Full Length Research Paper
References
Alberti RE, Emmons ML (2001).Your perfect right : assertiveness and quality in your life and relationships.8th ed. California: Impact. |
|
|
|
Bodzin AM, Mamlok R (2000). STS simulations engaging students with issues based scenarios. Sci. Teacher. 67(9):36-39. |
|
|
|
Dawson VM, Venville G (2010) Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Res. Sci. Educ. 40(2):133-148. |
|
|
|
Driver R, Newton P, Osborne J (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Sci. Educ. 84(3):287–312. |
|
|
|
Erduran S, Simon S, Osbourne J (2004) Tapping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Sci. Educ. 88(6):915–933. |
|
|
|
Hanegan NL, Price L, Peterson J (2008) Disconnections between teacher expectations and student confidence in bioethics. Sci. Educ. 17:921-940. |
|
|
|
Jim’enez-Aleixandre MP, Rodr’ıguez AB, Duschl RA (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": argument in high school genetics. Sci. Educ. 84(6):757–792. |
|
|
|
Kolsto SD (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension on controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. |
|
|
|
Kolsto SD (2006). Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 28(14):1689-1716. |
|
|
|
Newton P, Driver R, Osborne J (1999).The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 21(5):553-576. |
|
|
|
Nuangchalerm P (2009). Development of socioscientific issues-based teaching for preservice science teachers. J. Social Sci. 5(3):239-243. |
|
|
|
Nuangchalerm P (2010). Engaging students to perceive nature of science through socioscientific issues-based instruction. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 13(1):34-37. |
|
|
|
Nuangchalerm P (2012). Enhancing pedagogical content knowledge in preservice science teachers. Higher Educ. Stud. 2(2):66-71. |
|
|
|
Nuangchalerm P, Kwuanthong B (2010). Teaching "Global Warming" through socioscientific issues-based instruction. Asian Social Sci. 6(8):42-47. |
|
|
|
Osborne J, Erduran S, Simon S (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 41(10):994–1020. |
|
|
|
Palladino CD (1996). Developing self-esteem: A positive guide for personal success. United Stated of America: Bawden Printing company. |
|
|
|
Sadler TD (2002). Socioscientific issue research and its relevance for science education. Paper presented to science education graduate students at the university of South Florida. |
|
|
|
Sadler TD, Fowler SR (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Sci. Educ. 90(6):986-1004. |
|
|
|
Sadler TD, Zeidler DL (2003). Weighing in on genetic engineering and morality: students reveal their ideas expectations, and reservations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA. |
|
|
|
Sadler TD, Zeidler DL (2005).Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision-making. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42(1):112-138. |
|
|
|
Simon S, Erduran S, Osborne J (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 28(2-3):235-260. |
|
|
|
Toulmin, S.E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. |
|
|
|
Walker KA, Zeidler DL (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issue through scaffolded inquiry. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 29(11):1387-1410. |
|
|
|
Yore LD, Pimm D, Tuan HL (2007).The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 5(4):559-589. |
|
|
|
Zeidler DL, Walker KA, Ackett WA, Simmons ML (2002). Tangled up in views: beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Sci. Educ. 86(3):343-367. |
|
|
|
Zoller U (1999). Scaling-up of higher-order cognitive skills-oriented college chemistry teaching: An action-oriented research. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36(5):583-596. |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0