Abstract

If identification of the stationary logical object (LO) is understood to be its identification with an adequate finite-automation model among set of finite automation, in cases where two completely different aims (object logical structural model construction and device logical control) are being pursued, serious contradictions might arise. With the help of an adequate model received, one tries both to construct appropriate structural model of the computing unit (CU) and consider the object as a control object (CO) to control it. It goes without saying that during the development of the controlling unit of CO, which represents the logical object, its structural model is also being under construction and the object identification, the digital signal processor (DSP), is used as the main central process unit for its high control ability and computing power. Through the introduction of a rough set theory into the multi-sensor information fusion technology, the principal distinction between finite-automation identification for development of the logical structure object model and for logical control of the technological device is shown in this paper. In this work, the conversion of potential dynamic technological object to the guided dynamic object isachieved. It is possible to reach the object of self-control.

Key words: Identification, logic object, modeling, automation, control.

Abbreviation

LO, Logical object; CU, computing unit; CO, control object; CCG,cognitive computer graphics; SI, super-induction; CD, controlling device; SALC, system of automatic logical control.