African Journal of
Biotechnology

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Biotechnol.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1684-5315
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJB
  • Start Year: 2002
  • Published Articles: 12269

Full Length Research Paper

The population structure of wild sorghum species in agro-ecological zones of Western Kenya

Titus O. Magomere*
  • Titus O. Magomere*
  • Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Eliud K. Ngugi
  • Eliud K. Ngugi
  • Plant Science and Crop Protection Department University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Silas D. Obukosia
  • Silas D. Obukosia
  • Africa Harvest Biotechnology Foundation International, P.O. Box 642, 00621-Village Market, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Eunice Mutitu
  • Eunice Mutitu
  • Plant Science and Crop Protection Department University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Solomon I. Shibairo
  • Solomon I. Shibairo
  • Kibabii University College, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1699-50200 Bungoma, Kenya.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 15 February 2015
  •  Accepted: 22 April 2015
  •  Published: 29 April 2015

Abstract

There is need to understand the genetic structure of wild sorghums that grow alongside cultivated traditional sorghum varieties in order to assess the potential effect of crop genes in wild populations. In this study, 175 wild sorghum samples were collected from 13 agroecological zones (AEZs) from three counties in Western Kenya and genotyped using microsattelite markers. Crop alleles were observed in wild sorghum populations. The range of allelic frequencies varied from low (˂0.4), to moderate (0.4-0.7) and to high (0.7) in the AEZs. Wild sorghum populations had moderate to high expected heterozygosity (HE) values of between 0.453 in LM1 to 0.715 in LM2. Differences in the magnitude of diversity was significant in the counties (Busia HE = 0.59 – 0.71; Homabay HE = 0.58-0.68 and Siaya HE = 0.45-0.59) but not distinct among the AEZs. Whole population FIS, FST and FIT values were low at 0.15, 0.16 and 0.29, respectively indicating low level of inbreeding, low genetic differentiation of the population and low to moderate deviation from Hardy–Weinberg (HW) equilibrium respectively. The deviation from HW equilibrium was significant in some wild populations from Siaya and Busia. Intra-population diversity (HS) was larger than inter-population diversity (DST) in 13 populations from the sampled AEZs, indicating the importance of gene flow between populations of wild sorghums. Heterozygosity values under mutation drift equilibrium (HEQ) varied under infinite allele model (IAM), two–phase model (TPM) and the step wise mutation model (SMM). However, significant population bottlenecks were absent in the wild sorghums. Presence of significant geographic county clusters and lack of significance on AEZ clusters indicate that human activities have had more influence on the distribution and diversity of wild sorghums than the prevailing climatic conditions. Efforts towards physical and genetic containment of crops genes need to be enhanced for successful ecologically sensitive confined field trials and future adoption of transgenics in cropping systems.
 
Key words: Diversity, Sorghum bicolor, Sorghum halepense, Sorghum sudanense, microsatellite loci.

Abbreviation

AEZ, Agro-ecological zone; DST, inter-population gene diversity; FIS, fixation index; FIT, index of deviation from HW equilibrium; FST, degree of population differentiation; GST, proportion of inter-population gene diversity; HE, expected heterozygosity; HEQ, heterozygosity values under mutation drift equilibrium; HO, observed heterozygosity; HT, total gene diversity; IAM, infinite allele model; SMM, stepwise mutation model; TPM, two-phase model; LM, lower Midlands; UM, upper midlands; HB, Homabay; SY, Siaya; BU, Busia counties; SSR, simple sequence repeats.