Scientific Research and Essays

  • Abbreviation: Sci. Res. Essays
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1992-2248
  • DOI: 10.5897/SRE
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2755

Full Length Research Paper

Regional sustainability assessment and its sensitivity analysis based on ecological footprint model: A case study of Xingguo County in China

Hualin Xie
  • Hualin Xie
  • Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Google Scholar
Qu Liu
  • Qu Liu
  • Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Google Scholar
Peng Wang
  • Peng Wang
  • Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Google Scholar
Zhifei Liu
  • Zhifei Liu
  • School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi Agriculture University, Nanchang 330045, China
  • Google Scholar


  •  Accepted: 05 March 2014
  •  Published: 15 March 2014

References

Babcicky P (2013). Rethinking the Foundations of Sustainability Measurement: The Limitations of the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI). Soc. Indic. Res. 113(1):133-157.
Crossref
 
Bao HJ, Chen HX, Jiang SL, Ma YH (2011). Regional sustainability assessment based on long periods of ecological footprint: A case study of Zhejiang Province, China. Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 5(5):1774-1780.
 
Bleys B (2008). Proposed changes to the index of sustainable economic welfare: An application to Belgium. Ecol. Econ. 64 (4):741-751.
Crossref
 
Bleys B (2013). The Regional Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Flanders, Belgium. Sustainability 5(2): 496-523.
 
Burke PJ (2011). The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud. 47(2):286-288.
 
Choi Y, Yu YN (2014). The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance. Sustain. 6(1):348-364.
Crossref
 
Clarke M, Islam SMN (2005). Diminishing and negative welfare returns of economic growth: an index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Thailand. Ecol. Econ. 54(1):81-93.
Crossref
 
Dai FQ, Nan L, Liu GC (2010). Assessment of regional ecological security based on ecological footprint and influential factors analysis: a case study of Chongqing Municipality, China. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol. 17 (5):390-400.
Crossref
 
Duro JA, Teixido-Figueras J (2013). Ecological footprint inequality across countries: The role of environment intensity, income and interaction effects. Ecol. Econ. 93:34-41.
Crossref
 
Ewing BR, Hawkins TR, Wiedmann TO, Galli A, Ercin AE, Weinzettel J, Steen-Olsen K (2012). Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input-output framework. Ecol. Indicators 23:1-8.
Crossref
 
Gabrielson T (2013). Greening Citizenship: Sustainable Development, the State and Ideology. Environ. Values 22 (6):797-799.
 
Galli A, Kitzes J, Niccolucci V, Wackernagel M, Wada Y, Marchettini N (2012). Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint: A focus on China and India. Ecol. Indicators 17:99-107.
Crossref
 
Gil SS, Sleszynski J (2003). An index of sustainable economic welfare for Poland. Sustainable Development 11 (1):47-55.
Crossref
 
Jin W, Xu LY, Yang ZF (2009). Modeling a policy making framework for urban sustainability: Incorporating system dynamics into the Ecological Footprint. Ecol. Econ. 68(12):2938-2949.
Crossref
 
Kissinger M (2013). Approaches for calculating a nation's food ecological footprint-The case of Canada. Ecol. Indicators 24:366-374.
Crossref
 
Kissinger M, Sussman C, Moore J, Rees WE (2013). Accounting for the Ecological Footprint of Materials in Consumer Goods at the Urban Scale. Sustain. 5(5):1960-1973.
Crossref
 
Lawn PA (2003). A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. Ecol. Econ. 44(1):105-118.
Crossref
 
Li XM, Xiao RB, Yuan SH, Chen JA, Zhou JX (2010). Urban total ecological footprint forecasting by using radial basis function neural network: A case study of Wuhan city, China. Ecol. Indicators 10 (2):241-248.
Crossref
 
Liu MC, Zhang D, Min QW, Xie GD, Su N (2014). The calculation of productivity factor for ecological footprints in China: A methodological note. Ecol. Indicators 38:124-129.
Crossref
 
Menconi ME, Stella G, Grohmann D (2013). Revisiting the food component of the ecological footprint indicator for autonomous rural settlement models in Central Italy. Ecol. Indicators 34:580-589.
Crossref
 
Pulselli FM, Ciampalini F, Tiezzi E, Zappia C (2006). The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for a local authority: A case study in Italy. Ecol. Econ. 60(1):271-281.
Crossref
 
Rees WE (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. Environ. Urbanization(4):121-130.
 
Stokols D, Lejano RP, Hipp J (2013). Enhancing the Resilience of Human-Environment Systems: a Social Ecological Perspective. Ecol. Soc.18(1):7.
Crossref
 
Ture C (2013). A methodology to analyse the relations of ecological footprint corresponding with human development index: eco-sustainable human development index. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 20 (1): 9-19.
Crossref
 
Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol. Econ. (29):375-390.
Crossref
 
Yang P, Mao XL, Li TH, Gao XW (2011). Ecological Risk Assessment of the Shenzhen River-Bay Watershed. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 17 (3):580-597.
Crossref