Scientific Research and Essays

  • Abbreviation: Sci. Res. Essays
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1992-2248
  • DOI: 10.5897/SRE
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2768

Full Length Research Paper

Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of electronic commerce technologies outside the classroom

Mahmoud M. Maqableh
  • Mahmoud M. Maqableh
  • Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, P. O. Box 13876 Amman 11942 Jordan.
  • Google Scholar
Ashraf B. Mohammed
  • Ashraf B. Mohammed
  • Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, P. O. Box 13876 Amman 11942 Jordan.
  • Google Scholar
Ra'ed (Moh’d Taisir) Masa'deh
  • Ra'ed (Moh’d Taisir) Masa'deh
  • Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Business, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, P. O. Box 13876 Amman 11942 Jordan.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 17 October 2015
  •  Accepted: 15 December 2015
  •  Published: 29 February 2016

References

Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pp. 1-278

 

Arbuckle J (2009). Amos 18 user's guide. Armonk, New York, USA: SPSS Incorporated.

 
 

Bagozzi R, Yi Y (1988). On the evaluation of structural evaluation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 16(1):74-94.
Crossref

 
 

Bandura A (1977). Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84:191-215.
Crossref

 
 

Bentler P (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107:238-246.
Crossref

 
 

Blumberg B, Cooper DR, Schindler PS (2005). Business research methods. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1-690.

 
 

Byrne B (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 1-416.

 
 

Chan NN, Walker C, Gleaves A (2015). An exploration of students' lived experiences of using smartphones in diverse learning contexts using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Comput. Educ. 82:96-106.
Crossref

 
 

Chang S, Tung F (2008). An empirical investigation of students' behavioral intentions to use the online learning course wLLAsites. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 39(1):71-83.

 
 

Chou T, Chang P, Cheng Y, Tasi C (2007). A path model linking organizational knowledge attributes, information processing capabilities, and perceived usability. Inform. Manag. 44:408-417.
Crossref

 
 

Chuang HH, Weng CY, Huang FC (2015). A structure equation model among factors of teachers' technology integration practice and their TPCK. Comput. Educ. 86:182-191.
Crossref

 
 

Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(2):189-211.
Crossref

 
 

Creswell J (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd Edn., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. pp. 1-269.

 
 

Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989). "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models." Manag. Sci. 35:982-1003.
Crossref

 
 

Davis HA (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educ. Psychol. 38:207-234.
Crossref

 
 

Deepwell F, Malik S (2008). On campus, but out of class: an investigation into students' experiences of learning technologies in their self-directed study. Res. Learn. Technol. 16:1.
Crossref

 
 

Erdogdu F, Erdogdu E (2015). The impact of access to ICT, student background and school/home environment on academic success of students in Turkey: An international comparative analysis. Comput. Educ. 82:26-49.
Crossref

 
 

Ertmer PA, Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT, Sadik O, Sendurur E, Sendurur P (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Comput. Educ. 59(2):423-435.
Crossref

 
 

Fauville G, Dupont S, von Thun S, Lundin J (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Comput. Educ. 82:60-73.
Crossref

 
 

Fronell C, Larcker D (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18: 39-50.
Crossref

 
 

Gefen D, Straub DW, Boudreau MC (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Info. Syst. 4(7):1-70.

 
 

Greenhow C, Robelia B, Hughes JE (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educ. Res. 38(4):246-259.
Crossref

 
 

Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th Edn., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Inc. pp. 1-537

 
 

Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. pp. 1-816

 
 

Hao Y, Lee KS (2015). Teachers' concern about integrating Web 2.0 technologies and its relationship with teacher characteristics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48:1-8.
Crossref

 
 

Holmes-Smith P (2001). Introduction to structural equation modeling using LISREL. Perth: ACSPRI Winter Training Program.

 
 

Hsu MK, Wang SW, Chiu KK (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2):412-420.
Crossref

 
 

Hung ML, Chou C (2015). Students' perceptions of instructors' roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Comput. Educ. 81:315-325.
Crossref

 
 

Katyal KR, Evers C (2004). Teacher leadership and autonomous student learning: Adjusting to the new realities. Int. J. Educ. Res. 41: 367-382.
Crossref

 
 

Kim C, Kim MK, Lee C, Spector JM, DeMeester K (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teach. Teacher Educ. 29:76-85.
Crossref

 
 

Kline R (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd Edn., New York: The Guilford Press. pp. 1-366.

 
 

Kline R (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press. pp. 1-427

 
 

Kopcha TJ (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Comput. Educ. 59(4):1109-1121.
Crossref

 
 

Krejcie R, Morgan D (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 30: 607-610.

 
 

Kulakli A, Mahony S (2014). Knowledge Creation and Sharing with Web 2.0 Tools for Teaching and Learning Roles in So-called University 2.0. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 150:648-657.

 
 

Lai C (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Comput. Educ. 82:74-83.
Crossref

 
 

Lai C, Wang Q, Lei J (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students' use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Comput. Educ. 59(2):569-579.
Crossref

 
 

Levy M (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. Mod. Lang. J. 93:769-782.
Crossref

 
 

Maqableh M (2010). Secure Hash Functions Based on Chaotic Maps for E-Commerce Application. Int. J. Inform. Technol. Manag. Inform. Syst. (IJITMIS), 1(1):12-19.

 
 

Maqableh M (2012). Analysis and design security primitives based on chaotic systems for ecommerce." Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom. pp. 1-220

 
 

Masa'deh R, Gharaibeh A, Maqableh M, Karajeh H (2013a). An Empirical Study of Antecedents and Outcomes of Knowledge Sharing Capability in Jordanian Telecommunication Firms: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Life Sci. J. 10(4): 2284-2296.

 
 

Masa'deh R, Shannak R, Maqableh M (2013b). A Structural Equation Modelling Approach for Determining Antecedents and Outcomes of Students' Attitude toward Mobile Commerce Adoption. Life Sci. J. 10(4): 2321-2333.

 
 

Mohammadi H (2015). Factors affecting the e-learning outcomes: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Telemat. Inform. 32(4): 701-719.
Crossref

 
 

Mohammadyari S, Singh H (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education, 82:11-25.
Crossref

 
 

Mueller J, Wood E, Willoughby T, Ross C, Specht J (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Comput. Educ. 51(4):1523-1537.
Crossref

 
 

Newkirk H, Lederer A (2006). The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty. Inform. Manag. 43: 481-501.
Crossref

 
 

Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT, Glazewski KD, Newby TJ, Ertmer PA (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Comput. Educ. 55(3):1321-1335.
Crossref

 
 

Pallant J (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows version 12. Chicago, Illinois: Open University Press.

 
 

Rezaee Z, Elam R, Cassidy JH (2005). Electronic-commerce education: Insights from academicians and practitioners. Adv. Account. 21:233-258.
Crossref

 
 

Sekaran U (2003). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. 4th Edn., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

 
 

Sekaran U, Bougie R (2013). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. 6th Edn., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

 
 

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425-478

 
 

Whinston AB (1997). Electronic commerce: A shift in paradigm, IEEE Internet Comput. 1(6):17-19.
Crossref

 
 

Yousafzai SY, Foxall GR, Pallister JG. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1. J. Model. Manag. 2(3):251-280.
Crossref