International Journal of
Water Resources and Environmental Engineering

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Water Res. Environ. Eng.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-6613
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJWREE
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 332

Review

Critical analysis of existing economic tools available for assessing river water quality

Sudevi Basu
  • Sudevi Basu
  • Department of Biotechnology, Sir M Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology, Bangalore ? 562157, Karnataka, India.
  • Google Scholar
Lokesh K.S
  • Lokesh K.S
  • Department of Environmental Engineering, Sri Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering (Autonomous), Mysore ? 570006, Karnataka, India.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 10 January 2014
  •  Accepted: 30 October 2014
  •  Published: 01 December 2014

References

Alam K (2006). Valuing the Environment in Developing Countries: Problems and Potentials. Asia Pacific J. Environ. Dev. 13(1&2):27-44.
View
 
Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Martinsson P (2001). Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. Econ. Issues 8(1):83.110.
 
 
Arana JE, Leon CJ (2007). Repeated Dichotomous Choice Formats for Elicitation of Willingness to Pay: Simultaneous Estimation and Anchoring Effect. Environ. Res. Econ. 36(4):475-497.
Crossref
 
 
Balistreri E, McClelland G, Poe G, Schulze W (2001). Can Hypothetical Questions Reveal True Values? A Laboratory Comparison of Dichotomous Choice and Open-Ended Contingent Values with Auction Values. Environ. Res. Econ. 18(3):275-292.
Crossref
 
 
Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006). Using Economic Valuation Techniques to Inform Water Resources Management: A Survey and Critical Appraisal of Available Techniques and an Application. Sci. Total Environ. 365(1-3):105-122.
Crossref
 
 
Birol E, Das S (2010). Estimating the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment: The Case of River Ganga, India. J. Environ. Manage. 91:2163-2171.
Crossref
 
 
Bohara AK, Kerkvliet J, Berrens RP (2001). Addressing Negative Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation: A Monte Carlo Simulation. Environ. Res. Econ. 20(3):173-195.
Crossref
 
 
Borg NB, Hensher DA, Scarpa R (2009). An Analytical Framework for Joint vs Separate Decisions by Couples in Choice Experiments: The Case of Coastal Water Quality in Tobago. Environ. Res. Econ. 43(1):95-117.
Crossref
 
 
Boxall P, Rollins K, Englin J (2003). Heterogenous Preferences for Congestion During a Wilderness Experience. Res. Energy Econ. 25:177-195.
Crossref
 
 
Boyer T, Polasky S (2004). Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Review of Non – Market Valuation Studies. Wetlands 24(4):744-755.
Crossref
 
 
Brouwer R, Dekker T, Rolfe J, Windle J (2010). Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments. Environ. Res. Econ. 46(1):93-109.
Crossref
 
 
Callan SJ, Thomas JM (2010). Environmental Economics and Management: Theory, Policy and applications, 5th Edition, Nelson Education Ltd., pp 155-168.
 
 
Carr L, Mendelsohn R (2003). Valuing Coral Reefs: A Travel Cost Analysis of the Great Barrier Reef. Ambio 32(5):353-357.
Crossref
 
 
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Liljenstolpe C (2003). Valuing Wetland Attributes: An Application of Choice Experiments. Ecol. Econ. 47(1):95-103.
Crossref
 
 
Carson RT, Mitchell RC (1993). The Value of Clean Water: The Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable and Swimmable Quality Water. Water Resour. Res. 29(7):2445-2454.
Crossref
 
 
Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001). Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environ. Resour. Econ. 19(2):173:210.
 
 
Caulkins PP, Bishop RC, Bouwes NW (1986). The Travel Cost Model for Lake Recreation: A Comparison of Two Methods for Incorporating Site Quality and Substitution Effects. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 68(2):291-297.
Crossref
 
 
Cooper P, Poe GL, Bateman IJ (2004). The Structure of Motivation for Contingent Values: A Case Study of Lake Water Quality Improvement. Ecol. Econ. 50:69-82.
Crossref
 
 
Courant PN. Porter RC (1981). Averting Expenditure and Cost of Pollution. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 8:321-329.
Crossref
 
 
Crooker JR, Herriges JA (2004). Parametric and Semi–Nonparametric Estimation of Wilingness–to–Pay in the Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Framework. Environ. Resour. Econ. 27(4):451-480.
Crossref
 
 
D'arge RC, Shogren JF (1989). Okoboji Experiment: Comparing Non–Market Valuation Techniques in an Unusually Well–Defined Market for Water Quality. Ecol. Econ. 1:251-259.
Crossref
 
 
Diamond PA, Hausman JA (1994). Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? J. Econ. Perspect. 8(4):45-64.
Crossref
 
 
Doss CR, Taff SJ (1996). The Influence of Wetland Type and Wetland Proximity on Residential Property Values. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 21(1):120-129.
 
 
Douglas AJ, Taylor JG (1999). The Economic Value of Trinity River Water. Water Resour. Dev. 15(3):309-322.
Crossref
 
 
El-Bekkay M, Moukrim A, Benchakroun F (2013). An Economic Assessment of the Ramsar Site of Massa (Morocco) with Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7(6):441-447.
 
 
Elsin YK, Kramer RA, Jenkins WA (2010). Valuing Drinking Water Provision as Ecosystem Service in the Neuse River Basin. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. 136(4):474-482.
Crossref
 
 
Englin J, Cameron TA (1996). Augmenting Travel Cost Models with Contingent Behaviour Data – Poisson Regression Analyses with Individual Panel Data. Environ. Resour. Econ. 7(2):133-147.
Crossref
 
 
Epp DJ, Al-Ani KS (1979). The Effect of Water Quality on Rural Nonfarm Residential Property Values. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 61:529-534.
Crossref
 
 
Farmer MC, Lipscomb CA (2008). Conservative Dichotomous Choice Responses in the Active Policy Setting: DC Rejections below WTP. Environ. Resour. Econ. 39(3):223-246.
Crossref
 
 
Frykblom P, Shogren JF (2000). An Experimental Testing of Anchoring Effects in Discrete Choice Questions. Environ. Resour. Econ. 16(3):329-341.
Crossref
 
 
Garrod G, Willis K (1994). An Economic Estimate of the Effect of a Waterside Location on Property Values, Environ. Resour. Econ. 4(2):209-217.
Crossref
 
 
Halvorsen B (1996). Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Surveys – Willingness to Pay for Reduced Health Damage from Air Pollution. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8(4):485-499.
Crossref
 
 
Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz V (1998). Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment, Environ. Resour. Econ. 11(3-4):413-428.
Crossref
 
 
Hanley N., Bell D, Farizo BA (2003). Valuing the Benefits of Coastal Water Quality Improvements Using Contingent and Real Behaviour. Environ. Resour. Econ. 24(3):273-285.
Crossref
 
 
Hanley N, Wright RE, Alvarez-Farizo B (2006). Estimating the Economic Value of Improvements in River Ecology Using Choice Experiments: An Application to the Water Framework Directive. J. Environ. Manage. 78:183-193.
Crossref
 
 
Hanemann WM (1994). Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 8(4):19-43.
Crossref
 
 
Hanemann WM (1991). Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept – How Much Can They Differ? Am. Econ. Rev. 81(3):635-647.
 
 
Hellerstein DM (1993). Intertemporal Data and Travel Cost Analysis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3(2):193-207.
Crossref
 
 
Higgins A, Pearson L, Laredo L (2009). Modeling the Financial Value of the Maroochy River to Property Values: An Application of Neural Networks. J. Water Resour. Prot. 4:237-248.
Crossref
 
 
Hokby S, Soderqvist T (2003). Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Services in Sweden. Environ. Resour. Econ. 26(3):361-383.
Crossref
 
 
Hosking S (2011). The Recreational Value of River Inflows into South African Estuaries. Water SA 37(5):711-717.
Crossref
 
 
Imandoust SB, Gadam SN (2007). Are People Willing to Pay for River Water Quality, Contingent Valuation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4(3):401-408.
Crossref
 
 
Ivehammar P (2009). The Payment Vehicle Used in CV Studies of Environmental Goods Does Matter. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 34(3):450-463.
 
 
Johansson P (1996). Commodity Prices as Payment Vehicles in Valuation Experiments, Environ. Resour. Econ. 8(2):247-254.
Crossref
 
 
Johnston RJ (2007). Choice Experiments, Site Similarity and Benefits Transfer. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38(3):331-351.
Crossref
 
 
Jorgensen BS, Syme GJ, Bishop BJ, Nancarrow BE (1999). Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 14(1):131-150.
Crossref
 
 
Kealy MJ, Bishop RC (1986). Theoretical and Empirical Specifications Issues in Travel Cost Demand Studies. Am. J. Agric. Econ. pp. 660-667.
Crossref
 
 
Koundouri P, Pashardes P (2003). Hedonic Price Analysis and Selectivity Bias: Water Salinity and Demand for Land. Environ. Resour. Econ. 26(1):45-56.
Crossref
 
 
Kristrom B (1993). Comparing Continuous and Discrete Contingent Valuation Questions. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3(1):63-71.
Crossref
 
 
Kwak SJ, Russel CS (1994). Contingent Valuation in Korean Environmental Planning: A Pilot Application to the Protection of Drinking Water Quality in Seoul. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4(5): 511-526.
Crossref
 
 
Lansford NH, Jones LL (1995). Recreational and Aesthetic Value of Water using Hedonic Price Analysis. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 20(2):341-355.
 
 
Legget CG, Bockstael NE (2000). Evidence of the Effects of Water Quality on Residential Land Prices. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 39:121-144.
Crossref
 
 
Lindhjem H, Navrud S (2009). Asking for Individual or Household Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods: Implication for Aggregate Welfare Measures. Environ. Resour. Econ. 43(1):11-29.
Crossref
 
 
Loomis JB (1997). Panel Estimators to Combine Revealed and Stated Preference Dichotomous Choice Data. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 22(2):233-245.
 
 
Loomis J, Brown T, Lucero B, Peterson G (1997). Evaluating the Validity of the Dichotomous Choice Question Format in Contingent Valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10(2):109-123.
Crossref
 
 
Loomis J, Kent P, Strange L, Fausch K, Covich A (2000). Measuring the Total Economic Value of Restoring Ecosystem Services in an Impaired River Basin: Results from a Contingent Valuation Survey. Ecol. Econ. 33(1):103-117.
Crossref
 
 
Mahan BL, Polasky S, Adams RM (2000). Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach. Land Econ. 76(1):100-113.
Crossref
 
 
McKean JR, Johnson D, Taylor RG, Johnson RL (2005). Willingness to Pay for Non Angler Recreation at the Lower Snake River Reservoirs. J. Leis. Res. 37(2):178-194.
 
 
Meyerhoff J, Liebe U (2008). Do Protest Responses to a Contingent Valuation Question and a Choice Experiment Differ? Environ. Resour. Econ. 39(4):433-446.
Crossref
 
 
Michael JA, Reiling SD (1997). The Role of Expectations and Heterogeneous Preferences for Congestion in the Valuation of Recreation Benefits. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 166-173.
 
 
Monarchova J, Gudas M (2009). Contingent Valuation Approach for Estimating the Benefits of Water Quality Improvement in the Baltic Seas. Environ. Res. Eng. Manage. 47(1):5-12.
 
 
Morkbak MR, Christensen T, Gyrd-Hansen D (2010). Choke Price Bias in Choice Experiments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 45(4):537-551.
Crossref
 
 
Morrison MD, Blamey RK, Bennett JW (2000). Minimizing Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies. Environ. Resour. Econ. 16(4):407-422.
Crossref
 
 
Murphy JJ, Stevens TH, Yadav L (2010). A Comparison of Induced Value and Home–Grown Experiments to Test for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 47(1):111-123.
Crossref
 
 
Nallathiga R, Paravasthu R (2010). Economic value of conserving river water quality: Results from a contingent valuation survey in Yamuna River Basin, India. Water Pol. 12(2):260-271.
Crossref
 
 
Navrud S, Pruckner GJ (1997). Environmental valuation – To use or not to use? A comparative study of the United States and Europe. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10:1-26.
Crossref
 
 
Olmstead SM (2010). The Economics of water quality. Rev. Environ. Econ. Pol. 4(1):44-62.
 
 
Ortacesme V, Ozkan B, Karaguzel O (2002). An estimation of the recreational use value of Kursunlu waterfall nature park by the individual travel cost method. Turk. J. Agric. For. 26(1):57-62.
 
 
Park T, Loomis JB, Creel M (1991). Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Land Econ. 67(1):64-73.
Crossref
 
 
Poe GL, Welsh MP, Champ PA (1997). Measuring the difference in mean willingness to pay when dichotomous choice contingent valuation responses are not independent. Land Econ. 73(2):255-267.
Crossref
 
 
Poor PJ, Pessagno KL, Paul RW (2007). Exploring the hedonic value of ambient water quality: A local watershed–based study. Ecol. Econ. 60(1):797-806.
Crossref
 
 
Pruss-Ustun A, Bos R, Gore F, Bartram J (2008). Safer water, better health: costs, benefits and sustainability of interventions to protect and promote health. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp. 1-53.
 
 
Remoundou K, Koundouri P (2009). Environmental effects on public health: An economic perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Hlth. 6:2160-2178.
Crossref
 
 
Rogers P, de Silva R, Bhatia R (2002). Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Pol. 4:1-17.
Crossref
 
 
Shrestha RK, Stein TV, Clark J (2007). Valuing nature–based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River Region. Florida. J. Environ. Manage. 85(4):977-985.
Crossref

 
 
 
Soderqvist T (1998). Why give up money for the baltic seas? Motives for people's willingness (or reluctance) to pay. Environ. Resour. Econ. 12(2):249-254.
Crossref
 
 
Spash CL (2000). Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: The case of wetland recreation. Ecol. Econ. 34(2):195-215.
Crossref
 
 
Spash CL (2000). Multiple value expression in contingent valuation: Economics and ethics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:1433-1438.
Crossref
 
 
Steinnes DN (1992). Measuring the economic value of water quality: The case of Lakeshore land. Ann. Reg. Sci. 26:171-176.
Crossref
 
 
Strazzer E, Genius M, Scarpa R, Hutchinson G (2003). The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25(4):461-476.
Crossref
 
 
Svento R (1993). Some notes on trichotomous choice discrete valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3(6):533-543.
Crossref
 
 
Taylor LO, Morrison MD, Boyle KJ (2010). Exchange rules and the incentive compatibility of choice experiments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 47(2):197-220.
Crossref
 
 
Timmins C, Murdock J (2007). A revealed preference approach to the measurement of congestion in travel cost models. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 53:230-249.
Crossref
 
 
Turpie J, Joubert A (2001). Estimating potential impacts of a change in river quality on the tourism value of Kruger National Park: An application of travel cost, contingent and conjoint valuation methods. Water SA 27(3):387-398.
Crossref
 
 
Viscusi WK, Huber J, Bell J (2008). The economic value of water quality. Environ. Resour. Econ. 41(2):169-187.
Crossref
 
 
Vossler CA, McKee M (2006). Induced value tests of contingent valuation elicitation mechanisms. Environ. Resour. Econ. 35(2):137-168.
Crossref
 
 
Ward FA, Michelsen A (2002). The economic value of water in agriculture: Concepts and policy applications. Water Pol. 4:423-446.
Crossref
 
 
Watanabe M, Asano K (2009). Distribution free consistent estimation of mean WTP in dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 44(1):1-10.
Crossref
 
 
Whitehead JC, Blomquist GC (1991). Measuring contingent values for wetlands: Effects of information about related environmental goods. Water Resour. Res. 27(10):2523-2531.
Crossref
 
 
Whittington D (2002). Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries. Environ. Resour. Econ. 22(1-2):323-367.
Crossref
 
 
Tu Z (2013). Contingent valuation methodology: Evaluation of benefits of improving water quality in the Lake Tai Region. Undergrad. Econ. Rev. 10:1, 8:1-11.
 
 
Yoo SH, Yang HG (2001). Application of sample selection model to double–bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Environ. Resour. Econ. 20(2):147-163.
Crossref
 
 
Zhai G, Suzuki T (2009). Evaluating economic value of coastal waterfront in Tokyo Bay, Japan with willingness–to–accept measure. Water Resour. Manage. 23(4):633-645.
Crossref