Journal of
Media and Communication Studies

  • Abbreviation: J. Media Commun. Stud.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-2545
  • DOI: 10.5897/JMCS
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 227

Full Length Research Paper

Whose stream is this anyway? Exploring layers of viewer-integration in online participatory videos

Kevin Weller
  • Kevin Weller
  • Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), School of Social Sciences and Technology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany.
  • Google Scholar
Michael Holaschke
  • Michael Holaschke
  • Sociology Department, Faculty of History and Social Sciences, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 06 December 2021
  •  Accepted: 10 February 2022
  •  Published: 28 February 2022

References

Äijälä M (2021). Mobile video ethnography for evoking animals in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 89:103203.
Crossref

 

Bates C (Hg.) (2015). Video methods. Social science research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group. Routledge Advances in Research Methods 10).

 

Charmaz KC (Hg.) (2012). Constructing grounded theory. Los Angeles, California. Sage.
Crossref

 

Figeac J, Chaulet J (2018). Video-ethnography of social media apps' connection cues in public settings. Mobile Media and Communication 6(3):407-427.
Crossref

 

Iedema R, Long D, Forsyth R, Lee BB (2006). Visibilising clinical work: Video ethnography in the contemporary hospital. Health Sociology Review 15(2):156-168.
Crossref

 

Knoblauch H, Schnettler B (2012). Videography: analysing video data as a 'focused' ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise. Qualitative Research 12(3):334-356.
Crossref

 

Kuhn TS (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crossref

 

Luhmann N (1995). Die Kunst der Gesellschaft. 8. Auflage. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; Koch, Neff and Oettinger and Co (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1303).

 

Martins EEB (2019). I'm the Operator With My Pocket Vibrator: Collective Intimate Relations on Chaturbate. In: Social Media and Society 5(4).
Crossref

 

Pink S, Sumartojo S, Lupton D, Heyes LC (2017). Empathetic technologies: digital materiality and video ethnography. Visual Studies 32(4):371-381.
Crossref

 

Redmon D (2019). Video Ethnography: Routledge.
Crossref

 

Schmidt R, Wiesse B (2019). "Online Participant Videos: A New Type of Data for Interpretative Social Research." Qualitative Social Research 20.2.

 

Shields R (2005). The virtual. Routledge.
Crossref

 

Siapera E (2017). Understanding new media. Sage.

 

Spinney J (2011). A Chance to Catch a Breath: Using Mobile Video Ethnography in Cycling Research. In: Mobilities 6(2):161-182.
Crossref

 

Strangelove M (2007). Virtual Video Ethnography: Towards a New Field of Internet Cultural Studies. Interin 3(1).

 

Tuma R (2017). Videoprofis im Alltag. Die kommunikative Vielfalt der Videoanalyse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS (Wissen, Kommunikation und Gesellschaft, Schriften zur Wissenssoziologie).
Crossref

 

Tuma R (2018). Video-Interaktionsanalyse. In: Handbuch Qualitative Videoanalyse. 2018. Springer pp. 423-444.
Crossref

 

Tuma R (2019). Vernacular video analysis -communicative construction of evidence in Police work. In: SR 3(1):137-162.
Crossref

 

Vannini P (2017). Low and Slow: notes on the production and distribution of a mobile video ethnography. Mobilities 12(1):155-166.
Crossref

 

Woznica M (2020). Qualitative Online-Forschung. Methodische und methodologische Herausforderungen. ZQF 21 (1-2020):53-68.
Crossref

 

Zhang W, Watts S (2008). Online communities as communities of practice: a case study. In: J of Knowledge Management 12(4):55-71.
Crossref