Full Length Research Paper
References
|
Ajala MK (2007). Analyses of factors affecting the management of pigs in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Agricultural Journal 2(2):343-347. |
|
|
Am-in N, Wichai T and Mongkol T (2010). Comparison of artificial insemination with natural mating on smallholder farms in Thailand, and the effects of boar stimulation and distance of semen delivery on sow reproductive performance. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42 (5):921-924. |
|
|
Bayei JD, Nache AI (2014). The effect of socio-economic characteristics of cattle farmers on the adoption of artificial insemination technology in Kaduna State of Nigeria. International Organization of Scientific Reearch Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 7(9):2319-2372. |
|
|
Bortolozzo FP, Daniela AU, Paulo EB, Mauro CP, Cezar DC, Carlos HP, Waldomiro B, Ivo W (2005). Influence of time of insemination relative to ovulation and frequency of insemination on gilt fertility. Theriogenology 64(9):1956-1962. |
|
|
Chanapiwat P, Olanratmanee E, Kaeoket K, Tummaruk P (2014). Conception rate and litter size in multiparous sows after intrauterine insemination using frozen-thawed boar semen in a commercial swine herd in Thailand. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 76(10):1347-1351. |
|
|
Dee SA (1992). Porcine urogenital disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 8(3):641-660. |
|
|
Dhraief MZ, Bedhiaf-romdhani S, Dhehibi B, Oueslati-zlaoui M, Jebali O, Ben S (2018). Factors affecting the adoption of innovative technologies by livestock farmers in arid area of Tunisia. Research Report, Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa, Accra, Ghana. |
|
|
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2018). Meat Market Review. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. |
|
|
Feitsma H (2009). Artificial insemination in pigs, research and developments in The Netherlands, a review. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 37(1):61-72. |
|
|
Foxcroft GR, Dixon WT, Novak S, Putman CT, Town SC, Vinsky MD (2006). The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84(E. Suppl.):E105-E112. |
|
|
Gerrits RJ, Joan KL, Lawrence AJ, Vernon GP, Robert RK, Gary AR, John RD (2005). Perspectives for artificial insemination and genomics to improve global swine populations. Theriogenology 63(2):283-299. |
|
|
Godfray H, Charles J, John RB, Ian RC, Lawrence H, David L, James FM, Jules P, Sherman R, Sandy MT, Camilla T (2010). Food security : the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812-818. |
|
|
Howley P, Cathal OD, Kevin H (2012). Factors affecting farmers' adoption of agricultural innovations: a panel data analysis of the use of artificial insemination among dairy farmers in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science 4(6):171-179. |
|
|
IBM Corp. Released (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. |
|
|
Kadirvel G, Kumaresan A, Das A, Bujarbaruah KM, Venkatasubramanian V, Ngachan SV (2013). Artificial insemination of pigs reared under smallholder production system in northeastern india : success rate, genetic improvement and monetary benefit. Tropical Animal Health Production 45:679-686. |
|
|
Kaysen BL (2013). Factors that impacto probability of pregnanc when using ai boars. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Animal Sciences. Colorado State University, United States. |
|
|
Knox RV (2016). Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology 85(1):83-93. |
|
|
Kumar PM, Kent Y, Rungsung S, Ngullie L, Nakhro R, Deka BC (2014). Performance appraisal of artificial insemination technique in pig under organized farm and field condition in nagaland. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 14(4):55-60. |
|
|
Kyriazakis I, Whittemore CT (2006). Whittemore's science and practice of pig production. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. |
|
|
Lamberson WR, Safranski TJ (2000). A model for economic comparison of swine insemination programs. Theriogenology 54:799-807. |
|
|
Maes D, Alfonso LR., Tom R, Philip V, Ann VS (2011). Artificial Insemination in Pigs, Artificial Insemination in Farm Animals, Milad Manafi, IntechOpen, |
|
|
Mbuza F, Majyambere D, Ayabagabao JD, Dutuze MF (2016). Inventory of pig production systems in Rwanda. International Journal of Livestock Production 7(7):41-47. |
|
|
Merks J, Ducro-Steverink D, Feitsma H (2000). Management and genetic factors affecting fertility in sows. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 35(6):261-266. |
|
|
Nishimwe K, BizimanaJ, Manishimwe R, Ayabagabo J, Byukusenge M, Habimana R and Bareeba F (2015). Factors affecting the pregnancy rate in small scale dairy farms after the artificial insemination in rural area, Twanda. International Journal of Livestock Research 5(3):19-25. |
|
|
Niyiragira V, Rugira KD, Hirwa CD (2018). Success drivers of pig artificial insemination based on imported fresh semen. International Journal of Livestock Production 9(6):102-107. |
|
|
OECD-FAO (2018). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2018-2027, OECD Publishing, Paris/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. |
|
|
Oravainen J. Heinonen M, Seppä-Lassila L, Toomas O, Tast A, Virolainen JV, Peltoniemi OAT (2006). Factors affecting fertility in loosely housed sows and gilts: vulvar discharge syndrome, environment and acute-phase proteins. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 41(6):549-554. |
|
|
Roca J, Vázquez JM, Gil MA, Cuello C, Parrilla I, Martínez EA (2006). Challenges in pig artificial insemination. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 41(2):43-53. |
|
|
Roelofse JJ (2013). Economic feasibility study of the establishment of smallholder pig farmers for the commercial market : empolweni case study. Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Engineering (Engineering management) at the University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. |
|
|
Ronald BSM, Jawahar TP, Gnanaraj PT, Sivakumar T (2013). artificial insemination in swine in an organized farm - a pilot study. Veterinary World 6(9):651-654. |
|
|
Shimada M, Yasuhisa Y and Tetsuji O (2016). Development of artificial insemination technique in pig production based on the evidence of physiology and molecular biology in reproductive organs. AGri-Bioscience Monographs 6(2):59-83. |
|
|
Tummaruk P, Lundeheim N, Einarsson S, Dalin AM (2000). Reproductive performance of purebred swedish landrace and swedish yorkshire sows: i. Seasonal variation and parity influence. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science 50(3):205-216. |
|
|
Vanroose G, de Kruif A, Van Soom A (2000). Embryonic mortality and embryo–pathogen interactions. Animal Reproduction Science 60-61:131-143. |
|
|
Vargas AJ, Bernardi ML, Bortolozzo FP, Mellagi APG, Wentz I (2009). Factors associated with return to estrus in first service swine females. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 89(1-2):75-80. |
|
|
Visalvethaya W, Wichai T, Mongkol T (2011). The development of a model for artificial insemination by backyard pig farmers in thailand. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43(4):787-793. |
|
|
Zanu HK, Antwiwaa A, Agyemang CT (2012). Factors influencing technology adoption among pig farmers in Ashanti Region of Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Technology 8(1):81-92. |
|
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0
