Akar E (2005). Effectiveness of 5E learning cycle model on students' understanding of acid-base concepts. (Graduate), ODTU, Ankara.

Akdeniz AR, Keser ÖF (2003). Planning and evaluation of teaching activities in integrative learning environments. Paper presented at the XII.Educational Science Congress, Ankara.

Altun Yalcın S (2003). A Laboratory Activity Based on Constructivist Learning Approach: Teaching of Determination of Autoprotolysis Equilibrium Constant to Undergraduate Students. Gazi University J. Gazi Educ. Faculty 24(1):125-134.

Aydogmus E (2008). The effects of 5E model on success of the students during the instruction of work-energy chapter at physics course of tenth grade (Graduate), Selçuk University, Konya.

Balcı S, Cakiroglu J, Tekkaya C (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34(3):199-203.
Crossref

Baser ET (2008). The influence of teaching activities appropriate for 5E model on 7th grade students? academic achievement in mathematics lesson. (Graduate), Gazi University, Ankara.

Baskan Z, Alev N, Atasoy S (2007). Science Education candidate Teachers' Opinions about 5E Model's Applications. J. Educ. Faculty of Yeditepe University 2(2).

Boddy N, Watson K, Aubusson P (2003). A trial of the five Es: A referent model for constructivist teaching and learnıng. Res. Sci. Educ. 33:27-42.
Crossref

Bozdogan AE, Altuncekic A (2007). The opinions of science education candidate teachers related with utilisation of 5E teaching model. Kastamonu Educ. J. 15(2):579-590.

Brooks MG, Brooks JG (1999). The Courage to be Constructivist. Educ. Leadersh. 57(3):18-24.

Burhberger F (2000). Active Learning in Powerful Learning Enviroment.

Carin A, Bass J (2005). Teaching science as inquiry. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Cepni S (2010). Introduction to research and project work (Vol. 5. Baskı). Trabzon: Celepler

Dalkiran G, Kesercioglu T (2005, 28-30 September 2005). Concept maps and Conceptual Change Text Effects on Science Students' attitude to Science Education course and Student Opinions. Paper presented at the XIV. National Education Congress, Denizli.

Er Nas S, Cepni S, Coruhlu T (2010). An assessment on the effectiveness of the material developed for the elaborate stage of The 5E Model. Ondokuz Mayis University J. Faculty of Educ. 29(1):17-36.

Er Nas S, Cepni S, Yildirim N, Senel T (2007). Work sheets effect on student success: Acid Base Case. Journal of Education Faculty of Yeditepe University 2:1-17.

Ergin Ä°, Kanli U, Tan M (2006). Evaluation of the 5E Model Effects on Academic Achievement of Students in Physical Education. Paper presented at the VII. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Gazi University, Ankara.

Gurses E (2006). Application and investigating the effects of the materials in static electric that are based upon constructivist learning theory and 5E-model. . (Graduate), K.T.U., Trabzon.

Hand B, Treagust DF (1991). Student achievement and science curriculum development using a constructive framework. School Sci. Math. 91(4):172-176.
Crossref

Keser OF (2003). Designing and implementing a constructivist learning environment for physics education. (PhD.), K.T.U., Trabzon.

Kilavuz Y (2005). The Effects of 5E Learning Cycle Model Based on Constructivist Theory on Tenth Grade Students Understanding of Acid –Base Concepts. (Graduate), Middle East Technical Unıversıty, Ankara.

Kocakulah A, Kocakulah MS (2007). Undergraduates' attitudes towards constructivist learning theory based physics course. . Paper presented at the VII. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Anakara.

Kucukozer H (2004). The influence of teaching method which was designed according to constructivist learning theory for first year high school students' on simple electric circuits. (PhD.), Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.

Lewis D (2001). Objectivism vs. Constructivism: The Origins of This Debate and the Implications for Instructional Designers. 

Limon M (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5):357-380. doi:Doi 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
Crossref

Lord TR (1999). A Comparison Between Traditional and a Constructivist Teaching in Enviromental Science. J. Environ. Educ. 30(3):22-28.
Crossref

MMS (2002). Web Site of Miami Museum of Science, Constructivism and Five E's. Retrieved from www.Miamisci.org.ph/Ipintro5e.html

Newby E (2004). Using Inquiry to Connect Young Learners to Science. 

Orgill M, Thomas M (2007). Analogies and the 5E Model. . Sci. Theacher 7(1):40-45.

Osborne R, Wittrock MC (1983). Learning Science a Generative Procers. Science Education, 67(4):489-508.
Crossref

Ozerbas MA (2008). 5E Modeline Uygun ÖÄŸretim Etkinliklerinin 7. Sınıf Örgencilerinin Matematik Dersindeki Akademik BaÅŸarılarına Etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Ozmen H, Yildirim N (2004). Learning theories in science education and technology based constructivist learning in Science Teaching. Turk. Online J. Educ. 3(1):100-111.

Ozmen H, Yildirim N (2005). Effect of Work Sheets on Student's Success: Acids and Bases Sample. Turk. Sci. Educ. J. 2:124-142.

Ozsevgec T (2007). Determining effectiveness of guided materials about force and motion unit based on the 5E model for elementary students. (PhD.), K.T.U, Trabzon.

Ozsevgec T, Cepni S, Ozsevgec L (2006, 7-9 September). The Effectiveness of 5E Model for fixing the misconceptions: Force-Motion Case. Paper presented at the VII. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Ankara.

Powell A, Farrar E, Cohen D (1986). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Saglam M (2006). An investigation of guide material development and its affectiveness according to 5e model for the sound and light unit. (PhD.), K.T.U., Trabzon.

Saka A (2006). The effect of 5E model on removing svience student teachers' misconceptions about genetics. (PhD.), K.T.U., Trabzon.

Sensoy O, Yildirim HI, Aydogdu M (2006). The Impact of Constructivist Approach in Science Education on Science Teachers Success, Problem Solving Skills and Self Efficacy Level. Paper presented at the VII. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Ankara.

Seyhan HG, Morgil Ä° (2007). The effect of 5E learning model on teaching of acidbase topic in chemistry education. J. Sci. Educ. 8(2):120-123.

Sezen G, Birinci Konur K, Cimer A (2009). Evaluation of application of science and technology applications based on 5E teaching model in terms of candidate teachers. Paper presented at the The First International Congress of Educational Research" Trends and Issues of Educational Research, Canakkale.

Sifoglu N (2007). The Effects of constructivism and problem-based learning on students' success in the teaching the topic heritage' at the 8th grade. (Graduate), Gazi Üniversitesi, Anakara.

Smerdon BA, Burkam DT, Lee VE (1999). Access to Constructivist and Didactic Teaching: Who Gets it? Where is it practiced? Teachers College Record 101(1):5-34.
Crossref

Turker H (2009). An investigation of the effect of 5e learning cycle model on meaningfull learning in the force concept. (Graduate), Nigde University, Nigde.

Wilder M, Shuttleworth P (2004). Cell inquiry: A 5E learning cycle lesson. Sci. Activities 41(1):25-31.
Crossref

Yildiz E (2008). The effects of metacognition during the instruction based on conceptual change used with 5E model: An application regarding the force and motion subject in the 7th grade. (PhD.), Dokuz Eylul UNiversity, Ä°zmir.