Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2008

Full Length Research Paper

The use of personalized texts for teaching Turkish as a second language

Demet KardaÅŸ
  • Demet KardaÅŸ
  • Turkish Language Learning Research and Application Center, Gazi University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 26 October 2015
  •  Accepted: 02 February 2016
  •  Published: 23 March 2016

References

Bakır S (2014). Türkiye'deki Yabancılara Türkçe ÖÄŸretim Merkezleri ve Atatürk Üniversitesi Dil EÄŸitimi Uygulama ve AraÅŸtırma Merkezi (DÄ°LMER). Erzurum: Ankara Üniversitesi Türkiyat AraÅŸtırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi (TAED), 51:435-456. (Centers of Teaching Turkish to Foreigners in Turkey and Atatürk University DÄ°LMER).

 

Büyüköztürk Åž (2001). Deneysel Desen. (Experimental designs). Ankara: PegemA.

 

Çakır Ö (2008). The effect of personalized mathematical word problems usage on students' achievement in computer and classroom based environments. Ankara University Institute of Educational Sciences Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Program of Educational Technology. (Doctoral dissertation).

 

European common text for language (2009). 

 

Herndon JN (1988). Achievement and continuing motivation under differing levels of personalized instruction. Unpublished PHD, Arizona State University. Center for Positive Structures. 

 

Karasar N (2005). Bilimsel AraÅŸtırma Yöntemleri. (Scientific research method) (15. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel.

 

Keefe JW (2007). "What is personalization?". Phi Delta Kappa International. November, 213-223.
Crossref

 

Lopez CL (1989). Levels of personalization and the achievement and attitudes of Hispanic students (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University). Center for Positive Structures. 

 

Lopez CL, Sullivan HJ (1992). Effect of personalization of instructional context on the achievement and attitudes of Hispanic students. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 40(4):5-13.
Crossref

 

Öz MF (2001). Uygulamalı Türkçe ÖÄŸretimi. (Applied Turkish education). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

 

Özbay M (1997). Türkçe Özel ÖÄŸretim Yöntemleri I. (Turkish special teaching methods). Ankara: Öncü Kitap.

 

Özbay M (2006). Türkçe Özel ÖÄŸretim Yöntemleri II. (Turkish special teaching methods). Ankara: Öncü Kitap.

 

Sampson D, Karagiannidis C, Kinshuk (2002). Personalised Learning: Educational, Technological and Standardisation Perspective. Interact. Educ. Multimedia 4:24-39.

 

Sezer B (2015). Impact of personalized mathematic problems over academic success, teaching technologies, Theory Pract. 5(2):73-88.

 

Ross SM, McCormick D, Krisak N (1985). Adapting the thematic context of mathematical problems to students' interests: ındividual versus group-based strategies. J. Educ. Res. 79(1):245-252.

 

Şahin M, Kışla T (2013). Personalized Learning Environments: Literature Review, J. Res. Educ. Teach. 2(1):81-91.

 

Temizkan M (2012). Text-based grammar teaching and practice. Teaching grammar from the perspective of Turkish education, (Ed. Özbay, M.) Ankara: Pegem Akademi.