Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2009

Full Length Research Paper

Development of mathematics mobile learning application: Examining learning outcomes and cognitive skills through math questions

Mustafa Tuncay Saritas
  • Mustafa Tuncay Saritas
  • Department of Computer Education & Instructional Technology, Faculty of Education, Balikesir University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 27 August 2022
  •  Published: 30 September 2022

References

Alden J (2013). Accommodating Mobile Learning in College Programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 17(1):109-122.
Crossref

 

Amir MF, Hasanah FN, Musthofa H (2018). Interactive Multimedia Based Mathematics Problem Solving to Develop Students' Reasoning. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 7(2.14):272-276.
Crossref

 
 
 

Amir MF, Ariyanti N, Anwar N, Valentino E, Afifah DSN (2020). Augmented Reality Mobile Learning System: Study to Improve PSTs' Understanding of Mathematical Development. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 14(9):239-247.
Crossref

 

Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

View

 

Anderson T, Shattuck J (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher 41(1):16-25.
Crossref

 

Baya'a NF, Daher WM (2009). Learning mathematics in an authentic mobile environment: The perceptions of students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 3(1):6-14.
Crossref

 

Bray A, Tangney B (2016). Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on realistic mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal 28(1):173-197.?
Crossref

 

Cornelius-White J (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 77:113-143.
Crossref

 

Crompton H, Burke D (2017). Research trends in the use of mobile learning in mathematics. Blended learning: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications 2090-2104.
Crossref

 

Cumming TM, Strnadova I, Singh S (2014). iPads as instructional tools to enhance learning opportunities for students with developmental disabilities: An action research project. Action Research 12(2):151-176.
Crossref

 

Davies BS, Ra"que J, Vincent TR, Fairclough J, Packer MH, Vincent R, Haq I (2012). Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd) - how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students - a mixed methods study. BMC Medical Education 12(1).
Crossref

 

Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher 32(1):5-8.
Crossref

 

Fabian K, Topping KJ, Barron IG (2016). Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students' attitudes, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education 3(1):77-104.
Crossref

 

Gan CL, Balakrishnan V (2017). Enhancing classroom interaction via {IMMAP} - an interactive mobile messaging app. Telematics and Informatics 34(1):230-243.
Crossref

 

Geiser S, Santelices MV (2007). Validity of high-school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: High-school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes. Research & Occasional Paper Series. Centre for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.

View

 

Gikas J, Grant MM (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones and social media. The Internet and Higher Education 19:18-26.
Crossref

 

Guskey TR (2010). Formative Assessment: The Contributions of Benjamin S. Bloom. In Andrade HL, Cizek GJ (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment. Taylor & Francis, New York, NY. Pp. 106-124.

 

Gundogdu K, Kiziltas E, Cimen N (2010). Seviye belirleme sinavina (sbs) iliskin ogrenci ve ogretmen gorusleri (Erzurum il ornegi), Elementary Education Online 9(1):316-330.

 

Haßler B, Major L, Hennessy S (2016). Tablet use in schools: a critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 32(2):139-156.
Crossref

 

Hattie J (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

 

Hattie J, Timperley H (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77(1):81-112.
Crossref

 

Hegedus SJ, Dalton S, Tapper JR (2015). The impact of technology-enhanced curriculum on learning advanced algebra in US high school classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development 63:203-228.
Crossref

 

Huang YM, Hwang WY, Chang KE (2010). Guest Editorial - Innovations in Designing Mobile Learning Applications. Educational Technology and Society 13(3):1-2.

 

Jeng YL, Wu TT, Huang YM, Tan Q, Yang SJH (2010). The Add-On Impact of Mobile Applications in Learning Strategies: A Review Study. Educational Technology and Society 13(3):3-11.

 

Kalloo V, Mohan P (2012). Correlating Questionnaire Data with Actual Usage Data in a Mobile Learning Study for High School Mathematics. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 10(1):76-89.

 

Kearney M, Maher D (2013). Mobile learning in math teacher education: Using iPads to support pre-service teachers' professional development. Australian Educational Computing 27(3):76-84.

 

Klem AM, Connell JP (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health 74:262-273.
Crossref

 

Melhuish K, Falloon G (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad. Computers in New Zealand Schools: Learning, Leading, Technology 22(3):1-16.

 

Milli Egitim Bakanligi (2018). Ortaogretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. siniflar) ogretim programi. Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanligi.

View

 

Montrieux H, Schellens T, Van Landeghem J, Mouton T (2016). Introducing tablet devices during mathematics education: "is it really a magical learning tool?" PONTE: Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Research 72(7):393-410.

 

Murphy D (2016). A literature review: The effect of implementing technology in a high school mathematics classroom. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES) 2(2):295-299.
Crossref

 

National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

View

 

Nedungadi P, Raman R (2012). A new approach to personalization: integrating e-learning and m-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 60:659-678.?
Crossref

 

Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D (2006). Formative assessment and self?regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31(2):199-218.
Crossref

 

Reeves TC (2006). Design research from the technology perspective. In Akker JV, Gravemeijer K, McKenney S, Nieveen N (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 86-109). London: Routledge.

 

Roorda DL, Koomen HMY, Spilt JL, Oort FJ (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research 81(4):493-529.
Crossref

 

Ryan AM, Patrick H (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents' motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal 38(2):437-460.
Crossref

 

Sabah NM (2016). Exploring students' awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior 65:522-533.
Crossref

 

Traxler J (2009). Learning in a Mobile Age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1(1):1-12.
Crossref

 

Wadlington E, Wadlington PL (2008). Helping students with mathematical disabilities to succeed. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 51(1):2-7.
Crossref

 

Wang X (2013). Why students choose STEM majors motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal 50(5):1081-1121.
Crossref

 

Yu R, Singh K (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research 111(1):81-94.
Crossref

 

Zoraini WA, Chng LP, Norziati M (2009). A Study on Learner Readiness For Mobile Learning At Open University Malaysia. Sanchez IA, Isaias P (Eds.), IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning (pp. 151-157). New York: Curran Associates, incorporated.

View