Artz AF, Armour-Thomas E (1992). Development of Cognitive-metacognitive framework for Protocol Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving in Small Groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2):137-175.
Crossref

Blake B, Pope T (2008). Developmental Psychology: Incorporating Piaget's and Vygotsky's Theories in Classrooms. J. Cross-Disciplinary Perspective Educ. 1(1):59-67.

Brown A (1987). Metacognition executive Control, Self-Regulation and Other More Mysterious, Mekanisms. In Fann Winert & Rainer Kluwe (Eds), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. London :LEA pp. 65-115.

Downs JM, Downs M (2013). Problem Solving and Its Elements in Forming Proof. The Mathematics Enthusiast, ISSN 1551-3440. 10, 1(2):137-162.

Flavel J (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. American Psychologist, 34:906-911.
Crossref

Garofalo J, Lester FK (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance. J. Res. Math. Educ. 16(3):163-176.
Crossref

Goos M (2002). Understanding, Metacognitive Failure. 

View

Goos M, Galbraith P, Renshaw PA (2000). A money problem: A source of insight into problem solving action. Intl. J. Math. Teaching Learning, pp. 1-21.

Hernadi J (2013). Metoda Pembuktian dalam Matematika. Makalah Seminar. 

View

Magiera MT, Zawojewski JS (2011). Characterization of social-based and self-based context associated with students' awareness, evaluation, and regulation of their thinking small-group mathematical modelling. J. Res. Mathe. Educ. New York: Macmillan. 42(3):334-370.

NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, NTCM.

Rajiden S, Maedi SA (2015). The pseudo-covariational reasoning thought process in constructing graph function of reversible event dynamics based on assimilation and accomodation framework. J. Korean Soc. Math Educ. Ser. D, Res. Math Educ. 19(1):61-79.
Crossref

Savic M (2015). On similarities and differences between proving and problem solving. J. Humanustic Math. 5(2):60-89.
Crossref

Schoenfeld AH (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically : Problem Solving, Metacognition and Sense Making in Mathematics. In Douglas A. Grouws (ed) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Micmillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 355-358.

Scott BM, Leviy MG (2013). Examining the Component of Fuzzy. Educ. Res. 2(2):1-12.

Stillman G (2011). Applying Metacognitive Knowledge and Strategies in Applications and Modelling Task T Secondary Level. In Kaiser, G., Blum, W. Borromeo, F.R., & Stillman, G. Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, New York: Springer. pp. 165-180.
Crossref

Ultanir E (2012). An Epistemolological Glance at the Constructivit Aproach: Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 1, No.2. e-ISSN: 1308-14070.

Toit SD, Kotze G (2009). Metacognitive Strategies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Pythagoras 70:55-67.

Veenam MVJ, Wolters VH, Afflerbach P (2006). Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Metacognition Learning 1:3-14.
Crossref

Verghese T (2009). IUMPST: Secondary-Level Student Teachers Conception of Mathematical Proof. J. 1 (Content Knowledge).

Weber K (2001). Student Difficulty in Constructing Proof: The need for Strategic Knowledge Educ. Stud. Math. 48(1):101-109.
Crossref

Wilson J, Clarke D (2004). Toward Modelling of Mathematical Metacognition. Mathe. Educ. Res. J. 16(2):25-48.
Crossref

Zaslavsky O, Nickerson SD, Stylianides AJ, Kidron I, Vinicky-Landman G 2012. The Need for Proff and Proving: Mathematical and Pedagogical Perspective. In G. Hanna and M de Villiers (eds), Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. New ICMI Study Series. 
Crossref