International Journal of
Vocational and Technical Education

  • Abbreviation: Int. J. Voc. Tech. Educ.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-534X
  • DOI: 10.5897/IJVTE
  • Start Year: 2009
  • Published Articles: 106

Full Length Research Paper

Effect of using 4mat method on academic achievement and attitudes toward engineering economy for undergraduate students

Osama Mohamed Irfan
  • Osama Mohamed Irfan
  • Bani Suef University, Egypt.
  • Google Scholar
Fahad A. Almufadi
  • Fahad A. Almufadi
  • Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Google Scholar
Ayman Mohamed Brisha
  • Ayman Mohamed Brisha
  • Bani Suef University, Egypt.
  • Google Scholar

  •  Received: 09 July 2015
  •  Accepted: 16 December 2015
  •  Published: 31 January 2016


The study examined effect of 4MAT method on academic achievement and attitudes toward engineering economy for undergraduate students. Comparison between 4MAT and traditional method in teaching selected units from engineering economy course had been conducted. The sample of this study included 80 under graduate students in two separate groups. One of the groups was considered as an experimental group in which 4MAT method was applied; and the other was considered as a control group in which the traditional teaching has been delivered. Data was obtained from two scales, engineering economy attitude scale and knowledge test on foundations of engineering economy and present worth analysis units. It was concluded that students who are guided through 4MAT are exposed to a variety of learning experiences and increased chances for academic achievement and attitudes toward engineering economy. In addition, 4MAT method provides a rational foundation for faculty members, who might have hesitated to bring creativity into the classroom, and to develop activities beyond the traditional lecture. Also, the application of 4MAT in engineering classroom leads to renewed interest for the educational process and a greater commitment to teaching and learning

Key words:  4MAT, learning style, academic achievement, attitudes, engineering economy.


The individual’s preference for how to learn is the manifestation of learning style (Harb et al., 1991). One of the most famous definitions of learning style is the individually approximation for gathering and treating information or knowledge, creating ideas, and taking a decision (Orhun, 2007). Other definitions have been provided by educational researchers; for example, it is the favorite of the person in using his ability of recognizing and  processing  the  information  (Nicoll  and Joan, 2009).
It is well known that success can be attained with the effective learning which is established by the prepared education programs (Tatar and Dekici, 2009). When students were taught through their preferred learning style they show substantial improvement in their attitudes towards subject, better recognition for perceptive diversity, significant enhancement of academic achievement, and more self-commitment for homework completion (Given, 1996; Hein and Budny, 1999). 4MAT system has been developed by McCarthy as one of the well-known systems of instructions that is applied in teaching.   McCarthy’s 4MAT system is based on Kolb’s work (Kolb, 1984). The main purpose of such system was to employ a beneficial learning environment. 4MAT system is a process for conveying instructions in a way that involves, informs, and permits practice and creative use of material learned within each class. The system reflects the learning process as a journey by asking four simple questions; why?, what?, how?, and if?. Why question pursues a reason or motivation for learning; what question searches for knowledge and information; how question tries to find a way for applying the knowledge; and if question develops extensions for the learners to generate new experiences regarding the learned material (Guild and Garger, 1998).
The 4MAT system aids instructors to organize their teaching based on individual differences in the way people learn. 4MAT is an eight step cycle of instruction that capitalizes on individual learning styles and brain dominance processing preferences. 4MAT system is based on research from different fields of education, psychology, neurology and management (McCarthy, 1990).  Figure 1 shows the eight quadrants of 4MAT system. The system considers the style that each student brings to the classroom, while serving each student develops by mastering the entire cycle of learning styles (McCarthy, 1997). 
The main concept of 4MAT system can be summarized as: the brain has two halves, right and left hemispheres and these two halves process information in different manners; in the split-brain patient, there seem to be two different people up there, each with his/her preferred ways of processing information, each with a different mode of thinking; both hemisphere are equally important (Tatar and Dekici., 2009). The left brain is rational, verbal, serial and analytical.  Analysis and planning are key strategies of left brain. On the other hand, the right brain is visual, inclusive, and general, able to perceive shapes and relations. Right brain processing seeks patterns and solves problems by looking at the whole image. Sensitivity, theories and opinions are key processing strategies of right brain (McCarthy, 1997). It has been indicated that both hemispheres with different learning functions of the brain must be engaged in the learning activities to acquire an efficient learning and a permanent memory (Tatar and Dekici, 2009).
Referring to McCarthy, 4MAT system has four learning styles to recognize and process the received information.  Type one learners are principally interested in personal meaning. Type two learners are keen on the details as they result in conceptual understanding. Type three learners look for how things work and the practical side of the concept. Type four learners are interested in improvement and self-discovery (McCarthy, 1987). The 4MAT cycle contains eight activities cooperative each of the four types of learning using both right- and left-brain processing procedures in each quadrant (Tatar and Dekici, 2009).  Most of the learners like to be taught in all four techniques while being strained to develop other learning abilities. According to Morris and McCarthy (1990), all learners will engage at different places in the learning cycle. This will permit them to learn from each other (Kaplan, 1998). 


Recently, 4MAT has applications across different educational levels and disciplines such as medicine education (Spatz, 1991; Erwin et al., 1992), law studies (Kelly, 1990) and science (Bowers, 1987; Ursin,1995; Jackson, 2001). For example, many teaching methods were applied to meet the learning style of the students in engineering economy. An experiential learning cycle and a novel business game were applied to allow the present value of an alternative to be calculated quickly (Mare, 1993).  In order to transform a biostatistics course into a problem-based learning experience, Nowacki (2011) untaken 4MAT model to learning process. The results showed that students felt more strongly, encouraged sharing and integrated concepts across the subject. Furthermore, recommendations regarding problem-based learning techniques were provided. Studies of the 4MAT model were also accompanied at different levels of education. The obtained results showed that applying of 4MAT model resulted in positive attitudes, enhancing of academic achievement and more long-life learning (Dikkartin, 2006; Ergin and Sari, 2012; Tatar and Dikici, 2009; Uyangor, 2012(. The influence of learning activities on academic attainment and attitude towards mathematics of high school students were investigated by Kemal and Huseyin (2014) who developed an approach matched with 4MAT system. The results showed an enhancement in the academic attainment and problem solving. Uyangor and Sevinc (2012) investigated the impacts of the 4MAT model on academic attainment and attitudes towards mathematics of seventh year grade students at public schools. The authors applied an experimental model on a control group with a pre-test and post-test. The results revealed more efficient of 4MAT method than the traditional method (Uyangor and Sevinc, 2012). The work of Aktas and Bilgin (2015) considered the effects of the 4MAT learning model on seventh Grade students’ academic achievement and motivation on the ‘Particulate Nature of Matter’. The results showed an effectiveness of 4MAT model rather than traditional method in terms of enhancement of achievement and motivation (Aktasa and Bilgin, 2015(.
Problem statement
The problems encountered in this study were the result of the following:
1.  There is a lack of studies regarding the application of 4MAT in teaching engineering courses.
2. Comparing 4MAT method with traditional lecturing method in teaching engineering economy to undergraduate students hasn’t been implemented before.
3. Effectiveness of 4MAT on the academic achievement and attitudes toward engineering economy for undergraduate students hasn’t been investigated yet.
Significance of the study
The significance of this study has many sides: results obtained might assist in improving academic achievement of the students in engineering economy course by applying 4MAT method. This study may also affect positively the attitude of students toward engineering economy.
Furthermore, instructors will be able to apply 4MAT in engineering courses rather than engineering economy. Finally, the study aims to assist developers of engineering curriculum to benefit the 4MAT method when designing their curricula.
Study objectives
The main purpose of this study was to study the effectiveness of 4MAT method in teaching the foundations of engineering economy and present worth analysis units to undergraduate students. The researcher tries to answer the following questions:
Question 1: Would students taught via 4MAT perform better than students taught via traditional method on engineering economy?
Question 2: Does students' academic achievement in engineering economy for final year undergraduate students affected increase?
Question 3: Does students' attitude toward engineering economy affected positively?
Terminologies of study
4MAT system
The 4MAT system of instruction is a strategy dealing with individual differences. It is to develop or modify the procedures of teaching so that they specifically address individual differences of learners (Guild and Garger, 1998).
Academic achievement
Academic achievement is the learning outcomes that indicate to which extent a person has been able to achieve specific educational target (Huitt et al., 2009).
Attitude toward subject
The researchers used both definitions by Newcomb who defines attitude of students toward a subject as the organization of knowledge accompanied by negative or positive responses; Ajzen who stated that attitude toward a subject is an education preparedness to respond regularly and lovingly on a particular topic (Aql, 1985).
Variables of the Study
The study had 4MAT system as an independent variable while the two dependent variables were the academic achievement and attitude toward engineering economy.
Methodology and procedures
The population of this study consisted of all under graduate students in college of engineering, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
The sample contained 80 students studying in final year of the college and divided into two separate classes. One of the classes was considered as the experimental group (n=45) in which 4MAT method had been applied; and the other class was selected as a control group (n=35) in which the traditional teaching had been used, and this selection was performed randomly.
Data collection and Instruments
The data had been obtained from two scales, engineering economy attitude scale and foundations of engineering economy and present worth test.
Engineering economy attitude scale
In order to determine the attitudes of the students towards engineering economy, the researchers modified the scale that was developed by Fennema et al. (1976). The scale consists of four subscales: a confidence scale, a usefulness scale, a scale that measures engineering economy and a teacher perception scale. Each of these scales consists of items measuring a positive attitude and others measure a negative attitude.
Foundations of engineering economy and present worth test
A test consists of fifteen multiple choice questions covering the contents of the selected units “Foundations of engineering economy and present worth” was prepared. The test topics were taken from the text book which has been approved by subject and program committees at the Faculty of Engineering, Qassim University, KSA. The test was peer reviewed by two staff member of the same profession. Thus, this form of test was applied to a student group to which the subject was lectured, and Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient of the test was calculated and found to be 0.71. The high Cronbach’s alpha coefficients indicate that the instrument is highly reliable.
Experimental application
The units of foundations of engineering economy and present worth were prepared, and converted to 4MAT model including the skills and activities required; also mind maps of the contents were constructed.  Two 4MAT wheels of the main concepts were created by the researcher.  The main concept of the unit “foundations of engineering economy” was “time value of money” while the main concept of unit “present worth analysis” was “alternatives”. Both wheels are shown in Figures 2 and 3 while the mind maps, activities, and skills used in the experiments are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The applications of both 4MAT and traditional methods of instruction were conducted for a period of three weeks in first semester, “Fall” 2014/2015 academic year. The experimental methodology of the research is summarized in Table 3.
Both experimental and control groups have  been  taught  by  the corresponding author of this study. In the control group, traditional lecturing method of instruction was applied including problem solving and tutorials. In this phase of teaching 4MAT method was not applied. On the other hand, the experimental group was given a teaching based on 4MAT method.  The teaching process of both the 4MAT and the traditional methods were completed in a total of 9 h over three studying weeks. In order to motivate students to work seriously, they were informed that the evaluation results affect the final grades. This was announced to the students before both the pre-test and post-test.
The textbook by Blank and Tarquin (2012) was used in the control group whereas 4MAT method was used in the experimental group by means of following the related subject content of the same book. The preparations were aided by works of Morris and McCarthy (1990), Terms (2005) and White (2005). Examples from steps used regarding the application of 4MAT on the experimental group are as follows:
Wheel (1): The main concept of this wheel is “time value of money”.
Subject: Foundation of engineering economy.
Objective: Bringing up an experience by which the students can compare between simple interest and compound interest with respect to time.
Essential question: What would be the most important parameters and factors to be calculated or obtained to understand the effect of time on the value of money?
- Activities:   
Quadrant (1) {Connect-Attend}: In this stage the instructor connected the experience of students with the concept through brain storming about effect of time on our life and things surrounding us. Attending the students to the concept was performed via pair discussion, and giving examples by the instructor about the effect of time on everything in our life with reasons (for example, Life, cars, buildings). The instructor gives intended questions to manage the discussion.
Quadrant (2) {Imagine-Inform}: Students worked in pairs and were asked to imagine the effect of time on specific objects and they tried to visualize the concept of time value of money.  In order to bridge the gap between students experience and the contents of the unit to be taught, the instructor showed pictures and figures of a banks and graphs then a lecture was presented to inform the students about: definition of engineering economy, interest and interest rates (simple and compound), economical equivalence, symbols and terminology.
Quadrant (3) {Practice-Extend}:   This quadrant includes the practice of the previous given information. Instructor gave exercises to be solved by each student in order to realize the difference between simple and compound interests. In order to extent the knowledge and practice of the students, the instructor asks them to construct different types of cash flows and interpret them in their own words.
Quadrant (4) {Refine - Preform}: During this quadrant, the refining is required so the instructor gives a real case problem to the students and they are asked to construct cash flow diagram of this case. The students work in small groups (4 to 6 students) to prepare in class presentation for the solution.  Both peer refine and instructor’s refine are performed in this stage. By the end of this part, each group performs his work by presenting it to all other groups.
Skills: The most important skills to be gained, applied, and/ or improved by the students through the whole wheel are communication, imaging, categorizing, using formulas, constructing diagrams, comparing, solving problems, developing, and sharing. The skills of instructor were questioning, listening, lecturing, assessing, and sharing.
Wheel (2): The main concept of this wheel is “Alternatives”.
Subject: Present and annual worth analysis.
Objective: Comparing   and selection of engineering alternatives on a base of present worth analysis.
Essential question: Which criteria and guidelines would you follow to compare and select between alternatives on present worth basis?
Quadrant (1) {Connect-Attend}: The instructor tried to connect experience of students with the concept through group discussion about their understanding of a team wins in sport game and students succeed in a university course. Attending the students to the concept was performed via rally share to give differences of winning a game and succeeding in an exam. The instructor gives questions to clarify the concept and help students to get the concept.
Quadrant (2) {Imagine-Inform}:  In order to imagine the concept of alternatives, students were asked to represent the concept of alternatives and selection process by drawing sketches. The bridge of the general concept of alternatives is the decision of selection between alternatives such as buying a house or renting one. The instructor presented lectures through power point presentation of the contents: Mutually exclusive and independent projects, present worth and annual worth analysis – study period method of analysis - Least common multiple (LCM) method of analysis. Also tree diagram for selection considerations was presented.
Quadrant (3) {Practice-Extend}: Practicing the given information is conducted by given exercises to solve and compare between alternatives on economic bases. Students work in groups to compare between projects by applying study periods and LCM. Furthermore, students work in pairs to select from independent alternatives based on present worth analysis.
Quadrant (4) {Refine - Preform}: To refine their new experiences, the students worked in groups to create their own mind maps of the whole unit. Presentations were introduced and the best mind map had been chosen to be showed in the department.
Skills: The most important skills to be gained, applied, and/ or improved by the students through the whole wheel are communication, defining, and selecting, analyzing, comparing, using formulas, constructing diagrams, practicing problems, developing, and sharing. With respect to instructor the most important skills are communication, listening, managing groups, lecturing, sharing and evaluation.
Examples   of  questions  during  the  teaching  of  present  worth analysis by 4MAT are as follows:
1. From your point of view, which project belongs to mutually exclusive and which belongs to independent ones?
2. In your opinion, in order to select among alternatives, which criteria can be applied? Then, by asking the following more detailed questions one by one, and the students were asked to write their answers on a paper.
3. In order to select from an equal life alternative, which criteria should be applied?
4. In order to select from different life alternatives, which methods can be used?
Statistical analysis
The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS22 software. A significance level was set to 0.05 since it is the most used value in educational studies. The independent sample t-test was used to find out the effect of 4MAT on students’ learning concepts of present and annual worth analysis. 


The pre-tests were conducted before starting the experimental application. The results showed no significant differences between the experimental group and control group in the students’ attitudes towards engineering economy (t=1.401; p=0.193) and their knowledge levels on foundations of engineering economy and present worth analysis (t=1.013; p=0.312). These results proved that both the experimental group and control group have homogeneous structures. For the post-test, there was statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group compared to control group at t=3.180 and p=0.002. In terms of foundations of engineering economy and present worth analysis, the mean of success points of the students in the experimental group was higher than the control group as shown in Figures 4 and 5 as well as in Table 4. 
The obtained results showed that 4MAT method provides a positive effect to the success compared with the traditional method. These results support the results obtained by many studies such as Appell (1991), Ursine (1995) and Jackson (2001). Furthermore, the results are supported by the previous related works applied on other science courses such as:
1. Sung-Young and Chang (2005) who considered a teaching method based on the differences between right and   left   sides   of  the  brain,  and  tested  its  effect  on creativity and science achievement. The results of teaching by a method based on the bilateral brain characteristics were positive when compared with the results of the traditional method.
2. Shorman (2006) who compared a McCarthy-based and a conventional teaching method to find out their effect on primary eighth graders' acquisition of scientific concepts.
3. Dogar et al.  (2008) suggested that the right brain would be beneficial for the students’ achievements.
4. Qudah (2009) who studied the effect on science achievement by a teaching method based on McCarthy model comparing with conventional method. 
5. Bawaneh  et al. (2011) who showed  the superiority of Herrmann whole brain teaching method (4MAT) over the conventional one for teaching electric circuits.


In this research, effectiveness of 4MAT method on academic achievement and attitudes toward engineering economy for undergraduate students was investigated.  Materials appropriate to the 4MAT system have been prepared for the units of foundations of engineering economy and present worth analysis. A comparison between 4MAT method and traditional method of teaching has been conducted through experimental application. Engineering economy attitude scale and knowledge test were applied. Consistent with the obtained results, it can be concluded that 4MAT method of teaching is more effective than the traditional lecturing method in teaching undergraduate students. The recommendations are shown below, which are considered to be useful for all educators primarily including the engineering economy instructors and the researchers who are interested in the studies of under graduate students. The learning styles should be applied to all levels at the university education year. Thus, the lecture presentations must be prepared by taking into account these styles. Teaching techniques activating both hemispheres of the brain must be applied for more efficient education in engineering courses.
In order to improve cognition, perception, and affection skills during problem solving in engineering economy, the whole brain must be brought into balance. A specific education for the instructors may be provided to perform a teaching in which both the learning styles and the two sides of the brain are taken into account. Proficiency teaching and training must be delivered to them where these concepts will be taught.


The author(s) have not declared any conflicts of interest.


Aktasa I, Bilgin I (2015) The effect of the 4MAT learning model on the achievement and motivation of 7th grade students on the subject of particulate nature of matter and an examination of student opinions on the model, Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 33( 1):1-21.


Appell CJ (1991). The effects of the 4MAT system of instruction on academic achievement and attitude in the elementary music classroom, Ph.D. Diss., University of Oregon.


Aql A (1985). Social Psychology. Amman, Jordon: Albarq for publication and distribution.


Bawaneh AKA, Ahmad NMd Z, Salmiza S (2011). The Effect of Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method on Students' Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits. Eur. J. Phys. Educ. 2(2):1-23.


Blank L, Tarquin A (2012). Engineering Economy", 7th. Edition, McGraw Hill.


Bowers PS (1987) The effect of the 4MAT system on achievement and attitudes in science, Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina.


Dikkartın, FT (2006). The Effects of the 4MAT Education Model on the Student Success and Attitude at the Geometry Education. Master thesis, Balikesir University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Balikesir.


Dogar A, Dane S, Tan U (2008). Right brain is important for students' achievements in science. Int. J. Neurosci. 118:1175-1179.


Ergin S, Sari M (2012). Effects of the 4MAT Instruction Method on the Achievement of High School Students with Different Learning Styles on the Subjects of Work, Power and Energy in Physics. Energy Educ. Sci. Technol. Part B-Soc. Educ. Stud. 4(2):807-820.


Erwin DO, Spatz TS, Turturro CL (1992). Development of an African–American role model intervention to increase breast self-examination and mammography. J. Cancer Educ. 7:311-319.


Fennema E, Sherman JA (1976). Mathematics attitude scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. JSAS: Catalog Sel. Doc. Psychol. 6(2):31 No.1225.


Given BK (1996). Learning styles: A synthesized model. J. Accelerated Learn. Teach. (21):11-43.


Guild PB, Garger S (1998). Curriculum: McCarthy's 4MAT system in marching to Different Drummers. 2nd. Edition, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.


Harb JN, Durrant SO, Terry RE (1991). Use of the 4MAT system in engineering education. Frontiers in Education Conference, 21st. Annual Conference. Eng. Educ. New World Order Proc. 612-616.


Hein TL, Budny DD (1999). Teaching to students' learning styles: Approaches that work, 29th. ASEE/IEEE Front. Educ. Confer. (1): 12C1/7-12C1/14.


Huitt WG, Marsha AH, David MM, John HH (2009). A systems-based synthesis of research related to improving students' academic performance. Proceeding of 3rd International City Break Conference, sponsored by the Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER)


Jackson PR (2001). The effects of teaching methods and 4MAT learning styles on community college students' achievement, attitudes, and retention in introductory microbiology. Ph.D. diss., Lynn University.


Kaplan LS (1998). Using the 4MAT instructional model for effective leadership development. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bull. 599(82):83-92.


Kelly C (1990). Using 4MAT in law school. Educ. Leadersh. (48):40-41.


Kemal O, Huseyin A (2014). The Effects of Learning Activities Corresponding with Students' Learning Styles on Academic Success and Attitude within the Scope of Constructivist Learning Approach: The Case of the Concepts of Function and Derivative. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. 5(1):1-38.


Kolb DA (1984). Experiential Learning Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.


Mare RF (1993). Teaching Engineering Economy using Experiential Learning Cycle and a Novel Business Game. The Eng. Econ. 38(4):259-274.


McCarthy B (1990) Using the 4MAT system to bring learning styles to schools, Educ. Leadersh. 48:31-37.


McCarthy B (1997). A tale of four learners: 4MAT's learning styles, Educ. Leadersh. 54:46-51.


Morris S, McCarthy B (1990). 4MAT in Action II: Sample Lesson Plans for Use with the 4MAT System, Excel, Barrington.


Nicoll-Senft, Joan M (2009). Assessing the Impact of the 4MAT Teaching Model Across Multiple Disciplines in Higher Education. College Teach. J. (58):19-27.


Nowacki Amy S (2011). Using the 4MAT Framework to Design a Problem-based Learning Biostatistics Course. J. Stat. Educ. 19(3):1-24.


Orhun N (2007). An investigation into the mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics with respect to learning style according to gender. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. (38):321- 333.


Qudah A (2009). The effect of teaching using the McCarthy method on the biology achievement for the fourth learning styles of tenth female graders in Ajloun. Master Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbed, Jordan.


Shorman S (2006). The effect of using McCarthy teaching method on 8th graders' Acquisition of scientific concepts and their attitudes towards science in king Abdullah the 2nd for Excellence Schools. Master Thesis, Yarmouk University, Irbed, Jordan.


Spatz TS (1991). Improving breast self-examination training by using the 4MAT instructional model. J. Cancer Educ. 6:179-183.


Tatar E, Ramazan D (2009). The effect of the 4MAT method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 40(8):1027-1036.


Terms L (2005). The commutative property, the associative property, the distributive property, Lois Terms's Home Page.


Ursin VD (1995). Effects of the 4MAT system of instruction on achievement, products, and attitudes toward science of 9th. grade students. Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Connecticut.


Uyangor, Sevinç Mert (2012). The effectiveness of the 4MAT teaching model upon student achievement and attitude levels. Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ. 12:43-53.


Uyangor SM (2012). The Effectiveness of the 4MAT Teaching Model upon Student Achievement and Attitude Levels. Int. J. Res. Stud. Educ. 1(2):43-53.


White D (1998). Closure property.


Sung Y, Chang N (2005) Development and application of the whole brain learning cycle for nurturing creativity, science achievement, and science-related attitude of elementary students. The Korean Soc. Elem. Sci. Educ. 22 (2):120-122.