African Journal of
Business Management

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1993-8233
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJBM
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 4190

Full Length Research Paper

The production activities of sugar factories in Turkey and Malmquist total factor productivity analysis

Ferhat PEHLIVANOGLU
  • Ferhat PEHLIVANOGLU
  • University of Yalova, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Yuksel BAYRAKTAR
  • Yuksel BAYRAKTAR
  • University of Istanbul, Faculty of Economics, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Zaim Reha YASAR*
  • Zaim Reha YASAR*
  • University of Kirikkale, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Turkey
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 23 April 2014
  •  Accepted: 04 June 2014
  •  Published: 28 May 2015

 ABSTRACT

In this study, total factor productivity (TFP) with variance in its components as well as the technical efficiency levels of 25 active sugar factories in Turkey are surveyed via Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Total Factor Productivity method using the panel data from Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation’s annual activity reports. The aim of the study is to determine the comparative production performances of active sugar factories in Turkey, which would guide both government policies about the sector and the factory managements in the decision making process about issues such as production, growth and profit/cost analysis. It is found that sugar factories in Turkey show increase in TFP stemming from technological improvement in general. Although there is an increase in TFP and technical efficiency, it is nowhere near the one in technological efficiency. Considering the fact that variance in technical efficiency is set by scale efficiency and pure efficiency, the ability of production in optimal scales is found to be low imposing a more congruent use of already possessed production factors. These results put forward the need for increase in competitive capacity and resource management for the sugar factories in Turkey.

Key words: Sugar factories, efficiency, productivity, data envelopmant analysis, Malmquist index.


 INTRODUCTION

Acquiring competitive capacity in the production of a critical product such as sugar increases the importance of reorganization of policies in the world and more specifically in Turkey. Commonwealth production lot in Turkey constitutes approximately 70% of sugar industry. The effects of efficiency and productivity criteria are significant for the attempts towards the corporatization of sugar factories in order to reduce commonwealth production lot. Therefore, sugar factories should aim for sustainable competition in an environment in which global competition is steadily increasing. Due to its associated products, its contribution to other sectors and its being indispensable for human health sugar production has been rather important in Turkish economy. Sugar factories generate employment as well as providing economic territories within those specific regions, which is why sugar factories must be grounded on competitive capacity, efficiency and productivity.

Efficiency and productivity index values are accepted as the  most   reliable   units  of  measure  in  determining

production performance of sugar factories. Productivity represents the ratio of output to the input of the production process; on the other hand, efficiency is the ratio of the output acquired in some period to the maximum output acquired using the most ideal techniques. The quality and the amount of the output and input used in performance measurement also affect the decision maker performance. Consequently, it is crucial to deal with decision making units considering all the data. Production performance is accepted to be on the increase as the productivity and efficiency ratios acquired from output and input values. Although there are several ways of measuring efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis is the most commonly used one. DEA using mathematical programming is used to measure comparative productivity. It classifies companies as “efficient” and “not efficient” according to the already determined production limit of decision making unit which uses the best techniques. As for total factor productivity, it is derived from the multiplication of variance in technology and technical efficiency. The components of variance in technical efficiency consist of the variance in pure efficiency and scale efficiency. Malmquist index is the most commonly used index to measure total factor productivity and variance in its components.

This study in which total factor productivity with its components and technical efficiency levels of 25 public sugar factories in Turkey are measured via Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist TFP index firstly focuses on sugar production and sugar factories. Next the study introduces Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist TFP index in addition to related data set. Lastly, the production efficiency of sugar factories in Turkey is analyzed with CCR output oriented model, DEA and TFP index.

 

Sugar factor?es ?n Turkey

Approximately   350.000    farmers  grow  sugar  beets  in 350.000 – 500.000  hectares of cultivation areas (Konyal?

and Gaytanc?o?lu, 2012).Technology made use in sugar production in Turkey does not show any particular difference from the developed countries’ except for automation and scale size. Attempts to build a sugar factory in Turkey began in 1923. U?ak Sugar Factory, foundation of which was laid in 1925 was commissioned in 1926 along with Alpullu Sugar Factory in which the first sugar production took place. Reaching the total number of four after the commissioning of Eski?ehir (1933) and Turhal (1934), the sugar factories were merged under the title of Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation (TSFC) in 1935. The corporation which has 70% lot in total sugar production has continued to operate with 25 sugar factories ever since. Today, 33 sugar factories operate in Turkey, 25 of which belong to the government, 6 to Pankobirlik and 2 to private organizations (SPO, 2001) Figure 1. 

Acting upon the principles of profitability and productivity, TSFC is responsible from sugar production, sales, import/export and pricing out associated products. Aside from that, TSFC also provides necessary tools and means to its factories as well as offering fertilizers, seeds and pesticides to sugar beet farmers (SPO, 2001). Among 25 factories Malatya, Erzincan, Elaz?? and Elbistan Sugar factories in Portfolio B and Kastamonu, K?r?ehir, Yozgat, Turhal, Çorum ve Çar?amba Sugar Factories in Portfolio C are approved to be corporatized by Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Privatization Administration on 29.11.2011 for 922.000.000$ fee (http://www.oib.gov.tr/program/ uygulamalar/ 2007_uygulamalar/ihalesi_tamam_imza_asamasindakiler.htm, on 09.07.2012). In this study, production efficiency and total factor productivity comparison of sugar factories in Turkey are made for 25 sugar factories in Table 1 

belonging to TSFC (http://www.turkseker.gov.tr/ sekerfabrikalari.aspx on 09.07.2012).

Between 2001 and 2011, the most sugar (white sugar equivalents) producing countries were Brazil with 35.5 million tons, India with 23.9 million tons, EU with 14.5 million  tons  and  China  with  10.6  million tons. In 2010-2011 saccharose based white sugar production in the world per capita per annum is 21 kg. In Turkey, two types of sugar production takes place starch based sugar production and saccharose based sugar production. As for saccharose based, beet sugar is produced while for starch based glucose syrup, isoglucose (high fructose corn syrup- HFCS) and crystal fructose are produced. Beet sugar production and domestic sales in Turkey were 2 million 531 thousand and 2 million 159 thousand tons in 2009-2010 marketing year; 2 million 262 thousand tons and 1 million 768 thousand tons in 2010-2011 marketing year. Turkey’s share in world beet sugar production has been 8% since 2010-2011. 



 REFERENCES

Altan MS (2010) Efficiency in Turkish Insurance Sector: An Applicatioon of Data Envelopment Analysis, SEAD Journal, Gazi University 12(1):191.
 
Altın H (2010) Financial Efficiency Test towards ISE Industrial Firms in Global Crisis: Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, 10(2):18.
 
Avcı MA, Kaya A (2008), Economies in Transition and Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Analysis in Turkish Agriculture Industry, Ege Acad. Rev. J. 8(2):848-850.
 
Babacan A, Kartal M, BircanH (2007). A Comparison of the Efficiency of Cumhuriyet University with Public University: An Implementation of DEA, SEAS Journal, Cumhuriyet University, 8(2):99.
 
BozdaÄŸ GE, Atan M (2009). Avrupa Ülkelerine Göç Eden Türk Ä°ÅŸçilerinin Ä°ktisadi EtkinliÄŸe Katkısı, Gazi Üniversitesi Ä°ktisadi ve Ä°dari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Ankara, Üç Aylık Dergi, Cilt 11, Sayı 1, Sayfa:159 – 180.
 
DeliktaÅŸ E (2006). Production Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Analysis in Small, Medium and Large Scale Production Industry Working Papers in Economics, Ege University, No: 06/03, pp.7-8.
 
Kasap Y (2010) Development of Technical Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity in Turkish Coal Firms, Journal of Institute of Science, Dumlupınar University, Issue: 22, August, p. 79.
 
Kılıç M,Akın A(2008). Effects of Bank Purchases on Target Banks: An Empirical Study on Turkish Banking Sector, SEAS Journal, Gazi University 10(3):237-238.
 
Konyalı S, Gaytancıoğlu O (2012). Agricultural Policies Implemented on Sugar Beets in Turkey, World Food Magazine, Issue: 1, Available online at: http://www.dunyagida.com.tr/haber.php?nid=521.
 
Kutlar A, Güçlü A,Karagöz Y(2011) Performance Evaluation of the Faculties of Cumhuriyet University, SEAS Journal, Cumhuriyet University 5(2):140-141.
 
Lorcu F (2010). Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index: Implementation to Turkish Automotive Industry, Journal of Business Administration Faculty, Istanbul University, Vol: 39, Issue: 2, p. 279.
 
Mohammadi A,Ranei H(2011) The Application of DEA Based Malmquist Productivity Index in Organizational Performance Analysis, Int. Res. J. Finance Econ. 62:72.
 
Özata M,Sevinç Ä° (2012) Analysis of Community Clinic in Konya with Data Envelopment Analysis, SEAS Journal, Atatürk University 24(1):80.
 
Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Privatization Administration (2012). Available online at: http://www.oib.gov.tr/program/uygulamalar/2007_uygulamalar/ihalesi_tamam_imza_asamasindakiler.htm.
 
SPO (2001) 8th Five-Year Development Plan, Report of Sugar Industry Subcommittee of Food Industry Specialization Commission, Ankara pp.14-17.
 
Turkish Sugar Agency (2012). Available online at: http://www.seker kurumu.gov.tr/sss.aspx.
 
Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation (2012). Available online at: http://www.turkseker.gov.tr/sekerfabrikalari.aspx.

 




          */?>