Review
ABSTRACT
Avian eggs present an ideal alternative antibody source to mammals as the immunoglobulin (IgY) in the chicken’s blood is transported to the egg and accumulates in the egg yolk in large quantities. The existence of an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-like molecule in avian eggs, referred to as IgY, has been well documented, and extensive research has been carried out on its characterization, production and purification. Although it is the functional equivalent of mammalian IgG, the major serum antibody found in mammals IgY is structurally different, and has been found to exhibit several important differences when compared to mammalian antibodies, including its physicochemical properties and immunological capabilities. Recently, considerable research has focus seldom use of IgY as an alternative to mammalian antibodies for several applications, including immunotherapeutic applications, especially for the oral passive immunization against various bacteria and viruses. Much research has also been carried out on the use of IgY as a replacement for IgG in various immunodiagnostic and immunoaffinity purification purposes. The use of IgY offers several advantages over polyclonal antibodies produced in mammals, including providing a much more hygienic, cost efficient, convenient, humane and plentiful source of antigen-specific antibodies.
Key words: Avian, egg yolk antibody, immunodiagnostic, immunotherapeutic, IgY.
INTRODUCTION
The avian egg contains all the necessary nutrients and growth factors required for the developing embryo, including antibodies that are transported from the blood of the hen into the egg yolk to provide immunity to the chick (Yegani and Korver, 2010). The production of antibodies (Abs) in chickens and the extraction of specific Abs from egg yolk (IgY Abs) are increasingly attracting the interest of the scientific community as demonstrated by the significant growth of the IgY literature. Avian eggs present an ideal alternative antibody source to mammals as the IgY in the chicken’s blood is transported to the egg and accumulates in the egg yolk in large quantities.
Maternal antibody can be transferred from hens to the chicks either through the placenta, colostrum, milk, or egg (Grindstaff et al., 2003). Birds transmit maternal antibodies to their offspring by depositing the antibodies in the egg (Brambell, 1970). There are three classes of antibodies in chickens, namely Immunoglobulin IgY (IgG), IgA and IgM. Chicken IgA and IgM are similar to mammalian IgA and IgM in terms of molecular weight, structure, and immunoelectrophoretic mobility. In eggs, IgY is present predominantly in the egg yolk (Leslie and Clem, 1989) whereas IgA and IgM are present in the egg white as a result of mucosal secretion in the oviduct (Rose et al., 1994).
Hen eggs consist of approximately 9.5% egg shell (including shell membrane), 63% albumen, and 27.5% yolk. The main components are water (75%), proteins (12%), lipids (12%), as well as carbohydrates and minerals (1%) (Burley and Vadehra, 1989). The proteins are distributed throughout the egg with the majority found in the egg yolk and egg white, and a small proportion in the egg shell and shell membrane (Watkins, 1995). The lipids are found almost exclusively in the egg yolk, mainly in the form of lipoproteins (Burley and Vadehra, 1989). Several minerals have also been found in eggs, most of them in the eggshell. Carbohydrates are a minor egg component, present throughout the egg, both as free and conjugated forms, attached to proteins and lipids (Watkins, 1995).
IGY in avian egg has many applications in the medical and research fields, including in the areas such as diagnostics and proteomics. However, the most valuable and promising areas of IgY research is its use for passive immunization to treat and prevent human and animal diseases. Antibodies from eggs may have also many applications against microorganisms in humans and livestock or poultry (Gibbins, 1977). Serum antibodies of hyper-immunized hens are efficiently transferred and accumulated in the egg yolk (Fichtali et al., 1994). There are also efficient cation exchange chromatographic techniques for separating these antibodies from egg yolk. Coleman (1998) reported that antibodies from eggs can be effectively used to treat mastitis in dairy cows and may also have potential in treating human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). Immunoglobulins are glycoprotein molecules that are produced by plasma cells in response to an immunogen and which function as antibodies (Tizard, 2002). The chicken immune system has been studied for many years, and these studies have contributed substantially to the understanding of the fundamental concepts of immunology and the development of different immunoglobulin classes (Carlander et al., 1999). IgY is the major antibody in birds, reptiles and lungfish (Warr et al., 1995). In birds, the IgY is found mainly in blood and in the fluid fraction of the egg providing protection to newly hatched chick (Schade et al., 2005).
When animal welfare became more relevant in scientific studies, researchers began to seek alternatives to reduce the indiscriminate use of animals for research and diagnostic purposes. Although, IgY and IgG are sometimes used as synonyms in the scientific literature, the term IgY has become universally accepted based on its unique features (Tizard, 2002). Although functionally similar, there are several important differences between mammalian IgG and avian IgY (Sharma, 1997), and the use of avian antibodies offers many advantages over mammalian antibodies. The production of specific IgY against many different antigens has been studied, and its application as an immunotherapeutic agent including its use for the oral passive immunization against enteric pathogens has been extensively reported. Due to its distinctness from IgG, IgY has also been found to be advantageous in several techniques as well as in immunoaffinity purification, in many cases replacing IgG. Recently, the chicken has attracted considerable attention as an alternative source of antibodies. IgY is deposited in the egg yolk in large quantities (Janson et al., 1995), and it can be easily purified from the yolk by simple precipitation techniques, making chickens an ideal source for specific polyclonal antibodies (Gassmann et al., 1990).
Antibody purification involves selective enrichment or specific isolation of antibodies from serum (polyclonal antibodies), ascites fluid or cell culture supernatant of a hybridoma cell line (monoclonal antibodies). The need to develop effective, economical and rapid purification methods of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies from a variety of biological fluids becomes imperative for in vitro or in vivo application. Antibody purification can be divided into two main groups: precipitation methods and chromatographic methods. Purification of immunoglobulin from mammalian blood is time-consuming and expensive. Today, hens are recognized as a convenient and inexpensive source of antibodies. It has been reported that the amount of immunoglobulin that can be yielded from one egg of an immunized hen is as much as that can be obtained from 300 ml of rabbit blood. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) have been applied successfully for scientific, diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic purposes. Because of the phylogenetic distance between birds and mammals, mammalian proteins are often more immunogenic in birds than in other mammals and antibody synthesis readily stimulated in hens (Bizhanov et al., 2004).
IgY and IgG egg yolk antibodies have been used in many diagnostic and biomarker discovery applications as a result of immunoreactivity difference. However, much research has focused on the use of IgY for passive immunization application. Passive immunization has recently become an even more attractive approach because of the emergence of new and drug resistant microorganisms, and individuals with impaired immune system who are unable to respond to conventional vaccines. Passively administered antibodies have the ability to provide rapid and immediate protection; for example, against agents of bioterrorism (Casadevall et al., 2004). The reduction of antibiotics use in the livestock industry and increasing evidence that resistant organism may pass from animals to humans, resulting in infections that are harder to treat (Yegani and Korver, 2010).
Therefore, this paper aim to assess several aspects of avian immunoglobulins and the avian immune system, including the structure, production and purification of IgY, and to outline many current and potential applications of IgY, especially in the areas of immunotherapy and immunodiagnostics.
AVIAN EGG FORMATION
The hen’s reproductive system is a very complex system that can produce an egg in 24 h. The formation of an egg involves the conversion of the feed into egg constituents through a number of intricate and highly coordinated steps as a storehouse of nutrients. The formation of an egg occurs in the ovary and oviduct. Although two sets of ovaries and oviducts are present during embryonic development only the left set fully develop in chickens. When the chicken becomes mature (about 150 days old), the ovary grows to about 7 g and rapidly increases to about 40 g (around 170 days old) (Burley and Vadehra, 1989). The mature ovary will have several follicles in different development stages at any one time and the largest follicle is the one to be ovulated to produce an egg firstly. Yolk constituents are synthesized in the liver and they are transported to the follicular walls in the blood. The follicle undergoes a rapid development during which most of the yolk is deposited 6 to 10 days prior to ovulation, when sufficient yolk has accumulated. The follicle in the ovary is ovulated into the oviduct where the yolk is enveloped in albumen and the shell. It takes 24 to 27 h for this development. In laying hens, the oviduct is 40 to 80 cm long with an average weight of 40 g, and consists of five regions, infundibulum, magnum, isthmus, uterus and vagina (Burley and Vadehra, 1989). The infundibulum is the top portion of the oviduct; with a broad funnel shaped anterior end (8 to 9 cm) and a narrow posterior end to receive the ovulated follicles (Burley and Vadehra, 1989). An egg consists of the yolk (30 to 33%), albumen (~ 60%), and shell (9 to 12%) (Figure 1). The total solids content of egg yolk is generally around 50%, but can vary with the age of the hen and the storage of the shell eggs. The major constituents of the solid matter of yolk are proteins and lipids, present mainly in the form of lipoproteins (Li-Chan et al., 1995). Their relative amounts can be seen in Table 1. The yolk can be separated by high speedcentrifugation into sedimented granules and a clear fluid supernatant called plasma. Granules are composed of 70% α- and β-lipovitellins, 60% phosvitin, and 12% low-density lipoprotein. The plasma is divided into the low-density lipoprotein fraction (33%) and the water soluble fraction (WSF) (5%), which contains the livetins, which are lipid-free globular proteins, including g-livetin, also referred to as IgY (Li-Chan et al., 1995).
AVIAN EGG ANTIBODIES
The chicken immune system consists of the bursa of fabricius, bone marrow, spleen, thymus, the harderian gland, lymph nodes, circulating lymphocytes, and various lymphoid tissues. The thymus serves as the primary lymphoid organ for T-cell differentiation while the antibody-synthesizing B-cells are produced in the bursa of fabricius (Carlander et al., 1999). The spleen is the centre for plasma cell proliferation and memory B-cells (Carlander et al., 1999). Previously, antibodies presently available for research, diagnostic and therapies were mostly mammalian monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies, but now a daychicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) which has have been applied successfully for scientific, diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic purposes (Bizhanov et al., 2004). Chicken IgY is highly concentrated in egg yolk than it is in serum. The chicken is an excellent producer of antibodies. Even though avian IgY has been applied, it is under use according to some literature. This may be due to lack of information concerning the different methods and applications where IgY is more advantageous compared to the traditional mammalian IgG antibodies (Larsson et al., 1993). Avian antibodies contain both heavy (H) and light (L) chains that are encoded by two unlinked loci. In the light chain locus there are only single gene segments each for the V and J regions. The heavy chain has only one segment each for V and J regions, and about 15 D segments (Sharma, 1997). Therefore, rearrangement contributes little diversity in chicken B-cells, in contrast to mammals, because there are only single gene segments for the V and J regions. Only the D segments serve to introduce a combinatorial factor of diversity (Reynaud et al., 1989). Birds instead attain antibody diversity using sequences of pseudo genes (25 for the light chain and around 100 for the heavy chain) in a process of gene conversion in which segments of pseudogenes are inserted into the V-region (Sharma, 1997). In this way, despite the fact that chickens have an extremely limited number of immunoglobulin genes, compared to mammals, they are capable of producing a wide range of immune responses and diverse antibody molecules (Sharma, 1997).
Three immunoglobulin classes have been shown to exist in chicken: IgA, IgM, and IgY. The IgA and IgM are similar to mammalian IgA and IgM. Chicken IgY is the functional equivalent of IgG, the major serum antibody found in mammals, and makes up about 75% of the total antibody population (Carlander et al., 2000). In mammals, the transfer of maternal antibodies can take place after birth, however in the chicken; the maternal antibodies must be transferred to the developing embryo aim to give acquired immunity to the chick (Sim et al., 2000). Antibody, specifically IgA and IgM, is secreted into the ripening egg follicle and is incorporated into the egg white in the oviduct along with the egg albumen secretion. Serum IgY is selectively transferred to the yolk via a receptor on the surface of the yolk membrane which is specific for IgY translocation (Morrison et al., 2002). Egg white contains IgA and IgM at concentrations of around 0.15 and 0.7 mg/ml, respectively, whereas the yolk may contain from 5 to 25 mg/ml of IgY (Li et al., 1997). Mammalian equivalents of IgE and IgD have not been identified in chickens (Sharma, 1997).
The structure of IgY is significantly different from that of mammalian IgG even though there is similarity in their function (Carlander et al., 1999). IgY contains two heavy (H) and two light (L) chains and has a molecular mass of 180 kDa, larger than that of mammalian IgG (159 kDa). IgY possesses a larger molecular weight H chain (68 kDa) as compared to that from mammals (50 kDa). The H chain of IgG consists of four domains: the variable domain (VH) and three constant domains (C?1, C?2 and C?3). The C?1 domain is separated from C?2 by a hinge region, which gives considerable elasticity to the Fab fragments. In contrast, the H chain of IgY does not have a hinge region, and possesses four constant domains (Cv1- Cv4) in addition to the variable domain. Sequence comparisons between IgG and IgY have shown that the Cv2 and Cv3 domains of IgG are closely related to the Cv3 and Cv4 domains, respectively, of IgY, while the equivalent of the Cv2 domain is absent in the IgG chain, having been replaced by the hinge region (Warr et al., 1995). The content of b-sheet structure in the constant domains of IgY has been reported to be lower than that of IgG, and the exibility between the Cv1 and Cv2 domains, corresponding to the hinge region of IgG, is less than that of IgG (Shimizu et al., 1992). Unlike IgG, IgY has two additional Cys residues, Cys 331 and Cys 338, in the Cv2 Cv3 junction, which were likely to participate in the inter-n chain disulfide linkages (Warr et al., 1995) (Figure 2).
Although IgM is the only universally distributed antibody and is believed to be the precursor for all immunoglobulin classes, current evidence suggests that IgY may have instead been the immediate progenitor of both IgG and IgE (Warr et al., 1995). The comparisons of IgY and IgG are listed in Table 1. It does not also have the ability to precipitate or agglutinate multivalent antigens unless at high salt concentrations (around 1.5 M), perhaps due to steric hindrance caused by the closely aligned Fab arms of the IgY molecule. High salt concentrations may serve to release the Fab arms, permitting agglutination.
Chickens can be used for antibody production throughout their entire egg laying period. Animals that are used for antibody production for more than three months should be given booster immunizations every other month to assure that the antibody titer remain high. Chickens can produce high avidity antibodies already after one immunization, compared to sheep whose avidity becomes similar after four immunizations (Landon and Woolley, 1995). Chicken eggs present an ideal alternative antibody source to mammals, as the IgY in the chickens' blood is transported to the egg and accumu-lates in the egg yolk in large quantities.The amount of antigen specific antibodies of the total pool of antibodies in an egg has been reported to be up to 10 %. However, the actual amount of specific antibodies probably varies depending on the individual animal, immunization pro-cedures and the immunogenicity of the antigen itself (Carroll and Thalley, 1990).
The major problem in isolating IgY from egg yolk is separating the lipoproteins from egg yolk prior to purify-cation of the IgY (Kim et al., 1999). There are several methods of purification of IgY described. These IgY separation methods include: lipoprotein precipitation by polyethylene glycol (Svendsen et al., 1995), sodium dextran sulphate andnatural gums such as xanthan gum (Akita and Nakai, 1993), and dextran blue (Bizhanov and Vyshniausskis, 2000), and sodium alginate (Hatta et al., 1990). Chang et al. (2000) recently reported the precipitation of over 90% of lipoproteins from yolk using l- carrageenan, sodium alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, and pectin. Ion exchange chromatography has also been reported as a final step in IgY purification (Fichtali et al., 1993), as well as hydrophobic interaction chromatography (Hassl and Aspock, 1988).immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (Greene and Holt, 1997), thiophilic interaction chromatography (Hansen et al., 1998), affinity chromatography using alkaline conditions (Kuronen et al., 1997), and synthetic peptide ligands, designed specifically for immobilizing antibodies (Verdoliva et al., 2000). As well, Erhard et al. (1996) described a method for the purification of mouse IgG subclass specific IgY using indirect affinity chroma-tography with protein G Sepharose (Deignan et al., 2000). The choice of the methods is a matter of yield and purity desired, final use of the IgY as well as material cost and labor skills. The best way to obtain antibodies is to purify them from the yolk. Several methods can be used, even for large-scale purification, of functionally active chicken antibodies from egg yolk. Over 100 mg of purified IgY can be obtained from a single egg and it is also possible to purify specific antibodies by affinity-chromatography (Akita and Nakai, 1998).
IgY and IgG differ not only in structure, but also in their stability to pH, heat, and proteolytic enzymes. Although the stability of both immunoglobulins was similar when subjected to alkaline conditions, IgY showed much less stability than that of rabbit IgG to acid denaturation. Shimizu et al. (1993) found that the activity of IgY was decreased by incubating at pH 3.5 or lower and completely lost at pH 3. The rabbit IgG antibodies, on the other hand, did not demonstrate a loss of activity as the unit of the pH decreased to by 2, and even then some activity still remained. Similar results were also observed by Hatta et al. (1993), using IgY produced against human rotavirus. Similarly, the IgY was significantly more sensitive to heating than the rabbit IgG. Shimizu et al. (1992) found that the activity of IgY was decreased by heating for 15 minutes at 70°C or higher, whereas that of the IgG did not decrease until 75 to 80°C or higher. Hatta et al. (1993) found, using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), that the temperature corresponding to the maximum of denaturation endotherm (Tmax) was 73.9°C for IgY and 77.0°C for IgG. Shimizu et al. (1994), however, described the addition of sugar to an IgY solution, and found high concentrations of sugar allowed the IgY to maintain activity when subjected to high heat (75 to 80°C), low pH (3), or high pressure (5000 kg/cm2). IgY, like IgG, has been found to be relatively resistant to trypsin and chymotrypsin digestion, but sensitive to pepsin digestion (Shimizu et al., 1988). Hatta et al. (1993) found that almost all of the IgY activity was lost following digestion with pepsin, however activity remained even after 8 h incubation with trypsin or chymotrypsin. Otani et al. (1991) found that IgY was, however, more susceptible to digestion with trypsin, chymotrypsin and pepsin than IgG. The proteolytic digestion of antibodies is a common technique, used to remove the cross-reacting Fc portion of the antibody molecule. Akita and Nakai (1993b) noted further differences between IgY and IgG, with the peptic digestion of IgY resulting in mainly monovalent Fab' fragments, while the peptic digestion of IgG yields the bi-valent (F (ab') 2) fragments. The structural factors resulting in the stability differences of the two immunoglobulin’s are unknown, as immunoglobulins are large, complicated molecules, composed of heterogeneous polypeptides. Shimizu et al. (1992) predicted that the lower content of b structure in IgY may indicate that the conformation of IgY is more disordered and therefore less stable than mammalian IgG.
The use of chickens for the production of polyclonal antibodies provides several advantages over the traditional method of producing antibodies in mammals. In contrast to mammalian serum, egg yolk contains only the single class of antibody, IgY, which can be easily purified from the yolk by simple precipitation techniques (Gassmann et al., 1990). The phylogenetic distance between chickens and mammals renders possible outcomes on the production of antibodies, in chickens, against highly conserved mammalian proteins, that would otherwise not be possible in mammals, and much less antigen is required to produce an efficient immune response (Larsson et al., 1988). Chicken antibodies will also recognize different epitopes than mammalian antibodies, giving access to a different antibody repertoire than with mammalian antibodies (Carlander et al., 1999). As well, the method of producing antibodies in hens is much less invasive, requiring only the collection of eggs, rather than the collection of blood, and is therefore less stressful on the animal (Schade et al., 1991), and sustained high titres in chickens reduce the need for frequent injections (Gassmann et al., 1990).
The animal care costs are also lower for the chicken compared to that for mammals, such as rabbits (Carlander et al., 2000). Hens therefore provide a more hygienic, cost efficient, convenient, and plentiful source of antibodies, as compared to the traditional method of obtaining antibodies from mammalian serum (Carlander et al., 2000). Nakai et al. (1994) estimated that the productivity of antibodies in hens is nearly 18 times greater than that by rabbits based on the weight of antibody produced per head. Because of the high yolk IgY concentrations, over 100 mg of IgY can be obtained from one egg (Akita and Nakai, 1992). A laying hen produces approximately 20 eggs per month; therefore, over 2 g of IgY per month may be obtained from a single chicken (Carlander et al., 1999). In the egg, IgY is stable for months, and once purified it may be stored for years in the cold (Larsson et al., 1993). As the industrial scale automated collection and separation of eggs is currently carried out, the large-scale production of specific IgY for immunotherapeutic purposes is feasible (Cotterill and McBee, 1995). Similarly, vaccination of chicken flocks has long been used to control avian infections (Sharma, 1999), making the injection of chickens required for large-scale antibody production also feasible.
Active immunity refers to the process of exposing the individual to an antigen to generate an adaptive immune response. This response takes days or weeks to develop but may be long lasting. While, passive immunity refers to the process of providing preformed antibodies to protect against infections, and also provides immediate but short-lived protection lasting several weeks to three or four months at most (Baxter, 2007) (Figures 3 and 4).
THE POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN Y
Immunotherapeutic applications of immunoglobulin Y Passive immunization using specific antibodies is a recent concept, which presents an attractive approach to establish passive immunity against pathogens in both humans and animals (Carlander et al., 2000). Previously, immunotherapy was carried out via the systemic or intravenous administration of specific antibodies for such applications as a targeting agent for cancer diagnosis and therapy, the inactivation of toxic substances including drugs and as passive immunotherapy for neoplastic or infectious diseases (Reilly et al., 1997). However, there has been increasing interest in the oral administration of specific antibodies for localized treatment of infections (Reilly et al., 1997). The increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the desire to treat pathogens that do not respond to antibiotics such as viral pathogens, along with the escalating number of immune-compromised individuals has prompted much research into the administration of specific antibodies as an alternative to antibiotics and antimicrobial chemotherapy to treat infections. It is for this reason that much of the IgY research carried out has been with regard to immuno-therapy (Carlander et al., 2000). Nowadays, there is pro-gress to use chicken egg as source of antibodies for prevention and treatment of gut associated infections wherein, after immunization, the specific antibodies, otherwise, known as IgY are transported to the egg yolk and they can then be separated without scarifying the bird. Oral administration of IgY has been tried and found useful in treatment of human and animals against microbes. The potential applications of IgY for prevention and treatment of infections caused by pathogenic bacteria and viruses have been studied at length (Michael et al., 2010) and discussed.
Feed grade antibodies derived from the egg yolks of immunized hens have the advantage of being easily accessible, inexpensive and a rich source of polyclonal antibodies (Cook and Trott, 2010). Because of the ability of laying hens to produce large quantities of egg yolk antibodies on a relatively ongoing basis have been promoted and tested as potential feed grade prophylactic agents (Cook and Trott, 2010). They have been administered as potential inhibitors of the enzyme uricase to reduce nitrogen emissions in poultry due to the excess production of uric acid in the manure by microorganisms (Kim et al., 2013). The ability to generate specific antibodies in fairly large quantities has also proven advantageous for therapeutic prevention of microbial pathogen colonization. Incorporating feed grade egg yolk antibodies into animal diets has been examined extensively to attempt to limit pathogenic diarrhea causing Escherichia coli (E.coli) in swine, and limit Salmonella establishment in calves and mice, as well as Campylobacter, Clostridium, and Salmonella in poultry (Al-Adwani et al., 2013).
Egg yolk antibodies have also been developed for attempts to prevent establishment of food borne pathogens that commonly colonize food animals. Campylobacter jejuni is one of the major food borne disease causing microorganisms that also happens to be very well adapted to the ecological conditions prevalent in the poultry gastrointestinal tract (Pendleton et al., 2013). In an attempt to isolate antibodies that could limit C. jejuni colonization Al-Adwani et al. (2013) generated chicken egg-yolk-derived antibodies (IgY) in laying hens against the five different C. jejuni colonization-associated cell surface proteins. These proteins were produced in sufficient quantities by first expressing the respective protein in E. coli and subsequently purifying the proteins for intramuscular injection as a water-oil mixture in combination with Freund’s complete adjuvant into C. jejuni-free laying hens. Eggs were collected up to 10 weeks post-immunization and egg yolks were lyophilized for eventual purification and quantization of specific egg yolk antibodies reactive to each of the C. jejuni proteins.
After characterizing specificity and reactivity of the individual egg yolk antibodies generated against the specific cell surface proteins they demonstrated that several of these egg antibodies limited attachment of C. jejuni to chicken hepatocellular carcinoma cells and concluded that these were candidate egg yolk antibodies with potential to reduce C. jejuni colonization in chickens (Al-Aldawani et al., 2013).
Bovine rotavirus (BRV) is an important cause of diarrhea in newborn calves and local passive immunity is the most efficient protective strategies to control the disease (Vega et al., 2011). More recently, it was shown that anti-BRV IgY-containing yolk provided up to 80% protection against BRV-induced diarrhea in neonatal calves when compared with calves given non-immunized egg yolk suggesting that supplementing newborn calves’ diets for the first 14 days of life with BRV-specific IgY may be a promising strategy to prevent BRV-related mortality (Vega et al,. 2011). Diarrhea due to enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) is a major health problem in humans and animals. IgY could be an alternative source of immunoglobulins for the prevention of ETEC infection as it has been found to inhibit the binding of E. coli to the intestinal mucosa (Jin et al., 1998). IgY raised against ETEC antigen has been administered orally to piglets and has offered a potential prophylactic and therapeutic approach for controlling ETEC-induced diarrhea (Marquardt et al., 1999). Marquardt et al. (1999), found out that the IgY titre was much higher when E. coli fimbrial antigen was used rather than the whole cell. Imberechts et al. (1997) raised IgY against E. coli F18ac fimbriae and in vitro adhesion tests demonstrated that the IgY inhibited attachment of F18ac positive E. coli to the intestinal mucosa. The anti-F18ab antibodies were also found to diminish diarrheal cases and death in animals infected with F18ac positive E. coli. Yokoyama et al. (1992) studied the passive protective effect of IgY against ETEC infection in neonatal piglets. IgY was administered to the piglets in milk three times a day for 2 days. Control piglets developed severe diarrhea within 12 h and 30% of the pigs died. In contrast, the pigs given IgY exhibited no sign of diarrhea 24 or 48 h after treatment (Marquardt et al., 1999). The passive protective effect of anti- ETEC IgY, in neonatal calves, against fatal enteric colibacillosis, has also been studied (Ikemori et al., 1992). Prevention of ETEC in rabbits through the oral administration of anti-ETEC IgY. Because the oral administration of anti-ETEC IgY has proven to be successful for the treatment of gastrointestinal infections of animals and also the clinical application of passive immunization of IgY against diarrhea is now being examined to prevent and treat ETEC infection in infants (O'Farrelly et al., 1992).
Salmonella enteritidis (SE) and Salmonella typhimurium (ST) are the main cause of outbreaks in human and infectious in chickens (Lee et al., 2002). Chalghoumi et al. (2009) found that IgY against the outer
membrane proteins of SE and ST reduce salmonella spp.adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells in vitro, which suggests that passive immunization with salmonella-specific IgY could be useful to prevent salmonella colonization in broiler chickens. Moreover, feeding chickens egg powder containing SE-specific antibodies was found to reduce fecal shedding, cecal colonization and the rate of salmonella-contaminated eggs in experimentally infected chickens (Rahimi et al., 2007).
Streptococcus mutans serotype c is thought to be the principal causative bacterium of dental caries in humans. The molecular pathogenesis of S. mutans associated dental caries involves a series of binding events that eventually lead to the accumulation of sufficient numbers of these carcinogenic bacteria to cause disease (Hamada and Slade, 1980). Chicken antibodies against S. mutans MT8148 serotype c or cell-associated glucosyltransferase were prepared and tested against dental caries (Chang et al., 1999). Consumption of a carcinogenic diet containing more than 2% IgY yolk powder resulted in significantly lower caries scores (Otake et al., 1991) and effective passive protection for the prevention of colonization of S. mutans in the oral cavity. It has also been reported that mouth rinse containing IgY specific to S. mutans was effective in preventing the dental plaque of humans in vitro and in vivo (Hatta et al., 1997).
Recently, Smith et al. (2001) produced IgY against the glucan binding protein B (GBP-B) of S. mutans. GBPs are believed to be involved in S. mutans biofilm development, and antibodies against GBP-B appear to have the potential to modulate infection and disease caused by S. mutans. Using a rat model of dental caries, they found that those rats treated with anti-GBP-B IgY displayed a decrease in S. mutans accumulation, as well as a decrease in the overall amount of dental caries, as compared to control rats. These studies indicate that IgY against S. mutans, or its components, may act to interfere with S. mutans accumulation and control plaque with the subsequent oral health problems associated with plaque accumulation (Smith et al., 2001).
In addition, specific IgY has been shown to be effective at preventing and treating several other pathogens. It was found that specific IgY was capable of preventing the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Its use has also been suggested for passive protection of chicks against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) (Eterradossi et al., 1997), and for the protection against porcine epidemic virus (PEDV) in piglets (Kweon et al., 2000).
IgY has been found to be effective against a number of human diseases causing pathogens both in-vitro and in laboratory animal studies and clinical settings. One of the most successful clinical applications of IgY has been in the prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization in the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) in patients. In 2008, orphan drug designation was granted for IgY antibody against PA for the treatment of CF in humans by the European Medicines Agency. P. aeruginosa is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in CF patients and once a chronic infection has been established it is very difficult to eliminate, even with the use of antibiotics (Kollberg et al., 2003). Furthermore, there is increasing risk of developing antibiotic-resistant strains (Nilsson et al., 2008). In ongoing trials in CF patients, a mouth rinse containing purified anti-PA IgY given on a continuous basis could significantly reduce or prevent PA colonization, thereby reducing the need for antibiotics (Nilsson et al., 2008). These studies have shown that specific IgY is effective for immunotherapy for long treatment periods without negative side effects (Nilsson et al., 2007). The stability of the anti-PA IgY in the saliva of healthy individuals was also examined and antibody activity was shown to remain even after 8 h supporting the potential application of IgY for other localized infections such as the common cold and tonsillitis (Carlander et al., 2002). Another promising clinical application of IgY in human is the prevention of Helicobacter pylori infection. H. pylori is common cause of gastritis and gastric ulcers and the emergency of antibiotic-resistant strains has prompted the investigation into alternative treatment methods (DeLoney and Schiller, 2000). In vitro IgY against H. pylori reduced bacterial adhesion, growth and urease activity, and decreased H. pylori induced gastric mucosal injury and inflammation in an animal model. Because antibodies produced against whole-cell H. pylori might also cross-react with normal flora (Shin et al., 2003), the production and efficacy of IgY against immunodominant H. pylori proteins and peptides, including urease and urease-drived peptides (Nomura et al., 2005) and a 58 kDa highly reactive H. pylori antigen (Hp58) (Attallah et al., 2009), have been also examined. A functional drinking yogurt containing lactobacillus acidophilus and bifidobacterium species, supplemented with 1% antiurease IgY was produced commercially and given to volunteers testing positive for H. pylori (Horie et al., 2004).
The production came to be called "IgY Technology" (Warr et al., 1995), which is the internationally accepted term for describing the production and use of this antibody. Furthermore, the "European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods" (ECVAM) strongly recommends that yolk antibodies should be used as an alternative to mammalian antibodies for the animal welfare (Schade et al., 1996). The IgY can be harvested from the egg yolk instead of serum, thus making blood sampling outdated. The antibody productivity of an egg laying hen is greater than a similar sized mammal (Hau and Hendriksen, 2005) and the IgY concentration in the serum of adult hens can reach approximately 5 to 7 mg/ml. As a laying hen produces approximately 20 eggs per month, over 2 grams of IgY can be isolated during this period corresponding approximately the IgY content of 300 ml of serum or 600 ml of blood. Only larger mammals can produce equal amounts of serum antibodies. Chicken antibodies, therefore, constitute a much less expensive vehicle for use in diagnostic purposes (Carlander, 2002).
The use of IgY can also be advantageous in immunological tests where the interference caused by IgG antibodies can be problematic, particularly, the sensitivity of the assay increases. One example is the rheumatoid factor (RF) that reacts with IgG from different mammalian species and also with mouse monoclonal antibodies (Carlander, 2002). RF is usually found in serum samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but can also be found in patients with other diseases and even in 3 to 5% of healthy individuals. Interference by anti-IgG antibodies and antibody-binding substances have been demonstrated in approximately 40% of serum samples from healthy individuals in an immunoradiometric assay (Carlander, 2002).
Another important advantage arises from the phylogenetic distance and genetic background that distinguishes birds from mammals improving the likelihood that an immune response will be elicited against antigens or epitopes that may be non-immunogenic in mammals (Spillner et al., 2012). Due to the evolutionary distance between chicken and mammalian immunoglobulins, IgY recognizes more epitopes when the immunogen used is a mammalian protein which is highly conserved. This feature can result in amplification of the signal, emphasizing the advantages of using IgY over IgG as the first antibody in some types of immunological reactions (Carlander, 2002). It is a well-known concept that a stronger immune response is elicited when the distance between the antigen source and the immune system increases. It has also been shown that chicken antibodies have 3 to 5 times more affinity to antibodies of pigs than the rabbit IgG for signal amplification in immunological test (Olovsson and Larsson, 1993). The limited flexibility of the avian IgY may account for the inability to precipitate antigens at physiological salt concentrations (Warr et al., 1995). IgY and IgY(Fc) both possess two antigen-binding sites and should precipitate or agglutinate multivalent antigens but this does not always occur. Most chicken antibodies bind antigen strongly but display precipitating properties only at raised salt concentrations. Duck antibodies generally fail to exhibit efficient precipitation or agglutination reactions (Higgins, 1988). The non-precipitating duck antibodies do not acquire the ability to precipitate antigen at raised salt concentrations (Warr et al., 1995).
More recently chicken antibodies libraries have attracted scientific interest with increased reports on the isolation of chicken derived antibody fragments. In other words, avian species utilize a unique mode of DNA recombination, named gene conversion, resulting in a large and diverse antibody repertoire upon antigen priming (Spillner et al., 2012). This could be exemplified by the development of a humanized chicken monoclonal anti-IL12 antibody (Nishibori et al., 2006). It is also important to keep in mind that recombinant technologies currently available can generate monoclonal IgY or IgY like antibodies from combinatorial libraries, sometimes without animal immunization (Spillner et al., 2012). Taking together, all these characteristics clearly show substantial advantages of IgY technology in many medical areas, especially for diagnosis. Specific chicken antibodies have been successfully raised against a wide variety of antigens including proteins, peptides, lipid hormones and carbohydrate components from viruses, bacteria, fungi, plants and animals (Schade et al., 1994). Several studies have also shown promising results in the development of techniques for immunodiagnostic using IgY, such as immunoassays tests to detect circulating antigen of Schistosoma japonicum (Cai et al., 2012), development of IgY antibodies against proteins of Pythium insidiosum (Rangel, 2010), use in antigen capture-ELISA (Veerasami et al., 2008).
Immunoaffinity chromatography involves the isolation and purification of target molecules using immobilized antibodies directed against the target molecule. Due to the highly specific nature of the antibody-antigen interaction, immunoaffinity chromatography allows the purification of specific molecules from complex starting materials. The widespread use of this process in large scale, however, has been limited by the high cost of the technique and parameters relating to the production of antibody and the efficiency of immobilization (Li-Chan, 2000). Immobilized yolk antibodies have been used for the isolation of value-added proteins from dairy products, including the purification of lactoferrin (Li-Chan et al., 1998) and the isolation and separation of IgG subclasses from colostrum, milk and cheese whey (Akita and Li-Chan, 1998). Although IgY is more sensitive to low pH than IgG, Akita and Li-Chan (1998) reported that using standard affinity chromatography conditions (that is, elution at low pH), an IgY immunoaffinity column was stable and could be reused over 50 times without significant decreases in binding capacity. Alternative eluents have been examined, including highly alkaline conditions (Kuronen et al., 1997) and high concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride (Otani et al., 1991). To extend the use of IgY immunoaffinity columns, Kim et al. (1999) also examined the reusability of avidin-biotinylated IgY columns, in which biotinylated IgY is held by strong non-covalent interaction on columns containing immobilized
avidin. A number of other applications using IgY immunoaffinity columns have been described for the purification of biological molecules from human serum, including the purification of tetrachlordibenzo-pdioxin (Shelver et al., 1998), prekallikrein (Burger et al., 1986), and human alpha-2 antiplasmin (Lee et al., 1997).
It has been estimated that 1.7 million people are bitten or stung by venomous snakes, scorpions, jellyfish, or spiders each year, resulting in 40,000 to 50,000 fatalities. The most widely used treatment of envenomation is the use of specific anti-venoms to neutralize the toxic and potentially lethal effects of the venom. Chicken anti-venom IgY has been produced, and was found to have a higher bioactivity than anti-venoms raised in horses (Almeida et al., 1998). IgY also has a lower likelihood of producing significant clinical side effects, such as serum sickness and anaphylactic shock, which can occur upon administration of mammalian serum proteins (Larsson et al., 1993). Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, which are an increasing burden to hospitals and society in terms of the cost of medication and treatment, and time lost due to illness (Hay and Hay, 1992). Standard medical care for these diseases includes anti-inflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, and antibiotics, but their use is limited by side effects, immunosuppression, and incomplete efficacy. Immunotherapy using monoclonal mouse antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) has been approved for use, however it can be costly and adverse side effects have been reported in patients receiving systemic anti-TNF therapy (Sandborn and Hanauer, 1999). Recently, Worledge et al. (2000) reported that anti-TNF antibodies produced in chickens were capable of effectively treating acute and chronic phases of colitis in rats, and were also found to neutralize the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in humans in the future. Human TNF in vitro indicates its possible use for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in humans in the future.
CONCLUSION
Chickens like mammals are capable of producing antigen specific antibodies IgY which functions are similar to IgG in response to an antigenic stimulus. It was not until recently, however, the particular immunological properties of IgY were recognized and IgY began replacing mammalian antibodies in such applications as immunodiagnostic assays, immunotherapeutics and affinity purification techniques. Yolk antibodies do not activate the mammalian complement system or interact with mammalian Fc receptors that could mediate inflammatory response in the gastrointestinal tract. As theseimmunotherapeutic applications often require the continuous or frequent administration of antibodies, large quantities are required. IgY is, therefore, the ideal choice for the production of large quantities of conveniently purified antibodies. The use of IgY is also cost-effective with IgY costing less than $10 per gram compared to IgG which can cost up to $20 000 per gram. This technology will allow for new potential applications of IgY in medicine, public health, veterinary medicine and food safety. Chickens are useful for the production of specific IgY, and also needs to demonstrate the deposition of recombinant human antibodies into the egg yolk of transgenic chickens suggesting an extension of the production of specific IgY in eggs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. More research should be carried out on the potential methods of production and application of egg yolk antibodies.
2. To increase the use of IgY, techniques for both direct and indirect labelling must be optimized.
3. When antibodies are to be used for therapeutic purposes, the use of free from specific pathogens chicken is compulsory.
4. It is preferable to immunize chickens before they begin to produce egg, because the stresses induced by handling them have an adverse effect on egg production.
5. Further study on the application of IgY in immunotherapeutic and diagnostic purposes should be undertaken.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Always and foremost, thanks are indebted to God almighty for his mercy and guidance. Additional thanks are extended to everyone, particularly to my academic advisor Dr. Tesfaye Sisay, Dr. Fikre Zeru, Dr. Mu-uz Gebru and Mr.Yimer Muktar who helped me in the assemblage of this critical manuscript work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
Akita EM, Li-Chan ECY (1998). Isolation of bovine immunoglobulin G subclasses from milk, colostrums, and whey using immobilized egg yolk antibodies. J. Dairy Sci. 81:54-63. Crossref |
||||
Akita EM, Nakai S (1992). Immunoglobulins from egg yolk: Isolation and purification. J. Food Sci. 57:629-634. Crossref |
||||
Akita EM, Nakai S (1993a). Comparison of four purification methods for the production of immunoglobulins from eggs laid by hens immunized with an enterotoxigenic E. coli strain. J. Immunol. Methods 160:207-214. Crossref |
||||
Akita E M and Nakai S (1993b). Production and purification of Fab' fragments from chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin Y (IgY). J. Immunol. Methods 162:155-164. Crossref |
||||
Al-Adwani SR, Crespo R, Shah DH (2013). Production and evaluation of chicken egg-yolk-derived antibodies against Campylobacter je¬juni colonization-associated proteins. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 10:624-631. Crossref |
||||
Almeida CM, Kanashiro MM, Rangel Filho FB, Mata MF, Kipnnis TL (1998). Development of snake antivenom antibodies in chickens and the purification from yolk. Vet. Rec. 143:579-584. Crossref |
||||
Attallah AM, Abbas AT, Ismail H, abdel-Raouf M, EL-Dosoky I (2009). Efficacy of passive immunization with antibodies to a 58-kDa H. pylori antigen on severe gastritis in BALB/c mouse model. J. Immunoassay Immunochem. 30:359-377. Crossref |
||||
Baxter D (2007). Active and passive immunity, vaccine types, excipents and licensing. Occup. Med. 57:552-556. Crossref |
||||
Bizhanov G, Vyshniauskis G (2000). A comparison of three methods for extracting IgY from the egg yolk of hens immunized with Sendai virus. Vet. Res. Commun. 24:103-113. Crossref |
||||
Bizhanov G, Jonauskiena I, Hau F (2004). A novel method based on the lithium sulphate of precipitation for purification of chicken eggs yolk IgY, applied to the immunospecific antibodies against Sendi virus. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 31:121-130. | ||||
Brambell FWR (1970). Transmission of immunity in birds. Pages 20-41 in Transmission of Passive Immunity from Mother to Young. Vol. 18. A. Neuberger and E.L. Tatum, ed. Elsevier, New York, NY. pp. 20-41. | ||||
Burger D, Schleuning WD, Schapira M (1986). Human plasma prekallikrein. Immunoaf-finity purification and activation to alpha- and beta-kallikrein. J. Biol. Chem. 261:324-327. | ||||
Burley RW, Vadehra DV (1989). An outline of the physiology of avian eggs, In the Avian Egg: Chemistry and Biology, Wiley International, New York p 17. | ||||
Cai C, Guo J, Chen HS, Tian GL, Steinmann P, Chen XM, Ai LLH, Chenn JX (2012). Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) for detecting circulating antigens of Schistosoma japonicum. Parasitol. Int. 61:385-390. Crossref |
||||
Carlander D (2002). Avian IgY antibody: In vitro and in vivo. 53f. PhD Thesis-University of Uppsala, Faculty of Medicine (Sweden). | ||||
Carlander D, Kollberg H, Wejaker PE, Larsson A (2000). Peroral immunotherapy with yolk antibodies for the prevention and treatment of enteric infections. Immunol. Res. 21:1-6. Crossref |
||||
Carlander D, Stalberg J, Larsson A (1999). Chicken antibodies: A clinical chemistry perspective. Ups J. Med. Sci. 104:179. Crossref |
||||
Carroll SB, Thalley BS (1990). Rattlesnake and scorpion antivenoms from the egg yolks of immunized hens. Biotechnology 8(10):934-8. Crossref |
||||
Casadevall A, Dadachova E, Pirofski LA (2004). Passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Micrbiol. 2:695-703. Crossref |
||||
Chalghoumi R, Thewis A, Becker Y, Marcq C, Portetele D, Schneder YJ (2009). Adhesion and growth inhibitory effect of IgY on Salmonella enteric serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium in vitro. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 6:593-604. Crossref |
||||
Chang H M, Ou-Yang RF, Chen YT, Chen CC (1999). Productivity and some properties of immunoglobulin specific against Streptococcus mutans serotype c in chicken egg yolk (IgY). J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:61-66. Crossref |
||||
Chang HM, Lu TC, Chen CC, Tu YY, Hwang JY (2000). Isolation of immunoglobulin from egg yolk by anionic polysaccharides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:995. Crossref |
||||
Coleman M (1998). Chicken immunology and egg antibodies: laying hens, antibody-factory, IGY-technology, biomedical applications and treat disease. The 2nd International Symposium on Egg Nutrition and Newly Emerging Ovo-Technologies Banff, Ontario Canada, April 5 to 8, 1998. | ||||
Cook ME, Trott DL (2010). IgY Immune com¬ponent of eggs as a source of passive immunity for animals and humans. World Poult. Sci. J. 66:215-226. Crossref |
||||
Cotterill OJ, McBee LE (1995). Egg breaking, In Egg Science and Technology, Fourth Edition, eds Stadelman, W. J. and Cotterill, O. J. The Haworth Press, Inc., New York p 231. | ||||
Deignan T, Kelly J, Alwan A, O'Farrelly C (2000). Comparative analysis of methods of purification of egg yolk immunoglobulin. Food Agric. Immunol. 12:77. Crossref |
||||
DeLoney CR, Schiller NL (2000). Characterization of an in vitro selected amoxicillin for theresistant strain of Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3368-3373. Crossref |
||||
Erhard ME, Schmidt P, Hofmann A, Stangassinger M, Losch U (1996). Production and purification of mouse IgG subclass specific chicken egg yolk antibodies using a new indirect affinity chromatography method with protein G Sepharose. ALTEX 13(5):66-69. Pubmed |
||||
Eterradossi N, Toquin D, Abbassi H, Rivallan G, Cotte JP, Guittet M (1997). Passive protection of specific pathogen free chicks against infectious bursal disease by in-ovo injection of semi-purified egg-yolk antiviral immunoglobulins. J. Vet. Med. 44:371-379. Crossref |
||||
Fichtali J, Charter EA, Lo KV, Nakai S (1993). Purification of antibodies from industrially separated egg yolk. J. Food Sci. 58:1282. Crossref |
||||
Fichtali J, Charter EA, Lo KV, Nakai S (1994). A new process for IgY isolation from industrially separated egg yolk including automation and scale-up. In Egg Uses and Processing Technologies-New Developments. Edited by J.S. Sim and S. Nakai. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K. | ||||
Gassmann M, Thomes P, Weiser T, Hubscher U (1990). Efficient production of chicken egg yolk antibodies against a conserved mammalian protein. FASEB J. 4:2528. PMid:1970792 |
||||
Greene CR, Holt PS (1997). An improved chromatographic method for the separation of egg yolk IgG into subpopulations utilizing immobilized metal ion (Fe+3.) affinity chromatography. J. Immunol. Methods 209:155. Crossref |
||||
Grindstaff JL, Brodie ED III, Ellen ED (2003). Immune function across generations: Integrating mechanism and evolutionary process in maternal antibody transmission. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270:2309-2319. Crossref |
||||
Hamada S, Slade HD (1980). Biology, immunology and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Rev. 44:331-384. Pubmed |
||||
Hansen P, Scoble JA, Hanson B, Hoogenraad NJ (1998). Isolation and purification of immunoglobulins from chicken eggs using thiophilic interaction chromatography. J. Immunol. Methods 215:1-7. Crossref |
||||
Hassl A, Aspock H (1988). Purification of egg yolk immunoglobulins. Two-step procedure using hydrophobic interaction chromatography and gel filtration. J. Immunol. Methods 110:225-228. Crossref |
||||
Hatta H, Kim M, Yamamoto T (1990). A novel isolation method for hen egg yolk antibody ``IgY''. Agric. Biol. Chem. 54:2531. Crossref |
||||
Hatta H, Tsuda K, Ozeki M, Kim M, Yamamoto T, Otake SJ, Childers NK, Michalek SM (1997a). Passive immunization against dental plaque formation in humans: Effect of a mouth rinse containing egg yolk antibodies (IgY) specific to Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 31:268-274. Crossref |
||||
Hatta H, Tsudaa K, Akachi S, Kim M, Yamamoto T, Ebina T (1993). Oral passive of the immunization effect of antihuman rotavirus IgY and its behavior against proteolytic enzymes. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 57:1077. Crossref |
||||
Hau J, Hendriksen CFM (2005). Refinement of the polyclonal antibodies in productions by combining oral immunization of chickens with harvest of antibodies from the egg yolk. ILAR J. 46:294-299. Crossref |
||||
Hay JW, Hay AR (1992). An inflammatory of bowels disease: costs of illness. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 14:309-317. Crossref |
||||
Higgins DA (1988). Bile immunoglobulin of the duck (Anas platyrhynchos). II. Antibody response in influenza A virus infections. Immunology 62:499-504. | ||||
Horie K, Horie N, Abdou AM, Yang JO, Yun SS (2004). The suppressive effect of the functional drinking yogurt containing specific egg yolk immunoglobulin on Helicobacter pylori in humans. J. Dairy Sci. 87:4073-4079. Crossref |
||||
Ikemori Y, Ohta M, Umeda K, Icatlo F C J r, Kuroki M, Yokoyama H, Kodama Y (1997). Passive protection of neonatal calves against bovine coronavirus-induced diarrhea by administration of egg yolk or colostrum antibody powder. Vet. Microbiol. 58:105. Crossref |
||||
Imberechts H, Deprez P, Van Driessche E, Pohl P (1997). Chicken egg yolk antibodies against F18ab fimbriae of Escherichia coli inhibit shedding of F18 positive E. coli by experimentally infected pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 54:329-341. Crossref |
||||
Janson AK, Smith CI, Hammarstrom L (1995). Biological properties of the eggs yolk immunoglobulins. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 371:685-690. Crossref |
||||
Jin LZ, Samuel K, Baido K, Marquardt RR, Frohlich AA (1998). In vitro inhibition of adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to piglet intestinal mucus by egg yolk antibodies. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 21:313-321. Crossref |
||||
Kim H, Nakai S (1998). Simple separation of immunoglobulin from egg yolk by ultrafiltration. J. Food Sci. 63:485. Crossref |
||||
Kim WK, Patterson PH, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, Ricke SC (2013). The potential to reduce poultry nitrogen emissions with specific uricase egg yolk feed grade antibodies. World's Poult. Sci. J. 69:45-55. Crossref |
||||
Kim H, Durance TD, Li Chan ECY (1999). Reusability of avidin biotinylated IgY of columns in immunoaffinity chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 268:383-397. Crossref |
||||
Kollberg H, Carlander D, Olesen H, Wejaker PE, Johannesson M, Larsson A (2003). Oral administration of specific yolk antibodies (IgY) may prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in patients with cystic fibrosis: a phase I feasibility study. Pediater. Pulmonol. 35:433-440. Crossref |
||||
Kuronen I, Kokko H, Mononen I, Parviainen M (1997). Hen egg yolk antibodies purified by antigen affinity under highly alkaline conditions provide new tools for diagnostics. Human intact parathyrin as a model antigen. Eur. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 35:435-440. Crossref |
||||
Kweon CH, Kwon BJ, Woo SR, Kim JM, Woo GH, Son DH, Hur W, Lee YS (2000). Immunoprophylactic effect of chicken egg yolk immunoglobulin (IgY) against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) in piglets. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 62:961-964. Crossref |
||||
Landon J, Woolley JA (1995). Comparison of antibody production to human interleukin-6 (IL-6) by sheep and chickens. J. Immunol. 178:253-265. | ||||
Larsson A, Carlander D, Wilhelmsson M (1988). Antibody response in laying hens with small amounts of antigen. Food Agric. Immunol. 10:29-36. Crossref |
||||
Larsson A, Balow R, Lindahl TL, Forsberg P (1993). Chicken eggs antibodies: taking advantage of evolution: A review. Poult. Sci. 72:1807-1812. Crossref |
||||
Lee EN, Sunwoo H, Menninen K, Sim JS (2002a). In vitro studies of chicken egg yolk antibody (IgY against Salmonella enteritidis and Slmonella typhimurium. Poult. Sci. 81:632-641. Crossref |
||||
Lee SC, Lee KN, Schwartzott DG, Jackson KW, Tae WC, McKee PA (1997). Purification of human alpha 2- antiplasmin with chicken IgY specific to its carboxy-terminal peptide. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 27:227. Crossref |
||||
Leslie GA, Clem WL (1989). Phylogeny of immunoglobulin structure and function. Immunoglobulins of the chicken. J. Exp. Med. 130:1337-1352. Crossref |
||||
Li Chan ECY (2000). Applications of egg immunoglobulins in immunoaffinity chromatography, In Egg Nutrition and Biotechnology, eds. Sim JS, Nakai S, Guenter W CAB International, New York pp. 323-339. | ||||
Li X, Nakano T, Sunwoo H H, Paek B H, Chae HS, Sim JS (1997). Effects of egg and yolk weights on yolk antibody (IgY) production in laying chickens. Poult. Sci. 77:266-270. Crossref |
||||
Li-Chan ECY, Ler SS, Kummer A, Akita EM (1998). Isolation of lactoferrin by immunoaffinity chromatography using yolk antibodies. J. Food Biochem. 22:179-195. Crossref |
||||
Li-Chan ECY, Powrie WD, Nakai S (1995). The chemistry of eggs and egg products. In Egg Science and Technology. Edited by W.J. Stadelman and O.J. Cotterill. The Haworth Press Inc. New York. | ||||
Marquardt RR, Jin LZ, Kim JW, Fang L, Frohlich AA, Baidoo SK (1999). Passive protective effect of egg yolk antibodies against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. infection in neonatal and early weaned piglets. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 23:283-288. Crossref |
||||
Michael A, Meenatchisudaram S, Parameswari G, Subbraj T, Selvaku R, Ramalingam S (2010). Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) as an alternative to mammalian antibodies. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 3:468-474. | ||||
Morrison SL, Mohammed MS, Wims LA, Trinh R, Etches R (2002). Sequences in antibody molecules important for receptor-mediated transport into the chicken egg yolk. Mol. Immunol. 38:616-625. Crossref |
||||
Nakai S, Li-Chan E, Lo KV (1994). Separation of immunoglobulin from egg yolk, In Egg Uses and Processing Technologies. New Developments, eds Sim, J.S. and Nakai, S. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. P 94. |
Nilsson E, Kollberg H, Johannesson M, Wejaker PE, Carlander D, Larsson A (2007). More than 10 years' continuous oral treatment with specific immunoglobulin Y for the prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a case report. J. Med. Food.10:375-378. |
||||
Nilsson E, Larsson A, Olesen HV, Wejaker PE, Kollberg H (2008). Good effect of IgY against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in patients in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 43:892-899. Crossref |
||||
Nishibori N, Nhoko A, Horiuchi V (2006). Humanization of chicken monoclonal antibody using phage-display system. Mol. Immunol. 43:634-642. Crossref |
||||
Nomura S, Suzuki H, Masaoka T, Kurabayashi K, Ishii H (2005). Effect of dietary anti-urease IgY on Helicobacter pylori infection in Mongolian gerbils. Helicobacter 10:43-52. Crossref |
||||
O'Farrelly C, Branton D, Wanke CA (1992). Oral ingestion of egg yolk immunoglobulin from hens immunized with an enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain prevents diarrhea in rabbits challenged with the same strain. Infect. Immun. 60:2593. Pubmed |
||||
Olovsson M, Larsson A (1993). Biotin labelling of chicken antibodies and their subsequent use in ELISA and immune-histochemistry. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.16:145-152. Crossref |
||||
Otake S, Nishihara Y, Makimura M, Hatta H, Kim M, Yamamoto T, Hirasawa M (1991). Protection of rats against dental caries by passive immunization with hen egg yolk antibody (IgY). J. Dent. Res. 70:162-166. Crossref |
||||
Otani H, Matsumoto K, Saeki A, Hosono A (1991). Comparative studies on properties of hen egg yolk IgY and rabbit serum IgG antibodies. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 24:152-158. | ||||
Pendleton S, Hanning I, Biswas D, Ricke SC (2013). Evaluation of whole genome sequencing as a genotyping tool for Campylobacter jejuni in comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and flaA typing. Poult. Sci. 92:573-580. Crossref |
||||
Rahimi MS, Zahraei SZ, Karimi T, Torshizi MA, Grimes JL (2007). Prevention of Salmonella infection in poultry by specific egg-derived antibody. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 6:230-235. Crossref |
||||
Rangel MFN (2010). Development of IgY antibodies in chickens and IgG in rabbits immunized against proteins of Phytium insidiosum isolated from horses in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 30:87-93. Crossref |
||||
Reilly RM, Domingo R, Sandhu J (1997). Oral delivery of antibodies; Future pharmacokinetic trends. Clin. Pharmcokinet. 4:313-323. Crossref |
||||
Reynaud CA, Anquez V, Weill JC (1989). Somatic hyperconversion diversifies the single VH gene of the chickenwith a high incidence in the D region. Cell 59:171-183. Crossref |
||||
Rose ME, Orlans E, Buttress N (1994). Immunoglobulin classes in the hen's egg: Their segregation in yolk and white. Eur. J. Immunol. 4:521-523. Crossref |
||||
Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB (1999). Antitumor necrosis factor therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a review of agents, pharmacology, clinical results and safety. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 5:119. Crossref |
||||
Schade R, Bürger W, Schöneberg T, Schniering A, Schwarzkopf C, Hlinak A, Kobilke H (1994). Avian egg yolk antibodies. The egg laying capacity of hens following immunization with antigens of different kind and origin and the efficiency of egg yolk antibodies in comparison to mammalian antibodies. Alternativen zu Tierexperimenten 11:75-84. Pubmed |
||||
Schade R, Calzado EG, Sarmiento R, Chacana PA, Porankiewicz-Asplund J, Terzolo HR (2005). Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY-technology): a review of progress in production and use in research and human and veterinary medicine. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33:129-154. Pubmed |
||||
Schade R, Pfister C, Halatsch R, Henklein P (1991). Polyclonal IgY antibodies from chicken egg yolk-an alternative to the production of mammalian IgG type antibodies in rabbits. ATLA. 19:403-419. | ||||
Schade R, Staak C, Hendrikson C, Erhard M, Hugl H, Koch G, LarssonA, Pollman W, van Regenmortel M, Rijke E, Spielmann H, Steinbush H, Straughan D (1996). The production of avian (egg yolk) antibodies: IgY. ATLA 24:925. | ||||
Sharma JM (1997). The structure and function of the avian immune system. Acta Vet. Hung. 45:229-238. Pubmed |
||||
Sharma JM (1999). Introduction to poultry vaccines and immunity. Adv. Vet. Med. 41:481-494. Crossref |
||||
Shelver WL, Larsen GL, Huwe JK (1998). Use of an immunoaffinity column for tetra-chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin serum sample cleanup. J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 705:261. Crossref |
||||
Shimizu M, Fitzsimmons RC, Nakai S (1988). Anti-E. coli immunoglobulin Y isolated from egg yolk of immunized chickens as a potential food ingredient. J. Food Sci. 53:1360-1368. Crossref |
||||
Shimizu M, Nagashima H, Hashimoto K (1993). Comparative studies on molecular stability of IgG from different species. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 106:255-261. | ||||
Shimizu M, Nagashima H, Hashimoto K, Suzuki T (1994). Egg yolk antibody stability in aqueous solution with high sugar concentrations. J. Food Sci. 59:763-766. Crossref |
||||
Shimizu M, Nagashima H, Sano K, Hashimoto K, Ozeki M, Tsuda K and Hatta H (1992). Molecular stability of chicken and rabbit IgG. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 56:270-274. Crossref |
||||
Shin J H, Nam SW, Kim J T, Yoon J B, Bang W G, Roe I H (2003). Identification of immunodominant Helicobacter pylori proteins with reactivity to H. pylori-specific egg-yolk immunoglobulin. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:217-222. Crossref |
||||
Sim JS, Sunwo HH, Lee EN (2000). Ovoglobulin IgY, In Natural Food Antimicrobial Systems, ed. Naidu, A. S. CRC Press, New York p 227. | ||||
Smith DJ, King W, Godiska R (2001). Passive transfer of IgY to Streptococcus mutans glucan binding protein B can confer protection against experimental dental caries. Infect. Immun. 69:3135-3142. Crossref |
||||
Spillner E, Braren L, Greunke K, Seismann H, Du Plessis D (2012). Avian IgY antibodies and their recombinant equivalents in research, diagnostics and therapy. Biologicals 40:313-322. Crossref |
||||
Svendsen L, Crowley A, Ostergaard LH, Stodulski G, Hau J (1995). Development and comparison of purification strategies for chicken antibodies from the egg yolk. Lab. Anim. Sci. 45:89-93. Pubmed |
||||
Tizard I (2002). The avian antibody response. Seminars Avian Exotic Pet Med. 11:2-14. Crossref |
||||
Veerasami M, Schneid A, Santos DS (2008). Stereotyping of foot and mouth disease of virus by antigen capture ELISA using the monoclonal antibodies and chicken IgY. New Microbiol. 31:549-554. Pubmed |
||||
Verdoliva A, Basile G, Fassina G (2000). Affinity purification of immunoglobulins from chicken egg yolk using a new Avian egg antibodies: basic and potential applications 45 synthetic ligand. J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 749:233. Crossref |
||||
Warr GW, Magor KE, Higgins DA (1995). IgY: clues to the origins of modern antibodies. Immunol. Today. 16:392-398. Crossref |
||||
Watkins BA (1995). The nutritive value of the egg. In Egg Science and Technology. Edited by W.J. Stadelman and O.J. Cotterill. The Haworth Press Inc. New York. | ||||
Worledge KL, Godiska R, Barrett TA, Kink JA (2000). Oral administration of avian tumor necrosis factor antibodies effectively treats experimental colitis in rats. Dig. Dis. Sci. 45:2298-2305. Crossref |
||||
Yegani M, Korver DR (2010). Application of egg yolk antibodies as replacement for antibiotics in poultry. World Poult. Sci. J. 66:27-37. Crossref |
||||
Yokoyama H, Peraltta R C, Diaz R, Ikemori Y, Kodama Y (1992). Passive protective effect of chicken egg yolk immunoglobulins against experimental enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in neonatal piglets. Infect. Immun. 60:998. Pubmed |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0