International Journal of
Science and Technology Education Research

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Sci. Technol. Educ. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-6559
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJSTER
  • Start Year: 2010
  • Published Articles: 72

Full Length Research Paper

Internet Acceptance and Use Model in Ethiopian Agriculture Education and Research: the case of two Universities

Milkyas Hailu
  • Milkyas Hailu
  • Library and Information Services, Haramaya University, Diredawa, Zip code 251, P. O. Box 138, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Yared Mammo
  • Yared Mammo
  • Department of Information Science, Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar
Mengistu Ketema
  • Mengistu Ketema
  • Department of Agricultural Economics. Haramaya, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 26 March 2016
  •  Accepted: 03 August 2016
  •  Published: 30 September 2016

References

Altbach PG, Reisberg L, Rumbley LE (2009). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution, A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education.

 

Aggorowati MA, Iriawan NS, Gautama H (2012). Restructuring and Expanding Technology Acceptance Model Structural Equation Model and Bayesian Approach. JMIS.7(3):12-34.

 
 

Almarashdeh IA, Sahari N, Zin ZM (2010). The Success of Learning Management System Among Distance Learners in Malaysian Universities Based on TAM. J. Theoretical Appl. Infor. Technol. 21(2):23-38.

 
 

Chen L, Macredie R (2010).Web-based interaction: a review of three important human factors. Int. J. Infor. Manage. 3(2):2-3.
Crossref

 
 

Chen SC, Li SH, Li CY (2011). Recent Related Research in Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review. Aust. J. Bus. Manage. Res. 1(9):124-127.

 
 

David,G.,W.Detmarand B.Marie-Claude, 2000.Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. J. Infor. Syst. 4(7):12-16.

 
 

Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. J. Manage. Sci. 35(8):982-1003.
Crossref

 
 

Deng J (2010). Reliability and validity of the sit-to-stand navicular drop test: Do static measures of navicular height relate to the dynamic navicular motion during gait? J. Student Phys. Therapy Res. 2(1).

 
 

Engel KS, Moosbrugger H (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods Psychol. Res. Online. 8(2):23-74.

 
 

Fathema N (2013). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) of an extended Technology Acceptance Model(TAM) to report web technology adoption behavior in higher education institutions (Ph.D thesis).

 
 

Farrell G, Shafika I (2007). Survey of ICT and Education in Africa: ICT Report Based on 53 Country Surveys. 2(1):45-54.

 
 

Fetscherin M, Lattemann C (2008). User Acceptance of Virtual Worlds. Report designed by Second Life Research Team An Explorative Study about Second Life. Rollins College, University of Potsdam. 7-12.

 
 

JarvisCB, SB, Mackenzie, Philip M (2005). Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research: Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model. J. Consum. Res. 30(2):199-218.
Crossref

 
 

HU (2006). Haramaya University Facts and Figures Bulletin.

 
 

Judy CL, Lu H (2008). Towards An Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Web Site. Int. J. Infor. Manage. 20(3):197-208.

 
 

Kenny DA (2011). Measuring Model Fit. J. Infor. Syst. Res.1(9).

 
 

Kim SW, Leet MG (2008). Validation of an Evaluation Model for LMSs. J. Comp. Assisted Learn. 24(4):284-294.
Crossref

 
 

Kin HS (2011). The Importance of Training Evaluation using SEM: The Case of Malaysian Public Hospitals. J. Infor. Syst. 32(2):17-33.

 
 

Kripanont N (2007). Using technology acceptance model of Internet usage by academics Within Thai Business Schools. PhD Thesis, Victoria University.

 
 

Morris ED, Rosenbluth D, Watson F (2004). Statistical methods in Select Sample in Small Population. Canad. J. Stat. 95(1):74-78.

 
 

Planning Office (2012). Haramaya University Planning Office. Unpublished Report.

 
 

Polit DF, Beck CT (2003). In Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th Edition, Philadelphia press. USA. pp. 413-444.

 
 

Ramayah T, Muhamad J, Ismail N (2009). Impact of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on Internet usage in Malaysia. J. MIS Q. 27(1):25-37.

 
 

Shih HP (2004). Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Internet Utilization Behavior. J. MIS Q. 30 (4):50-70.
Crossref

 
 

Suki N (2011). Exploring the Relationship Between Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Enjoyment, Attitude and Subscribers' Intention Towards Using 3g Mobile Services. J. Infor. Technol. Manage. XXII(1):13-31.

 
 

Šumak B, Heričko M, Pušnik M, Polančič G (2009). Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Moodle: An Empirical Study Based on TAM. J. MIS Q. (27):91-100.

 
 

Ullman JB (2006). Structural equation modeling Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th Edition, Bombay, Inida. 653-771.

 
 

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Gordon B, Davis FD (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q. 27(3):425-478.

 
 

Moges B (2014). The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Enhancing the Quality Education of Ethiopian Universities: A Review of Literature J. Educ. Res. Behav. Sci. 3(8):246-258.

 
 

Yih MB, Syakira W, Hissan M, Ch'ng PE (2011). Developing a Mobile Curriculum Vitae Using Weblog: A Cross-disciplinary Survey on University Students' Perception Based on Technology Acceptance Model.

 
 

Wangpipatwong S, Chutimaskul W, Papasratorn B (2008). Understanding Citizen's Continuance Intention to Use e-Government Website: a Composite View of Technology Acceptance Model and Computer Self-Efficacy.

 
 

Weaver D, Spratt C, Nair C (2008). Academic and student use of a LMS: Implications for quality. Australasian J. Educ. Technol. 24(1):30-41.
Crossref