African Journal of
Agricultural Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Agric. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1991-637X
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJAR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 6091

Full Length Research Paper

Maize-lupine intercrop response to applied nitrogen and phosphorus in North-Western Ethiopia

Alemayehu Assefa
  • Alemayehu Assefa
  • Crop Research Directorate, Amhara Region Agricultural Research Institute, P. O. Box 8, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Charles S Wortmann
  • Charles S Wortmann
  • Agronomy and horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, P. O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915, USA.
  • Google Scholar
Yigzaw Dessalegn
  • Yigzaw Dessalegn
  • LIVE Project, International Livestock Research Institute, P. O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Kinde Tesfaye
  • Kinde Tesfaye
  • Crop Modeling and GIS for Agricultural Systems, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, P. O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Tamado Tana
  • Tamado Tana
  • School of Plant Science, Haramaya University, P. O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Nigussie Dechassa
  • Nigussie Dechassa
  • School of Plant Science, Haramaya University, P. O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 24 March 2016
  •  Accepted: 06 June 2016
  •  Published: 07 February 2019

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays) is a major staple crop in North-Western Ethiopia. Narrow leaf lupine (Lupinus angustifolius) grain is a commercial concentrates for livestock feed. Maize-lupine intercropping is a sustainable and emerging crop production approach for the resource poor smallholder farmers of North-Western Ethiopia; however, there is no recommended fertilizer rate for the intercrop. Therefore, field experiment was undertaken to determine maize-lupine intercrop yield response to applied N and P; to determine N use efficiency of maize; and to establish the basis for determining the most economical N and P rates with varying costs and commodity prices for the intercrop. The experiment was conducted at South Achefer and Mecha areas of North-Western Ethiopia in 2013 crop season. Four levels of each N (0, 64, 128 and 192 kg N ha-1) and P (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg P ha-1) were arranged in factorial combination. Sole crop maize and lupine were included as check treatments. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results indicated that maize growth parameters and yield components, maize grain yield, and total maize-lupine intercrop yield increased significantly with applied N, P, and N x P interactions. The highest total intercrop yields were obtained on 162/45 kg N/P ha-1 at South Achefer and 205/61 kg N/P ha-1 at Mecha with yield advantage of 4.14 and 7.05 t ha-1 over unfertilized, respectively.  The economic optimum rates for maize-narrow leaf lupine intercrop were 130/39 kg N/P ha-1 at South Achefer and 177/53 kg N/P ha-1 at Mecha with cost price ratio of N cost kg-1/maize grain price kg-1 equal to 6 and P cost kg-1/maize grain price kg-1 equal to 11. The economic optimum rates decreased as cost price ratio increased, therefore, seasonal price information is vital to adjust the economic optimum rates. Maize N use efficiency declined as N rates increased in the maize-lupine intercrop.          

Key words:  Intercropping, lupine, maize, optimum rate, yield response.

 

Abbreviation

AEN,  agronomic  efficiency  of  applied Nitrogen; AONR, agronomic optimum Nitrogen Rate, AOPR, agronomic optimum phosphorus rate; CPR, cost price ratio; EONR, economic optimum nitrogen rate; EOPR, economic optimum phosphorus rate; EYM, equivalent Yield of Maize; LAI, leaf area index; PEN, physiological efficiency of applied nitrogen; PFPN, partial factor productivity of applied Nitrogen; REN, recovery efficiency of applied Nitrogen; TKW, thousand kernel weight.