African Journal of
Food Science

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Food Sci.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0794
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJFS
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 979

Full Length Research Paper

Influence of temperature and time on microbial, physicochemical and functional quality of goat milk

Ibrahim Aldaw Ibrahim
  • Ibrahim Aldaw Ibrahim
  • Department of of Food and Technology, Faculty of agriculture, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman,Purwokerto, Indonesia.
  • Google Scholar
Rifda Naufalin
  • Rifda Naufalin
  • Department of of Food and Technology, Faculty of agriculture, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman,Purwokerto, Indonesia.
  • Google Scholar
Erminawati Wuryatmo
  • Erminawati Wuryatmo
  • Department of of Food and Technology, Faculty of agriculture, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman,Purwokerto, Indonesia.
  • Google Scholar
Hidayah Dwiyanti
  • Hidayah Dwiyanti
  • Department of of Food and Technology, Faculty of agriculture, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman,Purwokerto, Indonesia.
  • Google Scholar
Shima Esameldin Hamouda
  • Shima Esameldin Hamouda
  • Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum, Sudan.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 30 January 2020
  •  Accepted: 02 April 2020
  •  Published: 31 May 2020

 ABSTRACT

Microbial load in fresh milk has a significant effect on its keeping quality and nutritional value. From Prehistoric time, human used heat process to reduce microbials load in raw milk to improve its sensory characteristics. This research is proposed to treat fresh goat milk with heating process to provide optimal pasteurization conditions that does not  influence the goat milk chemical composition to suite production of goat yogurt powder. The pasteurization conditions considered were: Temperature (72, 80, and 85°C) and time (5, 10 and 15s). These results showed there were a significant difference (P<0.05) between treated milk and Indonesia national standards on viscosity and pH; whereas there was no significant differences on density and titratable acidity. The study results concluded that the temperature and time during heat processing had a significant effect on nutritional compounds of goat milk, with increase in lactose and non-fat solids contents; therefore, treated goat milk at 85°C to 5 s is better than other treatments.
 
Key words: Goat’s milk, pasteurization, physicochemical analysis, microbiology.


 INTRODUCTION

Milk is a good food in human diet. It is a source of nutrients such as vitamins, protein, fat, water, lactose, and essential minerals. It contains minerals, enzymes and vitamins as secondary constituents (Contreras et al., 2015; Raikos, 2010; Pereira, 2014; Mcmahon, 2013; Guetouache et al., 2014).
 
Goat’s milk contains a higher amount of minerals than cow and human milks, such as magnesium, calcium and phosphorus (Abbas et al., 2014). Moreover, itcontains several nutrients and therapeutic properties as a functional   diet   for   human   health.   It’s   important  for prevention of diseases, and used for stimulation of immunity (Vargas et al., 2008; Zenebe et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2012).. Goat’s milk has a higher digestibility and less sensitivity digestion than cow’s milk, as well as a higher content of short-chain fatty acids in milk fat, high zinc and iron content magnesium and antibacterial properties (Slacanac et al., 2010; Guowei et al., 2016). Microbial growth has been reported to impact negatively on the physicochemical characteristics,  shelf life of raw and processed milk as well as in other dairy products (Samaržija et al.,  2010).  Heat  processing  is  the  oldest methods used to treat dairy products; it is applied to reduce microbial load in raw milk and improving sensory properties of milk compounds. Thus, it is consideredas a very effective and simple method. In addition, it has a positive effect on sensory and nutritional values of milks and dairy products (Pedras et al., 2012; Raikos, 2010; Vargas, 2016).
 
The high temperature for long time processing of milk leads to more reduction of the amount of water, leading to increase in total solids. Moreover, heat treatment of milk up to 80°C for 15sleads to less nutritional minerals such as calcium (Sestan et al., 2016). Pasteurization is capable of reducing a count of microbial load in raw milk, which is important to extend the shelf life of milk. On the other hand, they have no influence on milk composition and fatty acid profile (Pestana et al., 2015; El-Zubeir et al., 2007).
 
Pasteurization is one of the processing used to reduce microbial load and extend the shelf life of the milk. However, it affects milk compounds and decreasesthe milk nutritional values. It has negative effect on loss of some vitamins with changing in nutritional and sensory properties (Cavalcante et al., 2013; Aguirre et al., 2009; Abd Elrahman et al., 2013). The study investigated the effect of pasteurization temperature and time on microbial and physicochemical quality of goat’s milk and its outcome on lactose and non-fat solids level.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collacted
 
Goat’s milk samples,Perankan Etawa, were purchased from Baturaden Animal Farm, Purwokertow, Central Java, Indonesia. Then samples were stored in freezer at -80°C for subsequent processing.
 
Heat processing
 
A half liter (500ml) for each goatmilk samples were weighted and put separately in a pot.Milk samples were coded from Y1 to Y9 as treated milk and Y10 as a control. Milk samples were put in pots and heated at different temparetures (72, 80 and 85°C) at different times (5, 10 and 15 s). The milk samples were treated according to methods (Zhao, 2016; Miao, 2011; Wu et al., 2016; Ibrahim et al., 2019).
 
Physicochemical analysis
 
The goat milk samples were analyzed for the chemical compositions using a lactoscan analyzer. The compositional parameters evaluated were: Physical and chemicalcharacteristics of heated milk as (total solid (TS), pH, titratable acidity (TA), density (25°C), viscosity (25ËšC), and color. The density was determined according to (SNI: 06- 2385-2006), official method 920.212. The viscosity was determined according to AOAC (2005). The color parameters were determined using a minolta CM-2002 spectrophotometer   (minolta   camera   Co.,  osaka,  Japan) in   the reflection mode, using the method of (Chugh et al., 2014; Bermúdez-Aguirre et al., 2009), according to color meassured. Lightness to darkness (L*) (100 to 0), redness(+) to greenness (-)(a*) and yellowness (+) to blueness (-)(b*) 20 ml of raw and thermo-ultrasonicated.The total solid (TS) was determined according to the method of Almeida et al. (2010). The pH (AOAC, 2005) and the titratable acidity (TA) was determined according to AOAC (2005) method.The microbiology analysis of the samples, total plat count, yeasts, and moulds were determined according to method of Mohammad and El -Zubeir, (2011) as decribed by Igbabul et al. (2014). The media and distilled water and other tools were sterilized using autoclave, and using serial dilution to 103 to reduce the number of microorganisms in samples.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) two-way tests was performed to evaluate the difference between data by using SPSS for Windows (version 16, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and Microsoft Excel (2013). The means were separated by Duncan Multiple range test. Significant differences were determined at (P≤0.05).


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Goat milk compositions
 
The results obtained from Table 1 shown compositions content of fresh goat milk.  Fresh goat milk sample analysis by lactoscan showed that the fat content was 6.67%. This result shows that fresh goat milk has a higher fat content than cow milk; thus, it has better taste and aroma in final yogurt production. This result agrees with Indonesian National Standards (2008), and disagrees with Yusa et al. (2017), who reported that the fresh goat milk fat content wes 4.5% and pasteurized goat milk was 5%. This difference in fat contentt is due to animal type, age, race, season, environment and feeds. Specific gravity value was 21.41%; this result is lower than cow milk specific gravity. These results showed significant difference with Standard National Indonesian (SNI) (2011) in specific gravity, this difference is due to water content in milk. The high amount of water in milk decrease specific gravity and other milk compositions. The non-fat solids values were 6.81%, this result is lowest in cow milk having non-fat solids, and disagrees with TAS (2008). The lactose value obtained was 3.26%, this result showed that the lactose content of fresh goat milk is lower that cow milk and not in range of standards. TAS (2008) it reported the lactose content of milk was minimum 4.5% and non-fat solids was 7.8%; this difference is due to animal type, age, race, season, environment and feeding.
 
Effect of pasteurization on fresh goat milk compositions
 
The protein results showed that in Table 2, from these results obtained, the  protein  content  (%)  of  sample  Y1 was 2.97 is higher than other samples, and protein value in sample Y6 was 2.59, which is lowest in protein content. The results obtained from each samples showed significant difference with control sample and SNI (2011), which reported that the goat milk protein contains between 3.1-3.2, fat contain is 3.25-3.5, and total solid is 11.7-12. This difference is due to temperature and time, which have significant effect on decreased fresh goat milk protein level. This decrease in level of protein with increase pasteurization temperature is due to concomitant decrease in moisture, hence the increase in level of protein denaturation. These results are consistentwith Hamodah et al. (2018),  Aguirre et al.(2009) but disagrees with Abdelrahman et al. (2013), who mentioned that pasteurizing milk can decrease nutritional values of milk such as protien content, pH and density. Also, from the results, it increase the butter fat and titratable acidity in milk, and this is in agreement with Ul Hag et al. (2013), who mentioned that pasteurization and sterillization processes revealed significant influence on pH, titeritable acidity, specific gravity, lactose, fat, protein and ash content of milk and skimmed milk.
 
 
The fat content was higher in Sample Y1, 6.65%and lowest in Y3,5.57%. This result showed that fat content is lower  than  control  and  higher  than indonesian national standard.From these results, the pasteurization has significant effect on decrease fat content of fresh goat milk. This decreasein fat content is due to effect of pasteurization temperature on oxidation of milk fat; thus, leading to  breaking up of the clumps or clusters of fat in raw milk, and consequently, decrease fat content in treated milk. These results are in agreement with Elhasan et al. (2017), Mohammad et al. (2017), and disagrees with Li et al (2018), who mentioned that pasteurization treatment is capable to reduce microbila load in fresh milk.However, it is not effective on levels of oxidation in lipids and without significant changes in the milk pH. This is in agreement with some studies (Cavalcante et al., 2013; Aguirrre et al., 2009; Abd Elrahman et al., 2013) that reported that Pasteurization is one of the treatments used to reduce microbial load and prolong the shelf life of raw milk. it has positive effect on milk compounds and decrease nutritional values of milk. However, it has loss of some vitamins with change in nutritional and sensory properties.
 
The non-fat solids are highest in Y3 sample was 8.06%, and showed lowest in sample Y1, 7.1%. From these results, there were significant difference (P≥0.05) between all treated milk samples with control. This results shows   that   pasteurization   has   significant   effect   on increased non-fat solids. This differencein increasing non-fat solid due to the temperature effect on evaporated water from milk led todecreased water content, and change in nature of carbhydrate in milk. These results disagree with Abdelrahman et al. (2013), who mentioned that pasteurizing milk can decrease nutritional values of milk such as protein content. On the other hand, lactose content and specific gravity in each samples increased.In addition, the heat treatment increased non-fat olids, lactose and specific gravity values, and deceased the protein and fat content. This results is consistent with Hamodah et al. (2018) and Aguirre et al. (2009) and disagree with Abdelrahman et al. (2013), who mentioned that pasteurizing milk can decrease nutritional values of milk such as protien content, pH. Also, it increased the titratable acidity in milk, which is in agreement with Ul Hag et al. (2013) who mentioned that pasteurization and sterillization processes revealed significant influence on pH, titeritable acidity, specific gravity, lactose, fat protein and ash content of milk.
 
Effect of heat processing on physicochemical properties of fresh goat milk
 
Table 3 showed effect of pasteurization on physical and chemical properties of fresh goat milk. The results obtained are presented in Table 3. Based on results obtained from milk analysis by lactoscan analyzer,it showed that the pH of Y1 was 6.6, Y2 was 6.5, Y3was 6.4, Y4 was 6.3, Y5 was 6.3, Y6 was 6.2, Y7 was6.6, Y8 was 6.4, and Y9 was 6.5. These results showed that the pH of Y3 is higher comparedto other samples, and pH values of Y6 sample was lowest, 6.2. From these results there was significant diference between heated goat milk and control. These results shows that pasteurization has significant effect on decreased pH value of fresh milk. Thedifference in pH value is due to effect of temperature and  time  on  milk  compounds.  The   density  values   of samples  were  1.03,  1.03,  1.05,  1.08,  1.01, 1.04, 1.06, 1.05, 1.06 respectivly. The result obtained shows that the density of Y4 is highest, and density value of Y5 sample is the lowest. These results showsignificant difference (P≤ 0.05) between Y4, Y9, Y7, Y8, Y3 and Y5;on the other hand, no significant difference (P≤ 0.05) between Y1Y2 and control samples. The freeze point values were -0.460, -0.493, -0.539, -0.501, -0.519, -0.452, -0.510, -0.480, -0.511, and -0.384 as control samplerespectively. These results showed significant difference (P≤ 0.05) between heat goat milk samples. These results indicate that the pasteurization has significant effect on pH decrease, density and freezing point, and increase of titeritable acidity in goat milk. Conversely, there was no significant effect on titeritable acidity. This result disagrees with Frau et al. (2014), and agrees others (Ul Hag  et al.,2013; Elhasan et al.,2017). Wang et al. (2016) reported the different heat processes effect on milk properties, and agrees with Ul Saha and Ara (2012), who mentioned that pasteurization and sterillization processes revealed significant influence on pH, titeritable acidity, specific gravity, lactose, fat protein and ash content of milk and skemmed milk.
 
Effect of pasteurization on micorobial load in goat milk
 
According to Table 4, the tpc values (x103cfu/ml ) were 8.6, 7.0, 6.0, 6.0, 5,3 5.3, 4.6, 4.4, 3.6 and 12.1 as control sample respectivly. The results showed significant difference (P≤ 0.05) between each sample. The values of yeast were  5.0, 4.0, 3.3, 2.3, 2.3, 2.3, 1.3, 2.0, 2.3 and 7.5 respectively. Significant difference (P≤ 0.05) between Y1, Y2, Y3, Y7, Y8, and control was seen. Moreover, no significant difference was seen between Y4, Y5, Y6 and Y9. The amount of microbials loded in raw milk was reduced by all treatment types of pasteurization. On the other hand, 80ËšC for 15 min of pasteurization reduced the amount of total plate count, yeast and mould compared to control     12.1 - 3.6,     7.5 - 2.3,     10.0 - 3.3 ×103   cfu/ml respectively. Therefore, the microbiological results highlighted that pasteurization was effective to reduce microbial loadin milk. Moreover, the pasteurizing milk at different temperature for different times such as 72, 80 and 85°C for 5, 10 and 15s were effective to decrease count of microbials in milk.These reductions are possibly enough to improve the quality of raw milk, thus increase quality of products made from it. These results are in agree with Cavalcant et al. (2013). SNI (2011) set the microbial contamination in fresh milk at a maximum limit of Enterobacteriaceae consisting 1×103cfu/ml and Staphylococcus aureus of 1×102 cfuL. The total plate count (TPC) has a maximum 1×106cfu/ml. In addition, the pasteurization at 85°Cfor 15sis capable of reducing microbial load in raw milk;however, most heat fresh goat milk at higher temperature to shorten time such as 85°C to 5s or 72°C for 15s.
 


 CONCLUSION

This study concludes that temperature and time has significant (P≤ 0.05) effect on goat milk chemical composition such as lactose, protein, fat, non-fat solids contents and physicochemical properties such as pH, density, and freezing point. Onthe other hand, it decreases protein, fat, pH, and density, whileit increases the lactose and non-fat solids of goat milk.Therefore, the 85°C for 5sincreased the level of non-solids and lactose in goat milk issuitable for producing goat milk yogurt powder. 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.

 


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The  authors   are   grateful  to  the  ministry  of  research, technology and higher education, and to the Research and Society Service Institute of Universitas Genderal Soedirman for their funding and support. They also want to thank Omdurman Islamic university for the collaboration.



 REFERENCES

Almeida LAGF, Cavalcante MT, Castro RD, Cavalcanti AL (2010). Cariogenic and erosive potential of industrialized fruit juices available in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 9(3):351-357.

 

Abbas H, Hassan FA, Abd El-Gawad MA, Enab A (2014). Physicochemical Characteristics of Goat's Milk. Igarss 11(1):307-17.

 
 

Abd Elrahman AMS, Ahmed MMA, El Zubeir MEI, El Owni OAO, Ahmed AKM (2013). Effect of Storage Temperature on The Microbiological and Physicochemical Properties of Pasteurized Milk, Annals. Food Science and Technology 14(1).

 
 

Aguirre B D, Mawson R, Versteeg K, Cánovas BVG (2009). Composition Properties, Physicochemical Characteristics and Shelf Life of whole Milk After Thermaland Thermo-Sonication Treatments. Journal of Food Quality 32:283-302.
Crossref

 
 

AOAC (2005). Official methods of analysis. The association of official analytical chemists. 16th Edition, North Fredrick Avenue Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.

 
 

Cavalcante DA, Leite Júnior BRC, Tribst AAL, Cristianini (2013). Improvement of the raw milk microbiological quality by ozone treatment. International Food Research Journal 20(4):2017-2021.

 
 

Chugh A, Khanal D, Walkling R M, Corredig M, Duizer L, Griffiths MW (2014). Change in Color and Volatile Composition of Skim Milk Processed with Pulsed Electric Field and Microfiltration Treatments or Heat Pasteurization. Journal of Foods 3:250-368.
Crossref

 
 

Contreras VIP, Gaspar MPB, Luis ALB, Víctor RMM, Ana MSR (2015). Milk Composition and Its Relationship with Weaning Weight in Charolais Cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 44(6):207-12.
Crossref

 
 

El-Zubeir IEM, Gabriechise V, Johnson Q (2007). Study on some quality control measures of pasteurized milk of the Western Cape, South Africa. International Journal of Dairy Sciences (4):372-379.
Crossref

 
 

Elhasan SMO, Bushara AMM, Abdelhakam KEK, Elfaki HA, Eibaid AIA,

 
 

Farahat FH, Ali EMY, Sukrab AMA (2017). Effect of Heat Treatments on Physico-chemical properties of Milk Samples. Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) 6(3).

 
 

Frau F, Valdez GF, Pec N (2014). Effect of Pasteurization Temperature, Starter Culture,and Incubation Temperature on the Physicochemical Properties,Yield, Rheology, and Sensory Characteristics of Spreadable Goat Cheese. Journal of Food Processin 2014, Article ID 705746, 8.
Crossref

 
 

Guetouache M, Bettache G, Samir M (2014). Composition and nutritional value of raw milk. Issues in Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research 2(10):115.

 
 

Guowei S, Chunju B, Chen H, Wang W, Yang H (2016). Fermentation optimization of goat milk with lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum by box-behnken design. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Technologia Alimentaria 15(2):151-159.
Crossref

 
 

Hamodah SE, Robi A, Efrimardawati, Ibrahim AI (2018). Influence of Ozone and Pasteurization on physico-chemical properties, Microbiology, and stability of milk. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 8(1 Series. III):2319-6726.

 
 

Igbabul B, Shember J, Amove J (2014). Physicochemical, Microbiological and Sensory Evaluation of Yoghurt Sold in Makurdi Metropolis. African Journal of Food Science and Technology 5(6):129-35.

 
 

Ibrahim AI, Rifda N, Erminawati W, Hidayah D (2019). Effect of fermentation temperature and culture concentration on microbial and physicochemical properties of cow and goat milk yogurt. IOP Conference. Series: Earth and Environment Science 406(2019) 012009.
Crossref

 
 

Kumar S, Birendra K, Rajesh K, Suryamani K (2012). Featur Eatures Nutritional F Eatur Es of Goat Milk Review Eview. Indian Journal Dairy Science 65(4):266-273.

 
 

Li Y, Joyner HS, Carter BG, Drake MA (2018). Effects of fat content, pasteurization method, homogenization pressure, and storage time on the mechanical and sensory properties of bovine milk. Journal of Dairy Science 101(4):2941-2955.
Crossref

 
 

Mcmahon D (2013). Dairy Products in Human Nutrition Dairy Products, Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations.E-Isbn 978-92-5-107864-8.

 
 

Miao YZ (2011). Extraction of Water-Soluble Polysaccharides (WSPS) from Chinese Truffle and Its Application in Frozen Yogurt. Carbohydrate Polymers 86(2):566-573.
Crossref

 
 

Mohammad EEB, El-Zubeir I EM (2011). Chemical Composition and Microbial Load of Set Yoghurt from Fresh and Recombined Milk Powder in Khartoum State, Sudan. International Journal of Dairy Science 6(3):172-180.
Crossref

 
 

Mohammad H, Mazloomi SM, Eskandari MH, Aminlari M, Niakousari M (2017). The Effect of Ozone on Aflatoxin M1, Oxidative Stability, Carotenoid Content and the Microbial Count of Milk. Ozone: Science and Engineering 39(6):447-453.
Crossref

 
 

Pedras MM, Pinho CRG, Tribst AAL, Franchi MA, Cristianini M (2012). The effect of high pressure homogenization on microorganisms in milk. International Food Research Journal 19(1):1-5.
Crossref

 
 

Pereira PC (2014). Milk Nutritional Composition and Its Role in Human Health. Nutrition 30(6):619-27.
Crossref

 
 

Pestana MJ, Gennari A, Monteiro WB, Lehn ND, De Souza VFC (2015). Effects of Pasteurization and Ultra-High Temperature Processes on Proximate Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Bovine Milk. American Journal of Food Technology 10(6):265-272.
Crossref

 
 

Raikos V (2010). Effect of heat treatment on milk protein functionality at emulsion interfaces. A review. Food Hydrocolloids 24:259-265.
Crossref

 
 

Saha S, Ara A (2012). Chemical and Microbiological Evaluation of Pasteurized Milk Available in Sylhet City of Bangladesh. The Agriculturists 10(2):104-108.
Crossref

 
 

Samaržija D, Zamberlin S, Pogačić T (2012). Psychrotrophic bacteria and milk and dairy products quality; Review. Mljekarstvo 62(2):77-95.

 
 

Sestan I, Odobašić A, Bratovčić A (2016). The effect of heat treatment on the physical-chemical properties of milk. Academia Journal of Environmental Science 4(7):131-136.

 
 

Standard Nasional Indonesia (SNI) (2006). Patchouli Oil, (SNI 06- 2385:2006), Jakarta.

 
 

Standard Nasional Indonesia (SNI) (2011). Susu segar-bagian 1: sapi. SNI 3141.1: 2011. ICS 67. 100. 01.

 
 

Slacanac V, Bozanic R, Hardi J, Rezessyne S J, Lucan M, Krstanovic V (2010). Nutritional and therapeutic value of fermented caprine milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology 63(2):171-189.
Crossref

 
 

Thai Agricultural Standard TAS (2008). Raw Goat Milk. Published in the Royal Gazette Vol. 125 Section 139 D, dated 18 Augest B.E.2551.

 
 

Ul Hag S, Khaskheli M, Kiani FA, Talpur AR, Lochi GM, Soomro AA, Salman M, Marri MY, Mari MM (2013). Effect of Heat Treatments on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Skimmed Milk. Journal of Agriculture and Food Technology 3(12)5-13.

 
 

Vargas M, Cháfer M, Albors A, Chiralt A, González-Martínez C (2008). Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of yoghurt produced from mixtures of cows' and goats' milk. International Dairy Journal 18(12):1146-1152.
Crossref

 
 

Wang C, Zhu Y, Wang J (2016). Comparative study on the heat stability of goat milk and cow milk. Indian Jornal of Animal Research 50(4):610-613.
Crossref

 
 

Wu H, Liming H, Guoping Z (2016). Effects of Electro-Osmosis on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Bentonite. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 28(8):6016010.
Crossref

 
 

Yusa M, Ismail, Razali, Ferasyi R, Syafruddin, Panjatan B (2017). Analysis kadar lemak Analisis Kadar Lemak Susu Kambing Peranakan Etawa Sebelum Dan Sesudah Dipasteurisasi Di Peternakan Lamnyong Kota Banda Aceh. JIMVET 2(1):35-40.

 
 

Zenebe T, Ahmed N, Kabeta T, Kebede G (2014). Review on Medicinal and Nutritional Values of Goat Milk. Academic Journal of Nutrition 3:30-39.

 
 

Zhao QZ, Jin SW, Mou MZ, Yue MJ, Cui CVL, Oszigeti J (2016). Use of ozone in the dairy industry: A review. International Journal of Dairy Technology 69:2.
Crossref

 

 




          */?>