BD, Sorho F, Brahima K (2013). Screening of new yam clones (D. alata and D. rotundata) in nematode prone ecology of Guinea savannah zone in West Africa. West Afr. J. Appl. Biosci. 61:4540-4550.
Crossref
 
FAO (2009). FAOSTAT. Statistics Division of the Food and Agricultural Organization.
 
Fu YRH, Kikuno H, Maruyama M (2011). Research on yam production, marketing and consumption of Nupe farmers of Niger state, Central Nigeria. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6:5301-5313.
 
Howard P (2003). Women and plants. Gender relations in biodiversity management Zed Press and Palgrave-Macmillan, London, New York pp. 101-114.
 
Jarvis DI, Campilan DM (2006). Crop Genetic Diversity to reduce pests and diseases on-farm: participatory diagnosis guide lines. Version 1. Biodiversity Technical Bulletin P. 12. Biodiversity International, Rome.
 
Kamara A, Defoer T, De Groove H (1996). Selection of new varieties through participatory research, the case of corn in South Mali. Tropicultura 14(3):100–106.
 
Kenyon L, Fowler M (2000). Factors affecting the uptake and adoption of output of crop protection research on yams in Ghana. Natural Resource International Limited. U.K, pp. 15-25.
 
Kitch LW, Boukar O, Endodo C, Murdrock LL (1998). Farmers' acceptability criteria in breeding cowpea. Exp. Agric. 34:473-486.
Crossref
 
Mignouna HD, Abang MM, Fagbemi SA (2003). A comparative assessment of molecular marker assays (AFLP, RAPD and SSR) for white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) germplasm characterization. Ann. Appl. Biol. 142:269-276.
Crossref
 
Morse S, Acholo M, McNamara N, Oliver R (2000). Control of storage insects as a means of limiting yam tuber fungal rots. J. Stored Prod. Res. 36:37-45.
Crossref
 
Ogato GS, Boon EK, Subramani J (2009). Gender roles in crop production and management practices: A case study of three communities in the Ambo district, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Ecol. 27(1):1-20.
 
Oluwole OB, Awororin SO, Henshaw F, Elemo GN, Ebuehi OAT (2013). Assessment of microbial changes and nutritional qualities of extruded white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) and Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranean) blends. Food Nutr. Sci. 4:100-107.
Crossref
 
Osei K, Awuah RT, Tabil MA, Asante JS (2004). Prevalence and farmers' perception of parasitic nematodes in yam rhizosphere soils from yam producing areas of Ghana. Agric. Food Sci. J. Ghana 3:217-226.
 
Owusu JGK, Quashie-Sam S J, Nkyi KA, Oppong SK (1994). Indigenous African food crops and useful plants, their preparations for food and home gardens in Ghana. UNU/INRA Natural Resources Survey. B1.
 
Park YJ, Dixit A, Ma KH, Kang JH, Rao VR, Cho EG (2005). On-farm conservation strategy to ensure crop genetic diversity in changing agro-ecosystem in the Republic of Korea. J. Agron. Soil Sci. 191(6):401-410.
Crossref
 
Rohlf FJ (2000). NTSYS-pc Version 2.2: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Exeter Software, NewYork, NY,USA, 2000.
 
Sesay L, Norman PE, Massaquoi A, Kobba F, Allieu AP, Gboku ML, Fomba SN (2013). Assessment of farmers' indigenous knowledge and selection criteria of yam in Sierra Leone. Sky J. Agric. Res. 2:1-6.
 
SRID (2011). Ghana Agriculture. Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Statistics, Research and Information Directorate (SRID, 2011).
 
Tanzubil PB, Yakubu EA (1997). Insect pests of Millet in Northern Ghana. 1. Farmers' perceptions and damage potential. Int. J. Pests Manage. 42:133-136.
Crossref
 
Witcombe JR, Joshi KD, Rana RB, Virk DS (2001). Broadening genetic diversity in high potential production systems by participatory selection. Euphytica 122:575-588.
 
Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi KD, Sthapit BR (1996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. I Varietal Selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exper. Agric. 32:445-460.
Crossref

 




          */?>