Amare N (2006). To Slideware or not to Slideware: Students" Experiences with PowerPoint vs. Lecture. J. Technical Writ. Commun. 36(3):297-308.
Crossref

Atkins-Sayre W, Hopkins S, Mohundro S, Sayre W (1998). Rewards and liabilities of presentation software as an ancillary tool: prison or paradise? Paper Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430260).

Bartsch RA, Cobern KM (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures, Comput. Educ. 41(1):77–86.
Crossref

Beets DS, Lobingier PG (2001). Pedagogical techniques: Student performance and preferences, J. Educ. Bus. 76(4):231–235.
Crossref

Bly RW (2001). The case against Power Point, Successful Meetings. 50(12):51-52.

Brill JM, Galloway C (2007). Perils and Promises: University Instructors Integration of Technology in Classroom- Based Practices, Bri. J. Educ. Technol. 38:95- 105.
Crossref

Clark RE (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media, Rev. Educ. Res. 53(4):445-459.
Crossref

Carlson S (2002). Wired to the hilt, Chronicle Higher Educ. A33–A35.

Daniels L (1999) Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as a first step, J. Comput. Higher Educ, 10(2):42–56.
Crossref

Frey BA, Birnbaum DJ (2002) Learners" perceptions on the value of PowerPoint in lectures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburg. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467192).

Hashmenzadeh N, Wilson L (2007). Teaching with the lights out: What do we really know about the impact of technology intensive instruction? College Student J. 41(3):601- 612.

Hlynka D, Mason R (1998). PowerPoint in the classroom: what is the point? Educ. Technol. 38(5):45–48. Intelligence Inc. The Principles of Recitation.

Kask S (2000). The impact of using computer presentations (CAP) on student learning in the microeconomics principles course. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Economic Association, Boston.

Keller J (2003). Is PowerPoint the Devil? Chicago Tribune (January 22).

Lowry RB (2003). Electronic presentation of lectures – effect upon student performance, University Chemistry Educ. 3 (1):18–21.

Mantei EJ (2000). Using internet class notes and power point in the physical geology lecture, J. College Sci. Teach. 29 (5):301-305.

Navarro P (1998). Notes from the electronic classroom. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 17(1):106-115.
Crossref

Nouri H. and Shahid, A. (2005). The Effect of Powerpoint Presentations on Student Learning and Attitudes. Global Perspectives Account. Educ. 2(1):53-73.

Nowaczyk RH, Santos LT, Patton C (1998). Student perception of multimedia in the undergraduate classroom. Int. J. Instructional Media 25(4):367-382.

Parker I (2001). Absolute PowerPoint: Can a Software Package Edit Our Thoughts? The New Yorker (May 28):76-87.

Parks RP (1999). Macro principles, power point and internet: four years of the good, the bad, and the ugly. J. Econ. Educ. 30(3):375-377.
Crossref

Perry T, Perry L (1998). University students" attitudes towards multimedia Presentations. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 29(4):375-377.
Crossref

Pippert TD, Moore HA (1999) Multiple perspectives on multimedia in the large lecture, Teach. Sociol. 27(2):92-109.
Crossref

Pauw AP (2002) Discoveries and dangers in teaching theology with PowerPoint, Teach. Theol. Religion. 5(1):39-41.
Crossref

Rim E, Dorine M (2012). Power point in accounting classrooms: constructive or destructive? Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 3(10):240-249.

Sammons MC (1995) Students assess computer-aided classroom presentations. T.H.E. J. 22(10):66-69.

view

Simons T (2002). The least we can do is allowing PowerPoint to die in peace, Presentations 16(9).

Sosin K, Blecha J, Agarwal R, Bartlett RL, Daniel JI (2004). Efficiency in the Use of Technology in Economic Education: Some Preliminary Results, Am. Econ. Rev. 94(2):253-258.
Crossref

Sugahara S, Boland G (2006). The Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentations in the Accounting Classroom, Account. Educ. 15(4):391–403.
Crossref

Susskind JE (2005). PowerPoint's power in the classroom: Enhancing students" self-efficacy and attitudes, Computer Educ. 45(2):203-215.
Crossref

Szabo A, Hastings N (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: Should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Comput. Educ. 35(3):175-187.
Crossref

Thomas DE (2002) Technology Integrated Classes versus Traditional Classes and their Impact on User Performance and Perceptions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE02).

Tufte E (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint (Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press).

Turk C (1996). Effective Speaking: Communicating in Speech, (JW Arrow Smith Ltd, Bristol, 1996).

Vashi K, Vishnu D, Kishan, Aditya V, Bhanuprakash (2012). Comparative study on the teaching effectiveness of chalk and talk and micro soft power point presentation from the student perspective. Int. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 4(1):191-193.

Walelign B, Bealy H, Sisay B, Dagachew M (2012). How to Improve Power Point Presentation among Medical College Instructors in Gondar University. Unpublished material.

Witt PL, Wheeless LR (2001). An experimental study of teachers" verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students" affective and cognitive learning, Commun. Educ. 50(4):327-342.
Crossref

Wilmoth J, Wybraniec J (1998) Profits and pitfalls: Thoughts on using a laptop computer and presentation software to teach introductory social statistics, Teach. Sociol. 26(3):166-178.
Crossref