Açıkgöz KÜ (2009). Active Learning Ä°zmir: BiliÅŸ Publishing House.

AkbuÄŸa S (2009). The effects of the Structured Group Activities according to Cooperative Learning Principles in Primary School 4th Class Mathematics Lessons on Student Gains and Attitudes. Ä°zmir: Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Educational Sciences, Approved Master Thesis.

Akman Ö, KoçoÄŸlu E (2016). Investigation 8th Grade Students Secondary School Cognitive Structure about Principles of Ataturk through Word Association Test. Journal of Education and Training Studies 4(11):151-162.
Crossref

Altun M (2006). Developments In Mathematics Teaching. UludaÄŸ University Journal of Faculty of Education 223-238.

Altun M (2013). Teaching Mathematics in Secondary School.Bursa: Aktüel Publishing House.

Andersen T (2009). Using Cooperative Learning In A Sixth Grade Math Classroom. University of Nebraska - Lincoln: Math in the Middle Institute Partnership Action Research Project Report.

Aptik A (1985). Method in Mathematics Teaching. Mathematics Teaching and Problems in Secondary Education Institutions(s. 175-186). Ankara: TürkEÄŸitimDerneÄŸiPublishing House.

Araz SG (2004). The Effect of In Teaching the Decimal Representation of Fractions Subject in the Classroom The Effect of cooperative Learning Method on Student Success Compared to the Traditional Method. Ä°zmir: DokuzEylül University / Institute of Educational Sciences / Department of Primary Education.

Arısoy B (2011). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Method STAD and TPT Techniques on Academic Achievement, Persistency and Social Skills Levels on 6th Grade Students' Mathematics Course on Statistics and Probability. Adana: Çukurova University /Institute of Social Sciences / Department of Primary Education.

Aşıcı F (2014).The Effect of Teaching Elementary 6th Grade Mathematics Lessons by Using Excel Academic Achievements and Attitudes of Students. Ankara: Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences.

Atay DY (2003). The Changing Face of Teacher Education. Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution.

BaÅŸkan T (1985). Contemporary Approaches In The Teaching of Mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Problems in Secondary Education Institutions (s. 99-127). Ankara: TürkEÄŸitimDerneÄŸi Publications.

Baykul Y (1990). Changes in attitudes towards mathematics and science courses From Primary School Fifth Grade to the Last Class of High School and Equivalent Schools and Some Factors Considered to Be Related With Success in Student Selection Examination. Ankara: ÖSYM Publications.

Bernero J (2000). Motivating Students in Math Using Cooperative Learning. Chicago, Illinois: Master of Arts Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University and Skylight Professional Development.

Bilgin T (2004). Use of Student Teams Achievement Divisions Technique in Primary Education Seventh Grade Math Lessons (On the subject of polygons) and Application Results. UludaÄŸ University Faculty of Education Journal pp. 19-28.

Borich GD (2014). Effective Teaching Methods Research Based Application. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.

Bosfield GF (2004). A Comparison of Traditional Mathematical Learning and Cooperative Mathematical Learning. Los Angeles: Faculty of California State University.

Bozkurt Y (1999). The Effect of Different Measurement Techniques Used at the End of Cooperative Learning in Primary School 4th Grade Math Lessons. Ankara: Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Approved Master Thesis.

Bruning RH, Schraw GJ, Norby MM (2014).Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. (D. Çölkesen, Çev.) Ankara: Nobel Academic Consultancy.

Brush T (1997). The Effects Of Student Achievement And Attitudes When Using Integrated Learning Systems With Cooperative Pairs. Educational Technology Research and Development pp. 51-64.
Crossref

Büyüköztürk Åž (2014). Experimental Designs. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing House.

ÇaÄŸlar A (2010). The Changing Role of School in the 21th Century and Some Optimistic Predictions on New Trends. The Education and Turkish Education System in 21st Century. Inside Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing House. pp. 57-68.

Can A (2014). Quantitative Data Analysis in Scientific Research Process with SPSS. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing House.

Can A (2016). Quantitative Data Analysis in Scientific Research Process with SPSS.Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing House.

Çapar G, Tarım K (2015). Efficacy of the Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude: A Meta-Analysis Research. Educational Sciences: Theory ve Practice pp. 553-559.

Carlan VG, Rubin R, Morgan BM (2005). Cooperative Learning, Mathematical Problem Solving, and Latinos.Brownsville: CveI Department, School of Education.

Charles CM (2003). Piaget Principles for Teachers. Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution.

ÇırakoÄŸlu C (2009). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Method and Traditional Teaching Approach on the Academic Achievements of 6th

Conring JM (2009). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Mathematic Achievement in Second Graders. Minneapolis, Washington: Walden University College of Education.

Coşkun M (2013). The Effect of Narration Method on Attitude and Success in Teaching Mathematics Concepts. Kırşehir: AhiEvran University Institute of Social Sciences.

CüceloÄŸlu D, ErdoÄŸan Ä° (2015). ÖÄŸretmenOlmakBirCan'aDokunmak. (Being a Teacher, Touching a Life) Ä°stanbul: Final Kültür Sanat Publishing House.

Çüçen K, Ertürk E (2008). The Place of Logic and Mathematics Knowledge in Abstract Thinking UludaÄŸ University Journal of Philosophy pp. 247-268.

Deane JA (2001). The Influence of Cooperative Learning on Students' Understanding of Mathematics and Literacy Content. Boston: Boston College The Graduate School of Education Department of Teacher Education, Special Education, and Curriculum and Instruction Program of Curriculum and Instruction.

Dewey J (2010). School and Society. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing House.

Dirlikli M (2015). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Methods on Academic Achievement and Retention in Analytical Examination of the Circle and its Reflections in the Class. Erzurum: Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Approved Doctorate Thesis.

Efe M (2011). Cooperative Learning Method, Student Teams Success Sections and Clustered Assisted Individualization Techniques Mathematics Course "Achievements in Statistics and Probability" Unit, Effects on Attitudes and Motivations. Hatay: Mustafa Kemal University Social Sciences Institute.

Efe R, Hevedanlı M, Ketani Åž, Çakmak Ö, Efe HA (2008). Cooperative learning theory and Practice. Ankara: Eflatun Publishing House.

Egüz Åž, Öztürk C, Kesten A (2018). "A Global Education Application in Turkey A Product Marketing Activity," Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(4):638-646.
Crossref

Erçelebi E (1995). The Effects of Traditional Teaching Methods and Cooperative Learning Method on Mathematics Teaching. Ä°zmir: DokuzEylül University /Institute of Social Sciences.

Erden M (1988). Teaching Techniques Based on Collaboration Among Students. Education and science pp. 57-60.

Eurydice (2011). Mathematics Education in Europe: Basic Challenges and National Policies. Ankara: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.

Gelici Ö, Bilgin Ä° (2011). Introduction of Cooperative Learning Techniques and Examination of Student Views. Adıyaman University Journal of Science pp. 40-70.

Gülsar A (2014). The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Mathematics Success and Student Opinions Regarding This Method. Bursa: Uludag University Educational Sciences Institute, Approved Master's Thesis.

Harding FR, Fletcher RK (1994). Effectiveness of Variations in Cooperative Cooperative Learning in RDS Mathematics Classes. Nashville: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Tennessee Academy of Science.

Işık C, Albayrak M, İpek SA (2005). Self Realization in Mathematics Teaching. Kastamonu Education Journal pp. 129-138.

Johnson DW, Johnson RT (2009). An Overview Of Cooperative Learning. 

Johnson DW, Maruyama G, Johnson R, Deborah N, Skon L (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin pp. 47-62.
Crossref

Johnson RT, Johnson DW, Tauer M (1979). The Effects of Cooperative, Competıtıve, and Individualistic Goal Structures on Students' Attitudes and Achievement. The Journal of Psychology pp. 191-198.
Crossref

Johnson SL (2013). The impact of cooperative and traditional learning on the academic achievement of third grade students in selected rural school districts in northeast, South Carolina. Orangeburg, South Carolina: Faculty of South Carolina State University.

Kabuk Ö (2014). A Review on The Effect of Cooperative Learning Techniques on Students' Mathematical Achievement Burdur: Mehmet AkifErsoy University Institute of Educational Sciences, Approved Master's Thesis.

Karaçay T (1985). Current Status and Evaluation of Mathematics Teaching.Teaching Mathematics in Secondary Education Institutions and its Problems. Ankara: TürkEÄŸitimDerneÄŸiPublishing House pp. 1-26.

Karagöz DI (2007). The Effect of Multiple Intelligence Theory Supported Cooperative Learning Method on the Academic Achievements and Persistency in Mathematics Course of Elementary Education Fourth Grade Students. Adana: Cukurova University/Social Sciences Institute / Department of Primary Education.

Koç B (2015). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Method on Gain, Persistency and Social Skills in Mathematics Lesson. Aydın: Adnan Menderes University Social Sciences Institute, Approved Master's Thesis.

KoçoÄŸlu E (2015). Social Studies Teachers Perspective of Religion Education in Turkey.International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 7(3):192-206.
Crossref

KoçoÄŸlu E (2017). Perceptions of teacher candidates about social network usage levels in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews12(4):230-238.
Crossref

KoÄŸ OU, BaÅŸer N (2012). The Role of Visualization Approach in Attitude towards Mathematics and Success Elementary Education Online pp. 945-957.

Kramarski B, Mevarech ZR (2003). Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training. American Educational Research Journal pp. 281-310.
Crossref

Kuloğlu S (2005). The Effect of Multiple Intelligence Theory on Student Success in Mathematics Teaching in Elementary Education Eighth Grade. Balıkesir: Balıkesir University Science Institute.

Macit E (2013). Teacher Opinions on the Use of Cooperative Learning Method in Elementary Education Second Level Mathematics Lessons. Malatya: Ä°nönüUniversity Institute of Educational Sciences.

Marangoz Ä° (2010). The Effect of the Cooperative Learning Method on Student Success and Attitudes Elementary 6th Grade Mathematics Course Geometry Learning Area. Ankara: Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Approved Master's Thesis.

McLaren P (2011). Life in Schools, Introduction to Critical Pedagogy.(M. Y. Eryaman, and H. Arslan, Trans.) Ankara: Anı Publishing House.

Mısır ZE, Çalışkan N (2007). Conditions to be Considered in Constructivist Learning. Ankara: KökPublishing House.

Özdemirli G (2011). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Method on Students' Math Achievement and Their Attitude towards Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis Study. Adana: Çukurova University / Institute of Social Sciences / Primary Education Department.

ÖzdoÄŸan E (2008). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Method on Student Attitude and Success in Primary School 4th Grade Mathematics Teaching: Computer Assisted Cooperative Learning And Cluster Assisted Individualization Technique. Ä°zmir: Ege Social Sciences Institute, Approved Master's Thesis.

Özsarı T (2009). Effect of Cooperative Learning on Mathematical Achievement of Elementary 4th Grade Students: Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Student Teams- Achievement Divisions (STAD). Ä°zmir: Ege University Institute of Social Sciences, Approved Master's Thesis.

Panitz T (1999). The Motivational Benefits of Cooperative Learning.New Directions For Teaching And Learning pp. 59-67.
Crossref

Panitz T (2010). Cooperative Learning Structures Help College Students Reduce Math Anxiety and Succeed in Developmental Courses. Cooperative Learning inHigher Education (s. 57-68). in Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Pesen A, Bakır B (2016). The Effect of Collaborative Learning Approach on 6th Grade Students' Achievements in Mathematics Course. Adana: 3rd International Congress on Curriculum and Education.

Philips DC, Soltis FJ (2004). Learning: Perspectives. Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution.

PosluoÄŸlu ZY (2002). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Approach on Gaining Problem Solving Skills in Primary Mathematics Course. Ankara: Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Approved Master's Thesis.

Roseth CJ, Johnson DW, Johnson RT (2008). Promoting Early Adolescents' Achievement and Peer Relationships: The Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures. Psychological Bulletin pp. 223-246.
Crossref

Schunk D (2014). Learning Theories.Ankara: Nobel Publishing House.

SenemoÄŸlu N (2012). From Development, Learning and Teaching - Theory to Application.Ankara: Pegem A Academy.

Åžengül S, Ekinözü Ä° (2004). The Effect of Animation Method in Mathematics Class on Perceived Benefits of Mathematics and Student Attitude. Malatya: XIII. National Educational Sciences Congress Ä°nönü University Faculty of Education.

Slavin RE (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research pp. 315-342.
Crossref

Slavin RE (1981). Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning.Research Information Service pp. 655-660.

Sofeme JR (2012). Impact of Cooperative Learning Approach on Senior Secondary School Students Performance in Mathematics. Ife Psychologia pp. 107-112.

Tarım K (2003). Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Method in Mathematics Teaching and A Meta-Analysis Study on the Cooperative Learning Method. Adana: Çukurova University / ScienceInstitute / Department of Mathematics.

Titsankaew P (2015). The Effects of using Cooperative Learning on Student's Achievement and Attitude toward Mathematics. Mathematics Education Program, International College.

Torchia SP (2012). Cooperative learning and its effect on fourth-grade mathematics students' achievement, motivation, and self-efficacy. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Capella University.

Torun Ö (2009). The Effect of Multiple Intelligence Assisted Cooperative Learning Method on the Achievement and Persistency of Elementary 7th Grade Students in Mathematics Course 'Geometric Objects' subject. Ankara: Gazi University/Institute Of Education Sciences/ Department Of Elementary Education/Elementary Mathematics Education Department/ Elementary Mathematics Teaching Department.

TuÄŸran Z (2015). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Mathematics Self-Efficacy Perception and Success of High School Students. Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Educational Sciences.

Tunç M (2016). Effect of Cooperative Learning on Learning Styles. Rize: Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Institute of Social Sciences.