Full Length Research Paper
References
Adodo SO (2014). An evaluation of secondary school teachers' competence in evaluating students cognitive and psychomotor achievement in basic science and technology (BST). J. Emerging Trends Educ. Res. Policy Stud. 5(3):48-53 |
|
Al-Rawi I (2013). Teaching methodology and its effects on quality learning. J. Educ. Practice, 4(6):100-105 |
|
Benjamin MA (2004). Nigerian science teachers' beliefs, their Pedagogical Content Knowledge and how these influence their classroom practices. Unpublished Phd thesis, Edith Cowan University, Perth Australian Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 25,2013, 83 |
|
Ben-Zvi R, Eylon B, Silberstein J (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? J. Chem. Educ. 63:64-66. |
|
Chamber S, Andre T (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, Interest and Experience in elecricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 34(2):107-123. |
|
Coll RK, Neil Taylor TG 2001. Using constructivism to inform tertiary chemistry pedagogy. Chemistry education: Research and practice in Europe, 2(3):215-226. |
|
Fatokun KVF (2006): Application of Computer-Aided Instruction in the Teaching of Mole Concept at secondary School level. J. Educ. Stud. 12(1):169-174. |
|
Fatokun KVF (2012). Effect of Concept Mapping- Guided Discovery Integrated Teaching Approach on Chemistry Students' Learning Style, Achievement and Retention. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis Nasarawa State University, Keffi. |
|
Fatokun KV, Eniayeju PA (2014a). The effect of Concept Mapping- Guided Discovery Integrated Teaching Approach on Chemistry Students' achievement and Retention. Educ. Res. Rev. 9(22):1218-1223 doi: 10.5897/ERR2014.1848. |
|
Fatokun KV, Eniayeju PA (2014b). The effect of Concept Mapping-Guided Discovery Integrated Teaching Approach on Chemistry Students' Learning styles and Achievement in Electrochemistry. FUDMA J. Sci. Educ. Res. 1(2):18-32. |
|
Gabel D (1996). The complexity of chemistry: Research for teaching in the 21st century. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Chemical Education, Brisbane, Australia. |
|
Haidar AH (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers' conception of the conservation of matter and related concepts J. Res. Sci. Teach. 34(2):181-197 |
|
Horton C (2001). Students Preconceptions and Misconceptions in Chemistry. |
|
Hurst O (2002). How we teach molecular structure to freshmen. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6): 763 – 764. |
|
Johnstone AH, Otis KH (2006). Concept Mapping in problem based learning: a cautionary tale. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 7(2):84-95 |
|
Kind V (2009). A conflict in your head: An exploration of a trainee science teacher subject matter knowledge development and its impact on teacher's self confidence. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 11:1529 -1562 |
|
Lee M (1992). Misconception of some selected topics in physics among Malayan pupils. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 15(1):55-62. |
|
Nakiboglu C (2003). Instructional misconception of Turkish prospective chemistry teachers about atomic orbital and hybridization Chemistry Educ. Res. Pract. 4(2):171 |
|
Okebukola P (2005). The race against obsolescence.STAN Memorial Lecture series. No 17:28-30. Delivered at the Annual STAN Conference, Jos. |
|
Oni JO (2014). Teacher quality and students academic achievement in basic technology in junior secondary schools in South –West, Nigeria. J. Educ. Soc. Res. 4(3):397-402 |
|
Robinson W (2003). Chemistry problem solving: Symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects J. Chem. Educ. 80:978-982. |
|
Settlage J, Southerland SA (2007). Teaching science to every child: Using culture as a starting point, New York: Routledge. |
|
Taber KS 1997. Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus electrostatic framework? School Sci. Rev. 78:85-95. |
|
Taber KS (2002). Chemical Misconceptions- prevention, diagnosis and cure. Vol. 1: theoretical and background, London, RS.C |
|
Taber KS, Coll R (2002). Bonding. In: J. K. Gilbert, O. D. Jong, R. Justy, D. F. Treagust, & J. H. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer. pp. 213-234. |
|
Taber KS, Watts M (2000). Learners' explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 1(3):329-353. |
|
Tan K, Taber KS (2009). Ionization Energy: Implication of preservice teachers conceptions. J. Chem. Educ. 86(5):623-629 |
|
Tan KD, Treagust FD (1999). Evaluatin students' understanding of chemical bonding. School Sci. Rev. 81(294):75-84 |
|
Wickman PO (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning making as situated talk and action. Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum |
|
Yager RE (2000). The constructivist learning model. Sci. Teacher 67(1):44-45. |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0