African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5233

Full Length Research Paper

Comparison of two mechanical instrumentation techniques in reducing root canal bacterial population

Mahsa Eskandarinezhad1,2, Hooman Sadrhaghighi1,3*, Mona Rahmani4, Nima Moradi Majd5 and Alireza Sadighi6
1Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University (Medical Sciences), Tabriz, Iran. 2Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, Tabriz University (Medical Sciences), Tabriz, Iran. 3Department of Orthodontics, Dental Faculty, Tabriz University (Medical Sciences), Tabriz, Iran. 4Department of Endodontics, Dental Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University (Medical Sciences), Tehran, Iran. 5Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. 6Neuroscience Research Center (NSRC), Tabriz University (Medical Sciences), Tabriz, Iran
Email: [email protected]

  •  Accepted: 22 March 2012
  •  Published: 23 April 2012

Abstract

Microorganisms and their products play an important role in the pathogenesis of pulpal and periradicular diseases, so their elimination from root canal system as well as reinfection prevention are the main purpose of root canal treatment. This study was designed to compare the in-vitro efficiency of the Hero and M-Two rotary instruments in intracanal bacterial reduction. Fifty six human extracted teeth were divided into two equal experimental groups (n=25), Hero file as group 1 and M-Two file as group 2, and one control group (n=6). All samples were prepared by K-file No 20 and Gates Glidden No 2 and 3 before sterilization. The teeth were autoclaved and then were infected withEnterococcus faecalis. The experimental groups were instrumented either with Hero 4% or with M-Two files up to #30. To determine the level of remaining organisms, bacteria samples were collected after instrumentation. In the group 1, two samples and in the group 2, 12 samples represented complete elimination of bacteria. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the level of bacteria elimination (p<0/05). So using M-Two instrumentation technique reduces the intracanal bacteria more efficiently than Hero 4% instrumentation technique.

 

Key words: Enterococcus faecalis bacteria, Hero rotary file, root canal preparation, M-Two rotary file