Journal of
Ecology and The Natural Environment

  • Abbreviation: J. Ecol. Nat. Environ.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2006-9847
  • DOI: 10.5897/JENE
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 408

Full Length Research Paper

Litterfall dynamics in Boter-Becho Forest: Moist evergreen montane forest of Southwestern Ethiopia

Talemos Seta
  • Talemos Seta
  • Department of Biology, Dilla University, Ethiopia.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Sebsebe Demissew
  • Sebsebe Demissew
  • Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management (DPBBM), Addis Ababa, University, Ethiopia.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Zerihun Woldu
  • Zerihun Woldu
  • Research and Technology Transfer, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 15 May 2017
  •  Accepted: 27 June 2017
  •  Published: 31 January 2018

 ABSTRACT

Litterfall in the forest is essential for balanced ecosystem processes. The present study determined seasonal variations of litterfall in the Boter-Becho forest, Southwestern Ethiopia. Based on forest disturbance level, two sites were selected: Low and high. Litterfall production in the high and low disturbed forest sites averaged 6.6 and 10.8 t ha-1 year-1, respectively. Significant differences (P<0.001) in litterfall were manifested between wet (0.6 ton ha-1 month-1) and dry (0.8 tons ha-1 month-1) seasons. Higher litterfall was associated with the dry compared with the wet season. Both litterfall and its fractions including leaf litter, reproductive parts and twigs followed a multimodal distribution pattern. Litterfall peaked during March, April, December, January and February with maximum peaks during March and December respectively. Monthly rainfall and temperature directly influenced litterfall production. Litterfall was strongly but negatively correlated with rainfall compared to ambient temperature. Although the present study provided useful information on the effects of low and high disturbance on litterfall production of the Boter Becho forest, further studies are required to quantify and understand the impact of disturbance on nutrient cycling specific to this forest.

 

Key words: Seasonal variation, site disturbance, leaf litter, reproductive parts, twigs.


 INTRODUCTION

Litterfall production is an important component of forest ecosystem functioning (Aragao et al., 2009; Clark et al., 2001). It transfers nutrients from aboveground biomass to the soil (Vitousek and Sanford, 1986). In the forest ecosystem, litterfall reduce bulk density, increase water holding and the cation exchange capacity of the soil. Xu et al. (2013) also suggested that greater litterfall inputs increase the soil carbon sink despite higher rates of carbon release and transformation. In addition, litter on the forest floor plays a significant role in determining the moisture status,runoff pattern and release of mineral elements accumulated in the aerial parts of the vegetation (Parsons et al,, 2014; Kumar and Tewari, 2014; Yang et al., 2005). Litterfall production in the forest ecosystem is also essential in the exchange of carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere, and forms a major contribution to seasonal variations in the terrestrial carbon cycle of the tropical forest biome (De Weirdt et al., 2012; Bousquet et al., 2000). It also provides nutrient input and organic matter replenishment and hence, an important stage in habitat conservation (Rawat et al., 2009; Wurzburger and Hendrick, 2009).
 
Recent studies indicated that litterfall production in forest system formed an important source of nutrients and organic matter over the past decades (Carnol and Bazgir, 2013; Meier et al., 2005; Vitousek and Sanford, 1986; Vitousek, 1984). However, climate, seasonality, tree species composition, stand structure, soil fertility, elevation and latitude alter the litterfall production pattern between ecosystems (Aerts, 1997; Becker et al., 2015; Simmons, 1996; Vitousek and Sanford, 1986; Parsons et al., 2014). According to Spain (1984), the most extreme variability of litterfall is seen as a function of seasonality. He reported that individual species of plants have seasonal losses of some parts of their body and can be determined by the collection and classification of plant litterfall throughout the year. Qiu et al. (1998) also observed that abiotic factors such as rainfall, temperature and light play an important role in litterfall, flushing among dominant canopy species in the forest.
 
Other workers reported that seasonal litter production is highest in dry months and lowest in the wet months of a year particularly in tropical forests (Arunachlam et al., 1998; Sundarapandian and Swamy, 1999). According to Zhang et al. (2014), seasonal variation in litterfall production results in large variation in the amount of litter on the soil in most tropical forests. Zhang et al. (2014) and Scheer et al. (2009) also indicated that seasonal patterns of litterfall show unimodal, bimodal or irregular modes, and the litter peaks might occur in several months of the year. Consequently, this phenomenon may affect the dynamics of ecosystem carbon and nutrient cycling (Xu et al., 2004; Das and Ramakrishnan, 1985). Ethiopia exhibits a wide range of ecological conditions ranging from arid lowlands in the east to rainforests in the west and southwest.
 
Ethiopia is also known for high endemism of wild plants and animal species (FAO, 1996). It possesses high altitude Afroalpine vegetation in the central, south eastern and northern highlands. The Ethiopian highlands contribute to more than 50% of the African land area with afromontane vegetation (Tamrat, 1994). Although many studies have been done on the Ethiopian flora and species diversity, studies related to litterfall and nutrient dynamics is lacking (Ambachew et al., 2012; Nigatu and Michelsen, 1994). Understanding litterfall and nutrient dynamics of Ethiopian Forests is important to their management. The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of seasonal variation on litterfall production and the effect of rainfall and temperature on litterfall components (total and fractions) under low and high disturbance conditions in Boter-Becho forest located in southwestern part of Ethiopia.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site description
 
Location
 
Boter-Becho forest (08°21’56.4’’ N and 037°16’25.4’’E) is one of the national forest priority areas located in Jimma Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia (Figure 1). It lies in Chora Boter district of Jimma zone and 223 km southwest of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. The study site lies along a volcanic mountain ridge, running almost north to south, and rising to a series of small peaks, the highest of which is 3,100 m above sea level. The Eastern part of the ridge is sharply steep, but more gradual in western side. The hills are divided by numerous valleys. The forest is dominated by Acacia wood land in the lower altitude, high montane forest on slopes and in the valleys up to around 2 900 m above sea level. Most of the valleys along the forest ridge contain only seasonal water course but remain dry from December to March. Boter Becho forest covers approximately a total area of 32 000 ha (Figure 1).
 
 
Vegetation
 
The forest vegetation in Boter Becho comprises a mixture of tree species including Olinia rochetiana, Polyscias fulva, Pouteria adolfi-friedricii, Schefflera volkensii, Syzygium guineense Subsp. afromontanum. Allophylus abyssinicus, Croton macrostachyus, Juniperus procera, Hagenia abyssinica and other small trees that grade into an open Erica arborea zone around the highest peak. Moreover, it contains a number of medium sized trees and large shrubs, a mixture of Podocarpus falcatus and broad-leaved species as emergent trees in the canopy including P. adolfi-friederici. There are some patches of Arundinaria alpina in wet, sheltered valleys. There are several streams forming rivers in mountains of Boter-Becho and are drained by the Gilgel Gibe to the west, which forms a wide valley supporting the lower parts of the forest, and the main Gibe River to the north and east.
 
Climate
 
 
In order to construct the climate diagram of Boter Becho forest, the 15 years climate data (2001-2015) was obtained from the Ethiopian Metrological Service Agency (NMSA, 2016). Boter-Becho has a warm and temperate climate. According to the climadiagram depicted in Figure 2, Boter-Becho has mean annual rainfall of 1434 mm and mean annual temperature of 14.6°C. Boter-Becho possess unimodal rainfall pattern with long rainy seasons from March to September of which the highest rainfall is recorded during the months of June and August. The area posses short dry season from October to February where it gets relatively smaller rainfall. Mean monthly rainfall in the area is 183.6 and 29.6 mm in wet and dry season, respectively. Mean annual temperature is 14.9 and 14.2°C in wet and dry season respectively. The mean annual temperature of the area in the wet season is greater than in the dry season which drives the rapid ecosystem processes in the forest system. The climatic seasonality data presented in this section was used to determine the effects of seasonal variation on litterfall production reported in this study.
 
 
 
Sampling technique for site selection
 
 
A reconnaissance survey was conducted in December and January 2014 to observe the topography, type and different structural features of the Boter Becho forest. The forest is classified as moist evergreen montane forest where rainfall in the wet season is usually higher than that of dry season (Friis et al., 2010). The climadiagram of the area depicts that seven months of the year gets higher rainfall with the remaining five months receiving relatively smaller amounts of rainfall. Two local sites called ‘Bore’ and ‘Getemi’ within the Boter-Becho forest are hereafter referred to as low and high disturbed. These two sites were randomly selected on the basis of their level of disturbance. Characteristics of the low disturbance (LD) level includes no logging, browsing, grazing and relatively protected despite the human trampling that was observed throughout the area. In contrast, the high disturbance (HD) site shows features that include distinct human trampling, browsing and grazing by domestic animals, in addition to the illegal practice of deliberate cutting of large trees for either fuel or honey by local people. Another distinction between the two sites is the nature of the forest canopy which is distinctly half open in HD site compared to a half open to closed canopy in the LD site respectively. The density (no of stems ha-1), mean of height ± sd (standard deviation) and total basal area (m2 ha-1) of dominant tree species in the study plots of LD and HD sites are given in Tables 1 and 2.
 
 
 
Litter traps preparation
 
 
For the litterfall collection, litter traps (1 m2) made of wooden frame was constructed (Figure 3). The 1 m2 traps were supported at each corner by wooden stakes so that at the rim they were 80 cm above the ground. Each trap consisted of a wooden frame which was suspended a net with a mesh size of 2 mm allowing for the rapid drainage of rainwater.
 
 
Sampling for litter-trap installation
 
Five plots of 900 m2 (30 m × 30 m) each were randomly selected from LD and HD sites of the forest. Two litter traps were installed within each plot with a total of ten traps in each site of the forest. Litter traps were installed on 4th February, 2014 on all sites of the forest. Litterfall was collected at monthly intervals for 12 months (4th March 2014 to 3th February, 2015) giving a total of 240 collections throughout the whole sampling period. However, the average of two replicates in each plot was taken as one in each sampling period for data analysis. Litterfall was transported to the laboratory where it was oven-dried at 80°C for 24 h to constant weight. Litter was then sorted into four litterfall fractions (components) including leaf, twigs < 2 cm in diameter, reproductive parts (flowers, fruits, and seeds) and fine litter/trash (any material passing through a 2-mm sieve, hereafter referred to as "other". These fractions were oven dried at 80°C to a constant weight and weighed on a digital balance.
 
Data analysis
 
 
The collections in each month were combined to obtain litterfall data per month. To calculate the amount of litterfall production per plot, all the oven-dry weights of the litterfall from a plot was added up to get the total litter mass (gram). Then, mass unit conversions were made to express the value in ton ha-1year-1 basis (1 g m-2 = 0.01 t ha-1). The mean monthly dry weights of litterfall in wet and dry season were compared between each other and also between low disturbed (LD) and high disturbed (HD) sites of the forest. A monthly dry weight of litterfall (ton ha-1) from each site was analyzed for mean variation using independent samples t-test. The Percent contributions of each fractions of litterfall to the total litterfall were calculated. Simple linear regression analysis was used to determine the effect of mean annual rainfall and mean annual temperature on a given litter variables. Moreover, one way ANOVA was used to test the significance difference in different categories between the low and high disturbed sites of the study forest. Significance level was determined at 95% CI. All the statistical analysis was done using R3.1.1 (R Core Team, 2013).


 RESULTS

Litterfall production
 
Significant differences (P < 0.01) in litterfall production between the LD and HD sites were detected (Figure 4). Annual litterfall production in the LD and HD sites averaged 10.76 and 6.64 ton ha-1year-1 respectively (Figure 4). Litterfall production of the Botor Becho forest averaged 8.7 ton ha-1year-1.
 
 
Litter fractions: Leaf litter, reproductive parts, other, and twigs
 
 
The level of disturbance between sites significantly (P <0.01) affected the proportion of litter fractions (Tables 3 and 4). Leaf litter in the LD and HD sites averaged 42 and 49% whereas both twigs and reproductive parts averaged 58 and 50% of the total annual litterfall, respectively (Table 4). Leaf litter contributed the most (45%) to litterfall production compared to reproductive parts (24.13%), other (15.92%), and twigs (14.95%), respectively (Table 5). The generally higher proportion of reproductive parts during March, April, December, January and February in both LD and HD sites of the forest may indicate that flowering and fruiting is occurring in some of the forest species.

Apparently, both wet and dry seasons significantly (P < 0.05) affect litterfall production in the forest ecosystem (Table 5). Total litterfall in both sites followed a multimodal distribution pattern in which litterfall peaks occurred in March, April, December, January and February with higher peaks in March and December (Figure 4) where March indicates the onset of wet season and December indicates the onset of the dry season. The components and the total litterfall also showed significant difference between wet and dry season in the forest (Table 5). Monthly litterfall in the wet season averaged 0.5586 ± 0.04 ton ha-1 compared with 0.844 ± 0.06 ton/ha in the dry season.           
 
The effect of climatic variables on litterfall dynamics
 
Both litterfall components and litterfall production were significantly correlated to mean monthly temperature and mean monthly rainfall (Tables 6 and 7). The regression model explained (30.4%) of the variation in total litterfall in the forest. However, from the analysis rainfall had a relatively more significant (P < 0.001) effect on the amount of litterfall than temperature.
 


 DISCUSSION

Litterfall production in the moist evergreen montane forest of Boter Becho averaged 8.7 ton ha-1year-1. Litterfall production in both the LD and HD sites of the forest peaked in March, April, December, January and February. Maximum litter production occurred during March and April. In both sites, the leaf litter fraction contributed the highest portion to total litter production followed by the reproductive parts fraction. Litterfall production was strongly correlated with both seasonal rainfall and ambient temperature. The average litterfall production of 8.7 t ha-1 year-1 reported in this study for the Boter Becho forest is in agreement with results reported by other workers (Staelens et al., 2011; Chave et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2005; Murphy and Lugo, 1986; Rai and Proctor, 1986; Singh et al., 1999; Vituosek and Sanford, 1986; Williams and Gray, 1974). Apparently, the amount of total litterfall production reported in this study is in range with that reported for other tropical moist forests; 3.6 to 12.4 t ha-1 year-1 (Vituosek and Sanford (1986). Litterfall production ranging between 9.7 to 12.6 t ha-1year-1 for broad-leaved plantation species and natural forest found in southern Ethiopia (Ambachew et al., 2012) is in agreement with results reported in this study.
 
In equatorial rainforests litterfall production ranged between 5.5 and 15.3 t ha−1 year-1 (Williams and Gray, 1974). Our results also concur with those reported from China where litterfall production ranged between 4.89 and 11.45 t ha-1 (Wang et al., 2008). However, in India where dry tropical conditions prevail litterfall production ranged between 4.88 and 6.71 t ha-1year-1 (Singh, 1992) which is considerably less than values reported in the present study. This difference may be attributed to differences in forest environments e.g. dry or moist tropical forests. In the present study, the leaf litter fraction averaged 46% of the total litterfall production. This is considerably less than that reported by Gawali (2014) for Indian forests (46%) located in the sub-humid tropics and Wang et al. (2008) for Chinese forests (68%), respectively. Evidence of the greater contribution of leaf litter to total litterfall production in tropical and temperate forests is reported by other workers (Ewel, 1976; Hoque et al., 2015; Kumar and Tewari, 2014; Oziegbe et al., 2011) who also highlighted the importance of leaf litter in nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems.
 
Seasonal patterns of litterfall production
 
The observed monthly variation in litterfall production under both LD and HD in the Boter Becho forest may be attributed to prevailing seasonal factors particularly rainfall and ambient temperature. According to Liu (2012), both rainfall and temperature are good predictors of litterfall. The highest variation in the amount of annual litterfall in the Boter Becho is predominantly due to rainfall pattern as it was highly significant compared to temperature. It has been suggested that rainfall may have a two-fold influence on litter production as it may induce water stress in dry periods which increases shedding of senescent leaves whereas heavy rainfall at some time of a year force the shedding of non-senescent leaves. This cycle of events provides a nutrient pulse through higher qualities of leaf litter (Cuevas and Lugo, 1998; Johansson 1995; Morrison, 1991; Parker, 1983; Gosz et al., 1976).
 
It is also known that litter production follows a seasonal pattern with lowest values during wet seasons and highest values in dry seasons in tropical forest ecosystem (Sanches et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2014; Scheer et al., 2009). The results are in agreement with this seasonal prediction, because litterfall production across all levels of disturbance was higher in the dry compared with the wet season. Similar results were reported under tropical conditions within the dry season (Ewel, 1976; Gawali, 2014; Arunachlam et al., 1998; Sundarapandian and Swamy, 1999). As expected, disturbance affected the rate of litterfall production which was greater in the LD compared with the HD sites. Similar studies were done previously support this finding (Barnes et al., 1998; Didham, 1998).


 CONCLUSION

It is concluded that litterfall production in the Boter Becho moist evergreen montane forest followed multimodal distribution pattern in which litterfall peaked in March, April, December, January and February with maximum peaks observed in March and December. It is also concluded that even if the mean annual air temperature in wet season was relatively higher than that of dry season, the dry weight of the total litterfall and its fractions in dry season were significantly higher in both sites of the forest. Of the fractions in the total litterfall in both sites, leaf litter contributed the highest portion followed by the reproductive parts in the forest. A seasonal and annual variation in litterfall production was mainly driven by rainfall variation. Accordingly, future changes in seasonal rainfall patterns in response to anthropogenic disturbance as well as climate change will likely have direct and indirect impacts for the litter dynamics of Boter Becho forest. Consequently, monitoring litterfall production of the Boter Becho forest does not only provide a biological gauge of its health status but also provides essential biological information for decision-makers to develop appropriate management measures for its conservation or sustainability.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Aerts R (1997). Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos, 79:439-449.
Crossref
 

Ambachew D, Singh BR, Lal R, Strand LD (2012). Leaf litter-fall and litter decomposition under Eucalyptus and coniferous plantations in Gambo District, southern Ethiopia. Soil and Plant Sci. 62, 467-476.

  
 

Aragão LEOC, Malhi Y, Metcalfe DB, Silva-Espejo JE, Jiménez E, Navarrete D, Vásquez R (2009). Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils. Biogeosci. 6:2759-2778.
Crossref

  
 

Arunachalam A, Arunachalam KM, Prindey HN Tripath RS (1998). Fine litterfall and nutrient dynamics during forest regrowth in the humid subtropics of North-eastern India. For. Ecol. Manag. 110:209-219.
Crossref

  
 

Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH (1998). Forest Ecology. 4th ed. Wiley. New york, USA. 774 pp.

  
 

Becker H, Pabst J, Mnyonga J, Kuzyakov Y (2015). Annual litterfall dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt. Kilimanjaro. Biogeosci. Discuss 12:10031-10057.
Crossref

  
 

Bousquet P, Peylin P, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Friedlingstein P, Tans PP (2000). Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980. Sci. 290:1342-1347.
Crossref

  
 

Carnol M, Bazgir M (2013). Nutrient return to the forest floor through litter and throughfall under seven forest species after conversion from Norway spruce. For.Ecol. Manag. 309:66-75.
Crossref

  
 

Chave J, Navarrete D, Almeida S, Álvarez E, Aragão LE, Malhi Y (2010). Regional and seasonal patterns of litterfall in tropical South America. Biogeosci. 7(1):43-55.
Crossref

  
 

Clark D A, Brown S, Kicklighter DW, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR, Ni J (2001). Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol. Appl. 11:356-370.
Crossref

  
 

Cuevas E, Lugo AE (1998). Dynamics of organic matter and nutrient return from litterfall in stands of ten tropical tree plantation species. For. Ecol. Manage. 112:263-279.
Crossref

  
 

Das K, Ramakrishnan PS (1985). Litter dynamics in Khasi pine (Pinus kesiya Royle ex Gordon) of north-eastern India. For. Ecol. Manage. 10:135-153.
Crossref

  
 

De Weirdt M, Verbeeck H, Maignan F, Peylin P, Poulter B, Bonal D, Ciais P, Steppe K (2012). Seasonal leaf dynamics for tropical evergreen forests in a process-based global ecosystem model, Geosci. Model Dev. 5:1091-1108.
Crossref

  
 

Didham RK (1998). Altered leaf-litter decomposition rates in tropical forest fragments. Oecologia. 116:397-406.
Crossref

  
 

Ewel JJ (1976). Litterfall and leaf decomposition in a Tropical Forest Succession in Eastern Guatemala. J. Ecol. 64(1):293-308.
Crossref

  
 

FAO (1996). Ethiopia: Country report to the FAO International Technical conference on Plant Genetic Resource. Lepzig, Gemany.

  
 

Friis I, Sebsebe D, Breugel PV (2010). Atlas of the Potential Vegetation of Ethiopia. The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen, Denmark, 306 p.

  
 

Gawali A (2014). Litterfall and carbon, nutrient returns in stands of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. Subhumid tropics of Eastern India. Afr. J. Wood Sci. For. (2):104-110.

  
 

Gosz JR, Likens GE, Bormann FH (1976). Organic matter and nutrient dynamics of the forest and food floor in his board book forest. Oecologia. 22:305-320.
Crossref

  
 

Hoque MM, Kamal AHM, Idris MH, Ahmed HO, Hoque ATM, Masum Billah M (2015). Litterfall production in a tropical mangrove of Sarawak, Malaysia. Zool. Ecol. 25(2):157-165
Crossref

  
 

Johansson MB (1995). The chemical composition of needle and leaf litter from Scots Pine, Norway Spruce and White birch in Scandinavian forests: Int. J. Forest Res. 68(1):49-63.
Crossref

  
 

Kumar S, Tewari LM (2014). Pattern of litter fall and litter decomposition in a Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus forest in Kumaun Himalaya. Int. J. Biodivers, Conserv. 6(1):108-114.

  
 

Liu L (2012). Patterns of litterfall and nutrient return at different altitudes in evergreen hardwood forests of Central Taiwan. Ann. For. Sci. 69(8):877-886.
Crossref

  
 

Meier IC, Leuschner C, Hertel D (2005). Nutrient return with leaf litter fall in Fagus sylvatica forests across a soil fertility gradient. Plant Ecol. 177:99-112.
Crossref

  
 

Morrison IK (1991). Addition of Organic matter and Elements to the Forest floor of an Old growth Accer saccharium forest in the annual litter fall. Can. J. For. Res. 9:19-26.

  
 

Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1986). Ecology of Tropical Dry Forest. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:67-88.
Crossref

  
 

Nigatu L, Michelsen A (1994). Litterfall and nutrient release by decomposition in three plantations compared with a natural forest in the Ethiopian highland. For. Ecol. Manag. 65:149-164.
Crossref

  
 

NMSA (2016). National Metereological Service Agency, Ethiopia.

  
 

Oziegbe MB, Muoghalu JI, Oke SO (2011). Litterfall, precipitation and nutrient fluxes in a secondary lowland rain forest in Ile–Ife, Nigeria. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 25(3):664-671.
Crossref

  
 

Parker GG (1983). Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Adv. Ecol. Res. 13:57-133.
Crossref

  
 

Parsons S A, Valdez-Ramirez V, Congdon RA, Williams SE (2014). Contrasting patterns of litterfall seasonality and seasonal changes in litter decomposability in a tropical rainforest region. Biogeosci. 11:5047-5056.
Crossref

  
 

Qiu Iu XZ, Xie SC, Liu WY (1998). Studies on the Forest Ecosystem in Ailao Mountains, Yunnan, China. Sciences and Technology Press, Kumming.

  
 

R Core Team (2013). A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  
 

Rai SN. Proctor J (1986). Ecological studies on four rainforests in Karnataka, India: II. Litterfall. J. Ecol. 74:455-463.
Crossref

  
 

Rawat N, Nautiyal BP, Nautiyal MC (2009). Litter production pattern and nutrients discharge from decomposing litter in an Himalayan alpine ecosystem. New York Sci. J. 2(6), ISSN 1554-0200.

  
 

Sanches L, Valentini CMA, Junior OBP, Nogueira JS, Vourlitis GL, Biudes MS, Da Silva CJ, Bambi P, Lobo FA (2008). Seasonal and interannual litter dynamics of a tropical semideciduous forest of the southern Amazon Basin, Brazil. J.Geophys.Res. 113(G4.
Crossref

  
 

Scheer MB (2009). Nutrient flow in rainfall and throughfall in two stretches in an Atlantic Rain Forest in Southern Brazil (in Portuguese). Floresta 39:117-130.

  
 

Simmons JA, Fernandez IJ, Briggs RD, Delaney MT (1996). Forest floor carbon pools and fluxes along a regional climate gradient in Maine, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 84:81-95.
Crossref

  
 

Singh L (1992). Dry matter and nutrient inputs through litter fall in dry tropical forest of India. Vegetatio 98:129-140.
Crossref

  
 

Singh KP, Singh PK, Tripathi SK (1999). Litterall, litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns in four native tree species raised on coal mine spoil at Singrauli, India. Biol. Fertil. Soils 29:371-378.
Crossref

  
 

Spain AV (1984). Litterfall and the standing crop of litter in three tropical Australian rainforests. J. Ecol. 72:947-961.
Crossref

  
 

Staelens J, Nachtergale L, De Schrijver A , Vanhellemont M, Wuyts K. Verheyen K (2011) Spatio-temporal litterfall dynamics in a 60-year-old mixed deciduous forest. Ann. For.Sci. 68(1):89-98.
Crossref

  
 

Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS (1999) Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in the Western Ghats, India. For. Ecol. Manag.123:231-244.
Crossref

  
 

Tamrat B (1994). Phytosociology and Ecology of Humid Afromontane Forest on the Central plateau of Ethiopia. J. Veg. Sci. 5:87-98.
Crossref

  
 

Vitousek P (1984). Litterfall, nutrient cycling and nutrient limitation in tropical forests. Ecology 65:285-298.
Crossref

  
 

Vitousek P, Sanford RLJ (1986). Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annu. Rev. Ecol Syst. 17:137-167.
Crossref

  
 

Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y (2008). Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. For. Ecol. Manag. 255:1210-1218.
Crossref

  
 

Williams ST, Gray TRG (1974). Decomposition of litter on the soil surface. In: Dickinson C. H. and Pugh G. J. F., eds. Biology of plant litter decomposition. Academic Press, New York, USA. 2:611-632
Crossref

  
 

Wu J, Liu Z, Wang X (2011). Effects of understory removal and tree girdling on soil microbial community composition and litter decomposition in two Eucalyptus plantations in South China. Funct. Ecol. 25:921-931.
Crossref

  
 

Wurzburger N, Hendrick RL (2009). Plant litter chemistry and mycorrhizal roots promote a nitrogen feedback in a temperate forest. J. Ecol. 97:528-536.
Crossref

  
 

Xu S, Liu LL, Sayer EJ (2013). Variability of above-ground litter inputs alters soil physicochemical and biological processes: a meta-analysis of litterfall-manipulation experiments. Biogeosci. 10:7423-7433.
Crossref

  
 

Xu XN, Hirata E, Shibata H (2004). Effect of typhoon disturbance on fine litterfall and related nutrient input in a subtropical forest on Okinawa Island, Japan. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5:271-282.
Crossref

  
 

Yang YS, Guo JF, Chen GS, Xie JS, Gao R, Li Z, Jin Z (2005). Litter production, seasonal pattern and nutrient return in seven natural forests compared with a plantation in southern China. For. 78(4):403-415.

  
 

Zhang H, Yuan W, Dong W, Liu S (2014). Seasonal patterns of litterfall in forest ecosystem worldwide. Ecol. Complexity 20:240-247.
Crossref

  

 




Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Back to Vol. 10 No. 1
Back to articles
SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
CONFERENCES
          */?>