Alper A, Gülbahar Y (2009). Trends and issues in educational technology researches: A review of recent research in TOJET. Turkish Online J. Edu.Technol.8 (2):124-135.

Bümen NT, Çakar E, Yıldız DG (2014). Türkiye'de öÄŸretim programlarına baÄŸlılık ve baÄŸlılığı etkileyen etkenler. Edu.Sci. Theory, Practice, 14(1), 203-228. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.1.2020.
Crossref

Çakıcı Y, Ilgaz, G (2011). An analysis of dissertations about 2004 primary science and technology curriculum: from 2005 through 2010. Marmara Univ. J.Edu.Sci. 34:35-47.

Çalık M, Sözbilir M (2014). Parameters of Content Analysis. Edu.Sci., 39(174), 33-38. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2014.3412.
Crossref

Çalık M, Ünal S, CoÅŸtu B, KarataÅŸ FO (2008). Trends in Turkish science education. Essay in education. Special Edition, 23-46.

Cansız-Aktaş M (2013). 5W -1H For Researches Related To New Mathematics Curriculums: Graduate Thesis. Nat.l Edu., 42(197):209-227.

ÇiltaÅŸ A (2012). Content analysis of the graduate thesis and dissertations in mathematics education in Turkey between 2005-2010. J. Acad. Soc. Sci. Stud.5(7):211-228.

ÇiltaÅŸ A, Güler G, Sözbilir M (2012). Mathematics education research in Turkey: A content analysis study. Edu. Sci.Theory, Practice. 12(1):565-580.

Demirel Ö (1997). Kuramdan uygulamaya eÄŸitimde program geliÅŸtirme. Ankara: USEM Publications, 13.

GöktaÅŸ Y, Hasançebi F, VarısoÄŸlu B, Akcay A, Bayrak N, Baran M, Sözbilir M (2012a). Trends in educational research in Turkey: A content analysis. Edu. Sci.: Theory Practice. 12(1):443-460.

GöktaÅŸ Y, Küçük S, Aydemir M, Telli E, Arpacık Ö, Yıldırım G, ReisoÄŸlu I (2012). Educational technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000-2009 decade. Edu. Sci. Theory Practice. 12(1):177-199.

Gözütok FD (2003). Türkiye'de program geliÅŸtirme çalışmaları. Nat.Edu., p:160.

Hazır-Bıkmaz F, Aksoy E, Tatar Ö, Atak-Altınyüzük C (2013). The content analysis of phd theses completed in the field of curriculum and instruction (1974-2009). Edu.Sci. 38(168):288-303.

Jacob R, Frid S (1997). Curriculum change: what do teachers and students really think?, The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL.

Kablan Z (2011). Analysis of elementary mathematics curriculum evaluation studies. Element. Edu. Online, 10(3):1160-1177.

Kablan Z, Topan B, Erkan B (2013). The effectiveness level of material use in classroom instruction: A meta-analysis study. Edu. Sci.Theory Pract.13 (3):1629-1644.

Kaptan S (1998). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri (11.Baskı). Ankara: Tekışık Web Ofset.

Karadağ E (2009). A thematic analysis on doctoral dissertations made in the area of education sciences. J. Kırşehir Edu. Faculty, 10(3):75-87.

KarakuÅŸ M, Mengi UF (2014). An examination of curriculum evaluation in elementary schools with regard to teachers' views. Pegem J.Edu.Instruct.4(4):01-22.
Crossref

Kazu H, Aslan S (2013). Evaluation of studies conducted on the "assessment-evaluation" dimension of 2004 primary school curriculum. Element. Edu. Online, 12(1):87‐108.

KurtoÄŸlu M, SeferoÄŸlu SS (2011). Web destekli eÄŸitime yönelik yapılan araÅŸtırmalar konusunda bir içerik analizi çalışması. Web Destekli ÖÄŸretim Uygulamaları Sempozyumu (WebDOU-2011), 27-28 Eylül 2011, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Kayseri, Turkey.

Lee MH, Wu YT, Tsai CC (2009). Research Trends in Science Education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals, Inter. J. Sci. Edu. 31:15, 1999-2020,
Crossref

Lubienski ST, Bowen A (2000). Who's counting? A survey of mathematics education research 1982-1998. J.Res.Mathemat. Edu.31(5), 626–633.
Crossref

Ma W, Adesope OO, Nesbit JC, Liu Q (2014) Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. J. Edu.Psychol.106(4):901–918.
Crossref

MNE (Turkish Ministry of National Education) (2005). Ä°lköÄŸretim 1-5. sınıf programlarını tanıtım el kitabı. (Elementary school curriculum introduction (grade 1-5) Ankara: Turkey). T.C. Milli EÄŸitim Bakanlığı, Ankara: Talim Terbiye Kurulu BaÅŸkanlığı.

Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publication.

Özdemir SM (2009). Curriculum evaluation in education and examination of the curriculum evaluation studies in Turkey. YYU J.Edu. Faculty, 4(2):126-149.

Polat M (2013). A research into completed post-graduate theses in the field of physical science: Celal Bayar university sample. Buca Faculty, Edu. J. 35:46-58.

Remillard JT (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: a framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29:3.
Crossref

Selçuk Z, Palancı M, Kandemir M, Dündar H (2014). Tendencies of the researches published in Education and Science Journal: Content analysis. Edu. Sci. 39(173):430-453.

Sert G (2010). Articles in the field of instructional technologies published in Turkey: A content analysis. Unpublished master's thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Shintani N, Wallace MP (2014). The effectiveness of listening support on l2 learners' listening comprehension ability: A meta-analysis. English Teaching and Learning, 38(3) (Special Issue):71-101. DOI: 10.6330/ETL.2014.38.3.03

Sözbilir M, Canpolat N (2006). Fen eÄŸitiminde son otuz yıldaki uluslar arası deÄŸiÅŸmeler: Dünyada çalışmalar nereye gidiyor? Türkiye bu çalışmaların neresinde? M. Bahar (Ed). in Fen ve Teknoloji ÖÄŸretimi (pp. 417-432). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

Sözbilir M, Kutu H (2008). Development and current status of science education research in Turkey. Essays, Edu.Special Issue, 1-22.

Sözbilir M, Kutu H, YaÅŸar MD (2013). Türkiye'de kimya eÄŸitimi araÅŸtırmalarının durumu ve eÄŸilimler. M. Sözbilir (Ed). in Türkiye'de Kimya EÄŸitimi (pp. 175-204). Ä°stanbul: Türkiye Kimya DerneÄŸi Yayın No: 22.

Sözbilir M, Kutu H, YaÅŸar MD (2012). Science education research in Turkey: A content analysis of selected features of papers published. In J. Dillon & D. Jorde (Eds). World, Sci. Edu.Handbook, Res. Europe. (pp.341-374). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Crossref

UlutaÅŸ F, Ubuz B (2008). Research and trends in mathematics education: 2000 to 2006. Element. Educat. Online, 7(3):614-626.

Umay A, AkkuÅŸ O, Duatepe-Paksu A (2006). An investigation of 1.-5. grades mathematics curriculum by considering NCTM principles and standards. Hacettepe Univ. Faculty,Edu.J. 31:198-211.

Uzunboylu H, Özçınar Z (2009). Research and Trends in Computer-assisted Language Learning during 1990–2008: Results of a Citation Analysis. Eurasion J. Edu. Res. 34:133-150.

Wang F, Burton JK (2013). Second Life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011. British J. Edu. Technol. 44(3):357–371.
Crossref

Yıldırım A,ÅžimÅŸek H (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araÅŸtırma yöntemleri, (5. Baskı), Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.