African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5233

Full Length Research Paper

Quality of water for human consumption in a rural area community from Brazil

Felipe Silva de Miranda
  • Felipe Silva de Miranda
  • Health Science Center, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Juciene de Jesus Barreto da Silva
  • Juciene de Jesus Barreto da Silva
  • Health Science Center, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Luiz Henrique Silva Mota
  • Luiz Henrique Silva Mota
  • Health Science Center, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Raíssa da Silva Santos
  • Raíssa da Silva Santos
  • Health Science Center, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Ana Lúcia Moreno Amor
  • Ana Lúcia Moreno Amor
  • Health Science Center, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar
Isabella de Matos Mendes da Silva
  • Isabella de Matos Mendes da Silva
  • Health Science Center, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Brazil.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 05 October 2017
  •  Accepted: 03 August 2018
  •  Published: 07 August 2018

 ABSTRACT

This work aimed at evaluating the bacteriological, parasitological, physical and chemical quality of water intended for human consumption in a community in a rural area of Recôncavo of Bahia (Brazil) and the factors related to a possible contamination. Samples were collected at two different times: at rainy season (August to September, 2015) and dry season (April 2016). The present work evaluated the presence of total coliforms and Escherichia coli; quantified heterotrophic bacteria; performed parasitological techniques of direct examination and modified Faust; analyzed pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, apparent color, turbidity and salinity; and applied a questionnaire regarding the water source and its storage. Out of the 53 households, 67.9% were in disagreement with bacteriological standards of potability. 5.7% in disagreement with parasitological standards, 92.5% in disagreement with physical and chemical standards and all samples were in disagreement with the parameters allowed and recommended by the Brazilian legislation. The water source, presence of a household reservoir, sewage destination and reservoir cleaning time were significantly related to the bacteriological results. The consumption of this water poses a risk to the population’s health and it could provoke outbreaks of food borne diseases. Effective water treatment and surveillance measurements should be taken in order to minimize risks to human health.

 

Key words: Potable standards, groundwater, indicator microorganisms, contaminated water.


 INTRODUCTION

Access to treated water is a basic human right (WHO, 2015). All water intended for human consumption provided from alternative supply sources, regardless of the way of access, is subject to water quality monitoring. Therefore, potable water intended for ingestion, food preparation and personal hygiene, regardless of its source, must meet established drinking standards (Brazil, 2011; Benedict et al., 2017).
 
Water could suffer contamination at the source, during its distribution, as well as in household reservoirs. About 10% of the world’s population does not have access to drinking water and 35% have no access to basic sanitation (WHO, 2015). Brazil possesses the world’s largest  fresh   water   reservoirs,   however,   due   to   its
 
territorial extension, distribution is heterogeneous. Due to the absence of effluent treatment systems, many times water is contaminated from the water table (Brazil, 2005; Rebouças et al., 2015).
 
Foodborne diseases represent an important public health issue in Brazil and in the world, being associated with multiple etiological agents, such as bacteria, viruses, helminths and protozoa, which invade human body through contaminated water and/or food. Despite the high occurrence rates, most cases of foodborne diseases are not reported (Brazil, 2010; Martins et al., 2015; Neves et al., 2016). Approximately 80% of all diseases in developing countries are caused by non-potable water and poor sanitation (Brazil, 2010, 2016; WHO, 2015). 
 
Considering the shortage of studies correlating microbiological and parasitological, physical and chemical results as well as the shortness of researches regarding possible contamination factors and the relevance of studies to subsidize actions aiming to improve health of the peasant population, this study aimed to evaluate the bacterial, parasitological, physical and chemical quality of water intended to human consumption in a rural area community of Recôncavo of Bahia (Brazil), and also to investigate factors related to a possible contamination.

 


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection
 
This research is characterized as a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study. Water samples were collected in 53 households of a rural area of Santo Antônio de Jesus-Bahia (Brazil), from August to September 2015 (end of rainy season) and repeated in 34 households in April 2016 (end of dry season), totaling 87 samples. The number of households varied according to availability of residents. Samples were collected after the reservoir. In the absence of faucets, samples were collected directly from the reservoir. Approximately, 1.5 L of water were collected. Samples obtained were stored in first use polyethylene flasks (VidroPET-Goiania, Goias, Brazil), labeled and packed in thermal boxes with recyclable ice packs, kept in the refrigeration temperature (+2 to +8°C), and analyzed within 6 h of collection at the Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology of Food and Nutrition Security Center (SANUTRI) from Health Science Center (CCS)/Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia (UFRB). Along with the water collection, a structured questionnaire based on the Sanitation Manual of the National Health Foundation (FUNASA) with 16 questions regarding the water source and its storage (Brazil, 2014).
 
Bacteriological analysis
 
For the analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli, a 100 mL aliquot of each sample was transferred to a sterile first-use bag Twirl’EM (Labplas™ - Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Then, Readycult Coliforms 100 (Merck KGaA™ - Darmstadt, Germany) was added and homogenized until the lyophile was completely dissolved. Samples were incubated in bacteriological oven at 35±1°C for 24±2 h with subsequent reading. All samples positive for E. coli in the ultraviolet light test (366 nm) underwent the indole test with the addition of Kovacs  reagent  (Laborclin® - Pinhais,  Paraná,  Brazil).
 
For quantification of heterotrophic bacteria, a dilution of 10-1 with 0.9% NaCl was initially performed. 1 mL of the dilution was inoculated into a Petrifilm Aqua Heterotrophic Count Plate (AQHC, 3M Company™ - Maplewood, Minnesota, USA). After complete gel solidification, the plates were incubated in bacteriological oven at 36±1°C for 44±4 h. Results were expressed in log CFU/mL (APHA, 2012).
 
Parasitological analysis
 
For investigation of parasitic forms in water sources sampled, the methods of direct examination and modified Faust were applied in triplicate. Samples were considered positive when at least one parasitic form was found in one of the methods. For the direct examination, 250 mL of the sample were maintained under spontaneous sedimentation for 24 h at room temperature. The sediment was collected, stained with Lugol’s iodine and visualized under optical microscopy (Olympus-Tokyo, Japan) at 100 and 400× (Neves et al., 2016; Teixeira et al., 2016).
 
For modified Faust, a new aliquot of 50 mL was removed from the spontaneous sedimentation of the total sample and centrifuged at 838 relative centrifugal field (RCF) for 1 min (SPLABOR-Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil). The supernatant was discarded and the sediment resuspended with 10 mL of sterile distilled water and further centrifuged for 1 min. The supernatant was discarded and the sediment resuspended with 10 mL of zinc sulfate solution (density 1.18 g/mL; Synth-Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil) with further centrifugation at 838 RCF for 1 min. The membrane formed on the liquid’s surface was removed with a bacteriological loop, stained with Lugol’s iodine (Dinâmica-Indaituba, São Paulo, Brazil) and visualized under optical microscopy at 100 and 400× (Neves et al., 2016; Teixeira et al., 2016).
 
Physical and chemical analyses
 
For the physical and chemical analyses, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and salinity analyses were performed on field, immediately after water collection with a multiparameter meter AK88 (AKSO®-São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), using an approximate aliquot of 100 mL. Turbidity analysis was performed in laboratory, with a AP-2000 (PoliControl®-Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil) microprocessed bench turbidimeter, with 860 nm wavelength. Apparent color analysis was performed with visual colorimeter DLNH-100 (DelLab®-Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil) (APHA, 2012).
 
Statistical analysis of data
 
Data were processed and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 (International Business Machines™-New York, New York, USA). A normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) was carried out with all quantitative variables. Descriptive and analytical statistics, such as median, maximum, minimum, percentage distribution, Spearman’s correlation coefficient, Pearson’s chi-squared test and variance analysis (ANOVA) were performed. The adopted level of significance was 5% (p<0.05).
 
Ethical considerations
 
This study was evaluated and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee from the Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia (UFRB) (CAAE: 04022312.0.0000.0056 - Authorization 1.167.637),  in   accordance   to   National   Health   Council   (CNS)Resolution 466/2012 (Brazil, 2012). All participants were informed of the study objectives and those who agreed were invited to sign the informed consent form.


 RESULTS

Water from every household came from an alternative source of supply, that is, with underground or surface collection, with or without pipeline and without distribution network (Brazil, 2011). Counts of heterotrophic bacteria resulted in maximum values of 4.15 and 4.10 log CFU/mL and minimum values of <1 and 1.43 log CFU/mL by the end of the rainy and dry season, respectively. There were no significant differences between the results of heterotrophic bacteria for both samples (p = 0.071) (Figure 1). Dry season presented a higher proportion of positive samples, with 88.2% (n = 30) positive samples for total coliforms and 70.6% (n = 24) for E. coli (Table 1).
 
No parasitic structures were found in the majority of samples (60.4 and 76.5%). Unidentified protozoa cysts, acari, flagellate protozoa, Giardia species and Endolimax nana were found in the positive  samples,  in  descending
order (Table 2).
 
Amongst the physical and chemical parameters, there were no significant differences between the means of the two seasons of pH (p = 0.338) and dissolved oxygen (p = 0.859). However, there were significant differences between temperature (p = 0.034), turbidity (p = 0.002) and salinity (p = 0.015) means. It was not possible to perform statistical analysis in the parameter color, because the second water collection was constant, presenting zeroed values. However, there was a significant reduction of this parameter between the rainy and dry season (Figure 2).
 
Ordinance MS 2914/2011 (Brazil, 2011) subdivides maximum values of potability between allowed and recommended. If a sample is out of the recommended samples, it does not mean it is unsafe for human consumption. However, the source of the problem must be investigated and fixed. 
 
 
 
Heterotrophic bacteria, total coliforms and pH have maximum recommended values, however, the presence of E. coli, Giardia spp. or Cryptosporidium species turbidity  and   apparent   color   have  maximum  allowed  values. 32.1% samples (n = 17) collected during rainy season were in accordance with the permitted parameters. However, none of the samples was in accordance with the permitted and recommended standards. 29.4% samples from dry season (n = 10) were in accordance with the standards, but only one sample (2.9%) was classified as allowed and recommended (Table 3).
 
Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis between bacteriological, physical and chemical analyses showed a weak, directly proportional and significant correlation between dissolved oxygen in the results from rainy season (p = 0.040); a moderate, directly proportional and significant correlation between apparent color and turbidity in the results from rainy season (p = 0.000);  and a weak, inversely proportional and significant correlation between pH in the results from dry season (p = 0.030) (Table 4).
 
Results from the parasitological examination presented statistically significant differences between results of heterotrophic bacteria analysis (p = 0.012), with a higher proportion of negative parasitological results in samples in disagreement with the established parameters for heterotrophic bacteria. The other variables are independent (Table 5).
 
E. coli and heterotrophic bacteria presented statistically significant differences between the distributions of various sources of water (p = 0.01; p = 0.002) and construction of the tank (p = 0.02; p = 0.01). On the other hand, only  results  from heterotrophic bacteria presented statistically significant differences between the distribution of variables openings or cracks  in  the water source (p = 0.001), sewage destination regarding the water source (p  =  0.004),  reservoir cleaning time (p = 0.003) and presence of a reservoir  in  the  household  (p = 0.004) (Table 6).
 
 
 


 DISCUSSION

Every household studied had alternative water supply solutions, either individually or collectively. Therefore, it is necessary for the Municipal Health Department to control and monitor the water quality (Brazil, 2011).
 
A high percentage of improper samples (67.9%) and not recommended (99%) for human consumption was found. Some samples presented 28 times (4.15 log CFU/mL) the maximum recommended for heterotrophic bacteria based on Brazilian legislation (2.70 log CFU/mL). It has been observed that 51% samples were above this reference standard during the first water collection and 44.1% in the second.
 
Heterotrophic bacteria constitute an indirect indicator of water safety, not identifying the microorganisms, which may be pathogenic or from the water microbiota (Brazil, 2006; Richards et al., 2018). Its high count may indicate bacterial colonization, water treatment ineffectiveness and even a formation of biofilms in the distribution system, from the presence of organic matter in water (Bargellinia et al., 2011; Chowdhury, 2012; Richards et al., 2018).
 
Sudden changes or values above the potability standards should be investigated in order to identify irregularities and measures must be taken to restore the integrity of the distribution system, such as the maintenance of a minimum free residual chlorine content of 0.5 mg/L (Brazil, 2011).
 
Ordinance MS 2914/2011 recommends the absence of total coliforms and determines the absence of E. coli in 100 mL of water (Brazil, 2011). The total coliforms group comprises bacteria of both enteric and non-enteric origin (Madigan et al., 2016). Therefore, this parameter is not considered a good sanitary indicator of water intended for human consumption, not of crude water, meaning the presence of the bacteria in crude water does not indicate that water is unsafe for consumption (Cabral, 2010).
 
In order to differentiate enteric coliforms from total coliforms, the thermotolerance characteristic of enteric coliforms is used. E. coli is considered the main thermotolerant coliform, being an ideal sanitary indicator in the bacteriological analysis of the water, since its presence indicates that fecal contamination occurred and, consequently, there is a potential risk of presence of other microorganisms of enteric origin, including pathogenic (Cabral, 2010; Brunkard et al., 2011; Madigan et al., 2016). Several strains of E. coli are known to be pathogenic to humans. They may present virulence genes, which are involved in colonization, adhesion, and host invasion; pathogenic tissue processes; and avoidance mechanisms (Mainil, 2013).
 
Parasitic structures were identified in 33.3% of the total samples. Of these, three samples were contaminated by pathogenic protozoa (Giardia spp.) and two by commensal protozoa (Endolimax nana).
 
Giardia   duodenalis,   the    protozoa    responsible   for causing giardiasis, may lead to diarrhea, but most cases are oligosymptomatic or asymptomatic. In Brazil, even with high prevalence of giardiasis (12.4 to 50%), researches of these protozoa are scarce in alternative sources of supply. Its main form of transmission occurs by ingestion of water contaminated by cysts. Population clusters without basic sanitation and sanitary preparation tend to increase the spread of this pathogen. Even with treatment, it is still possible to find cysts in water, due to their resistance to chlorination, filtration and temperature increase (Fregonesi et al., 2012; Santana et al., 2014).
 
As with Giardia spp., protozoa E. nana presents fecal-oral contamination through food or water, but is not pathogenic to humans and can be eliminated by conventional water treatment (Poulsen and Stensvold, 2016). The presence of commensal parasites in water, due to their life cycle, can be used as an indicator of fecal contamination, just like E. coli (Xavier et al., 2011; Poma et al., 2012).
 
Free-living protozoa and heterotrophic bacteria are subjected to disharmonious interspecific relations of predation and interspecific competition (Ricklefs, 2016). This fact may be related to the greater number of samples with higher quantifications of heterotrophic bacteria when the result of the parasitological examination was negative.
 
Due to the lack or inefficiency of sewage collection systems, water can become a vehicle and source of diseases when transporting pathogens. Generally, high levels of parasitic diseases and cases of foodborne diseases prevail where the socioeconomic conditions of the population are more precarious. Less-favored classes are more affected by food contamination due to difficulty or lack of access to basic sanitation, treated water, education and safe food (Andrade et al., 2010; Neves et al., 2016).
 
Regarding the physical and chemical parameters, apparent color had the highest standard deviation due to the amplitude of its results. As most of the water samples came from shallow wells and it did not underwent filtration, turbidity interfered with the values, increasing them due to suspended particles, thus not demonstrating the actual color of the samples. However, Ordinance MS 2914/2011 establishes apparent color instead of true color as an organoleptic standard of potability, with a maximum value of 15 uH (Scorsafava et al., 2010; Daneluz and Tessaro, 2015).
 
Turbidity was the parameter with the highest number of samples in conformity (96.2 and 97.1%). These values reflect the low presence of suspended solids, such as inorganic particles and organic debris. High values may be related to the presence of metals in water, such as iron, from the soil itself or from precarious conditions of pumps and plumbing (Adolfo Lutz Institute, 2008; Satake et al., 2012; Daneluz and Tessaro, 2015).
 
pH was the parameter with the lowest number of samples (7.5  and  11.8%) within the range of recommended values (6.0 to 9.5), presenting a more acidic pH. Temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen are not described as potability standards in Ordinance MS 2914/2011; however, they have a direct relationship with bacterial multiplication. The decrease of dissolved oxygen levels is related to decomposition of organic matter (Araujo et al., 2011; Brazil, 2011). Dissolved oxygen reached maximum levels of 15.40 mg/L and minimum levels of 3 mg/L. Temperatures recorded were within the standards for mesophilic microorganisms (minimum of 23.0°C and maximum of 39.5°C). Salinity remained in a range of low values, with minimum of 0.01 ppm and maximum of 0.08 ppm.
 
Temperature presented significantly higher mean values in the dry season. However, turbidity and salinity presented significantly lower mean values in the dry season. This can be explained by the existence of openings or cracks in most shallow wells, allowing rainwater to conduct soil and organic matter to the wells located in abysses, increasing the amount of organic and inorganic particles in suspension. As a result of the increase in organic matter in the medium, there is an increase of heterotrophic bacteria, since they are chemotrophic, heterotrophic and organotrophic organisms.
 
Similar bacteriological, parasitological, physical and chemical results were found in other studies with water from shallow and semi-artesian wells in rural regions of Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and several cities in the state of São Paulo. These studies have small variations in the quantifications of potability standards, however, the results are unanimous, showing that most samples were unfit for human consumption (Dias et al., 2008; Menezes et al., 2009; Scorsafava et al., 2010; Araujo et al., 2011; Satake et al., 2012; Daneluz and Tessaro, 2015).
 
Heterotrophic bacteria will consume the oxygen dissolved in water, due to the aerobic respiration process. From this consumption, oxygen levels fall and consequently there will be a greater presence of facultative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (Santos et al., 2008). Microorganisms are sensitive to pH changes, since the optimum pH ranges from 6.5 to 7.5 for most bacteria, thus lower values can inhibit or delay bacterial multiplication (Machado et al., 2012; Daneluz and Tessaro, 2015).  
 
From the comparison of the bacteriological analyses with the questionnaire, it was possible to identify that results of E. coli and heterotrophic bacteria had significant differences between several distributions of the variables.
 
Water from shallow wells, tanks constructed by dwellers and sewage destination above the level of the water source had higher percentage distributions of samples in disagreement regarding E. coli and heterotrophic bacteria.
 
Results of heterotrophic bacteria also showed significant differences between the variables, in which the presence of openings or cracks in the water source, cleaning time of the reservoir superior to six months and absence of reservoir in the household had larger distributions of samples in non-conformity. Relationships between the other variables were not identified, thus they were considered independent.
 
FUNASA recommends a minimum distance of 15 m between the wells and the septic tank, and sewage destination should not be at the same level or above the water source (Brazil, 2006). It is also recommended to position breeding farms far from the sources (> 45 m), and both the reservoir and the water source should always remain covered. Finally, reservoirs must be cleaned every six months (Brazil, 2006; Capp et al., 2012; Scalize et al., 2014).
 
Overall, the study carried out from bacteriological, parasitological, physical and chemical analyses, in association with the verification list, points out to the nonconformity of 99.9% samples from a bacteriological, physical and chemical point of view, considering the MS Ordinance 2914/2011. Therefore, the consumption of this water represents a risk to the population’s health of that area, and may lead to the involvement of food borne diseases.
 
Considering that this rural community is deprived of treated water supply by the state water and sanitation company, alternative and effective measures of water treatment must be taken, such as filtration for the correction of physical, chemical, bacteriological and parasitological parameters, as well as the use of chlorination, or even a solar water disinfection system (SoDiS) in order to eliminate pathogenic microorganisms.
 
Corrective measures, such as the presence of water reservoirs in the households, protection against animals in the water source, elimination of septic tanks and animal breeding sites near the source, can minimize this risk and guarantee the health of the community.
 
It is necessary to increase the presence of state with surveillance and quality control of water for human consumption. Sanitary education actions, regular evaluation of potability standards of wells and households, correction of detected failures related to the quality of supply and maintenance of the articulation between the departments of health of the municipalities, states and the union are measures that can be taken to reverse the current situation.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflicts of interests.


 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement  of  Higher  Education  Personnel (CAPES),  Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia (UFRB) and Group of Studies in Human Parasitology (GEPaH).



 REFERENCES

Adolfo Lutz Institute (2008). Physical-Chemical Methods for Food Analysis. 4th edition. São Paulo, Brazil. pp. 467-468.

 

American Public Health Association (APHA) (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd edition. Washington, USA.

 
 

Andrade EC, Leite ICG, Rodrigues VO, Cesca MG (2010). Intestinal parasites: a review of their social, epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects. Revista de APS 13:231-240.

 
 

Araújo GFR, Alves RIS, Tonani KAA, Ragazzi MF, Julião FC, Sampaio CF, Cardoso OO, Segura- Mu-oz SI (2011). Microbiological and physical-chemical quality of water for human consumption and the relationships with health: study in an agricultural community in state São Paulo. O Mundo da Saúde 35:98-104.

 
 

Bargellinia A, Marchesia I, Righia E, Ferraria A, Cencettib S, Borellaa P, Rovestia S (2011). Parameters predictive of Legionella contamination in hot water systems: Association with trace elements and heterotrophic plate counts. Water Research 45:2315-2321.
Crossref

 
 

Benedict M, Reses H, Vigar M, Roth DM, Roberts VA, Mattioli M, Cooley LA, Hilborn ED, Wade TJ, Fullerton KE, Yoder JS, Hill VR (2017). Surveillance for Waterborne Disease Outbreaks Associated with Drinking Water — United States, 2013–2014. Morbidity And Mortality Weekly Report 66:1216-1221.
Crossref

 
 

Brazil, General Coordination of Communicable Diseases (2016). Epidemiological Surveillance of Foodborne Diseases (VE-DTA). Available at: 

View

 
 

Brazil, Ministry of Health (2010) .Integrated Handbook of Surveillance, Prevention and Control of Foodborne Diseases. 3rd edition. Brasília, Brazil.

 
 

Brazil, Ministry of Health (2011). Ordinance Nº 2.914, 12 of December of 2011. Brasília, Brazil.

 
 

Brazil, Ministry of the Environment (2005). Water Resource Books: Availability and demands of water resources in Brazil. 2nd edition. Brasília, Brazil.

 
 

Brazil, National Health Council (2012). Resolution nº 466, 12 of December of 2012. Brasília, Brazil.

 
 

Brazil, National Health Foundation (2006). Manual of sanitation. 3rd edition. Brasília, Brazil.

 
 

Brunkard JM, Ailes E, Roberts VA, Hill V, Hilborn ED, Craun GF, Rajasingham A, Kahler A, Garrison L, Hicks L, Carpenter J, Wade TJ, Beach MJ, Yoder JS (2011). Surveillance for Waterborne Disease Outbreaks Associated with Drinking Water - United States, 2007-2008. Surveillance Summaries 60:38-68.

 
 

Cabral JPS (2010). Water Microbiology: Bacterial Pathogens and Water. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:3657-3703.
Crossref

 
 

Capp N, Ayach LR, Santos TMB, Guimarães STL (2012) .Water quality and contamination factors of shallow wells in the urban area of Anastácio (MS). Geografia Ensino and Pesquisa 16:77-91.

 
 

Chowdhury S (2012). Heterotrophic bacteria in drinking water distribution system: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:6087-6137.
Crossref

 
 

Daneluz D, Tessaro D (2015). Physical-chemical and microbiological pattern of water from springs and shallow wells of rural properties in the southwest region of Paraná. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 82:1-5.
Crossref

 
 

Dias GMF, Bevilacqua PD, Bastos RKX, Oliveira AA, Campos GMM (2008). Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. in a fresh water supply source contaminated with human and animal excreta and waste water. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 60:1291-1300.
Crossref

 
 

Fregonesi BM, Sampaio CF, Ragazzi MF, Tonani KAA, Segura-Mu-oz SI (2012). Cryptosporidium and Giardia: challenges in public water supplies. Revista O Mundo da Saúde 36:602-609.

 
 

Machado RP, Augusto RS, Martins AO (2012). Chemical analysis of water from springs in the cities of Avaré and Cerqueira César, São Paulo. Revista Eletrônica de Educação e Ciência 2:40-44.

 
 

Madigan MT, Martinko, JM, Dunlap PV, Clark, DP (2016). Biology of microorganisms. 14th edition. Porto Alegre, Brazil.

 
 

Mainil J (2013). Escherichia coli virulence factors. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 152:2-12.
Crossref

 
 

Martins M, Lacerda MVG, Monteiro WM, Moura MAS, Santos ECS, Saraceni VS, Gomes MG (2015). Progression of the load of waterborne and intestinal parasitic diseases in the State of Amazonas. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 48:42-54.
Crossref

 
 

Menezes JM, Prado RB, Silva-Júnior GC, Mansur KL, Oliveira ES (2009). Water quality and its spatial relation with sources of natural and human contamination: São Domingos river basin, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Engenharia Agrícola 29:687-698.
Crossref

 
 

Neves DP, Melo AL, Linardi PM, Vitor RWA (2016). Human Parasitology. 13rd edition. São Paulo, Brazil.

 
 

Poma HR, Cacciabue DG, Garcé B, Gonzo EE, Raja VB (2012). Towards a rational strategy for monitoring of microbiological quality of ambient waters. Science of the Total Environment 433:98-109.
Crossref

 
 

Poulsen CS, Stensvold CR (2016). Systematic review on Endolimax nana: A less well studied intestinal ameba. Tropical Parasitology 6:8-29.
Crossref

 
 

Rebouças AC, Braga B, Tundisi JG (2015). Fresh water in Brazil - ecological capital, use and conservation. 4th edition. São Paulo, Brazil.

 
 

Richards CL, Broadaway SC, Eggers MJ, Doyle J, Pyle BH, Camper AK, Ford TE (2018). Detection of Pathogenic and Non-pathogenic Bacteria in Drinking Water and Associated Biofilms on the Crow Reservation, Montana, USA. Microbial Ecology 76:52-63.
Crossref

 
 

Ricklefs RE, Relyea R (2016). The Economy of Nature. 7th edition. São Paulo, Brazil.

 
 

Santana LA, Vitorino RR, Antonio VE, Moreira TR, Gomes AP (2014). Update on giardiasis. Jornal Brasileiro de Medicina 102:7-10.

 
 

Santos PRNM, Kolm HE, Sautter KD (2008). Bacteria in sediments of the inter-tidal region of Guaratuba Bay, Paraná, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Aquatic Science and Technology 12:9-17.
Crossref

 
 

Satake FM, Assunção AWA, Lopes LG, Amaral LA (2012). Water quality on rural properties located in the Rico stream basin, Jaboticabal-SP. Revista Ars Veterinaria 28:48-55.

 
 

Scalize PS, Barros EFS, Soares LA, Hora KER, Ferreira NC, Fernandes LR (2014). Evaluation of water quality for supply in the agrarian reform settlement Canudos, State of Goiás. Revista Ambiente and Água 9: 696-707.

 
 

Scorsafava MA, Souza A, Stofer M, Nunes CA, Milanez TV (2010). Physico-chemical evaluation of drinking water quality from wells and springs for human consumption. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz 69:229-232.

 
 

Teixeira ADS, Pulz E, Silva BCR, Irazusta SP, Teixeira EP (2016). Evaluation of rainwater quality for domestic use. Revista Eletrônica de Tecnologia e Cultura 18:15-23.

 
 

World Health Organization (WHO) (2015). Millennium Development Goal drinking water target met. Available at: 

View

 
 

Xavier RP, Siqueira LP, Vital FAC, Rocha FJS, Irmão JI, Calazans GMT (2011). Microbiological quality of drinking rainwater in the inland region of Pajeú, Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 53:121-124.
Crossref

 

 




          */?>