Journal of
Languages and Culture

  • Abbreviation: J. Lang. Cult.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 2141-6540
  • DOI: 10.5897/JLC
  • Start Year: 2010
  • Published Articles: 131

Full Length Research Paper

Friendship: acquisition forms and functions as a web of social relationship in Raya Community of Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

Bereket Godifay Kahsay
  • Bereket Godifay Kahsay
  • Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia.
  • Google Scholar


  •  Received: 02 February 2021
  •  Published: 31 January 2021

 ABSTRACT

This cultural study was conducted in Raya community of Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia, focusing on the relevance of friendship for social relationships. Specifically, the study aimed at identifying the forms of friendship acquisition, describing friendship application procedures and rituals performed and depicting the social function of friendship as a web to strengthen social networks. The study was limited to the friendship of males. To meet these objectives, fieldwork and interviews were used to gather the primary data. The research design was descriptive, while the study approach was qualitative. The author found that there are two friendship acquisition forms in the study community; inherited and acquired. In the community under study, there are three friendship entitlement occasions that is friendship during an early age, friendship at social events, and friendship formed through daily routine practices. In the procedure of applying friendship, there are cultural rituals performed. Furthermore, there are local names with cultural connotations that intimates use to address each other. The social relevance of friendship has appeared as a base for the creation of fictive affinity which ensures decent social relations. Similar ethnographic studies that would contribute to the critical reading of anthropology of friendship are suggested.

 

Key words: Cultural study, friendship, social relations, Raya, Ethiopia.


 INTRODUCTION

Friendship is a relationship that has existed across historical times in all types of societies (Keller, 2004). Friendship exists in the majority of, if not all, societies, and normally throughout the numerous stages of life (DeSousa and Cerqueira-Santos, 2012). Friendship is an important affiliation for people that endorse cheerfulness and life satisfaction through instrumental rewards, emotional sustenance and comradeship (Argyle, 2001). Definitions of friendship regularly denote to it as a completely voluntary association (Wiseman, 1986). According to Adams and Plaut (2005), from this viewpoint, actual friendship is context autonomous rather than setting explicit, rather than a result of structural affordances, and it involves impulsive acts of fondness rather than the scripted performance of institutionalized compulsions. All these characteristics infer independent constructions of an unrestricted self which is permitted to form such relationships (Carrier, 1999).
 
Aristotle conceives friendship as a kind of virtue or indicates virtue, and it is also the greatest requirement for living that even if having all the other good things, nobody would choose to live without friends (Doyle and Smith, 2002). Friendship ascends out of meagre companionship when two or more of the mates learn that they have common belief or interest which the others do not share and which each believed to be his own exceptional treasure or burden (Lewis, 2002).
 
According to Ravichandran (1999), friendship exists for three reasons: virtue- when it exists for the sake of friendship, where both like and cherish each other for some admirable values in the other’s character; usefulness- when established for the utilitarian value of it; and pleasure- essentially on account of the pleasure the relationship can offer. Aristotle also describes three types of friendship namely genuine friendships, one based on mutual usefulness, and the other grounded on pleasure. Genuine friendship does not dissolve, it occur between good men; the two forms will last provided that there are utility and pleasure involved in the relationship (Doyle and Smith, 2002).
 
Friendship was one of the pillars of the traditional community that were disordered by the upsurge of the more objective forms of society linked with industrialization, urbanization and capitalism (Tönnies, 1955). In a social system, the rights and responsibilities of friendship can exceed all formally institutionalized roles, and it diffuses the larger social order by satisfying both individual and social functions (Sivertsen, 2003). According to DeSousa and Cerqueira-Santos (2012), friendship relationships have the purpose of encouraging affection, intimacy and trust. However, even the finest friendships can have undesirable forms (Berndt, 2002).
 
In childhood, association with friends helps the healthy socialization process which allows them to practice positive relational features such as collaboration and social support; and negative ones, such as conflict and competition. However, in adolescence it delivers the main basis of intimacy for youths (DeSousa and Cerqueira-Santos, 2012:326). “Generally, in childhood and adolescence, the friendship relationships promote social engagement, cooperation and conflict management” (DeSousa and Cerqueira-Santos, 2012:326), while the cultural similarities of friendship are expected in different societies, in the contemporary world, cultural variation in connotation and purpose of friendship do likewise exist (Krappmann, 1996). It stands obvious that the importance of friendship to general social life differs across time and space (Beer and Gardner, 2015).
 
Since friendship is regarded as private, regardless of its being a public phenomenon, research on friendship is difficult which resulted in limited anthropological interest on the study of this subject (Uhl, 1991). Moreover, perhaps anthropologists have concentrated too strongly on kinship, thus becoming unmindful of occasionally even overlapping notions of friendship (Beer, 2001).
 
This study, therefore, aimed at contributing to the anthropological reading of the concept of friendship through describing the acquisition forms of friendship and the functions that it provides in networking social associations among the Raya Community of Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Specifically, the study aimed at identifying the forms of friendship acquisition, describing friendship application procedures and rituals performed, specific to friendship of males, and depicting the relevance of friendship as a web of the social relations.


 METHODOLOGY

Research approach and research design
 
The study approach was qualitative search, and the design for this study was descriptive. The collected data was analyzed using content analysis that the spoken and physically observed data was described. But again, narrative analysis was used to transcribe the gathered data as interviews and observations have a narrative aspect.
 
Data collection tools
 
The period during which the primary data collection was June to August 2020. This period was during the Covid-19 crisis. All necessary arrangements have been made to ensure the protection of the researcher and the informants. The following primary data collection methods were utilized to reply to the research questions and produce a report based on the specified study objectives.
 
Field work
 
The researcher used participant observation to physically observe the ceremonies practiced in the process of establishing a friendship. As a native researcher, the author has experienced the friendship acquisition forms and the application procedures and rituals performed. Researcher’s life experience was of great added value to the making of this article.
 
Interviews
 
Key informant interviews with 18 people were conducted. The 14 key informants were purposefully sampled aged people with extended knowledge of the culture and have exercised the formation of friendship. Moreover, an interview with randomly sampled 4 youth was made to comprehend their perspective viewpoints. Unstructured open-ended questions were used to gather the data. The major question include how friendships are obtained in the community under study, how do people address to their friends, and what functions does friendship contribute to the social process.


 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Description of the study area This study was conducted among the Raya community of Southern Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Raya community resides in northern Ethiopia, northeast of the Amara regional states and south end of Tigray regional state in Ethiopia. There are historical evidences that the district was a habitual residence of the Doba and Qeda community, who no longer exists as an ethnic group in the present Ethiopia, who had a long-established connection with the Afars, the Amharas and the T'egrians, and Oromo that expanded to that area (Mengesha, 2010). Raya is a name for both the community and the territory (Mengesha, 2010). Currently, five major languages are being spoken in Raya area namely: Tigrigna, Amharic, Agawigna, Afarigna, and Oromiffa, thus the Rayans do not share a mutually intelligible language (Alemayehu, 2019). Usually, this is taken as footage of respective ethnic groups that have lived or are living in the area at some time. A historical discourse since 16th century discloses that Raya is a label for a diverse group of people that formed a collective identity due to merger and intermarriage of the stated ethnic groups (Alemayehu, 2019). This consolidation of multiple cultures in this area has resulted in a unique way of life for the study community. The cultural values and emotional settings are virtually similar throughout the different language speaking communities Raya with insignificant differences in linguistic and cultural traits. The research was conducted specifically at one of the villages in Raya-Azebo district which was later divided into two districts namely Raya-Azebo and Raya-Chercher. The primary data was collected from the village called Dalate, in which the fieldwork was conducted. The village was purposefully selected because it is one of the biggest villages in the study area with considerable aged population. Three of the languages namely: Afar, Amharic, and Tigrigna are spoken in this village. Forms of friendship acquisition The forms of attaining friends customarily involve four main cultural elements namely vowing, selecting a name to address each other, perform ceremonies of the respective applied friendship, and calling each other in a way that signifies respect. There are two forms of friendship accession. Literature on anthropology of friendship states that contrary to kinship, friendship is based on choice and voluntariness that it is an acquired not an ascribed status (Beer, 2001). However, as experienced in the fieldwork, there are two friendship acquisition forms in the study community namely: acquired and inherited. Acquired An intimate relationship of people can result in establishment of friendship. This procedure of forming friendship makes it a personal choice and so voluntary and proves that it is an acquired status. People can attain friends at any age. Inherited This form of friendship is the type of alliance that people get as a result of the previously formed friendship between their fathers, elder brothers, or close relatives. People are told from an early age that the sons of the friends of their fathers are their friends. They use their family name to address each other. Usually, this occurs for children who closely match in their age. If there are no children of their age from the other party, the alliance could be formed regardless of the age difference as the alliance has to be maintained. This type of friendship could be extended to other relatives in case there are no boys born in one or both leading families. Friendship application procedures and rituals performed The acquired and inherited friendships need to be applied through one of the friendship requisitions measures. It was discovered that there are three friendship entitlement occasions that is friendship during an early age, friendship at social events, and friendship formed through daily routine practices. Friendship during early age Children at early age exercise friendship when they are looking after sheep, goats and cattle. While heading to the field to do so, they find children at a different age. The normal scenario is that children prefer spending time with their favorite kids. The continuous connection results in forming a friendship. The fundamental rule is that friendship is dependent on the mutual pact of the parties. The children do not need consent from their parents to ally. The parties proceed to perform a ritual after they agreed to form the friendship. The ceremony could be performed in the presence of other kids or autonomously. They sat face to face catching a pebble with their left hands and holding their right hands with their little fingers crisscrossed on each other. Then, they swallow the pebbles vowing that they are friends from that instant forward and that they will not deny each other at adverse events. They choose one of the terms of friendship to name each other and decide to never address themselves using their actual names. In case one of them forget the agreed name of friendship and used the real name of their alliance, they get penalized with a formerly agreed punishment. If the mistake continues even with continuous punishments, it can result in an offence to the addressed party to the extent of terminating the partnership. Usually, the penalties are looking after the other’s animals for some time, minor punching with free hands/legs, or slight beating with a stick or bush branch. Social events There are two social events at which men can apply the formation of friendship namely circumcision and marriage. The social events validate the formality of the friendship of the parries. Once friends are invited to these social events, they get acknowledged by family members and relatives and their ally becomes branded publicly. One basic principle is that once you are invited to one of these social events, it is mandatory to invite them in return to similar occasions. There is no standard vis-à-vis the number of friends essential for the social event but usually, it ranges from five to fifteen. Friendship at circumcision Circumcision happens at two different age categories. First, at early ages; and secondly in their teens. There are no fixed ages for both categories. The later life juncture requires a celebration. People gathered, traditional music played, aboriginal dances performed, and food and drinks served. During the circumcision, the boy is in company of his friends. Usually, the ceremony lasts for a week. The friends stay for the whole week taking care of the boy and serving him with foods meant to bring fast recovery from the circumcision’s wound. The food items could be collected from the family, relatives, neighbours in the same village, even from adjacent villages. The friends could be from both friendship acquisitions forms, but most apparently from the inherited acquaintance. For the acquired friendship, for any buddy to join the social event as a friend, there is a need of preceding communication of parents of both teenagers, usually fathers, that the father of the boy to be circumcised must properly request the other side for the friendship to be formed. The friends have equal status, except the fact that one of them is considered as a premium friend which they call bokri-arki in local terms. The premium friend is assumed to have relative special intimate and is responsible to coordinate the other friends throughout the ceremony. Usually, the circumcision formality persists for a week period. The specific ritual of applying the friendship happens towards the end of the circumcision ceremony. A spotlight of a candle but usually a lamp is required to perform the ritual. Early morning, around 4:00 am is the perfect time chosen to accomplish the rite aimed at having a complete attentiveness. Though not mandatory, all friends are expected to attend the event. All available friends seat rounded next to the boy. Then the friends crisscrossed their little fingers of their right hands with the boy one by one. With their hands attached as stated, the lamp must be on. At that moment, a facilitator starts speaking. A relatively elderly person, usually an older brother of the circumcised boy or any relative, facilitates the sets of actions at this occurrence. If not, any of the friends could handle the course and get replaced by another for himself. The intermediary tells the friends that they will be friends from that instant. He fabricates stories of both parties and tells both sides. Invented stories such as that one of them is a thief, a killer, or a deceiver and may encounter a serious problem at some point. Then, he asks both sides whether they will maintain their friendship and stand beside each other regardless of the future challenges in which they are expected to vow to do so. After that, if friendship is attained, the friends are given a chance to choose one of the friendship names to address each other; or asked to start using their family’s designation if it’s an inherited friendship. Finally, both together, put out the light vowing that they will perish like the light any moment they betray each other. The friends get replaced by another and the same process happens for all of them. Friendship at a marriage Like in other communities, marriage has a special value in the Raya community, which is one of the principal social events. At a marriage day, the bridegroom gets a company of his friends. The friends could be from both friendship acquisition systems but clearly from the inherited one. By default, friends that attended the circumcision ceremony are part of the marriage event. However, there is still a chance for the groom to have additional friends on his marriage day. The premium friend maintains his status also at this occasion with extra responsibilities such as leading the communication with the bride and her relatives, organizing the event, and handling all cultural performances required for the event. The ritual is almost the same as the circumcision. The major difference is that a bride is added to the bridegroom’s side. Then, the mediator addresses each friend versus the couple to crisscross little fingers of their right hands. Similar fabricated stories are also used to get the pact of their friendship and vow to not each other or commit any wrong. The usage of the lamp is also similar. Then, they choose one of the friendship names, or start using the term from the inherited friendship, or keep using the designation they selected at the circumcision event as appropriate. Routines practice The third category of the friendship acquisition procedure is the normal routine practice in which people acquire friends at any age and various circumstances apart from the above procedures. To illustrate, there is a chance for people to have friends in addition to their allies at an early age and the social event. There are no specific rituals performed for applying such friendships. Any of the friendship names might still be used, but usually, they choose to address each other by the term Arkey which is simply translated as ‘my friend’. The friends do not perform the vowing process, hence could be terminated without any requisitions. This sort of friendship has an insignificant purpose in the social system. Names used to address friends In all the forms of friendship established, there are cultural rituals performed. The essence of forming a friendship is entering to vow and that the initial step is selecting a name of friendship to address each other which is called Etsfi (Etsifti). When entering the vow, the performed ceremonies vary according to the type of friendship. As a rule, one designation term is used only with one associate. The individuals involved must choose one of the terms which suit their social connection and conveys the connotation of their friendship. The researcher found a total of 45 designation terms from the interviews made during the data collection. Although there could be variation from area to area, usually the first thirty names are used for a recognized alliance, while the remaining fifteen appellations are usually for informal friendship that people acquired in their childhood or in their routine life. The formality of friendship, as discussed, is appropriated at the social events. The names that people choose to address their friends are presented in Table 1.
 
 
Functions of friendship as a web of social relations
 
In the social system, the acknowledged friendships give significant functions in strengthening the social order in two ways as learned from the fieldwork. First, friends are expected to be part of every success and letdown event of their party. Friends offer any required support at any social relation that the more you have friends the more you are privileged in the social process. Equally, like in the case of kinship, men can give their life to protect their friends or retaliate if any harm happens to their friends. Traditionally, men describe themselves with their friends at any respectable accomplishments or even failures; they have preferred friends to remark. They use the friendship naming, otherwise the father of the friend, to denote who they are attached more. Secondly, in the study community, friendship of two individuals, particularly an alliance acknowledged at the social events leads to the affiliation of both parties ranging to act like family members and relatives. Occasionally, the association of parties through friendship outweighs the existed kinship system. This goes to the extent of restricting the friends from marring each other’s family members. Relatives of the friends, usually siblings follow the friendship naming to address their respective equals of the party. Generally, similar with kinship, friendship has solid purpose in the social relationship of individuals in the community that is the social network it establishes has contribution to the overall social structure.


 CONCLUSION

The study area has a unique way of life that resulted from the amalgamation of multiple cultures. Friendship is one of the cultural practices that contribute to the smooth maintenance of social order. Differing to the personality and social psychological, perhaps also sociological and anthropological, understandings of friendship acquisition forms, this research reveals that friendship is not restricted to a personal choice, like kinship, but it is also inherited. In the contemporary world in which private matters are emphasized, there exists an alliance of two individuals that ensue from the strong attachment of families and kinfolks. The study of the same topic in different cultures would contribute to the robust anthropological analysis of the subject. Hence, the author recommends similar ethnographic enquiries in diverse cultural settings.


 CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The author has not declared any conflict of interests.



 REFERENCES

Adams G, Plaut VC (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North American and West African worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, July 2005.
Crossref

 

Alemayehu W (2019). Raya: a category error, and a catalog of errors. Ethiopian Insight; Retrieved from

View Accessed on January 12, 2021.

 
 

Argyle M (2001). The psychology of happiness (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.

 
 

Beer B (2001). Friendship, Anthropology of. In: N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Kidlington, England: Elsevier.
Crossref

 
 

Beer B, Gardner D (2015). Friendship, Anthropology of. In: James D. Wright (editor-in-chief). International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 9:425-431.
Crossref

 
 

Berndt TJ (2002). Friendship Quality and Social Development. American Psychological Society 11(1):7-10.
Crossref

 
 

Carrier JG (1999). People who can be friends: Selves and social relationships. In: S. Bell & S. Coleman (Eds.). The anthropology of friendship (pp. 21-38). Oxford, UK: Berg.
Crossref

 
 

Doyle ME, Smith MK (2002). Friendship: theory and experience. The encyclopedia of informal education.

 
 

DeSousa DA, Cerqueira-Santos E (2012). Intimate friendship relationships between young adults. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 22(53):325-333. 
Crossref

 
 

Keller M (2004). A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Friendship Research. In ISBBD Newsletter 46(2):10-11, 14.

 
 

Krappmann L (1996). Amicitia, drujba, shin-yu, philia, Freundschaft, friendship: On the cultural diversity of human relationship. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.). The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 19-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.

 
 

Lewis CS (2002). The Four Loves. London: Harper Collins.

 
 

Ravichandran T (1999). Friendship. College English Review 3(2):23-25.

 
 

Mengesha RE (2010). Cultural and Ethno-History of Raya in Ethiopia: Conflict Resolution and Ritual Practices: Raya since 1930 Paperback. VDM publishing Press.

 
 

Sivertsen E (2003). William K. Rawlins' Dialectical Theory of Friendship: An exploration of friendship in contemporary USA and a look at the television Sitcom, Friends. Candlewyck Park, Ithaca, NY.

 
 

Tönnies F (1955). Community and Association (Gemeinshaft and gesselschaft). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

 
 

Uhl S (1991). Forbidden friends: Cultural veils of female friendship in Andalusia. American Ethnologist 18(1):90-105.
Crossref

 
 

Wiseman JP (1986). Friendship: Bonds and binds in a voluntary relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 3(2):191-211.
Crossref

 

 




          */?>