Full Length Research Paper
References
Bandara D, Wijekularathna DK (2017). Comparison of student performance under two teaching methods: Face to face and online. The International Journal of Educational Research 12(1):69-79. |
|
Bandura A (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52:1-26. |
|
Bagriacik YA (2019). Distance and face-to-face students' perceptions towards distance education: A comparative metaphorical study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 20(1):191-207. |
|
Burge E (2000). The strategic use of learning technologies. NY: John Wiley. |
|
Chaney EG (2001). Web-based instruction in a rural high school: A collaborative inquiry into its effectiveness and desirability. NASSP Bulletin 85(628):20-35. |
|
Chen L (1997). Distance delivery systems in terms of pedagogical considerations: A revolution. Educational Technology 37(4):34-37. |
|
Cohen L, Manion M, Morrison K (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). NY: Rout. |
|
Connelly LM (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing 25(6). |
|
Creswell JW (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. |
|
Creswell JW (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). CA: SAGE. |
|
Croxton RA (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning in Merlot. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(2):314. |
|
Danny G (2014). Triangulation in qualitative research podcast: Short version. |
|
Davis A (2017). Measuring student satisfaction in online Mathematics course. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning 14(2):20-27. |
|
Deming DJ. Goldin C, Katz LF. Yuchtman N (2015). Can online learning bend the higher education cost curve? American Economic Review 105(5):496-501. |
|
Fish LA, Snodgrass CR (2019). Instructor academic factors and their influence on instructor perspectives of online versus face-to-face education at a Jesuit institution. Business Education Innovation Journal 11(1):107-117. |
|
Kee CL (2020). Face to face tutorial, learning management system and WhatsApp group: How digital immigrants interact and engage in e-learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 8(1)18-35. |
|
Kirkup G, Jones A (1996). New technologies for open learning: The superhighway to the learning society? In P. Raggatt R. Edwards, & N. Small (Eds.), adult learners, education and training 2: The learning society - Challenges and trends (pp.272-291). London: Routledge. |
|
Krishnan S (2014). Students' perceptions of learning mode in Mathematics. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences 4(2):32-41. |
|
Kurasaki KS (2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods 12(3):179-194. |
|
Leedy PD, Ormrod JE (2018). Practical research: Planning and design (12th ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. |
|
Leung L (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 4(3):324. |
|
Mac Phail C, Khoza N, Abler L, Ranganathan M (2016). Process guidelines for establishing intercoder reliability in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research 16(2):198-212. |
|
Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Fran.: Jossey - Bass. |
|
Merton RK (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review 8:193 - 210. |
|
Meyer J (2000). Using qualitative methods in health-related action research. British Medical Journal 320:178-181. |
|
Miles D, Mesinga J, Zuchowski I (2018). Harnessing opportunities to enhance the distance learning experience of MSW students: An appreciative inquiry process. Social Work Education (37(6):705-717. |
|
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook pp. 705-717. (2nd ed.). Thou. Oaks, CA: Sage. |
|
Mouw JM, Saab N, Janssen J, Vedder P (2019). Quality of group interaction, ethnic group composition, and individual mathematical learning gains. Social Psychology of Education 22(2):383-403. |
|
Montelongo R (2019). Less than/more than: Issues associated with high-impact online teaching and learning. Connecting Education, Practice and Research 9(1):68-79. |
|
Pozzi F, Manganello F, Passarelli M, Persico D, Brasher A, Holmes W, Whitelock D, Sangra A (2019). Ranking meets distance education: Defining relevant criteria and indicators for online universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 20(5):42-63. |
|
Qureshi JA (2019). Advancement in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) to revolutionize disruptive technology in education: A case of Pakistan. Journal of Education and Educational Development 6(2):219-234. |
|
Reason P, Bradbury H (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. |
|
Spaulding DT (2014). Program evaluation in practice: Core concepts and examples for discussion analysis (2nd ed.). San Fran., CA.: Jossey-Bass. |
|
Suresh M, Vishnu PV, Gayathri R (2018). Effect of e-learning on academic performance of undergraduate students. Drug Invention Today 10(9):1797-1800. |
|
Walsh K (2013). When I say…triangulation. Med. Edu. 47(9):866. |
|
Wilkinson D, Birmingham P (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. New York: Routledge. Falmer. |
|
Yin R (2009). Case Study Research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub. |
|
You JW, Kang M (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers and Education 77:125-133. |
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0