Journal of
Philosophy and Culture

OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS AND PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST
  • Abbreviation: J. Philos. Cult.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 0855-6660
  • DOI: 10.5897/JPC
  • Start Year: 2004
  • Published Articles: 57

Full Length Research Paper

Corporate social responsibility: An old wine in a new gourd

Peter Sena Gawu
  • Peter Sena Gawu
  • Department of Classics and Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
  • Google Scholar
Husein Inusah
  • Husein Inusah
  • Department of Classics and Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 16 October 2018
  •  Accepted: 13 December 2018
  •  Published: 31 March 2019

References

Bakan J (2005). The Corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York: Free Press.

 

Blowfield M, Frynas JG (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs Journal 81(3):499-513.
Crossref

 

Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management of British Academy of Management 12(1):85-105.
Crossref

 

Clarkson B (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review 20(1):92-117.
Crossref

 

Davies K (1973). The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal 16:312-322.

 

Decker OS (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Structural Change in Financial Services. Managerial Auditing Journal 19(6):712-728.
Crossref

 

Donaldson T, Preston L (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20:65-91.
Crossref

 

Frederick WC (1960). The Growing Concern over Social Responsibility. California Management Review 2:54-61.
Crossref

 

Freeman RE (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. California: Prentice Hall.

 

Friedman M (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Goodpaster KE, Matthews JB (1982). Can a Corporation Have Conscience? Harvard Business Review 60(1):132-134.

 

Goodpaster KE (1978). On Being Morally Considerable. Journal of Philosophy 75:308-325.
Crossref

 

Gray R, Owen D, Adams C (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

 

Hayek FA (1969). The corporation in a democratic society: In whose interest ought it and will it be run? In: Business Strategy Ansoff, H. (Ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books P 225.

 

Hobbes T (1651). The Leviathan: Reprint of 1651. Smith George (Ed.), Translated by F. L. Pogson, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

McGuire J (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw–Hill.

 

McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1):117-127.
Crossref

 

Olen J, Barry V (1992). Applying Ethics: A Text with reading (4ed.), California: Wadsworth.

 

Rand A (1964). Virtue of Selfishness. New York: Penguin P 51.

 

Schwartz MS, Carroll AB (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4):503-530.
Crossref

 

Singer P (1975). Animal Liberation: A new Ethics for our Treatment of Animals (6th ed.), New York: New York Review P 360.

 

Smith A (1761). Theory of moral sentiments. Millar A, Kincaid A, Bell J (2nd ed). London: Edinburg.

 

Viswesveran C, Deshpande SP, Milman C (1998). The effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Counterproductive Behavior. Cross Cultural Management 5(4):5-12.
Crossref

 

Wood D (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review 16(4):91-718.
Crossref