Scientific Research and Essays

  • Abbreviation: Sci. Res. Essays
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1992-2248
  • DOI: 10.5897/SRE
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2767

Full Length Research Paper

Clues of production for the Neolithic Çatalhöyük (central Anatolia) pottery

Erhan Akça1, Selim Kapur2, Serap Özdöl3, Ian Hodder4, Jeroen Poblome5, Joselito Arocena6, Gilbert Kelling7 and Çetin Bedestenci8
1Adiyaman University, Department of Ceramics, 02040, Adiyaman Turkey. 2Çukurova University, Department of Archaeometry, 01330, Adana, Turkey 3University of Ege, Vocational School of ÇeÅŸme, Ä°zmir, Turkey. 4University of Stanford, Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, CA, USA. 5Katholieke University Leuven, Department of Archaeology, Leuven, Belgium. 6University of Northern British Columbia, College of Science and Management, Canada. 7University of Keele, School of Physical Sciences and Geography, Keele, UK 8ÇaÄŸ University, Depatment of Economics, Mersin, Turkey.
Email: [email protected]

  •  Accepted: 28 May 2009
  •  Published: 30 June 2009

Abstract

Probable source materials and production technologies of neolithic pottery from Çatalhöyük were studied with micromorphological and archaeometrical methods, seeking to shed light on the established techniques and appropriate source material mixtures used by the inhabitants of the epoch (7500 yr BP) in contrast to the reputed idea of primitiveness of the neolithic pottery. The results revealed the use of reed chaff along with mud brick (sun-dried) fragments that may have been derived from brick-making. The application of the ‘slip’ represents a novel observation and the intention of the use of a dye that needs further confirmation. The presence of gehlenite and aluminum diopside are considered to be the evidence of reached temperatures of about 800°C and not over with short durations manifested by the presence of calcite. Stress phenomena along with the bent weed fragments may also manifest the practice in shaping of pottery, where the former may also reflect fluctuating firing temperatures. Thus, analytical and micromorphological data obtained herein can provide some guidelines on designating prehistoric Anatolian pottery to the archaeologist and potters working on the subject matter.

 

Key words: Neolithic, pottery, traditional knowledge, archaeometry, micromorphology.