African Journal of
Microbiology Research

  • Abbreviation: Afr. J. Microbiol. Res.
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 1996-0808
  • DOI: 10.5897/AJMR
  • Start Year: 2007
  • Published Articles: 5211

Full Length Research Paper

Prevalence of aflatoxin M1 in pasteurized and ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk marketed in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Hilda F. Mwakosya
  • Hilda F. Mwakosya
  • Tanzania Bureau of Standards, P. O. Box 9524, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Google Scholar
Jovin K. Mugula
  • Jovin K. Mugula
  • Department of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3006, Morogoro, Tanzania.
  • Google Scholar

  •  Received: 30 June 2021
  •  Accepted: 10 August 2021
  •  Published: 30 September 2021


The aim of this study was to determine the level of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in pasteurized and UHT milk marketed in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.  AFM1 in pasteurized milk samples (75) and ultra-high temperature (UHT) milk (43) was determined by using immuno-affinity high performance liquid chromatography. AFM1 was detected in 97% (115/118) of samples that consisted of 96% (72/75) of pasteurized milk samples and 100% (43/43) of UHT milk samples. About 82% of the contaminated pasteurized and UHT had AFM1 levels above EU acceptable levels (0.05 µg/L). However, none of the contaminated pasteurized and UHT milk sample had levels of AFM1 above the maximum recommended Codex limits (0.5 µg/L). The results indicate that the contamination of the samples with AFM1 at such level could pose a serious public health problem. Thus, regular monitoring of AFM1 levels in milk is important in order to protect consumers. 
Key words: Aflatoxin M1, ultra-high temperature (UHT), milk, pasteurized milk, food safety.


Tanzania has the third largest livestock population in Africa comprising 25 million cattle out of which 98% are indigenous breeds (FAO, 2020). The dairy production in Tanzania is categorized into two systems: traditional system and dairy system (Munyaneza et al., 2019). Traditional system is the most dominant and it is based on both milk and meat products; dairy system is based mainly on milk production (URT, 2017). In the  year  2018 about 934,628 tonnes of raw and heat-treated milk were produced in Tanzania. Milk production contributes to income, food security, nutrition and household livelihood (FAOSTAT, 2020). The sector contributes to 7.4% of total national GDP and the annual growth rate (2.2%) of the sector is considered low (FAO, 2020). Raw milk is a valuable nutritious food, highly perishable, with short shelf-life and it is an excellent medium for the growth of microorganisms, particularly harmful bacterial pathogens that can cause spoilage and diseases to consumers (FAO, 2021). Heat treatment of milk such as pasteurization and ultra-high temperature (UHT) allows the preservation of milk and helps to reduce food-borne illness (Melini et al., 2017).
According to FAO/WHO (1982), pasteurization is defined as a heat treatment process applied to a product such as milk with the objective of minimizing numbers of harmful micro-organisms to a level at which they do not constitute a significant health hazard with minimal chemical, physical and organoleptic changes in the product. It also extends the storage time for some products by reducing the number of spoilage micro-organisms in the product (FAO/WHO, 1982). Codex Alimentarius (2004), defined UHT treatment of milk and liquid milk products as the application of heat to a continuously flowing product using such high temperatures for such time that renders the product commercially sterile at the time of processing. When UHT treatment is combined with aseptic packaging, it results in a commercially sterile product at the heating range of 135 to 150°C for 1 s up to 4 s (Melini et al., 2017). AFM1 is a heat stable compound that can survive heat treatment such as pasteurization, UHT technique and autoclaving but also AFM1 may be reduced but not completely destroyed by heat treatments (Mahmoodi et al., 2019; Tahira et al., 2019). 
Aflatoxins are amongst the most poisonous mycotoxins and are produced by Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus nomius fungi found in soil and that can grow in plant, human food products and feeds (WHO, 2018). The most important aflatoxins in order of toxicity are BI, B2, G1, and G2 (Ismail et al., 2018; Tahira et al., 2019). Aflatoxins may also be found in the milk of animals that are fed contaminated feed, in the form of aflatoxin M1, a hydroxylated metabolite of aflatoxin B1, within 12 h of contaminated feed consumption (Langat et al., 2016). Once lactating cow consume contaminated feeds with aflatoxin B1 it is absorbed into the gastrointestinal tract and biotransformation occurs in the liver by cytochrome P450 enzymes to form a 4-hydroxy metabolite known as aflatoxin M1, a compound  soluble in water and therefore it is easily excreted in milk during milking (Daou et al., 2020; Tahira et al., 2019). 
Aflatoxin M1 is a hepato-carcinogen, classified as a group 1 carcinogen by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC Monograph, 2018). Aflatoxin M1 is heat-stable and can survive pasteurization, autoclaving and thermal inactivation (Zakaria et al., 2019). The contamination of milk and milk products by aflatoxin M1 has been reported in various countries such as Morocco (Mannani et al., 2021), Iran (Mahmoodi et al., 2019), Lebanon (Daou et al., 2020), Turkey (Eker et al., 2019), Pakistan (Tahira et al., 2019), and Kenya (Langat et al., (2016).
The occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk in Tanzania reported earlier indicated that 92% of raw cow milk retailed in Dar es Salaam city was contaminated with aflatoxin M1 (Urio et al., 2006) and 83.8% of raw cow milk from households in Singida was contaminated with aflatoxin M1 (Mohammed et al., 2016). However, there is no information on aflatoxin M1 contamination of pasteurized and ultra-pasteurized (UHT) milk in Tanzania, as well as the awareness of contamination. Thus, the aim of this study was to carry out surveillance of the level of contamination of aflatoxin M1 in pasteurized and ultra-pasteurized marketed milk in Dar-es-Salaam, commercial capital of Tanzania. The results of this study will provide information on level of milk contamination by aflatoxins and contribute to raise awareness and efforts of food control authorities in developing strategies to ensure public safety.


Sample collection
A total of 118 milk samples both ultra-high temperature (UHT) and pasteurized were purchased randomly from different mini markets and supermarkets located in Kinondoni, Ilala, Temeke, Ubungo and Kigamboni districts of Dar es Salaam region a commercial city of Tanzania during December 2020 and January 2021. This region was selected on purpose since it is the largest urban consumer market with availability of milk brands from different regions in Dar es Salaam shops/outlets. Seventy-five samples of pasteurized milk and 43 UHT milk samples were collected. The larger number of pasteurized milks collected is due to the fact that most dairies produce pasteurized milk. 
The collected samples originate from two climatic zones of Tanzania, hot humid coastal zone (Tanga, Morogoro, Dar es Salaam and Zanzibar) and temperate highland zone (Kilimanjaro and Iringa). All samples were randomly purchased, coded and transported in an ice box together with their original packaging prior to laboratory analysis at the Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) food laboratory in Dar es Salaam.
Aflatoxin M1 analysis
Reagents standards, chemicals, columns and other materials HPLC grade acetonitrile, methanol and glacial acetic acid were obtained from Fisher Scientific UK. A standard aflatoxin M1 (0.504 µg/L) solution was obtained from Biopure, Romer Labs Diagnostics GmbH, Tullin Austria. Distilled water was produced with a Milli-Q Integral 15 water purification system, France. Whatman Filter paper No. 4 (Whatman Inc., Clifton, NJ, USA) and AflaStarTM M1 R, Immunoaffinity Columns (IAC) for aflatoxin M1 were from Romer Labs, Austria. 
HPLC conditions 
The HPLC system (Infinity II, Agilent technologies) with vial sampler, Quant pump, MCT and FLD Spectra (model 1260) with excitation set at 365 nm and emission 450 nm was used. Instrument settings were: injection volume 50 µL, pump flow rate 0.8 mL/min, run time was 6 min, HPLC analytical column 4.6×150 mm (Waters® Spherisorb® 5 µm ODS1, Ireland) column oven set at 25°C, mobile phase comprised 2% acetic acid: acetonitrile: methanol (40:35:25) that was prior degassed for 20 min and run isocratically. Data acquisition and processing were done with OpenLab software (Version 3.4, Agilent technologies). Aflatoxin M1 peak in the chromatogram was identified by comparing its retention time with that of the analyzed aflatoxin M1 standard under the same conditions.
Standards preparation
Exactly 1985 µL of aflatoxin M1 standard was added in 9015 µL of aflatoxin M1 mobile phase to get a stock solution of100 µg/L. This solution was used to prepare 5, 8 and 10 µg/L standards by dilutions with mobile phase. The 10 µg/L standard was further diluted with mobile phase to prepare 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 3 µg/L standard. These seven standards were used for validation and quality control of the method.  
Extraction and quantification of aflatoxin M1 by HPLC
The method for extraction, detection and quantification of aflatoxin M1 in the milk samples was done in a dark room according to Behfar et al. (2012) with minor modifications. Fifty milliliters of the milk samples were measured in Teflon tubes, warmed up in the water bath (ThermoHaake IP30, Germany) set at 37°C. Samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min (Eppendorf 5810R, German) and the fat layer was removed completely and milk was filtered through filter paper (Whatman No. 4, UK). 10 mL of the filtered milk sample was passed through aflatoxin M1 immuno-affinity column (AflaStarTM M1 R IAC column, Romer Labs, Austria) at steady flow rate of 2 to 3 mL/min. The column was washed with 10 mL distilled water (Milli-Q Integral 15 water purification system, France) two times. The column was dried by means of the syringe plunger and the toxins were eluted by 1 mL acetonitrile in two portions of 500 µL into test tubes. The extract was evaporated with nitrogen concentrator at 50°C to dryness gently with stream of nitrogen. The residues were reconstituted with 500 µL of mobile phase and vortexed ready for injection into HPLC system.  
Method validation
Quality control
Linearity of the method was determined by running a seven-point calibration curve that was prepared from standard solutions having concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 8 and 10 µg/L each ten times. Peak area was plotted against concentration to give a regression equation which was used to determine aflatoxin M1 concentrations. The calibration curve is described with the equation y = 0.4796x + 0.0044 (R2 = 0.9992).
Recovery of aflatoxin M1
The accuracy of the method was established based on the percentage recovery, and contaminated milk  which  was below  the limit of detection was treated as blank sample and spiked with 1.0 µg/L aflatoxin M1 standard solution, it was then run-in triplicate parallel with the samples. Recovery was calculated as:


Aflatoxin M1 contamination in pasteurized and UHT milk
Among the 118 UHT and pasteurized milk samples analyzed in this study, 97.5% (115/118) samples were contaminated with AFM1. This is similar to the study reported by Daou et al., (2020) in Lebanon that indicated 90.9% aflatoxin M1 contamination in UHT and pasteurized milk. The results of the present study were higher than the study conducted by Nejad et al. (2019) in Hamadan province of Iran who reported that 86.3% of pasteurized and UHT milk were contaminated with aflatoxin M1. However, this study was contrary to results of the study conducted in Casablanca, El Jadida, Fez and Meknès cities in Morocco, which reported that 9 (13.4%) of pasteurized and UHT milk samples were contaminated with aflatoxin M1 (Mannani et al., 2021). The discrepancy in AFM1 levels might be due to differences in climatic conditions, hygiene, and precautions to prevent AFM1 contamination of lactating cow feedstuff and dairy processing. The overall prevalence of aflatoxin M1 contamination obtained in the present study was high which indicates the risk of chronic exposure to consumers. The  high AFM1 concentrations might be due to poor storage of animal feeds and poor feeding practices observed, which resulted into aflatoxin B1 contamination in feeds and eventually metabolized into aflatoxin M1 in milk. A study carried out by Mohammed et al. (2016) in Singida region, Tanzania reported that aflatoxin M1 was detected in raw milk from household cows fed with contaminated aflatoxin B1 sunflower seedcakes.
Furthermore, this study (Table 1) showed that 96% (72/75) pasteurized milk samples analyzed, were found to be contaminated with AFM1, A similar observation was made in a study conducted in Beijing and Shanghai in China where 96.2% pasteurized milk samples were contaminated with AFM1 (Zheng et al., 2013). In the current study, all 100% (43/43) of UHT milk samples were contaminated with AFM1. This was similar to the study conducted in Pakistan whereby all UHT milk samples 105 (100%) were contaminated by aflatoxin M1 (Tahira et al., 2019). These results also confirmed the heat stable nature of aflatoxin M1.
The highest mean for AFM1 was in pasteurized milk with a significant difference between the means at p<0.05. The obtained mean value of AFM1 contamination in pasteurized and UHT milk samples was 0.144±0.015 and 0.07±0.008 µg/L, respectively, while concentration range of pasteurized and UHT milk was <LOD - 0.454 and 0.01-0.1 µg/L, respectively, shown in Table 1. This was similar to the studies reported by Lindahl et al. (2018) in Nairobi, Kenya and Xiong et al. (2018) in Henan, Hubei and Hunan provinces in China whose results indicated  low mean concentration of AFM1 in UHT milk and high mean concentration of AFM1 in pasteurized milk. These observations might be due to the fact that, UHT milk is subjected to high temperature (above 135°C) treatments to kill harmful microbes and to increase the shelf life of milk. The UHT heat treatment may reduce AFM1 concentration. This is supported by a study conducted by Omeiza et al. (2018) in Nigeria reported that high temperature treatments reduce AFM1 up to 58.8% but could not be removed completely. 
Ninety three percent (93%) of AFM1 contaminated pasteurized milk sample in this study were found to exceed the EU regulatory limits (0.05 µg/L) and 63% of UHT contaminated milk sample were found to exceed the EU regulatory limits (0.05 µg/L) (Table 2). However, none of the contaminated samples of pasteurized and UHT milk were above the maximum Codex limit (0.5 µg/L) for AFM1.
The results obtained in this study indicated that mean values for aflatoxin M1 contamination for pasteurized and UHT milk samples from hot humid coastal zone (Dar es Salaam, Tanga, Zanzibar and Morogoro) and temperate highland zone (Kilimanjaro and Iringa) ranged from 0.05±0.005 to 0.15±0.019 µg/L. The highest aflatoxin M1 mean value was in the hot humid coastal zone, while temperate highland zone had the lowest contaminated sample. In all samples from climatic zones, pasteurized milk samples had statistically higher mean values (p<0.05) of aflatoxin M1 than UHT milk samples (Table 3). Higher AFM1 concentration from hot humid coastal zones might be due to the fact that hot humid zones are characterized by high temperature and humidity which are favorable environmental conditions for fungal growth in animal feeds and production of aflatoxin B1 which in turn are responsible for high levels of AFM1 in milk. This is supported by the study done by Khaneghahi et al. (2019) from Iran who reported that milk samples obtained from hot humid climate areas were significantly higher in AFM1 content. Hot humid climates are more favorable for the growth of aflatoxigenic fungi (A. flavus and A. parasiticus) and aflatoxin production than temperate climate (Benkerroum, 2020).


In the current study, high AFM1 levels were found in both UHT and pasteurized milk samples collected from supermarkets and dairy shops in Dar es Salaam city. Aflatoxicosis is still one of the main public health concerns in Tanzania that lead to health hazard in all population particularly children. There is need to reduce AFM1 transmission in milk by controlling aflatoxin B1 contamination in animal feed and feed ingredients by adopting Good Agriculture Practices (GAP) at farm level as well as improved storage conditions. It is important that farmers and other stakeholders of the dairy industry be educated on the potential harmful effects of AFM1 on human health.


The authors have not declared any conflict of interests.


The authors appreciate the financial support from Tanzania Bureau of Standards and are grateful to Mr. Roman Fortunatus of Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) for technical assistance during samples extraction and analysis of AFM1.


Behfar A, Khorasgani ZN, Alemzadeh Z, Goudarzi M, Ebrahimi R, Tarhani N (2012). Determination of Aflatoxin M1 levels in produced pasteurized milk in Ahvaz City by using HPLC. Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products 7(2):80-84.


Benkerroum N (2020). Aflatoxins. Producing-molds, structure, health issues and incidence in Southeast Asian and Sub-Saharan African countries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(4):1-40.


Chatfield M, Mander A (2009). The Skillings-Mack test (Friedman test when there are missing data). The Stata Journal 9(2):299-305.


Codex Alimentarius (2004). Code on Hygienic Practice for Milk and Milk Products. Standard CAC-RCP57-2004.


Daou R, Afif C, Joubrane K, Khabbaz LR, Maroun R, Ismail A, El Khoury A (2020). Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in raw, pasteurized, UHT cows' milk, and dairy products in Lebanon. Food Control 111:1-543.


FAOSTAT (2020). Raw and heat-treated milk production in Tanzania 2018. 


Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (1982). Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on the code of principles concerning milk and milk products [meeting held in Rome Italy from 26 to 30 April 1982]. twentieth report. World Health Organization.


Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2020). Tanzania at a glance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

View site visited on 22/9/2020.


Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2021). Gateway to dairy production and products - Milk processing. 


International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (2018). Monograph 100F Aflatoxins.


Ismail A, Gonçalves BL, de Neeff DV, Ponzilacqua B, Coppa CF, Hintzsche H, Oliveira CA (2018). Aflatoxin in foodstuffs. Occurrence and recent advances in decontamination. Food Research International 113:74-85.


Khaneghahi AH, Bahonar A, Noori N, Yazdanpanah H, Shojaee Aliabadi MH (2019). Aflatoxin M1 in raw, pasteurized and UHT milk marketed in Iran. Food additives and contaminants Part B 12(4):236-244.


Langat G, Tetsuhiro M, Gonoi T, Matiru V, Bii C (2016). Aflatoxin M1 contamination of milk and its products in Bomet County, Kenya. Advances in Microbiology 6(07):528-536.


Lindahl JF, Kagera IN, Grace D (2018). Aflatoxin M1 levels in different marketed milk products in Nairobi, Kenya. Mycotoxin Research 34(4):289-295.


Mahmoodi M, Mazaheri M, Talebi Mehrdar M (2019). Determination of Aflatoxin M1 in pasteurized liquid and powdered milk products imported to Iran. Iranian Journal of Toxicology 13(2):19-23.


Mannani N, Tabarani A, El Adlouni C, Zinedine A (2021). Aflatoxin M1 in pasteurized and UHT milk marked in Morocco. Food Control 124:1-12.


Melini F, Melini V, Luziatelli F, Ruzzi M (2017). Raw and heat-treated milk. From public health risks to nutritional quality. Beverages 3(4):1-33.


Mohammed S, Munissi JJ, Nyandoro SS (2016). Aflatoxin M1 in raw milk and aflatoxin B1 in feed from household cows in Singida, Tanzania. Food Additives and Contaminants Part B 9(2):85-90.


Munyaneza C, Kurwijila LR, Mdoe NS, Baltenweck I, Twine EE (2019). Identification of appropriate indicators for assessing sustainability of small-holder milk production systems in Tanzania. Sustainable Production and Consumption 19:141-160.


Nejad ASM, Heshmati A, Ghiasvand T (2019). The occurrence and risk assessment of exposure to aflatoxin M1 in ultra-high temperature and pasteurized milk in Hamadan province of Iran. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives 10(4):228-233.


Omeiza GK, Mwanza M, Enem SI, Godwin E, Adeiza MA, Okoli C (2018). Reducing efficiencies of the commonly used heat treatment methods and fermentation processes on aflatoxin M1 in naturally contaminated fresh cow milk. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine 8(8):134-145.


Tahira I, Sultana N, Munir A, Hasan SM, Hanif NQ (2019). Occurrence of Aflatoxin M1 in raw and processed milk consumed in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 32(3):1097-1101.


United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2017). Tanzania livestock master plan (2017/2018 - 2021/2022). Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries.


Urio E, Juma A, Mwanyika S, Mlingi N, Ndunguru G, Ndossi G (2006). The occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in fresh milk retailed in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania In. Mycotoxins and phytotoxins. (Edited by Njapau H, Trujillo S, van Egmond HP and Park DL), Advances in determination, toxicology and exposure management. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands pp. 202-207.


World Health Organization (WHO (2018). Mycotoxins. World Health Organization.

View site visited on 6/6/2020.


Xiong J, Xiong L, Zhou H, Liu Y, Wu L (2018). Occurrence of aflatoxin B1 in dairy cow feedstuff and aflatoxin M1 in UHT and pasteurized milk in central China. Food Control 92:386-390.


Zakaria AM, Amin YA, Khalil OSF, Abdelhiee EY, Elkamshishi MM (2019). Rapid detection of aflatoxin M1 residues in market milk in Aswan Province, Egypt and effect of probiotics on its residues concentration. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research 6(2):197-201197.


Zheng N, Sun P, Wang JQ, Zhen YP, Han RW, Xu XM (2013). Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in UHT milk and pasteurized milk in China market. Food Control 29(1):198-201.