Bizup J (2009). The uses of toulmin in composition studies. The National Council of Teachers of English. CCC 61:1 / September 2009.

Boero P, Garuti R, Lemut E, Mariotti AM (1996). Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: A hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Valencia, Spain: PME. 2:113-120.

Brem SK, Rips LJ (2003). Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Sci. 24 (4):573-604 ISSN 0364-021.

Cerbin B (1988). The Nature and Development of Informal. Reasoning Skills in College Students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED 298 805.

Conner AM (2007). Student Teachers' Conceptions of Proof and Facilitation of Argumentation in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms. The Pennsylvania State University: Dissertation.

Creswell WJ (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 4th Edition. Boston: Pearson Education.

Cross DI (2009). Creating optimal mathematics learning environments: Combining argumentation and writing to enhance achievement. Intl. J. Sci. Math. Edu. 7(5):905-930.
Crossref

Fischbein, Kedem (1982). Proof and Certitude in the Development of Mathematical Thinking. In A. Vermandel. Proceding of the Sixth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. pp. 128-131.

Fischbein E (1987). Intuition in Science and Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publihers.

Freeman JB (2005). Systematizing Toulmin's warrants: An epistemic approach. Argumentation 19(3):331-346.
Crossref

Harel G, Sowder L (1998). Students' proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. CBMS Issue in Mathe. Educ. 7:234-283.

Harel G (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNRbased instruction. In S. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex. pp.185-212.

Inglis M, Ramos JPM, Simpson A (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification. Educ Stud. Math 66:3-21. Springer, Heidelberg.
Crossref

Jimenez Alexandre MP, Pereiro Munoz C, Aznar Cuadrado V (2000). Expertise, Argumenation and Scientific Practice: A Case Study about Environmental Education in the 11th Grade. The National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) annual meeting, New Orleans, April-May 2000. PB 98-0616. No. ED 493 960.

Klaczynski P (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Dev. 71:1347-1366.
Crossref

Krummheuer, G (1999). The Narrative Character of Argumentative Mathematics Classroom Interaction in Primary Education. European Research in Mathematics Education I: Group 4. Berlin, Germany.

Kuhn D, Udell W (2003). The development of argument skills. blackwell publishing and society for research in child development. JSTOR 74(5):1245-1260.

Kuhn D (1992). Thinking as Argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62:155-178.
Crossref

Kuhn D (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Crossref

Kustos PN (2010). Trends Concerning Four Misconceptions In Students' Intuitively-Based Probabilistic Reasoning Sourced In The Heuristic Of Representativeness. The University of Alabama: a Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Tuscaloosa, Alabama.

Martin WG, Harel G (1989). Proof Frames of Preservice Elementary Teacher. J. Res. Mathe. Educ. 20(1):41-51.
Crossref

Miles A, Huberman B (1992). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and Standards of School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Soejadi O (2000). Kiat Pendidikan Matematika di Indonesia. DirektoratJenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional: Jakarta.

Solso RL, Maclin OH, Maclin MK (2002). Psikologi Kognitif Edisi Kedelapan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Tall DO (2004). Building theories: The Three Worlds of Mathematics. For the Learn. Mathe. 23(3):29-32.

Toulmin S (2003). The uses of argument. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crossref

Tristanti LB, Sutawidjaja A, As'ari AR, Muksar M (2016). Warrant Deduktif dalam Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Vol. 2 No. 1 Tahun 2016. ISSN: 2443-1923. Jombang. Indonesia.

Tristanti LB, Sutawidjaja A, As'ari AR, Muksar M (2015). Modelling Student Mathematical Argumentation with Structural-Intuitive and Deductive Warrant to Solve Mathematics Problem. Proceeding of ICERD 2015. ISBN: 978-979-028-799-0. Surabaya. Indonesia. pp. 130-139.

Verheij B (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin's Scheme. Argumenattion Springer 2006. 19:347-371. 
Crossref

Walton ND (1990). What is reasoning? What is an Argument?. J. Philosophy. JSTOR. 87(8):399-419.

Weber K, Alcock L (2005). Using Warranted Implications to Understand and Validate Proofs. For the Learning of Mathematics 25, 1 (March, 2005). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: FLM Publishing Association.

Whitenack JW, Knipping N (2002). Argumentation, instructional design theory and students' mathematical learning: A case for coordinating interpretive lenses. J. Mathe. Behav. 21:441-457.
Crossref

Yackel E (2002). What We can learn from analyzing the teacher's role in collective argumentation. J. Math. Behav. 21:423-440.
Crossref