African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5230

Full Length Research Paper

Isolation of bacterial diversity present in medical waste and health care settings in hospitals in Kenya

Susan Muthoni Maina
  • Susan Muthoni Maina
  • Department of Medical Microbiology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Andrew K. Nyerere
  • Andrew K. Nyerere
  • Department of Medical Microbiology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.
  • Google Scholar
Caroline Wangari Ngugi
  • Caroline Wangari Ngugi
  • Department of Medical Microbiology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.
  • Google Scholar

  •  Received: 02 May 2018
  •  Accepted: 04 June 2018
  •  Published: 14 July 2018


Nosocomial infections have impacted great burden in healthcare system and has led to deteriorating health condition and deaths. This study characterizes medically important bacterial diversity, isolated from staff hands, hospital surfaces and wastes in healthcare settings in Kenya during a one year period. Descriptive cross sectional hospital based study design and simple random sampling method was used to collect 246 samples from 10 sections in each hospital, using sterile cotton swabs and processed in the laboratory. Colony morphology and biochemical characterization was also recorded and confirmation of Enterobactericeae using API-20E test for later study of ESBL resistant genes was done. Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel and ANOVA. The study highlighted the presence of Providentia rettgeri (21.01%), Staphylococcus aureus (18.47%), Escherichia coli (13%), other Gram negatives (9.55%), Pseudomonas aeuriginosa (9.3%), coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS) (9.12%), Serratia marcescens (6.58%), Klebsiella pneumonia (6.36%), Proteus vulgaris (4.03%) and Enterobacter cloaca (3%). Most nosocomial infections especially urinary tract infections are caused by these bacteria. It is necessary for hospitals to implement most of the recommended measures in this study to reduce the risk of transmission of pathogens via contaminated hospital surfaces and sites.


Key words: Hospital surfaces, hospital waste, environment, isolation, bacteria, nosocomial infections. 


Hospital is the place, which is frequently accessed by the people irrespective of age, sex, race, religion, region and even nationality. The waste generated during entire healthcare activities has higher potential to produce health and environmental hazards than the wastes of other places (Boyce et al., 1997). Hospital acquired infection also called nosocomial infection is an infection acquired in hospital by a patient who was admitted for a reason other than that  infection.  Nosocomial  pathogens are organisms causing diseases that are acquired from the hospital and healthcare environment within few days of admission and are responsible for nosocomial infections (Medubi et al., 2006). The hospital exists as a closed community; it is therefore not surprising that certain microorganisms become predominant and cause diseases (Boyce et al., 1997). The pathogens can be expelled from an infected or colonized patient either through direct contact, aerosols  droplets  or faeces to the environmental surfaces. These pathogens can be contracted by the healthcare workers and even by the patients. Therefore, environmental surfaces in healthcare centers act as reservoir for bacteria and can as well serve as vectors of the bacterial pathogens (Boyce et al., 1997). The risk for nosocomial infections poses a potential patient safety threat (WHO, 2002). These infections are often caused by breaches of infection control practices and procedures, unclean and non-sterile environmental surfaces, and/or ill employees. Kenya like many developing countries experience the problem of getting sufficient medical supply and even worse is the disposal of medical waste. This is due to lack of enforcement of legislation for handling, treatment and disposal. Healthcare surfaces and wastes act as the store house of harmful infectious pathogens. Potential health risk includes spreading of diseases by these pathogens and wide dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes. Antimicrobial resistance in both pathogenic and commensal bacteria is increasing steadily. Failure of antibiotic resistant bacteria containment is responsible for this expansion. The incidence of infections caused by beta lactam resistant organisms due to the production of various enzymes has increased in recent years. Hospital waste can be hazardous to public health and ecological balance since it can contain various kinds of pollutants such as radioactive, chemical and pharmaceutical wastes and also pathogenic microorganisms (WHO, 2002). In Kenya like many developing countries, data is limited to the number of cases registered in health facilities, like Ibn Sina hospital in Rabat (Bakkali et al., 2015) which highlighted the presence of pathogens in distinct areas of the hospital environment like Pseudomonas aeuriginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella species and various gram negative bacilli. Therefore, the present study was done to evaluate the presence of pathogen bacteria in the environment of Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) and Kikuyu Mission Hospital (KMH) in Kenya and to characterize them for better management of the hospital environment quality.


This constitutes bacteriological analysis and it included cultivation of collected samples from various sites or departments in the hospitals, colony morphology study under different selective media, biochemical tests and confirmatory test using API-20E strips. The study site chosen for this study are KNH and KMH situated in Nairobi County ( and in which samples were collected from various sites or departments in the hospitals. The study design used in this research was descriptive cross sectional hospital based study with a sample size of 246. Simple random sampling method was used to collect samples from ten departments in each hospital. Sampling was performed during the morning after the regular daily cleaning. Different surfaces and locations were included (door handles, toilet, bathroom knobs, bed rails, cabinet locks and handles, water dispensers taps, tables including operating tables, scrubber surfaces, sink surfaces, theatre equipment surfaces (for example breathing tubes, infusion pump, aspirators), waste bin surfaces, dump site, door handles and knobs and floor surfaces, etc. Basically, 23 to 24 samples were used, at least, for each sampling site, giving a total of 246 samples in each hospital. Samples collected using sterile polyester fibre tipped applicator swabs (Becton Dickson, Basel, Switzerland) were moistened in 2 ml sterile saline solution and rolled several times over a surface area of around 25 cm. They were then put into sterile tubes, tightly capped and labeled appropriately; similarly, sterile swabs were dipped into drainages and treated as earlier stated. They were transported in ice cooler box to the laboratory for processing. Samples were inoculated on various selective and differential media such as MacConkey, Mannitol salt agar (MSA), Eosin methylene blue (EMB), and Salmonella shigella agar (SS), using the streaking method. Samples were incubated at 36°C (+/- 1°C) in an incubator for 18 to 24 h (overnight). Visible colonies were further sub cultured and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Isolation and identification of microorganisms were done according to standard procedures. Bacteria were identified by examination of colonial morphology, on appropriate agar media. Samples from MacConkey media were classified as either lactose fermenters or non-lactose fermenters. Gram staining rapid tests (catalase, oxidase, and coagulase) was done to classify the isolates. Various biochemical tests (indole test, methyl red-Voges Proskauer test, citrate utilization and triple sugar iron test, were performed on the isolates to confirm their identities and aid in bacterial species identification as per the protocol by Tolaro (2005). Results of Enterobactericeae were confirmed using API-20E test (Biomeriux, France) (Baron and Finglod, 1996). Confirmation was necessary for future study in antibiotic sensitivity test (Kirby et al., 1966) and detection of Beta lactamase genes from Enterobactericeae. Data analysis was done using SPSS and ANOVA. Scientific approval of the study was obtained from Kenyatta National Hospital Ethics and Review Committee, while ethical clearance to carry out the study was obtained from KNH and KMH hospitals administration. All procedures were carried out in accordance to the standard biosafety guidelines and waste disposal.



Isolation of pathogen strains from hospitals surfaces and hands
Results from this study revealed that a total of 592 sampling were made from various hospital surfaces and hands of health staffs. KNH had the highest number of positive plates which indicated the presence of bacterial with a total of 197 (80.08%), while KMH had 163 (66.26%). There was no statistical significant increase in the prevalence of contamination in private as compared to public hospitals (p = 0.38). Out of those 246 samples, majority of positive plates for the presence of bacterial in both hospitals were from site A (waste from hospital main drainage) with 25 (100%) and site I (orthopedic unit) for KNH with 25 (100%) level of positive growth plates. The least was site C (operation theatre) for both hospitals; KNH had only 6 plates with positive growth out of 25 (24%), while KMH had 9/25 (36%) as indicated in Table 1. Among the 360 positive samples, 471 pathogens strains were isolated, comprising of Gram negative bacteria which were more in most departments, (341, 72.3%) than the Gram positive bacteria (130, 27.7%).
The distribution of strains according to samples origin
The distribution of strains isolated from surfaces and hands of health personnel and their detection rates were reported in figures and it shows that 471 were isolated from surfaces of various locations in different surfaces and personnel hands. Characterization of strains isolated showed clearly a high prevalence of Gram negative bacteria. Results clearly demonstrate the presence of both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria with the predominance of Providentia species (21.01%), S. aureus (18.47%), Escherichia coli (12.95%), other Gram negatives such as Roultella ornithylitica, Ochrobactrum anthropic, Pantoea species (9.55%), Pseudomonas species (9.34%), coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CONS) (9.12%), Serratia species (6.58%), Klebsiella species (6.36%), Proteus species (4.03%), and Enterobacter species (2.54%) as shown in Table 2. Most of the frequently isolated bacterial included E. coli in waste   water   main   drainages   (A)   while   Providentia, Pseudomonas, Serratia and Klebsiella species were the most abundant in ICU, while S. aureus and other coagulase negative Gram positives were abundant in ICU (B), general ward (H). Moreover, the percentage of detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria isolated at different locations is summarized in Figure 1. For both Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria, the main infected surfaces were the door handles and nurses hands surfaces representing the major reservoirs of pathogens. Moreover, Gram negative bacteria were predominant in sinks and waste waters, whereas Gram positive bacteria prevail in samples taken from door handles and nurses hands surface as reported in Table 2.
Pseudomonas species was most abundant in sinks (20.4%) followed by operation table (18.18%) (Table 2). In operation table (26.66%), Klebsiella pneumoniae was most abundant followed by door handles (20%). E. coli was found mostly in nurses’ hands surface (NHS) (22.9%), followed by nurses’ staff table (NST) (19.6%). Proteus  vulgaris  was  found  in  stretchers  and  elevator buttons while Enterobacter cloaca was abundant in nurses’ hands surfaces. Species of Providentia were mostly found in door handles at 14.14%, Serratia species were most abundant in waste water samples and door surfaces at 22.58% in both cases. Other Gram negative isolates were found in waste water and door surfaces. S. aureus was abundantly found in nurses’ hands surface in about 21.83%, while other coagulase negative Staphylococcus was most abundant in elevator buttons (39.53%) and door handles in 25.58% occurrence (Table 2).



In this study, it was clearly demonstrated that the hospital with the most positive plates indicated higher contamination. More contaminated plates were observed in this study from the public hospital, which is slightly more but not significant in the private hospital. This is a reflection of the practices in these establishments and may be attributed to improper or insufficient treatment of the wastes before disposal (Sridhar and Olajumoke, 2003). It can be explained by the fact that majority of people are low income earners in this part of the country and ordinary working citizens who tend to patronize the public hospital because of lesser medical charges as compared to the private hospital where charges are higher (Sridhar and Olajumoke, 2003). Moreover, the public hospital pre-treats their wastes before disposal. Occurrence of bacterial isolates generated from different departments, wards and waste effluent sites at both hospitals is revealed in the study. The department with the highest level of contamination was A (main drainage waste water) in both hospitals (100%) with all the plates indicating positive. The department, with the  least contamination was site C (operation room) probably because of the level of efficiency in use of disinfectants and sterilization in the operation room as confirmed by research done by Moges et al. (2014) in Ethiopia, who found the operation room with lesser bacterial contamination as compared to other hospital units.
There were significant differences in the number of bacterial isolates in the orthopedic/surgical departments in both hospitals. Several factors may contribute to this; the difference in quality of the ventilation system, the difference in cleaning procedures and the difference in traffic in these areas as revealed by Moges et al. (2014). It was also noted that about 20% of hospital dump site waste samples in both public and private hospital departments, showed no growth at all. This could probably be due to the nature of the organism or the effect of possible pre-treatment given to wastes as researched by Sridhar and Olajumoke (2003).
Many of the bacterial isolates found in the waste samples reported here are also known to cause hospital acquired or nosocomial infections (from the records of Hospital, 2014). It is however believed that hospital surfaces and medical wastes are the least possible source of a hospital-acquired infection. This study confirms this point, but cautions that in the communities, these wastes can be a health risk. There is need to manage them properly and also to train waste generators and handlers on safe work practices during collection, storage and transportation. Both lactose fermenting and non-lactose fermenting bacteria were isolated and identified. From the result, more Gram-negative organisms [especially members of the Enteriobacteriaceae 341 (72.3%)] were isolated than Gram positive organisms 130 (27.7%). This agrees with research done in Markudi, Benue State, Nigeria by Omoni et al., 2015, who revealed that more Gram negatives were present than Gram positive in samples collected from hospital settings. In the study, Providentia spp. (21%) and E. coli (13%) were among the Gram-negative bacteria while S. aureus was amongst the Gram-positive bacteria (18%); among the majority isolated from the samples collected from the current study. The high frequency of pathogenic bacterial in this study may be due to high admission of cases with bacterial infections, which is common in developing countries like Kenya (Hospital records). This study also conforms to the work of Anitha and Jayraaj (2012) who reported E. coli a Gram negative bacteria as the predominant organism in hospital wastes and also there was presence of Gram-positive isolates such as Bacillus subtilis and S. aureus in biomedical wastes collected in a public and private hospital in Coimbatore, India. Characterization of pathogen strains showed the predominance of Gram negative bacteria from surfaces and hands of health professionals. Gram positive pathogens such as staphylococcus strains show much higher transmission rates as compared to Gram negatives. That could be explained by diminished survival time of Gram negatives in the environment (Gastmeier et al., 2006). Infact, Gram negative bacteria other than Acinetobacter species (Wendt et al., 1997), survive on dry surfaces for few hours only, while the survival time can be several days for Staphylococci (Hirai, 1991).
In this study, the pathogenic bacterial isolated from the medical waste and hospital environment included Providentia spp. (21%), S. aureus (18.5%), E. coli (13%), Pseudomonas spp. (9.3%), and other coagulase negative Staphylococci (9.13%), Serratia marcescens (6.6%), Klebsiella spp. (6.4%), Proteus vulgaris (4%), and E. cloaca (3%) among others. Some of these isolates have been reported by earlier researchers (Yagoub and Agbash, 2010). Similar reports by Ekhaise and Omavwoya (2008) in Benin hospital and Vichal et al. (2011)   showed   that   the  bacterial  genera,  Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Serratia were the most frequently distributed isolates in the hospital wastewater. In another study, Pseudomonas spp. was found to be the most prevalent by 20.7% (Ashfaq et al., 2013). In the study conducted by Oyeleke and Istifanus (2009), the most predominant pathogens isolated from hospital wastes were Bacillus and S. aureus (80 to 90%); however, findings by Oyiasogie et al. (2010) showed that P. aeruginosa was among the highest Gram negative organism isolated from hospital waste accounting for about 25.00% overall of all the isolates. In a study carried out in Erbil city, Rhizgari by Aziz et al. (2014) revealed that E. coli was mostly isolated (100%) from a hospital wastewater. It is widely accepted that these pathogens are the major cause of hospital acquired infections which is in agreement with this study that E. coli strains were obtained (13%) from both hospitals being second to Providentia spp. A similar observation was made in hospitals in Ethiopia (Yismaw et al., 2010) where it was reported to be among the most frequent isolates. The high occurrence of Providentia spp. and E. coli isolates in these samples could be attributed to poor hygienic conditions in the hospitals studied and the conditions in other hospitals are not different as the country lacks adequate number of healthcare facilities (Yismaw et al., 2010). These results in overcrowding in the few hospitals available and hence the unhygienic conditions.
In the present study, Salmonella and Shigella species showed positive growth in the Salmonella-Shigella agar but were not positively identified from the surface swabs and wastes collected in hospitals in the confirmatory tests using API-20E. This may probably be due to the nature of the organism; viable but non-cultivable or the effect of possible pre-treatment given to wastes. Dudley et al. (1980) also reported variety of pathogenic bacterial in sewage sludge; however, Shigella spp. were not detected in their study due to low sensitivity of enrichment procedure and high temperature which decreased its survival in their study.
Providentia spp. are members of Enterobacteriaceae and uncommon cause of infections, although among the species Providentia rettgeri and Providentia stuartii are the most common causes of infections, especially urinary tract infections (UTIs) and bacteremia in hospitalized patients or nursing care facilities. A few studies have been published on the subject. In a review done by Kim et al. (2007), Providentia spp. incidence was 0.16%; our study confirms that Providentia spp. is uncommon and that the incidence rate in this study was higher than that by Kim et al. (2007). Providentia spp. are the most frequently isolated from elderly patients or patients with urinary catheters. The reason for the variable incidence of Providentia is not apparent, but the types of patients and institution might contribute to such a difference. There were significant number of bacteria especially Providentia spp. on the floors of various areas in the operating suite; several  factors  may  contribute  to  this.
First, the difference in quality of the ventilation system; secondly, the difference in cleaning procedures; thirdly, the difference in traffic in these areas. We consider the major contributing factor to be the difference in cleaning procedures. On the basis of researchers’ observations, it is recommendable that, there should be regular use of disinfectant in cleaning the operating room floor after every operation. There are several reports on the use of disinfectant on cleaning the floors. Rutala and Weber (2014) reported a significant reduction in floor bacteria with the use of a germicidal detergent. He also reported that the floors in the inner zones of the operating suite cleaned with disinfectant showed low level of bacterial contamination.
S. aureus strains were the second most frequently isolated bacterium (18.5%) from this study. This finding is similar to Yagoub (2010) report who found that Gram positive bacteria such as S. aureus in particular as most pre-dominant bacterium in their study. These results were also observed by Perwaiz et al. (2007) who obtained an isolation rate of S. aureus at 13% and the second most frequent pathogen. It has been frequently isolated from nurses/doctors’ hands including nurses’ staff table. Several studies have reported the importance of frequent and adequate hand washing to reduce rates of hospital acquired infections (Rupp et al., 2008), showing that hands regularly acquire bacterial pathogens responsible of nosocomial infections and can survive on dry surfaces for several weeks (Frost and Sullivan, 2010). Elevator buttons had more coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (9.3%) than other surfaces; this could be due to the fact that they are touched repeatedly by ungloved hands by multiple individuals who will later go on to contact patients colonized by bacteria that were not pathologic in most case but overall prevalence rate exceeded sink surfaces. Furthermore, if hand hygiene practices are suboptimal, microbial colonization is more easily established and/or direct transmission to patients or a fomite in direct contact with the patient may occur as concluded by Allegranzi and Pittet (2009). It has been reported that organisms are capable of surviving on hands of health care workers for at least several minutes following contamination (Allegranzi and Pittet, 2009); hence, the necessity of a hand washing facility at most points in a health care institution. Thus, risk of infection is high in individuals occupationally exposed to wounds or wound dressing indicating a need to screen individuals in hospitals for risk exposures and infections, to avoid outbreak and cross infections in hospitals for risk exposures and infections as described by Perwaiz et al. (2007) in their research work. Staphylococcus strains has been incriminated in various diseases such as post-operative infections, urinary tract infections, skin diseases, respiratory infections and food poisoning (Murray et al., 1995; Buchanan and Gibbons, 1974). The S. aureus strains were mostly isolated from hand swab of the nurses from this hospital and were  almost  the  same
as compared to the earlier report of Boyce (2007) and Ekrami et al. (2011). The high prevalence of the S. aureus from hand swabs and door handles in this work might be as a result of inadequate hand hygiene and this could be one of the attributing factors of the distribution of the pathogen in the hospital environmental surfaces as reported earlier by Olalekan et al. (2011). The low prevalence rate of S. aureus on beddings and bed rails in this hospital is not in agreement with 100% prevalence on bedrail as reported by Boyce (2007). Also, 26% of S. aureus reported on door handle by Carvalho et al. (2007) is higher to the prevalence rate of the S. aureus on door knob/door handle of 17% from these hospitals in the current study. The prevalence rate of 16% of E. coli on door knobs/door handles confirms the early report of Nworie et al. (2012) from some parts of Abuja metropolis that the contamination of door knob/door handle can be as a result of poor hand hygiene after using toilet. In addition, results from this investigation, recommends that materials contaminated with patients' secretions, such as saliva, sputum and mucus, should be cleaned with disinfectant or discarded. This is especially true of patients' pillows, which are usually contaminated with secretions from mouth, nose and trachea. In one instance, S. aureus was found in a pillow (beddings and bed rails category). Contamination of the operating light in the operation theatre was reported by Husein et al. (2001). Since operating lights are cleaned daily with disinfectant, it was not found holding any contamination. It was found that S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci species was the major species contaminating floors and other surfaces in the operating rooms. Staphylococci are usually human in origin and point to the restriction of traffic in operating rooms, Pseudomonas strains were obtained in this study with a prevalence rate of 9.3%. Similar prevalence rate of 9.3% was reported by Srinivas et al. (2015) in Andhra Pradesh, India. In comparison, higher prevalence rate of 32.1 and 20.3% was reported by Rajat et al. (2012), in Gujarat, India, respectively. This varied prevalence of P. aeruginosa in different places may be attributed to the type of swab received for examination, type of hospitals and geographical positions. It is widespread in natural environments and it is an opportunistic pathogen for humans lead to a broad spectrum of disease such as urinary, burn, respiratory infections and septicemia. Pseudomonas spp. is one of the most common isolated pathogens from hospitalized people and that it thrived on moist surfaces as also confirmed by Nagoba et al. (1997), heightening the risk of infection for patients with catheters or ventilators; from its commonly found wet places it reaches sick patients admitted in hospital and causes a variety of serious infections in hospitalized patients with impaired defenses. It causes serious infections such as bacteremia pneumonia, sepsis, burn wound   infections   and   meningitis.  In  our  studies,  the highest number of Pseudomonas spp. was isolated from sinks (20.45%), floors and waste water drainages. The isolation of Pseudomonas spp. from the sinks confirms the report of Udeze et al. (2012) that sinks are the most common place in hospital environment where Pseudomonas spp. are predominantly found. Sinks are the most common article of contact by the people. It is therefore and not surprising that it also gave very high P. aeruginosa isolates since people with wet hands (water or sweat) may easily come into contact with it. The places with least number of isolates were the bedrails, stretchers, nurses staff tables, etc., and these are places that are likely to be dry most of the time in the hospitals. Also, the prevalence rate of Pseudomonas spp. on operation table of the hospitals in the current study hospital was still higher (18.18%) than a work reported by Pal et al. (2010) with about 9.6% of the pathogen was isolated from operation table in a hospital in India. The presence of this pathogen on operation table can contaminate open wounds of the patients in course of the operation.
Serratia spp. also isolated in the current study is an opportunistic, Gram negative pathogen which belongs to family Enterobacteriaceae. It was originally considered as non-pathogenic, but it was discovered that ICU are often involved in the epidemics of the colonization and the infection with Serratia marcescens. The important reservoirs in epidemics are the digestive and respiratory tracts. The current study of S. marcescens was found mostly in ICU with the highest population sinks, door surfaces and waste in ICU and this was confirmed by research done by Mlynarczyk et al. (2007); it accounts for only 1 to 2% of the nosocomial infections and caused by instrumentation (urinary catheterization or placement of the endotracheal tube for ventilation).
Proteus mirabilis was isolated in some of the units in this study with a prevalence rate of 4%. This species is implicated in many clinical conditions. In other studies, it was also isolated in some residential areas not close to any health care facility (Giske et al., 2008), which suggests that it is present in the general environment.
Results from the current study reveals that bacterial isolates found in the hospital surfaces, waste samples and dumpsites reported here are also known to cause hospital acquired or nosocomial infections (from the records of KNH and KMH, 2015). Bacterial pathogens may develop in wastes undergoing decomposition in soils that suffer from environmental pollution as a result of indiscriminate disposal of pollutants. These bacterial pathogens, when increased in population, pose great risk to human health (Onweremadu et al., 2009). Soil-transmitted pathogens play an important role to the emergence of community-acquired infections, contributing to the burden of communicable disease morbidity and mortality. The bacterial pathogens in the soil and wastes are not considered as public health concern    (Santamaria    and    Toranza,   2010).   Little information is available on the types of microorganisms associated with and isolated in waste dumpsite soil consequently; comprehensive assessments on pathogenic organisms must be established to build local knowledge about public health issues and trends in hospital infections and waste management. Other Gram negative bacteria species for example, Pantoea spp. was also isolated (12 isolates) in this study. Actually, several studies have reported the association of this germ with nosocomial infections (Liberto et al., 2009). The fungi that were morphologically identified in this study were suspected to be Fusarium and Penicillin spp.; their spores are common in environment and are responsible for allergic infection of human and animals (Thurston and Cysewsk, 1979). It is however believed that hospital wastes are the least possible source of a hospital-acquired infection. This study confirms this point, but cautions that in the communities, these hospital surfaces and wastes can be a health risk. There is need to manage them properly and also to train waste generators and handlers on safe work practices during collection, storage and transportation. In conclusion, there is need to study antimicrobial resistance rate in hospitals and the possible dissemination of resistant bacteria in the inanimate surfaces or the hands of health professionals reinforce the need for knowledge and control of the sources of pathogens in the hospital environment. The evaluation of the environmental role in the acquisition of healthcare associated infections is needed to collaborate with infection control committees. The establishment of a control system is also required in hospitals for the reduction of length of stay, costs and morbid-mortality. Such a surveillance system should continuously report the prevalence of microorganisms and their resistance pattern to hospital wards; this information will be used in defining policies for control of hospital environments, and building awareness especially in Kenyan hospitals where antimicrobial prescription is sometimes inappropriate.


The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.



The authors acknowledge fundings from National Council of Science, Technology and Innovation.



Allegranzi B, Pittet, D. (2009). Role of Hand Hygiene in Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention. The Journal of Hospital Infection 73(4):305-315.


Anitha J, Jayraaj IA (2012). Isolation and identification of bacteria from bio-hospital waste (BMW). International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 4(5):1-3.


Ashfaq K.M.A, Pijush S, Majharul I.M, Kant O.R, Chandra B.G (2013). Screening of antibiotic resistant gram negative bacteria and plasmid profiling of multi-drug resistant isolates present in sewage associated with health care centers. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences 2(4): 923-930.


Aziz RJ, Al-Zubaidy FS, Al-Mathkhury HJ, Resul B, Musenga J. (2014) Antibiogram of Escherichia coli isolated from different hospitals wastewater in Erbil City, Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Science 55(2):341-351.


Bakkali MEL, Hmid K, Kari KE, Zouhdi M, Mzibri MEL (2015). Characterization of bacterial strains and their resistance status in hospital environment. Journal of Tropical diseases 4:180.doi 10.4172/2329-891X.1000180.


Baron J, Finglod S (1996). Methods for identification of etiological agents of infectious diseases. In: St Louis, USA editors. Bally &Scotts diagnostic microbiology, 10th edition. Mosby: Inc pp. 327-529.


Boyce JM (2007). Environmental contamination makes an important contribution to hospital infection. Journal Hospital Infection 65(2):50-54.


Boyce JM, Potter-Bynoe G, Chenevert C, King T (1997). Environmental contamination due to methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Possible infection control implications. Journal of Infections Control and Hospital Epidemiology 18(9):622-627.


Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (1974). Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. 8th ed. Baltimore: William and Wilken P 1042.


Carvalho KS, Melo MC, Melo GB, Gontijo-Filho PP (2007). Hospital surface contamination in wards occupied by patients infected with MRSA or MSSA in a Brazilian university hospital. Journal of Basic and Applied Pharmaceutical Science 28(2):159-163.


Dudley DJ, Guentzel NM, Ibarra MJ, Moore BE, Sagik BP (1980). Enumeration of potentially pathogenic bacteria from sewage sludges. Applied Environmental Microbiology pp. 118-126.


Ekhaise FO, Omavwoya BP (2008). Influence of hospital wastewater discharged from university of Benin teaching hospital (UBTH), Benin City on its receiving environment. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Environmental Science 4(4):484-488.


Ekrami A, Kayedani A, Jahangir M, Kalantar E, Jalali M (2011). Isolation of common aerobic bacterial pathogens from the environment of seven hospitals. Journal of Microbiology 4(2):75-82.


Frost M, Sullivan K (2010). Hospital acquired infections – Trends across Europe M56E-54.


Gastmeier P, Schwab F, Barwolff S, Ruden H, Grundmann H.(2006). Correlation between the genetic diversity of nosocomial pathogens and their survival time in intensive care units. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35:1394-1397.


Giske CG, Monnet DL, Cars O, Carmelli Y (2008). Clinical and economic impact of common multidrug- resistant Gram negative bacilli. Antimicrobial. Agents Chemotherapy 52:813-821.


Hirai Y (1991). Survival of bacteria under dry conditions; from a viewpoint of nosocomial infection. Journal of Hospital Infections 19:191-200.


Hospital records KNH and KMH (2014-2016).


Husein JR, Villar RN, Gray AJ, Farrington M (2001). Use of light handles in the laminar flow operating theatre-is it a cause of bacterial concern. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 83:353-354.


Kim TE, Jeong YW, Cho SH, Kim SJ, Kwon HJ (2007). Chronological study of antibiotic resistances and their relevant genes in Korean avian pathogenic E. coli isolates Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45(10):3309-3315.


Kirby WM, Bauer AM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966) Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standard simple disk method. Journal Clinical Pathology 45:493-496.


Liberto, M.C, Matera R, Piccis, T, Lo Russo E, Colosima, E. Foca (2009), Six cases of sepsis caused by Pantoea agglomelans in a teaching hospital. New Microbial 32:119-123.


Medubi SA, Akande TM, Osagbemi GK. (2006). Awareness and pattern of needle stick injuries among health workers at university of Ilorin teaching hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria. African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology 7(3):183-187.


Młynarczyk A1, Młynarczyk G, Pupek J, Bilewska A, Kawecki D, Łuczak M, Gozdowska J, Durlik M, Paczek L, Chmura A, Rowińnski W (2007). Serratia marscens isolated in 2005 from clinical specimens from patients with diminished immunity. Transplantation Proceedings 39(9):2879-2882.


Moges F, Mengistu E, Yeshambel B, Walelegn W (2014). Isolation and characterization of multiple drug resistance bacterial pathogens from waste water in hospital and non-hospital environments, Northwest Ethiopia. BioMed Central Research Notes 7:215.


Murray PR, Baron EJ Jorgesen JH, Faller PM, Yolken RH (2003). Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th edition. Washington, D.C; ASM Press.


Nagoba BS, Deshmukh SR, Husain RA (1997). Bacteriological analysis of various environmental sources in a rural hospital. Indian Journal Medical Sciences 51:465-469.


Nworie A, Ayeni JA, Eze UA, Azi SO (2012). Bacterial contamination of door handles/knobs in selected public conveniences in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria: A public health threat. Continental Journal of Medical Research 6(1):7-11.


Olalekan AW, Asekun-Olarinmoye EO, Bamidele, JO, Abodunrin, OL, Olowu A (2011). A comparative study of awareness and attitude to nosocomial infections among levels of health care workers in Southwestern Nigeria. Continental Journal of Tropical Medicine 5(2):5-10.


Omoni VT, Makinde OA, Abutu SO (2015). Prevalence of multidrug resistant bacteria isolatedfrom biomedical waste generatedin Markudi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria. British Microbiology Research Journal 10(3): Article no. BMRJ.17384 



Onweremadu EU, Chukwuma MC, Ogbonna FC (2009). Spatial Variability of Mercury in Soils Affected by Automobile Wastes at Port-harcourt, Nigeria. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences 3(2):260-264.


Oyeleke SB, Istafanus N (2009). The microbiological effects of hospital wastes on the environment. Journal of Biotechnology 8(220):6253-6257.


Oyiasogie FE, Ajuzie CU, Ighodaro UG (2010). Bacterial analysis of soil from waste dumpsite. Archives of Applied Science Research 2(5):161-167.


Pal RB, Rodrigues M, Datta S (2010). Role of Pseudomonas in nosocomial infections and biological characterization of local strains. Journal of Bioscience Technology 1(4):170-179.


Perwaiz S, Barakzi Q, Farooqi BJ, Khursheed N, Sabir N (2007). Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 57: 2-7


Rajat R, Ninama G, Mistry K, Parmar R, Patel K, Vegad, M (2012). Antibiotic resistance pattern in Pseudomonas species isolated at a tertiary care hospital, Ahmadabad, National Journal of Medicine 2(2):156-159.


Rupp ME, Fitzgerald T, Puumala S, Anderson JR, Craig R (2008). Prospective, controlled, crossover trial of alcohol-based hand gel in critical care units. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology 29:8-15.


Rutala WA, Weber DJ (2014). Selection of the ideal disinfectant infect control Hospital Epidemiology 35:855-865.


Sridhar MK, Olajumoke B, Ayeni J (2003). Infection potential of wastes from selected healthcare facilities In Ibadan, Nigeria, in Martin J. Bunch, V. Madha Suresh and T. Vasantha Kumaran, eds., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Environment and Health, Chennai, India, 15-17 December, 2003. Chennai: Department of Geography, University of Madras and Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University pp. 512-519.


Srinivas B, Aruna SB, Nayak SK, Rao, BN (2015). A study of drug resistance of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in rural and urban tertiary care centers. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceuticals Sciences 4(06):1144-1155.


Toralo, P.K (2005) Foundation in Microbiology, Bacteriology. 5th edition, The McGraw Hill Companies, New York.


Thurston J, Cysewsk ST (1979). The pathogenic fungi and the pathogenic actinomycetis in J.W Rippon (editon), Medical Mycology pp. 697-699.


Udeze AO, Adeyemi AT, Adeniji FO, Nwanze JC, Onoh C, Okerentubga, P.O. Okonko I.O. (2012). Plasmid mediated ampicillin resistant bacteria isolates from University of Ilorin Health Centre. New York Science Journal 5(4):56-63.


Vichal R, Pooja R, Shalini B (2011). Bacteriological profile of bio-hospital waste: Management guidelines. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine 33(2):145-147.


Wendt C, Dietze B, Dietz E, Ruden H (1997). Survival of Acinetobacter baumanni on dry surfaces. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 35:1394-1397.


World Health Organization (2002). Antibiotic resistance. WHO Media center WHO/Geneva.

View Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH) retrieved on 23rd October 2016 at 03.20 GMT. October Issue (3)2014 pp. 1-16 at 01.30 GMT.


Yagoub SO, Amani EL Agbah (2010). Isolation of potential pathogenic bacteria from the air of hospital. Journal of Applied Science 10:1011- 1014.


Yismaw G, Abay S, Asrat D, Yifru S, Kassu A (2010). Bacteriological profiles and drug resistance pattern of clinical isolates from pediatric patients, Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Gondar Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Medical Journal 18:293-300.