Educational Research and Reviews

  • Abbreviation: Educ. Res. Rev.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1990-3839
  • DOI: 10.5897/ERR
  • Start Year: 2006
  • Published Articles: 2008

Full Length Research Paper

Evaluation of attainments in 2018 Life Sciences curriculum based on the views of primary school teachers

Selçuk Şimşek
  • Selçuk ÅžimÅŸek
  • Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar
Ali Rıza Erdem
  • Ali Rıza Erdem
  • Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 26 May 2020
  •  Accepted: 25 June 2020
  •  Published: 30 June 2020

References

Aktay S, Çetin HS (2019). 2015 2017 and 2018 Life Sciences Course Teaching Programs EskiÅŸehir Osmangazi University. Journal of Social Sciences 20:577-600.

 

Alak G (2011). Assessment of Elements Relating the Instructional Program of Social Studies as a School Subject Based on the Views of Teachers Unpublished Master Thesis Fırat University Social Sciences Institute Elâzığ.

 
 

Alak G, Nalçacı A (2012). Assessment of elements relating the instructional program of social studies as a school subject based on the views of teachers. Buca Faculty of Education Journal 33:36-51.

 
 

Altun T, Güler T (2020). Investigation of Classroom Teachers' Views on the Renewed Life Science Program YYU. Journal of Education Faculty 17(1):54-78.

 
 

Avcı KE, Kayabaşı KZE (2018). Content Analysis of the Values in the Purposes of Life Science Education Curricula (1936- 2018). Journal of Values Education 16(35):27-56.

 
 

Aykaç N (2011). Evaluation of the methods and techniques used in knowledge of life course teaching program according to teacher opinions (Sinop case study). Kastamonu Education Journal 19(1):113-126.

 
 

Christensen LB, Johnson RB, Turner LA (2015). Research methods design and analysis Translation Editor: Ahmet Aypay Ankara: Anı Publishing.

 
 

Çakır G (2007). Determining the level of realization of learning attainments which takes place in the new Life Sciences program in the given activity borders. Unpublished Master Thesis Fırat University Social Sciences Institute Elâzığ.

 
 

Çelik Ö (2017). Evaluation of 2009 curriculum of Life Sciences course according to teachers' opinions Unpublished Master Thesis Ä°nönü University Education Sciences Institute Malatya.

 
 

Esemen A, SadioÄŸlu Ö (2018). National values in Life Sciences curriculum reconstruction in 2018. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences 3(1):14-27.
Crossref

 
 

Güldalı UÅž (2017). Comprasion of 2009 and 2017 Life Science Course Curricula. Journal of Turkish Academic 1(1):76-98.

 
 

Karaman P (2019). Evaluation of the Elements in the Life Science Curriculum as per Teachers' Views Igdır University. Journal Social Sciences 17:347-367.

 
 

Karasar N (2009). Scientific research methods (20Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

 
 

Karakaya I (2009). Scientific research methods TanrıöÄŸen A (Edt) Within scientific research methods (57-83). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

 
 

Ministry of Education (2004). Social studies curriculum it was taken from the internet address of mebgovtr.

 
 

Ministry of Education (2009). Social studies curriculum it was taken from the internet address of mebgovtr.

 
 

Ministry of Education (2015). Social studies curriculum it was taken from the internet address of mebgovtr.

 
 

Ministry of Education (2017). Social studies curriculum it was taken from the internet address of mebgovtr.

 
 

Ministry of Education (2018). Social studies curriculum it was taken from the internet address of mebgovtr.

 
 

Özgüç C (2019). Elementary school 2nd grade Life Science course teaching program's evaluation according to views of teachers. Unpublished Master Thesis Yıldız Teknik University Social Sciences Institute Ä°stanbul.

 
 

Öztürk T, Kalafatcı Ö (2017). Analysis of life studies course curriculum in terms of teachers' opinions. Journal of Research in Education and Society 4(2):102-123.

 
 

Regina Hill Effective Consulting Pty Ltd (2015). Life education Queensland module evaluation term 3 and 4 

View 23062020.

 
 

Robson C (2015). Real world research translation editors: Çınkır Åž and DemirkasımoÄŸlu N Ankara: Anı Publishing.

 
 

Sönmez ÖF, KılıçoÄŸlu G (2016). Social studies education programs in terms of assessment (1924-2005). Turkish Scientific Researches Journal 1(1):36-49.

 
 

Sözer MA, Yıldırım G (2017). Evaluation of the 3rd grade Life Sciences teaching through constructivist approach: Teacher's lesson guide books. Journal of KırÅŸehir Faculty of Education 18(1):451-469.

 
 

Åženay Y (2015). Investigation of primary school teachers' opinions about life and social science curriculum (The case of Bursa). Unpublished Master Thesis UludaÄŸ University Education Sciences Institute Bursa.

 
 

Tay B, BaÅŸ M (2015). Comparison of 2009 and 2015 Life Science course curricula. Bayburt University Journal of Education X(II):341-374.

 
 

Temiz N (2019). An analysis of learning outcomes of 3rd grade curriculum of social studies in 2018 with respect to character education. BaÅŸkent University Journal of Education 6(2):147-154.

 
 

Tuncer Ö (2009). Evaluation of 3rd grades elementary life skills curriculum based on teachers' views (the case of Aydın). Unpublished Master Thesis Adnan Menderes University Social Sciences Institute Aydın.

 
 

Türkyılmaz A (2011). Evaluation of primary Life Sciences course curriculum according to teachers' views (Balıkesir Sample). Unpublished Master Thesis Balıkesir University Social Sciences Institute Balıkesir.

 
 

UçuÅŸ GÅž (2017). Comparison of 2009 and 2017 Life Science course curricula. TAY Journal 1(1):76-98.

 
 

Ünsal H (2018). Classroom teachers' views on the implementation of new curriculum of Life Science lesson in first grade of primary schools. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal 4(14):1082-1092.
Crossref