Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010). Principal Component Analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2(4):433-459.
Crossref

Albert MJA (2004). Comparison of Statistical Methods to describe G x E interaction and yield stability in multi-location maize trials. M.Sc. Thesis, University of the Free State, pp. 19-51.

Anley W, Zeleke H, Dessalegn Y (2013). Genotype X Environment Interaction of Maize (Zea mays L.) across North Western Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 5(9):171-181.
Crossref

Apraku B, Akinwale R (2011). Identification of early-maturing maize inbred lines based on multiple traits under drought and low N environments for hybrid development and population improvement. Canadian Journal of Plant Science (91):931-942.
Crossref

Askari H, Kazemitabar KS, Zarrini NH, Saberi HM (2017). Analysis of the Genotype by Salt Interaction of Barley (Hordeum voulgar L) Genotypes at early Growth Stage by Graphical Models. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Research 3:190-196.

Bose LK, Jambhulkar NN, Pande K, Singh ON (2014). Use of AMMI and other Stability Statistics in the Simultaneous Selection of Rice Genotypes for Yield and Stability under Direct-seeded conditions. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 74:3-9.
Crossref

Bustos-Korts D, Malosetti M, Chapman S (2016). Modelling of Genotype by Environment Interaction and Prediction of Complex Traits across Multiple Environments as a Synthesis of Crop Growth Modelling. Genetics and Statistics. In: Yin X., Struik P. (eds) Crop Systems Biology. Springer, Cham.
Crossref

Dewi AK, Chozin MA, Triwidodo H, Aswidinnoor H (2014). Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis in lowland rice promising genotypes. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 5(5):74-84.

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) (2015). Enhancing Crop-Livestock Systems in Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production Intensification. Integrated Crop Management 7:11-49.

Frutos E, Galindo MP, Leiva V (2015). An interactive biplot implementation in R for modeling genotype-by-environment interaction. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 28(7):1629-1641.
Crossref

Giridhar K, Surya Kumari S, Sarada C, Naram NL (2016). Stability for Seed Yield in Ajwain based on Gentoype Selection Index. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 50(3):244-248.
Crossref

Haruna A, Adu GB, Buah SS, Kanton RAL, Kudzo AI, Seidu AM, Kwadwo OA (2017). Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Grain Yield of Intermediate maturing Drought Tolerant Top-cross Maize Hybrids under rain-fed conditions. Cogent Food and Agriculture 3(1):1-13.
Crossref

IRRI (2009). IRRISTAT version 7.2. Tutorial manual part I and II. Crop Research Informatics Laboratory. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines.

Kumar K, Bharagava PD, Upadhyaya SM (2014). Variability studies in Maize in Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 37:293-301.

Kumar P, Singh NK (2015). Determining Behaviour of Maize Genotypes and Growing Environments Using AMMI Statistics. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 13(1):162-173.
Crossref

Lin CS, Binns MR (1986). A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar x location data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 68:93-198.
Crossref

Malosetti M, Ribaut JM, van Eeuwijk FA (2013). The Statistical Analysis of Multi-environment Data: Modeling Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and its Genetic Basis. Frontiers in Physiology 4:1-17.
Crossref

Miah MA, Uddin MS (2016). Assessment of yield stability of maize inbred lines in Multi-Environment Trials. Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 51(1):61-68.
Crossref

Mortazavian M, Reza H, Mohammad S, Sharif-al-hosseini M, Taheri M, Mahlooji M (2014). GGE Biplot and AMMI Analysis of Yield Performance of Barley Genotypes across Environments in Iran. Agricultural Science and Technology 16:609-622.

Mustapha M, Bakari HR (2014). Statistical Evaluation of Genotype by Environment Interactions for Grain Yield in Millet (Penniisetum glaucum (L). The International Journal of Engineering and Science 3:7-16.

Ndhlela T, Herselman L, Magorokosho C, Setimela P, Mutimaamba C, Labuschagne M (2014). Genotype x Environment Interaction of Maize Grain Yield using AMMI Biplots. Crop Science 54(5):1992-1999.
Crossref

Nzuve F, Githiri S, Mukunya DM, Gethi J (2013). Analysis of Genotype x Environment Interaction for Grain Yield in Maize Hybrids. Journal of Agricultural Science 5(11):75-85.
Crossref

Purchase JL (1997). Parametric analysis to describe G x E interaction and yield stability in winter wheat. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. p. 148.

Purchase JL, Hatting H, Vandenventer CS (2000). G x E interaction of wheat: stability analysis of yield performance. South Africa Journal of Plant Science 17:101-107.
Crossref

Shiri M (2013). Grain Yield Stability Analysis of Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids in Different Drought Stress Conditions Using GGE Biplot Analysis. Crop Breeding Journal 3(2):107-112.

Solomon A, Mandefro N, Zelke H (2008). Genotype-Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis for Grain Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Plant Science 7(2):163-169.
Crossref

Sumathi P, Govindaraj M, Govintharaj P (2017). Identifying Promising Pearl Millet Hybrids Using AMMI and Clustering Models. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(2):1348-1359.
Crossref

WARC and APARI (2007). Werer Agricultural Research Center and Afar Pastoral and Agro-pastoral Research Institute. Assessment of soil status and Topographic exploration of Western and South-western districts of Afar Regional state. Proceedings, pp. 9-36.

Yong-Jian LIU, Chuan D, Meng-liang T, Er-liang HU, Yu-bi H (2010). Yield Stability of Maize Hybrids Evaluated in Maize Regional Trials in

Southwestern China Using Nonparametric Methods. Agricultural Sciences in China. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 9(10):1413-1422.

Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomic Journal 80:388-389.
Crossref