Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2009

Full Length Research Paper

Effects of the types of error, proficiency level of the learners and nature of the recasts on the uptake of learners

Dogan Yuksel
  • Dogan Yuksel
  • English Language Teaching Department, Faculty of Education, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Campus, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Banu Inan-Karagul
  • Banu Inan-Karagul
  • Turkish Language Teaching Department, Faculty of Education, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Campus, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Dilek Fidan
  • Dilek Fidan
  • Turkish Language Teaching Department, Faculty of Education, Kocaeli University, Umuttepe Campus, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 03 September 2017
  •  Accepted: 22 September 2017
  •  Published: 23 October 2017

References

Apaydın D (2007). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öÄŸretiminde sözcük öÄŸretimi üzerine bir yöntem denemesi. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences.

 

Barin E (1992). Yabancılara Türkçe öÄŸretiminde bir metod denemesi. Unpublished M.A Thesis. Ankara: Gazi University Institute of Social Sciences.

 
 

Carroll S, Swain M (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition 15:357-386.
Crossref

 
 

Dilek I (1995). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öÄŸretiminde özgün metinlerle çalışma yolları. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Istanbul: Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences.

 
 

Dilidüzgün Åž (1995). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öÄŸretiminde yazınsal metinler. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Istanbul: Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences.

 
 

Doughty C (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Table -Strategic Interaction and Language Acquisition: Theory, Practice and Research, Washington D.C.

 
 

Doughty C, Varela E (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C., and Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. NY: Cambridge University Press. pp.114-138

 
 

Eker DN (2010). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öÄŸretiminde öÄŸrenen özerkliÄŸi. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences.

 
 

Ellis R, Basturkmen H, Loewen S (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Lang. Learn. 51:281-318.
Crossref

 
 

Ellis R (2006). Researching the effects of form-focussed instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA Review 19:18-41.

 
 

Ellis R, Loewen S, Erlam R (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 28:339-368.
Crossref

 
 

Fidan D (2015). Learners' preferences of oral corrective feedback: An example of Turkish as a foreign language learners. Educ. Res. Rev. 10(9):1311-1317.
Crossref

 
 

Inan B, Fidan D (2012). Oral corrective feedback patterns in Turkish as a foreign language classes. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 70:1070-1077.
Crossref

 
 

Iwasaki J, Oliver R (2003). Chat-line interaction and negative feedback. Aust. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 17:60-73.

 
 

Krashen S (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

 
 

Kucukler N (2010). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öÄŸretimine yönelik, sanatsal uyaranlarla yapılandırılmış etkinlikler üzerine bir model önerisi. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Ankara: Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences.

 
 

Li S (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Lang. Learning, 60(2):309-365.
Crossref

 
 

Loewen S, Erlam R (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Comput. Assisted Lang. Learn. 19:1-14.
Crossref

 
 

Long M (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. B., and Kramsch, C. (eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 39-52.
Crossref

 
 

Long M (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C., and Bahtia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press. pp. 413-468.
Crossref

 
 

Lyster R (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 26:399-432.
Crossref

 
 

Lyster R, Ranta L (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Stud. Second Lang. Acquisition, 19:37-66.
Crossref

 
 

Nabei T, Swain M (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Lang. Awareness 11:43-63.
Crossref

 
 

Ozdemir S (2010). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçenin öÄŸretiminde halk hikâyelerinden yararlanma. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Izmir: Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Educational Sciences.

 
 

Panova I, Lyster R (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quart. 36:573-595.
Crossref

 
 

Philp (2003). Constraints on "noticing the gap": Non-native speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 25:99-126.

 
 

Sheen Y (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Lang. Teach. Res. 10:361-392.
Crossref

 
 

Schmidt R (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Appl. Linguist. 11:129-158.
Crossref

 
 

Schmidt R (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-32
Crossref

 
 

Schwartz B (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Stud. Second Lang. Acquis. 15:147-163.
Crossref

 
 

Sheen Y (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Lang. Teach. Res. 8:263-300.
Crossref

 
 

Sheen Y (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quart. 41:255-283.
Crossref

 
 

Sheen Y (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. NY: Springer.
Crossref

 
 

Top F, Fidan D, Gunay VD (2015). Yabanci dil olarak Turkce oÄŸretiminde yaratici yazma etkinliklerinin kullanilmasi. Int. J. Lang. Acad. 3(3):23-36.
Crossref

 
 

Truscott J (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. System 16:255-272.
Crossref

 
 

White L (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Lang. Res. 7(2):133-161.
Crossref

 
 

Yayli D (2004). Göreve dayalı öÄŸrenme yönteminin Türkçe'nin yabancı dil olarak öÄŸretiminde uygulanması ve bu uygulamaya iliÅŸkin öÄŸrenci görüÅŸleri. Izmir: Dokuz Eylul University, Institute of Social Sciences.

 
 

Yilmaz Y, Yuksel D (2011). Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Lang. Teach. Res. 15(4):457-477.
Crossref

 
 

Yuksel D (2007). Nature of literature discussions in an advanced-level foreign language literature course in a Turkish EFL setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

 
 

Zengin R (1995). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öÄŸretiminde alıştırmalar. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Istanbul: Istanbul University, Institute of Social Sciences.