Baki A (2008). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Matematik Eğitimi. Harf Yayıncılık. Ankara

Breslich ER (1928). The Place of Mathematics in Education For social change pp.104-113.

View

Büyüköztürk Åž (2001). Deneysel desenler Pegem Yay. Öncü Basımevi. Ankara.
PubMed

Choike JR (2000). Teaching Stratejies for "Algebra for All".

View

Eisenberg T (1992). On the Development of a Sense for Functions. In: G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (eds.). The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy MAA Notes Washington DC: MAA. 25:153-174.

Even R (1998). Factors involved in Linking Representations of Functions. J. Math. Behav. 17(1):105-121. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/07323123/1998/00000017/00000001/art80063
Crossref

Harel G, Dubinsky E (1992). The nature of the process conception of function G. Harel Ed Dubinsky (Eds.). The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy Mathematical Association of America pp.85-106.

Hiebert J (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Hiebert J (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.). A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. pp.5-23.

Hiebert J, Carpenter TP (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In: D. A. Grouws (Ed.). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan pp.65-97.

Hiebert J, Wearne D (1996). Instruction understanding and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cogn. Instr. 14:251-283.
Crossref

Knuth E (2000). Student understanding of the Cartesian Connection: An exploratory study. J. Res. Math. Educ. 31(4):500-508. http://www.academia.edu/611068/Student_understanding_of_the_Cartesian_connection_An_exploratory_study
Crossref

Leinhardt G, Zaslavsky O, Stein MK (1990). Functions Graphs and Graphing: Tasks Learning and Teaching Review of Educational Research 60(1):1-64.

Monaghan J, Özmantar F (2007). Abstraction And Consolidation Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 3:353-360.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: Va NCTM.

Radford L (2001). Signs And Meanings In Students' Emergent Algebraic Thinking: A Semiotic Analysis.

View

Romberg TA, Fennema E, Carpenter TP (1993). Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Sfard A (1992). Operatioanal Origins Of Mathematical objects and the Quandary of Reification-The Case of Function Harel and Ed Dubinsky (Eds). The Concept of Function Aspects and Pedagogy. USA: Mathematical Association of America pp.59-85.

Slavit D, Yeidel J (1999). Using Web-based Materials in Large-scale Precalculus Instruction.Int. J. Computers Math. Learn. 4(1):27-50.http://www.springerlink.com/content/nm71642p8x001763/
Crossref

Schwarzenberger RLE (1980). Why calculus cannot be made easy. Mathematical Gazette 64(429):158-166
Crossref

Åžandır H, Ubuz B, Argün Z (2002). OrtaöÄŸretim 9. sınıf öÄŸrencilerinin mutlak deÄŸer kavramındaki öÄŸrenme hataları ve kavram yanılgıları V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik EÄŸitimi Kongresi (5th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress). ODTÜ Ankara.

Tall DO (1992). Current Difficulties in the Teaching of Mathematical Analysis at University: an essay review of Victor Bryant Yet another introduction to analysis Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik 92/2:37-42.

Tall DO (1997). Functions and Calculus. In: A. J. Bishop et al (Eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Education 289-325 Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Thuy NT, Rijkje D, Martin JG (2008). "Preparing Vietnamese student teachers for teaching with a student-centered approach" J. Math. Teacher Educ. 11:61-81 DOI 10.1007/s10857-007-9058-4
Crossref

Weber K (2008). How Mathematicians Determine if an Argument is a Valid Proof. J. Res. Math. Educ. 39(4):431-459.

Tuluk G, Kaçar A (2007). Fonksiyon kavramının öÄŸretiminde bilgisayar cebiri sistemlerinin etkisi Kastamonu EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi vol. 15 No: 1 Kastamonu.