African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5233

Full Length Research Paper

Efficacy of biocontrol agents in the management of head rot of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

Kamesh Krishnamoorthy K.
  • Kamesh Krishnamoorthy K.
  • Department of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003, India.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Sankaralingam A.
  • Sankaralingam A.
  • Department of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003, India.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar
Nakkeeran S.
  • Nakkeeran S.
  • Department of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641003, India.
  • Search for this author on:
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 24 March 2016
  •  Accepted: 26 April 2016
  •  Published: 28 October 2016

 ABSTRACT

Head rot of cabbage caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum leads to rotting of fully matured cabbage heads in the field. In the present study the antagonistic effects of twenty Bacillus isolates was tested against S. sclerotiorum in vitro. Eight effective Bacillus isolates obtained from studies in vitro, commercial formulations of Trichoderma viride isolate TV-1 and Pseudomonas fluoroscens isolate Pf-1along with a fungicide check (Nativo-Tebuconazole+Trifloxystrobin) were carried further for field studies. Results of field studies indicated that fungicide check of Nativo (1.5 g/L) was highly effective with least disease incidence of 10.36% indicating 74.50% reduction over control. Among the biocontrol agents commercial formulation of Trichoderma viride isolate TV-1 was the most effective showing disease incidence of 11.38% indicating 72.00% reduction over control followed by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolate B15 and Pseudomonas fluoroscens isolate Pf-1 showing disease incidence of 13.24 and 13.31% indicating 67.41 and 67.24% reduction over control respectively and both treatments were on par. B. licheniformis isolate B16 was found to be least effective with 20.41 percent disease incidence indicating 49.76% reduction over control.

 

Key words: Bacillus, commercial formulation, fungicide check, Pseudomonas fluoroscens,  Trichoderma viride, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.


 INTRODUCTION

Head rot of cabbage caused by the pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum leads to rotting of fully grown cabbage heads in the field and during post-harvest operations and storage (Hudyncia et al., 2000). The pathogen is geographically cosmopolitan and has a broad ecological distribution (Purdy, 1979). The broad host range of the pathogen includes high value crops like  alfala,  bean, cabbage, canola, lettuce, peanut, soybean, sugarbeet, sunflower, tobacco and tomato (Grau, 1988; Farr et al., 1989).
 
The relatively unreliable control of S. sclerotiorum with traditional methods and concerns about pesticide residues has prompted interest in biological control as an alternative disease  management  strategy  (Fernando  et al., 2007). Biological control of S. sclerotiorum has received considerable attention as an alternative disease management tactic to the use of fungicides due to its ability to provide safe and environmentally friendly disease control (Xiaojia et al., 2013).
 
Attributes of Bacillus spp. such as high thermal tolerance and ready formulation of endospores makes it an ideal agent for the development of commercial products. They adhere firmly to root surface especially when an inoculum of spore is used (Shoda, 2000). Bacillus spp. are known to survive well under field conditions due to the production of endospores (Boyetchko et al., 1999; Collins and Jacobsen, 2003). Bacillus spp. isolated from rhizosphere of common bean were tested for their antifungal activities against S. sclerotiorum. The maximum inhibition in radial growth caused by Bacillus spp.BPR7 was observed after seven days of incubation in dual culture and cell free culture filtrate (Pankaj et al., 2012). Fernando et al. (2013) reported that the metabolites produced by B. subtilis were antagonistic to the fungus with 17.7% reduction in mycelial growth which was constant even after two weeks suggesting high efficiency of the metabolites in control of S. sclerotiorum.
 
The aim of the present study was to determine efficacy of biocontrol agents under in vitro and field conditions.


 MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening of Bacillus isolates in vitro
 
Standard isolates of Bacillus spp. maintained as glycerol stocks were obtained from the Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. The isolates were subcultured and maintained on Nutrient agar (NA) medium for further studies. The antagonistic effects of twenty Bacillus isolates were tested against S. sclerotirum by dual culture technique. A 9-mm-dia mycelial disc of the pathogen was placed at one end of the Petri plate containing combination medium (Potato Dextrose Agar + Nutrient Agar) and the bacterial antagonist was streaked at the opposite end. Inoculation of the pathogen without antagonist served as control and each treatment was replicated three times. The plates were kept in an incubator at 20±2°C.  When the fungus attained full growth in the control plate, growth of the pathogen and inhibition zone were measured and percent reduction in growth over control was calculated.
 
Percent inhibition over control was calculated using the formula:
 
 
Where C = growth of S. sclerotiorum in control; T = growth of S. sclerotiorum in treatment.
 
Commercial formulations of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluoroscens
 
The commercial formulations of Trichoderma viride (TV-1) as talc formulation and Pseudomonas fluoroscens (Pf-1) as liquid formulation     were     obtained     from     Trichoderma     Lab    and Pseudomonas Lab respectively from Department of Plant Pathology, Centre for Plant Protection Studies (CPPS), Tamil Nadu Agricultural University , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
 
Field trial
 
Eight effective Bacillus isolates obtained from in vitro studies, commercial formulations of Trichoderma viride (TV-1) and Pseudomonas fluoroscens (Pf-1) along with a fungicide check (Nativo-Tebuconazole+Trifloxystrobin) were carried further for field studies.
 
The field trial was conducted between February and March 2014 in the Kothagiri area of Nilgiris district and was laid out in a randomised block design. First spraying was done 48 days after planting when the cabbage was at cupping stage and subsequent sprayings were done at 7 days interval till head fill stage of the cabbage.
 
There were nine treatments in all consisting of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (B15), B. licheniformis (B 19), B. cereus (B31), B. licheniformis (BSD-1), B. subtilis (B14), B. licheniformis (B16), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf-1) (commercial formulation), Trichoderma viride (TV1) (commercial formulation) each at a concentration of 10 mL/L and Fungicide check- Nativo (Tebuconazole+Trifloxystrobin) at a concentration of 1.5 g/L. The control had no bio control agent treatment at all.
 
The percent disease incidence was calculated using the following formula:
 
 
Results were expressed in terms of per cent disease reduction over control which was calculated as follows:
 
 
Where, R = Percent reduction over control; C = Percent disease incidence in control; T = Percent disease incidence in treatment.
 
Data analysis method
 
Statistical analysis was performed using the IRRISTAT software version 92 developed by the International Rice Research Institute Biometrics unit, the Philippines (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).  Before performing the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) the percentage values of the disease index were arcsine transformed. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) at two significant levels (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01) and means were separated by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

 


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twenty Bacillus isolates were tested in vitro against S. sclerotiorum. The treatment B15 (B. amyloliquefaciens) yielded the minimum mycelial growth of 53.0 mm and the highest growth reduction of 41.0% with an inhibition zone of 26.6 mm (Table 1). This was followed by B19 (B. licheniformis) which recorded 54.3 mm growth with39.7% growth reduction with an inhibition zone of 24.3 mm. However both the treatments were at par with each other.
 
B. amyloliquefaciens inhibited growth of S. sclerotiorum in vitro which was indicated by an inhibition zone between the two organisms (Abdullah et al., 2008). Strains of B. amyloliquefaciens ARP23 and MEP218 caused alterations in sclerotial morphology and sclerotial germination of S. sclerotiorum causing stem rot of soybean according to Alvarez et al. (2012). Under  in vitro B. licheniformis strain 9555 showed effective antifungal activity against S. sclerotiorum (Vipin et al., 2012).
 
Results of field studies indicated that fungicide check of nativo applied at a concentration of 1.5 g/L was highly effective with least disease incidence of 10.36% indicating 74.50% reduction over control (Table 2). Among the biocontrol agents commercial  formulation  of  T. viride isolate (TV-1) was the most effective treatment showing disease incidence of 11.38% indicating 72.00% reduction over control. This was  followed by B. amyloliquefaciens isolate (B15) and P. fluorescens isolate (Pf-1) showing disease incidence of 13.24 and 13.31% indicating 67.41 and 67.24% reduction over control respectively and both treatments showed no significant difference. B. licheniformis isolate (B16) was found to be least effective with 20.41% disease incidence indicating 49.76% reduction over control. Maximum yield of 47.86 t/ha was observed for the fungicide check - Nativo treatment (Table 2). This was followed by the T. viridae (TV-1) treatment with 46.38 t/ha yield. Gaur et al. (2010) reported that under field conditions Sclerotinia stem rot of mustard caused by S. sclerotiorum was effectively controlled by seed treatment (10g/kg) and foliar spray (0.2 per cent) at 50 days after sowing with talc based mixed formulation of T. hamatum and T. viridae in the ratio of 1:1 followed by bioagent combination of T. harzianum (10 g/kg) and Gliocladium virens (0.2%) over two consecutive years. P. fluorescens isolate (P13) decreased severity of Sclerotinia stem rot of oilseed rape by 59% under field conditions and also promoted seedling growth (Li et al., 2011). Use of B. amyloliquefaciens as a soil treatment supressed stems rot of cucumber caused by S. sclerotiorum (Sharie et al., 2013).  
 
 


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Abdullah MT, Ali NY, Patrice S (2008). Biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary with Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Crop Prot. 27:1354-1359.
 

Alvarez F, Castro M , Príncipe A, Borioli G, Fischer S, Mori G, Jofré E (2012).The plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains MEP218 and ARP23 capable of producing the cyclic lipopeptides iturin or surfactin and fengycin are effective in biocontrol of Sclerotinia stem rot disease. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112:159-174.

  
 

Boyetchko S, Pedersen E, Punja Z, Reddy M (1999). Formulations of biopesticides. Methods Biotechnol. 5:487-508.

  
 

Collins DP, Jacobsen BJ (2003). Optimizing a Bacillus subtilis isolate for biological control of sugarbeet cercospora leaf spot. Biol. Control 26:153-161.

  
 

Farr DF, Bills GF, Chamuris GP, Rossman AY (1989). Fungi on Plants and Plant Products in the United States. In. The American Phytopathological Society. P 1252.

  
 

Fernando PM, Larissa CF, Leandro PE, Paulo, ES (2013). Antagonism of Bacillus subtilis against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on Lactuca sativa. J. Agric. Sci. 5(4):214-223.

  
 

Fernando WGD, Nakkeeran S, Zhang Y, Savchuk S (2007). Biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary by Pseudomonas and Bacillus species on canola petals. Crop Prot. 26(2):100-107.

  
 

Gaur RB, Sharma RN, Gautam VS, Dangi RP (2010). Management of Sclerotinia rot of mustard through bioagents. Indian Phytopathol. 63:392-397.

  
 

Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

  
 

Grau CR (1988). Soybean diseases of the north central region. In. American Phytopathological Society. pp. 56-66.

  
 

Hudyncia J, Shew HD, Cody BR, Cubeta MA (2000). Evaluation of wounds as a factor to infection of cabbage by ascospores of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis. 84(3):316-320.

  
 

Li H, Li H, Bai Y, Wang J, Nie M, Li B, Xiao M (2011). The use of Pseudomonas fluoroscens P13 to control Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of oilseed rape. J. Microbiol. 49(6):884-889.

  
 

Pankaj K, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2012). Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere showed plant growth promoting and antagonistic activity against phytopathogens. Microbiol. Res. 167:493-499.

  
 

Purdy LH (1979). Sclerotinia sclerotiorum:History, diseases and symptomatology, host range, geographic distribution and impact. Phytopathology 69:875-880.

  
 

Sharie R, Mojdeh M, Dariush S (2013). The use of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to control Sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of cucumber. Int. J. Farm. Allied Sci. 2:965-970.

  
 

Shoda M (2000). Bacterial control of plant diseases. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 89:515-521.

  
 

Vipin MD, Sandhya M, Vasvi C, Swati T, Poonam S, Sumit Y, Shashank M, Ijinu TP, Varghese G, Ajit V, Chandrashekhar N (2012). Biocontrol and plant growth promotion and conferring stress tolerance: Multifaceted role of Bacillus licheniformis 9555. J. Fitopatolgi 3(4):780-783.

  
 

Xiaojia H, Daniel PR, Lihua X, Jude EM, Changbing Y, Yinshiu L, Shujie Z, Xing L (2013). Bacillus megaterium A6 supresses Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on oilseed rape in the field and promotes oilseed rape growth. Crop Prot. 52:151-158.

  

 




Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

Back to Vol. 10 No. 40
Back to articles
SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT
CONFERENCES
          */?>